ML061590062
| ML061590062 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 06/08/2006 |
| From: | Ogle C NRC/RGN-II/DRS/EB1 |
| To: | Stall J Florida Power & Light Co |
| References | |
| IR-06-011 | |
| Download: ML061590062 (5) | |
See also: IR 05000250/2006011
Text
June 8, 2006
Florida Power and Light Company
ATTN: Mr. J. A. Stall, Senior Vice President
Nuclear and Chief Nuclear Officer
P. O. Box 14000
Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420
SUBJECT:
NOTIFICATION OF TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PLANT COMPONENT DESIGN
BASES INSPECTION - NRC INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-250/2006011,
50-251/2006011
Dear Mr. Stall:
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Region II staff will conduct a component design bases inspection at your Turkey Point facility
during the weeks of August 28 - September 1, 2006, September 11 - 15, 2006, and September
25 - 29, 2006. The inspection team will be led by Mr. Caswell Smith, a Senior Reactor Inspector
from the NRCs Region II Office. This inspection will be conducted in accordance with the
baseline Inspection Procedure 71111.21, Component Design Bases Inspection, issued
December 2, 2005.
The inspection will evaluate the capability of risk significant / low margin components to function
as designed and support proper system operation. The inspection will also include a review of
selected operator actions, operating experience, and modifications.
During a telephone conversation on June 5, 2006, Mr. C. Smith of my staff, and
Ms. Olga Hanek of your staff, confirmed arrangements for an information gathering site visit
and the three - week onsite inspection. The schedule is as follows:
Information gathering visit: Week of August 14, 2006,
Onsite inspection: August 28 - September 1, 2006, September 11 - 15, 2006 and
September 25 - 29, 2006.
The purpose of the information gathering visit is to meet with members of your staff to identify
risk-significant components and operator actions. Information and documentation needed to
support the inspection will also be identified. Mr. W. Rogers, a Region II Senior Reactor
Analyst, may accompany Mr. Smith and the inspection team during the information gathering
visit to review probabilistic risk assessment data and identify risk significant components which
will be examined during the inspection.
The enclosure lists documents that will be needed prior to the information gathering visit.
Please contact Mr. Smith prior to preparing copies of the materials listed in the enclosure.
2
The inspectors will try to minimize your administrative burden by specifically identifying only
those documents required for the inspection preparation.
During the information gathering visit, the team leader will also discuss the following inspection
support administrative details: office space; specific documents requested to be made available
to the team in their office space; arrangements for reactor site access; and the availability of
knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing organization personnel to serve as points of
contact during the inspection.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding the
information requested or the inspection, please contact me at (404) 562-4605, or Mr. Smith at
(404) 562-4630.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Charles Ogle, Chief
Engineering Branch 1
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos.: 50-250, 50-251
Enclosure:
Information Request for Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Component Design Bases
Inspection
3
cc w/encl:
T. O. Jones
Site Vice President
Turkey Point Nuclear Plant
Florida Power and Light Company
Electronic Mail Distribution
Walter Parker
Licensing Manager
Turkey Point Nuclear Plant
Florida Power and Light Company
Electronic Mail Distribution
Michael O. Pearce
Plant General Manager
Turkey Point Nuclear Plant
Florida Power and Light Company
Electronic Mail Distribution
William E. Webster
Vice President, Nuclear Operations
Florida Power & Light Company
Electronic Mail Distribution
Mark Warner, Vice President
Nuclear Operations Support
Florida Power & Light Company
Electronic Mail Distribution
Rajiv S. Kundalkar
Vice President - Nuclear Engineering
Florida Power & Light Company
Electronic Mail Distribution
M. S. Ross, Managing Attorney
Florida Power & Light Company
Electronic Mail Distribution
Marjan Mashhadi, Senior Attorney
Florida Power & Light Company
Electronic Mail Distribution
Attorney General
Department of Legal Affairs
The Capitol
Tallahassee, FL 32304
William A. Passetti
Bureau of Radiation Control
Department of Health
Electronic Mail Distribution
County Manager
Metropolitan Dade County
Electronic Mail Distribution
Craig Fugate, Director
Division of Emergency Preparedness
Department of Community Affairs
Electronic Mail Distribution
Curtis Ivy
City Manager of Homestead
Electronic Mail Distribution
_________________________
OFFICE
RII:DRS
RII:DRP
SIGNATURE
/RA/
/RA/
NAME
C.Smith
J. Munday
DATE
6/7/2006
6/7/2006
11/ /2006
11/ /2006
11/ /2006
11/ /2006
11/ /2006
E-MAIL COPY?
YES
NO YES
NO YES
NO YES
NO YES
NO YES
NO
Enclosure
INFORMATION REQUESTS FOR TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PLANT
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
Please provide the information electronically in pdf files, Excel, or other searchable format on
CDROM. The CDROM should be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use.
Information in lists should contain enough information to be easily understood by some one
who has knowledge of pressurized water technology.
1.
Risk ranking of components from your site specific probabilistic safety analysis (PSA)
sorted by Risk Achievement Worth (RAW) and sorted separately by Birnbaum
Importance. If possible, please provide a correlation between actual plant components
in plain language and RAW values.
2.
Provide a list of the top 500 cutsets from your PSA.
3.
Risk ranking of operator actions from your site specific PSA sorted by RAW. Provide
copies of your human reliability worksheets for these items.
4.
If you have an External Event or Fire PSA Model, provide the information requested in
items 1 and 2 for external events and fire.
5.
Any pre-existing evaluation or lists of components and calculations with low design
margin ( i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure, diesel generator
close to design required output, heat exchangers close to rated design heat removal,
MOV risk margin rankings, etc).
6.
A list of the last two years of operating experience evaluations, modifications, and
corrective actions sorted by component or system.
7.
Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the last 5 years
at your facility.
8.
Contact person to discuss PRA information prior to information gathering trip: phone
number and email address.
9.
List of equipment on Station Equipment Problem List, list of equipment in GL 91-18
status, list of equipment in MR(a)(1) status, and a list of equipment for which an
operability evaluation was required in past 2 years.