ML060670106

Basis for Not Conducting a Team Inspection Per Nd 8.3

ML060670106
Person / Time
Site:	Salem
Issue date:	06/17/2004
From:	Dan Collins, Holody D, Schmitt J Division of Nuclear Materials Safety I
To:
References
FOIA/PA-2005-0194
Download: ML060670106 (5)

Text

- AtBASIS Q4Ae kM I\

FOR NOT CONDUCTING A TEAIM INSPECTION PER MD 8.3 PLANT - Salem, Unit 1 EVENT DATE - 5/28/04 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SIGNIFICANT OPERATIONAL EVAL DATE - OEVl 0/04 EVENT - 1 SW26 Inoperable in Mode 3 and Higher Deterministic Criteria

a. Involved operations that exceeded, or were not Included in, the design bases of the facility.

Remarks: Only one train affected

b. Involved a major deficiency in design, construction, or operation having potential generic safety implications.

Remarks: repetitive valve maintenance issues have surfaced over recent months, however, the number of failures and the low risk associated with them do not constitute a major deficiency.

c. Led to a significant loss of integrity of the fuel, the primary coolant pressure boundary, or the primary containment boundary of a nuclear reactor. (Significant loss applies to each boundary)

Remarks: Only one train affected

d. Led to the loss of a safety function or multiple failures in systems used to mitigate an actual event.

(An event has occurred and a safety-function or mitigation system has actually failedO Remarks: Only one train affected

e. Involved possible adverse generic implications.

Remarks: N/A

f. Involved significant unexpected system interactions.

Remarks: Nothing unexpected

g. Involved repetitive failures or events involving safety-related equipment or deficiencies in operations.

Remarks: there were a number of MOV issues during recent RFO or repetitive MOV issues in past.

h. Involved questions or concerns pertaining to licensee operational performance.

Remarks: N/A

x. Involved one or more of the radiological or materials criterion provided in MD 8.3 Guidance.

Remarks: N/A Conditional Risk Assessment - 2E-8 Decision Basis: Risk falls within 'no additional inspection" region of risk table.

COMPLETED BY- D.Collins G DATE-RISK ANALYSIS BY - W. SchmIdt,, g- AHATE - I _/ ,

BC REVIEW - D. Holodi

, I Ah AdX S C-DETERMINk i'C CRITERIA FOR NOT CONDUCTING A TEAMF INSPECTION PER MD 8.3 PLANT- be,+ 2 EVENTDATE-44 it 0 Lj BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SIGNIFICANT OPERATIONAL EVAL DATE -

EVENT- " b 25AO J sB J( A/§/oe YIN Deterministic Criteria

a. Involved operations that exceeded, or were not included in, the design bases of the facility.

Remarks 0/-

b. Involved a major deficiency in design, construction, or operation having potential generic safety implications.

,__ Remarks [ C1/seeMf '&j 9'; /r& 1/ d!/ d,,S 4 !A (2110-

c. Led to a significant loss of integrity of tie fuel, the primary coolant pressure boundary, or the primary containment boundary of a nuclear reactor. (Significant loss applies to each boundary)

Remarks

. 4 A o ecfA4& /Od K A-

? &ch t T 4~thja_

d. Led to the loss of a safety function or multiple failures in systems used to mitigate an actual event.

(An event has occurred and a safety-function or mitigation system has actually failed)

N Remarks6N ogk Ticvu

e. Involved possible adverse generic implications.

Remarks l)o (

• g tL k ihSO r(f *(6C#AtSdt.

WjI 1*

f. Involved significant unexpected system interactions.

Remarks _T^4-A aaieJ cW4er,*,&d,.0 d 6ed,,t4. mAP

g. Involved repetitive failures or events involving safety-related

&1j equipment or deficiencies in operations.

Remarks It /EA

h. Involved questions or concerns pertaining to licensee JI operatiohal performance.

__ Remarks N/0

x. Involved one or more of the radiological or materials criterion provided in MD 8.3 Guidance. /4-Remarks lJ/ ra Conditional Risk Assessment I/A

I

, f

[COMPLETED BY - l ][ DATEE -/v

. Asl RISKANALYSIS BY- * =llDATE - Kt/A-

[BC REVIEW- Dop-/

, [!7

][DATE - l/Z, I I 'I I _

G:\MD8.3RECORD.wpd f

.1 DETERMINU.TIC CRITERIA FOR NOT CONDUCTING A TEAM INSPECTION PER MD 8.3 PLANT- b He.+ 2 EVENT DATE-4<(/o BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SIGNIFICANT OPERATIONAL EVAL DATE -

EVENT - j$2d° We/

YIN Deterministic Criteria

a. Involved operations that exceeded, or were not included in, the design bases of the facility.

Remarks /

b. Involved a major deficiency in design, construction, or operation having potential generic safety implications.

Remarks d<pB rM/a ¢de aft;

c. Led to a significant loss of integrity of the fuel, the primary coolant pressure boundary, or the primary containment boundary of a nuclear reactor. (Significant loss applies to each boundary)

Remarks 4 /9k, achdd /b6S q1 4.c/e? - b te& t- -4

d. Led to the loss of a safety function or multiple failures in systems used to mitigate an actual event.

(An event has occurred and a safety-function or mitigation system has actually failed)

Remarks)A Wo vdidA&& CoMdY k)4A 4 -

e. Involved possible adverse generic implications.

tik Remarks (nor *ertA5L wItC(jS6a.

r((( -CbnS(dt I _,

f. Involved significant unexpected system interactions.

tJ Remarks l WtQ (XAG rJd S AoP

g. Involved repetitive failures or events involving safety-related r 1 equipment or deficiencies in operations.

Remarks j IA-

h. Involved questions or concerns pertaining to licensee lj operational performance.

IV Remarks A/e

x. Involved one or more of the radiological or materials criterion provided in MD 8.3 Ai\ Guidance.

Remarks $J/p-Conditional Risk Assessment: tH/A

IE t- i lA COMPLETED BY - I DATE- = I/,/ov RISKANALYSIS BY- vtA t DATE - 8J/eI BC REVIEW -

. f A

In

° D L Dw ATE- f It

.r G:\MD8.3RECORD.wpd