ML062750282

Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1)

ML062750282
Person / Time
Site:	Calvert Cliffs
Issue date:	09/22/2006
From:	Caruso J Operations Branch I
To:	Marvin Sykes Operations Branch I
Sykes, Marvin D.
References
Download: ML062750282 (16)

Text

-14

11. Examination ap d by NRC supervisor for fa (C.2.h; C.3.f)

-7

15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)

-7

16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: cF\\G VGET G U F F 5 Date of Examination: g/as/oC Examinations Developed by:

I 1

Target Date*

Chief Examiner's Initials Task Description (Reference)

-1 80

1.

Examination administration date confirmed ((2.1.a; C.2.a and b)

-1 20

2.

NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.l.d; C.2.e)

-120

3.

Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)

-120 I 4.

Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)

~ 9 0 1 I

I I

I *+

7 I

I

[5. Reference material due (C.l.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)]

I

(-751

6.

integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-l's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d)

(7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e))

PY c I

(-45)

8.

Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.l.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)

9.

-30 I

ES-202)

Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.l; C.2.g;

-1 4 I O. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.I; C.2.i; ES-202)

-14 I 12. Examinations reviewed I

with faci 4 ity licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)

I 2 I, -

-7

-7 Y

14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >IO) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)

• Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared the NRC.

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 rotation schedule pecified on the form s specified on the form ks meet the criteria

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer (")

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor Note:

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-201, Page 25 of 27

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Calvert Cliffs Date of Examination: 8/25/06-9/1/06

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

c. To the extent possible, asses whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative NA

a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

J ( 1 )

the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form J(2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test@) -#Jh &-

/(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form 4 5 ) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria

a. Author (Written)

b. Author (Operating Test)

c. NHC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor Note:

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3

a.

The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s). (see Section D.l.a.)

Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent

b.

C.

d.

e.

Facility: Calvert Cliffs Units 1 & 2 Date of Examination: 8/28/06 - 9/1/06 Operating Test Number:

2006 I

I 4%

A

1. General Criteria I-

b.

Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

4 A6

a.

Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant, criteria for successful completion of the task -

identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable 4 1

Initials 3 II Printed Name / Signature Date 11 a.

Author 0811 012006

b.

Facility Reviewerr)

c.

NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d.

NRC Supervisor NOTE:

The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG 1021 REVISION 9

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 QUALITATIVE AlTRlBUTES Initials a

b*

c#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

Each event description consists of

2.

3.

the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the c r e w 0 the expected operator actions (by shift position) 1 the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5.

6.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. J Cues are given. /

The simulator modeling is not altered.

/6

8.

9.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

10.

11.

12.

NUREG 1021 REVISION 9

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Page 1 of 3 I Facility: Calvert Cliffs Units 1 & 2 Date of Exam: 8/28/06-9/1/06 Operating Test No.: 2006 Scenarios 1

2 3

4 T

M 0

1

1.

Circle the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (VC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

• Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1 -for-1 basis.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirement.

2.

3.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

NUREG 1021 REVISION 9

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Page 2 of 3 A

P D

E Scenarios v

c 2

I L

I I F I Y

I 4

I 3

I

1.

Circle the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

• Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1 -for-1 basis.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insiaht to the applicants competence count toward the minimum reauirement.

2.

3.

Author:

NUREG 1021 REVISION 9

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Page 3 of 3 1

2 3

N T

CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T

Facility:

A P

P L

I C

A N

T 4

T M

0 1

T N

CREW POSITION j,

I alvert Cliffs Units 1 & 2 Date of Exam: 8128106-911106 Operating Test No.: 2006 v

Scenarios

1.

Circle the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (VC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlledabnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

• Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1 -for-1 basis.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insiaht to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirement.

2.

3.

NUREG 1021 REVISION 9

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Page 1 of 2 Scenario Roles =>

Applicant Type =>

~~~

~~

Facility: Calvert Cliffs Units 1 & 2 Date of Exam: 8/28/06-9/1/06 Operating Test No.: 2006 BOP = CRO (RO / SRO-I)

ATC = RO (RO / SRO-I)

I APPLICANTS 2 5 6 8 1 2 9

1 2 6

1 2 3 5 8 9 4 5 3 5 5 6 7 8 8 9 6 7 3 5 1 5 6

8 4

6 8

4 6 3 5 1 6 7 8 6 8 8 9 1 4 3 5 1 5 6 7 6 7 6 8 8

8 9

I SCENARIO 3 5 6 7 8 9 1-8 1-8 1-9 3 4 v Competencies v v 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1-8 1-8 1-9 3 5 InterpreVDiagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (1) 2 3 2 4 3 7 5 7 6 7 8 9 8

Operate Control Boards (2) 1 2 6 7 4 6 2 7 7 8 8 9 L

1 2 3 6 7 8 Communicate and Interact 1 4 2 7 6 7 8 9 8

Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

4 3

4 5

8 9

1 4

1 4

7 9

1 4

7 8

9 CRS (SRO-VU) 1-8 SCENARIO 2 -

2 3 4 5 7 8 -

1-8 1-8 Instructions:

Circle the applicantslicense type and enter one or more event numbers thaf will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

NUREG 1021 REVISION 9

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Calvert Cliffs Units 1 & 2 Date of Exam: 8/28/06-9/1/06 Operating Test No.: 2006 APPLICANTS Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicantslicense type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

NUREG 1021 REVISION 9

ES-401 Written Examination QuaIity Checklist Form ES-401-6 Note:

• The facility reviewers initialskignature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence

~~

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: Calvert Cliffs Date of Exam: 8/25/06 Exam Level: RO 0 SRO x I

Initial

5.

Question duplication from the license screeninglaudit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

X-the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or the examinations were developed independently; or the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain)

I I

I

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO I SRO-only question Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level;

7.

Date 8/22/06

- N/A-Note:

• The facility reviewers initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c7; chief examiner concurrence rea ui red.

Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 ES-201 I.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of ghS-%& as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the WRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of

. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME ES-201, Page 26 of 27

ES-201 Exam in at ion Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of b'/tzi&b8as of the date of my signature. 1 agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

@Q%>

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my kno during the week(s) of instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not TURE(2)

DATE NOTE PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY ES-201, Page 26 of 27

1 '

I ES-201 Examination Sscutify Agreement F

o

~

ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examinaticrn x

I acknowledge that I have acquired specidlzed knowledge about the NRC licm-ng examinations scheduled for the week@) of 8?1+@?tas of the date of my signature. I agree that I wiif not knowingly divulge any infamation about those examinations to any p a m k who have not been authorlzed by the NRC chlef examiner. I understand that 1 am not to instruct, evaluate. or provide performance feedback to those appficanfs scheduked to be administered these licensing examinations from this date unfil cumplefkm of examinafion adminisfration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e& acting as 8 simuiabr booth operator or communicator is acc#pfabte if the individual does not selec;t&e tralning content or provide direct or Indirect feedback}- Furt[lermore, I am aware of the physical s%udfy measures and rsquimments (as documented In the facility kensee's procsdures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement rnuy result in csncellation of the examinations andfar an enforcement a&on against me or he facnity licensee. I will lmrnedate[ywparh facility management or fhe NRC chief examlner any lndimilons a-suggestiolla that examination security may haw been compromised.

2.

Past-ExaminatTom Tct ths best of my kn during fhe week@} of instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who wew administered these licensing examinations, except a6 spacif[cally noted below and authorfzed by the NRC.

C-J I

naf divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered From the dak that I entered info this securityagreemant until the completion af eKarnlnation administmtlon, I did nd PRMTEb NAME

41.

12.

I

3.

14.

15.

NOTES:

ES-201, Page 26 of 27

ATTACHMENT 3

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist dl$

tJka (4 d s I

Facility:

Date of Exam:

Exam Level: R O m S R O D I

Initials Item Description a

b C

1.

2.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80 22% overall and 70 or 80, as amlicable. +4% on the SRO-onlvl reviewed in detail

6.

Performance on missed auestions checked for trainina I

I IC(

deficiencies and wording broblems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed NameEignature D a d

a. Grader

b. Facility Reviewerr)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 5 of 5