ML061810465
| ML061810465 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Bellefonte  |
| Issue date: | 01/30/2006 |
| From: | Tennessee Valley Authority |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Pickett D, NRR/DLPM, 415-1364 | |
| References | |
| 2006-20 CPPR-122, CPPR-123 | |
| Download: ML061810465 (11) | |
Text
Document Type: EA Administrative Records Index Field: Final Environmental Document Project Name: Bellefonte Nuclear Plant Redress Project Number: 2006-20 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT BELLEFONTE NUCLEAR PLANT REDRESS Jackson County, Alabama TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY JANUARY 2006
Page intentionally blank FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT BELLEFONTE NUCLEAR PLANT REDRESS JACKSON COUNTY, ALABAMA TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY JANUARY 2006 The Proposed Decision and Need The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued the construction permits for both units of the Tennessee Valley Authoritys (TVA) Bellefonte Nuclear Plant (BLN) in December 1974. By 1988, Unit 1 was approximately 90 percent complete, and Unit 2 was about 58 percent complete. On July 29, 1988, TVA notified NRC that BLN was being deferred as a result of a lower load forecast for the near future. The plant remained in deferred status until March 23, 1993, when TVA notified NRC of plans to complete BLN Units 1 and 2. TVAs decision to complete BLN came after three years of extensive studies that concluded completion of the facility as a nuclear power plant was viable.
Subsequently, in December 1994, the TVA Board of Directors (Board) announced that BLN would not be completed as a nuclear plant without a partner and put further construction activities on hold until a comprehensive evaluation of TVAs power needs was completed. In June 2005, the Board approved amortizing TVAs investment in the deferred BLN nuclear generating units costs over 10 years, and in November 2005, contingent upon notification of NRC approved the cancellation of the BLN construction project.
The BLN plant site now is also under consideration as the location of an advanced technology nuclear plant. Canceling construction of the existing facility and withdrawal of the construction permits is necessary in order to close out the existing BLN project. These actions also facilitate the consideration of other possible uses of the BLN site. A letter notifying the NRC that TVA has placed BLN Units 1 and 2 in terminated status was sent in December 2005.
Other Environmental Reviews and Documentation
- Tennessee Valley Authority, Energy Vision 2020, Integrated Resource Plan Environmental Impact Statement, Volumes 1-3, dated December 21, 1995
- Tennessee Valley Authority, Final Environmental Impact Statement, Bellefonte Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Volumes 1 and 2, dated May 24, 1974
- Tennessee Valley Authority, Review of Final Environmental Impact Statement, Bellefonte Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2, dated March 1993
- Tennessee Valley Authority, Final Environmental Impact Statement, Bellefonte Nuclear Plant Conversion Project, dated October 1997 1
Alternatives and Comparison TVA considered two alternatives in this EA: (1) the No Action Alternative (Alternative A) and (2) the Action Alternative (Alternative B), to cancel construction of the existing facility, seek the withdrawal of the construction permits, and redress the BLN site.
Under Alternative A, TVA would seek to retain BLNs existing construction permits. TVA would also continue to seek a partner for the completion of BLN Units 1 and 2 as an industrial nuclear plant facility. It has been more than 10 years since TVA announced that it would consider completing BLN if a partner could be found to share in the cost and financial risks of doing this and TVA has yet to receive a reasonable, financially viable proposal. Consequently, the viability of this alternative has become increasingly doubtful and TVA no longer considers this to be a reasonable alternative. If this alternative is chosen, however, any potential impacts of completing BLN in accordance with its existing licenses have already been addressed by the above referenced environmental reviews.
Under Alternative B, TVA would cancel construction of the existing facility, TVA would seek the withdrawal of the construction permits, and TVA would redress the BLN site as described herein. Because there is other ongoing activity on the BLN site (i.e., training centers for the Transmission Service Organization and the Tennessee Valley Public Power Association) and because the switchyard at BLN is utilized as a substation for system operations in the region, TVA would not withdraw existing environmental permits or remove equipment associated with these other activities. Because so much of the site will be maintained, the general activities associated with the present decision involving redress of the site are relatively minor in nature and would include the following:
- Identifying equipment and structures that are necessary for other site activities and environmental permits associated with other activities at the site.
- Equipment or structures not identified necessary for other site activities would have the power disconnected and would either be sold for reuse or abandoned in place.
- Any unwanted construction material or waste associated with disposition of equipment/structures would be properly disposed of in accordance with pertinent federal, state, and local laws, regulations and ordinances, as well as TVA processes and procedures.
Affected Environment and Evaluation of Impacts Site Description BLN is located on an approximately 1,600-acre site adjacent to the Tennessee River near Hollywood, Alabama. See Attachment 1 for a location map. By 1988 when TVA deferred completion of the plant, Unit 1 was approximately 90 percent complete, and Unit 2 was about 58 percent complete. As the plant did not become operational, no nuclear fuel or waste is on site. The only radioactive material to be disposed of would result from removal of smoke detectors and exit signs from various buildings to be sold, demolished, or abandoned in place.
2
The current environmental status of BLN is as follows:
Air - Minor Source Status granted June 24, 1996, by the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM). There is no expiration date for a minor source permit.
Toxics - There are no polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) transformers on site; however, there are other PCB-containing items/equipment/articles on site but not in service. All PCB information is reported annually in the PCB Annual Document Log.
Wastes (Environmental Protection Agency Identification Number AL5640090002):
Hazardous - Small Quantity Generator Solid - Presently disposed of off site by contract at an ADEM-permitted facility Wastewater (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System [NPDES] Permit Number AL0024635) - Construction and permanent sewage currently routed to Hollywood Sewer System. Current NPDES permit expires on November 30, 2009.
Water - Drinking water is purchased from the city of Hollywood, a community public water system regulated by the state.
Potential Impacts TVA would keep and maintain BLN in regulatory compliance regardless of the termination of the NRC permits. Compliance activities would include NPDES permits, division monitoring reports, demolition permits (10 day notifications), and air permits that are applicable to the entire site. These measures would continue as long as TVA has ownership of the BLN site. Maintaining and complying with these existing permits and regulations would ensure the stability of the site, until such time that TVA may decide, if or how the site would be alternatively utilized. Such a future decision would be subjected to the appropriate environmental review at that time.
Most of the minor environmental impacts resulting from redress would be associated with removal of equipment or structures not identified as necessary for other site activities.
Materials and structures removed would be above grade or in areas that have experienced substantial previous ground disturbance for the original construction of the plant. TVA currently plans to maintain such major components as the intake and discharge facilities, cooling towers, wastewater system, and transmission switch yards. Under current plans, the existing containment, turbine, and auxiliary buildings would not be demolished. The other structures not identified as necessary would be sold, taken apart, and removed from the site, abandoned in place, or demolished. These structures, most of which are metal and wood warehouses located to the western portion of the site, are as shown to the right of the cooling towers in the photograph included with Attachment 1. Any demolition wastes generated would be disposed of in appropriately permitted solid waste or other disposal facilities.
Equipment identified as unnecessary would have the power disconnected and would either be reused by other TVA facilities, sold for reuse, or abandoned in place. Such items may include, but are not limited to: valves; strainers; battery boards and chargers; 3
transfer switches; vent fans; motors; cabinet panels; breakers; power systems; shop equipment such as lathes, air compressors, and dryers; as well as other miscellaneous equipment. Additional materials may include, but are not limited to items such as: piping, tubing, and conduit; cable; instrumentation; and general construction materials. TVA would continue to conduct periodic site inspections to ensure that none of the equipment or materials are causing environmental, health, or safety problems.
Redress would involve the removal of diesel generator fuel (approximately 45,000 gallons per generator) and lube or control fluids from the main turbine lube oil tanks (16,500 gallons each), feedwater pump lube oil tanks (1500 gallons each), RX coolant pump motors (400 gallons each), control fluid tanks (1200 gallons each), and diesel generator lube oil sumps (1500 gallons each). Fuel and lubricant would be removed and storage containers would be closed in accordance with all applicable federal, state, or local laws and regulations.
TVA has both agency and site processes and procedures in place to safely handle the demolition and removal the identified equipment, structures, and fuels or lubricants in an environmentally sound manner. The details of the environmental impacts of redress are identified in the CEC shown as Attachment 2. If there were any changes to the redress plan beyond the scope of this EA, TVA would perform an evaluation to determine if a further NEPA review needed to be performed.
Cumulative Impacts Because the redress activities at the BLN site would constitute minor, insignificant, routine activities, there would be no cumulative impacts associated with the redress activities.
Mitigation Measures There would be no additional mitigation measures other than the routine mitigation measures, i.e., best management practices, listed in the CEC.
Preferred Alternative TVAs preferred alternative is Alternative B, to cancel construction of the existing facility, to seek the withdrawal of the construction permits, and to redress the BLN site.
TVA Preparers Diedre Nida and Bruce Yeager, Senior NEPA Specialists, EA preparer Casey Cothran, Facilities Management Environmental Program Administrator, CEC preparer Attachments - Location Map and Aerial Photo of Site - Categorical Exclusion Checklist 11066 4
- Location Map and Aerial Photograph of Site N
Tennessee on ek ens Cre North Chattanooga tev Mud Carolina S
To les
)
mi 72 x. 5 pro (Ap Georgia Alabama wn eek To Cr Te M nn OU ess HOLLYWOOD ee NT Riv sb oro AI er cott BELLEFONTE N S )
To les NUCLEAR mi SA x .6 PLANT ND pro LEGEND (Ap Creeks SELECTED EXISTING Transmissions Line NUCLEAR FACILITIES Railroads TVA Reservation RIV Repowering Site Lak ER e RID Gu nter GE svil le 0 1/4 1/2 3/4 1 5
- Categorical Exclusion Checklist 11066 6
7 8
9