ML061110039

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Afternoon Session (Comment Article) for Palisades Dseis Meeting
ML061110039
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 04/04/2006
From: Wald M
The New York Times
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML061110039 (1)


Text

Study Faults

~

d Rules

(- Reactors ByMATHEW. L. WALD WASHINGTON, April 3 -

After consulting with the Industry, the Nu-clear Regulatory Commission weak-en*d security regulations it had pro-posed for reactors, government au-ditorssa~id in a report to be released on-Tuesday.1..',

,jrhe auditors said the process "cre-ak-fte.the Reappearano.3 that the cljnges'wereiiiade based on what the -lndustry consider'ed 'reasonable an4 feasible to defend against rather than an-assessment of the terrorist tl~eat Iseu4'p.

report, by the Go vernment Ac-cowuntabilityOffice, stopped short of

  • attg that? -the. connii~slon had 6

changesi"based solely on in-dtiitryvieivs."rdg i he bstudy,. requested by Repre-sentative.Christopher Shays, a Con-nkctcut Republican who is the chair-'

rr'n np..6hesubcommitl ee on national security of the House Government Reform :Commi~lee,.did not draw any broad conclusions about'the ac-tual level of security.,at the plants,

.except to note that drils had not been held at:most of the plants since the neW.requirements tool: effect on Oct.

29,. ?20G4.rThe :03 operable reactors

  • ar spread'among 65 :;ltes, but as of the.en( of March, only 27' have had exercisesdinwhich attackers and de-

'feiders-used laser guns to -test pre-pa ednessj-according to the subcom-ii.Shv in-a statenment, said:

  • These GAO. findings; paint a decid-
  • diy mixed picture of nuclear power security.today.. Whill documented, progress has been made In strength-

-- enig reactor security standards, the I

ticlear

-Regulatory.. Commission

- seermi nable to fortify Itself against

'tlia erofan averly 'cozy rela-.

  • tnth1Vwlthnthe-industry."
  • f..-)3e added,."The.re:lulated should

-'noleven appear to be able tQ dictate tystandards to the regulator."

sokesman for the commisslon,

.laot h er, lsaed the agency had P.mde4siqg Iksy after the Sept.

"1 at-ktaicstto.ryew its Jules, Including LtecharacteristlsL.we attacking a.force; that the 'plants ni~atate Spe spared to defend against, called the:

  • , design basis threat."

'-Making changes td the design ba-jis threat while simultaneously sollc-ttg feedback fronm the industry

'iiay~bave. contributed to'the im'pres-

  • ,o,.~n omndue influence, Mr. Brenner
  • >4; prpmine~nt critic of the nuclear stryt<DavldoLchbaum of the of Concerned Scientists, said inerview that'his group was Q)

~~~~.

, '...,x, THE NEW YORK TIMES NATIONAL TUESDAY APRIL 4, 2006

's'An overly cozy is.. relationship' with industry is seen.

often not allowed to talk informally to commissioners, because they

  • were the ultimate arbiters of what rules were Issued. But the industry appears to have done just that on se-

' curity, Mr. Lochbaum said, consult-

~ing with the commission, members

',i after they received recommenda-

-i; tionsfrom agency staff members.

. 4 "How did the commissioners de-

ide to overrule their staff?" he
asked.

.Mr.' Brenner, the commission

., spokesman, said he knew of no direct

- communicationbetween the industry and the commission members; the a-communication had been with' the t

commission's staff, he said.

T' Thecommissionhascutoffalmost s all public discussion on, security is-

. sues; the government accountability

__.report is one of the few independent looks at the status of the plants.

L The subcommittee will hear testi-

- mony on Tuesday afternoon from the no commission, the industry and inde-pendent security experts.

In its report, the auditing agency

- singled out two changes that the
  • *-commissioners had made to recom-

_mendations by the agency's staff

.. about the weapons that the attackers

'F would be assumed to carry.

. ma The staff expanded the list of

-. 4weapons that plants would have to
  • ',-defend against, but the commission

,q tdeleted two of them. While the G.A.O.

- did. not specify the two, people in-0s volved in the process said they were rocket-propelled

grenades, which

,." are common around the world, and 50-callber sniper rifles, which can be bought legally in the United States.