BVY 06-016, Entergy Nuclear Northeast - Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Report for the Period July 2005 - December 2005
ML060620058 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Indian Point, Pilgrim, Vermont Yankee, FitzPatrick ![]() |
Issue date: | 02/27/2006 |
From: | Kansler M Entergy Nuclear Northeast, Entergy Nuclear Operations |
To: | Document Control Desk, NRC/FSME |
References | |
BVY 06-016, ENO 2.06.012, JPN-06-001, NL-06-024 | |
Download: ML060620058 (24) | |
Text
Entergy Nuclear Northeast Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Entergy 440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Tel 9142723200 Fax 914 272 3205 Michael R. Kansler President February 27, 2006 JPN-06-001 NL-06-024 ENO 2.06.012 BVY 06-016 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001
SUBJECT:
James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-333 Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units No. 1, 2 and 3 Docket Nos.50-003, 50-247, and 50-286 Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-293 Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-271 Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Report For the Period July 2005 - December 2005
Dear Sir or Madam:
This letter transmits the James A. FitzPatrick, Indian Point 1, Indian Point 2, Indian Point 3, Pilgrim, and Vermont Yankee Fitness-for-Duty Program performance reports for the period from July 2005 through December 2005 in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 26.71 (d).
The FitzPatrick report is Attachment l; the combined Indian Point 1, 2, and 3 report is Attachment II; the Pilgrim report is Attachment IlIl, and the Vermont Yankee report is Attachment IV.
OD-1
There are no new commitments made in this letter. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Charlene Faison at 914-272-3378.
Attachments: As stated cc:
Mr. Samuel J. Collins Resident Inspector's Office Regional Administrator, Region I Indian Point Unit 3 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road P.O. Box 59 King of Prussia, PA 19406-1415 Buchanan, NY 10511-0059 Mr. John Boska, Project Manager Resident Inspector's Office Plant Licensing Branch I-1 Indian Point Unit 2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation P.O. Box 59 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Buchanan, NY 10511-0059 Mail Stop O-8-C2 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Resident Inspector's Office James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Mr. James J. Shea, Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Plant Licensing Branch I-1 P.O. Box 136 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Lycoming, NY 13093-0136 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Senior Resident Inspector's Office Mail Stop O-8-C2 Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Washington, DC 20555-0001 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 600 Rocky Hill Road Mr. Michael Webb, Project Manager Mail Stop 66 Generic Communications & Plymouth, MA 02360 Power Uprate Branch Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 0-12-H2 Washington, DC 20555-0001 2
Resident Inspector's Office Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 320 Governor Hunt Road P.O. Box 157 Vernon, VT 05354 Mr. Paul Eddy NYS Department of Public Service 3 Empire State Plaza Albany, NY 12223 Mr. Peter R. Smith President NYSERDA 17 Columbia Circle Albany, NY 12203 Mr. David O'Brien Commissioner Department of Public Service 112 State Street, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-2601 3
ATTACHMENT I TO JPN-06-001 / NL-06-024 / ENO 2.06.012 / BVY 06-016 JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR JULY 2005 THROUGH DECEMBER 2005 (4 pages)
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DOCKET NO. 50-333 DPR-59
ATTACHMENT I TO JPN-06-001 / NL-06-024 / ENO 2.06.012 / BVY 06-016 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Report For the Period July through December 2005 INTRODUCTION 10 CFR 26.71 (d) requires that nuclear power plant licensees periodically collect, compile and submit Fitness-for-Duty performance data. Specifically, this performance data must include:
- 1. Random testing rate;
- 2. Drugs tested for and cut-off levels, including results of tests using lower cut-off levels;
- 3. Workforce populations tested;
- 4. Numbers of tests and results by population, and type of test (i.e., pre-access, random, for-cause, etc.);
- 5. Substances identified;
- 6. Summary of management actions; and
- 7. A list of events reported.
Fitness-for-Duty performance data for Entergy's James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (JAF) for the period July 2005 through December 2005 are provided below and in the attached tables. Data on random testing rate, a summary of management actions, and a list of events reported (items 1, 6 and 7) are given below. Data for the remaining items (2, 3, 4 and 5) are given in the attached tables.
An additional section not required by 10 CFR 26 is included in this report. The additional section summarizes events related to the FitzPatrick Fitness-for-Duty Program and lessons learned.
At JAF, Entergy considers all contractors to be short-term contractors for the purposes of the Fitness-for-Duty Program. For this reason, the attached tables show "zeros" for data associated with long-term contractors.
RANDOM TESTING RATE For this period, 23.60% of the workforce was tested randomly. The annual testing rate for 2005 was 53.16%.
1
ATTACHMENT I TO JPN-06-001 / NL-06-024 / ENO 2.06.012 / BVY 06-016
SUMMARY
OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS Entergy used the definition of "Management Actions" implicit in 10 CFR 26.27
("Management actions and sanctions to be imposed") to determine the content of this section.
Pre-Access Testing A total of 99 pre-access tests (10-employees, 89-contractors) were administered. One pre-access test for a contractor was positive for Marijuana. Access was denied. All other tests were negative.
Random Testing A total of 215 random tests (199-employees, 16-contractors) were administered. One employee tested positive for alcohol. A mandatory EAP referral was initiated. Employee returned to work and was placed in the follow-up program after signing a re-entry agreement.
For Cause Testing One employee for-cause test was performed during this period, after reporting a DWI arrest; the test was negative. Employee was placed in the follow-up program, with full access.
Follow-Up Testing There were 13 follow up tests (11-employees and 2-contractors) administered during this reporting period. All test results were negative.
Other This category includes tests repeated because the results of the specimen were negative but the specimen was determined by the laboratory to have either a low specific gravity or a low concentration of creatinine. There were 6 atypical tests, 5 employees and 1 contractor.
All repeat observed test results were negative. There were 5 Department of Transportation (DOT) tests performed (which had a lower alcohol cutoff level at 0.02% BAC). The test results were negative.
Events Reported There were no reportable events during this period. No performance indicators were identified during this period.
Lessons Learned and Program Events There were no program events during this period.
2
ATTACHMENT I TO JPN-06-001 / NL-06-024 / ENO 2.06.012 / BVY 06-016 Fitness For Duty Program Semi-Annual Performance Data Report - Personnel Subject to 10CFR26 Section I - Company Data Company: Entergy - James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear Plant Six-Month Period: 07/01/2005 to 12/31/2005 Location: James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Plant PO Box 110 Druas Tested For Screen/Confirmation (na/ml)
Lycoming NY 13093 Marijuana 100/15 Marijuana 50/15 (N/A at JAF)
Contact:
Michael Warchol Cocaine 300/150 Supervisor of Investigations & Fitness for Duty Opiates 300/300 Amphetamines 1000/500 Phencyclidine '25/25 Phone: (315) 349-6493 Alcohol (%BAC) 0.04% BAC Random Testing Rate: NLT 50% per annum.
Section II - Testing Results Licensee Employee Long-Term Contractor Short-Term Contractor Total Avg. Workforce s787.25123^96 E 91121 Category Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Follow-Up 11 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 13 0 0 Observed Behavior 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Other 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 11 0 0 Post Accident 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pre-Access 10 0 0 0 0 0 89 1 0 99 1 0 Random 199 1 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 215 1 0 Total 231 1 0 0 0 0 108 1 0 339 2 0 Section III - Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances Alcohol Ampheta- Cocaine Marijuana Marijuana Opiates Phenycli- FFD Refused Total mines 50 100 dine Violation Licensee Employee 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 C0 0 1 Short-Term Contractor 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 C0 0 1 Total 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 C0 0 2 Note: Discrepancies in the totals in this section versusSection II indicate that one or more tests detected multiple drugs. Refer to Section IV for the declaration of these tests and their corresponding drugs.
Generated on 02/09/2006 Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT I TO JPN-06-001 / NL-06-024 / ENO 2.06.012 / BVY 06-016 Section IV - Breakdown of Tests With Multiple Detected Drugs Alcohol Ampheta- Cocaine Marijuana Marijuana Opiates Phenycli- FFD Refused mines 50 100 dine Violation None Section V - Blind Testing Results Q3 11.36 %
Q4 12.27 %
Period 11.80 %
Section VI - Random Testing Results For Period 23.60 %
ForYear 53.16 %
Generated on 02/09/2006 Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENT II TO JPN-06-001 / NL-06-024 / ENO 2.06.012 / BVY 06-016 INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNITS NO. 1, 2, and 3 FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR JULY 2005 THROUGH DECEMBER 2005 (4 pages)
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO.50-003 DPR-5 INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-247 DPR-26 INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 3 DOCKET NO. 50-286 DPR-64
ATTACHED II TO JPN-06-001 / NL-06-024 / ENO 2.06.012 / BVY 06-016 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Indian Point Energy Center Units No. 1, 2, 3 Fitness-For-Duty Program Performance Report For the Period of July through December 2005 INTRODUCTION 10 CFR 26.71 (d) requires that nuclear power plant licensees periodically collect, compile and submit Fitness-For-Duty performance data. Specifically, this performance data must include:
- 1. Random testing rate;
- 2. Drugs tested for and cut-off levels, including results of tests using lower cut-off levels and tests for other drugs:
- 3. Workforce populations tested;
- 4. Numbers of tests and results by population, and type of test (i.e., pre-access, random, for-cause, etc.);
- 5. Substances identified;
- 6. Summary of management actions; and
- 7. A list of events reported.
Fitness-For-Duty performance data for the Entergy's Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC) for the period from July 2005 through December 2005 are provided below and in the attached tables. The random testing rate, a summary of management actions, and a list of events reported (items 1, 6, and 7) are given below. Data for the remaining items (2, 3, 4 and 5) are given in the attached tables.
An additional section not required by 10CFR26 is included in this report. The additional section summarizes events related to the IPEC Fitness-For- Duty program and lessons learned.
At IPEC, Entergy considers all contractors to be short-term for the purposes of the Fitness-For-Duty program. For this reason, the attached tables show "zeros" for data associated with long-term contractors.
RANDOM TESTING RATE For this period, 24.34% of the workforce was tested randomly. The annual testing rate for 2005 was 51.07%.
SUMMARY
OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS Entergy used the definition of "Management Actions" implicit in 10 CFR 26.27
("Management actions and sanctions to be imposed") to determine the content: of this section.
1
ATTACHED II TO JPN-06-001 / NL-06-024 / ENO 2.06.012 / BVY 06-016 Pre-Access Testing A total of 249 pre-access tests were performed (90-employees and 159-contractors). All employee tests were negative. Two contractor tests were positive (1-cocaine and 1-PCP).
Both individuals were denied access to the site for three years.
Random Testing A total of 404 random tests were performed (355-employees and 49-contractors). All employee tests and all contractor tests were negative.
For-Cause Testing A total of 12 for-cause (9-employee and 3 contractors) tests were performed (ten tests were for observed behavior and two tests were post accident). All employee tests were negative.
One (1) contractor (observed behavior) tested positive for alcohol. The individual was denied access to the site for one year.
Follow-Up Testing A total of 8 follow-up (5-employee and 3-contractor) tests were performed. All contractor tests were negative. One (1) employee tested positive for alcohol. The employee was a supervisor and per regulations the NRC was notified. Individual was permanently denied access to site per company procedure.
Other This category includes tests repeated because the results of the specimen were negative but the specimen was determined by the laboratory to have either a low specific gravity or a low concentration of creatinine. A total of eleven (4) tests were performed (1-employee and 3 contractors). All tests were negative.
Events Reported There were no additional reportable events during this period. No performance indicators were identified during this period.
Lessons Learned and Program Events There were no program events during this period.
2
ATTACHMENT II TO JPN-06-001 / NL-06-024 / ENO 2.06.012 / BVY 06-016 Fitness For Duty Program Semi-Annual Performance Data Report - Personnel Subject to 10CFR26 Section I - Company Data Company: Entergy - Indian Point Energy Center Six-Month Period: 07/01/2005 to 1;231/2005 Location: Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, 40BodaSie3Druas Suite 3 Tested For Screen/Confirmation (na/ml)
Buchanan, NY 10511 Marijuana 100/15 Marijuana 50/15
Contact:
Sharon Quinn Cocaine 300/150 Supervisor, Investigations & Fitness for Duty Opiates 300/300 Amphetamines 1000/500 Phencyclidine :25/25 Phone: (914) 788-2193 Alcohol (%BAC) 0.04% BAC Random Testing Rate: NLT 50% per annum.
Section II - Testing Results Licensee Employee Long-Term Contractor Short-Term Contractor Total Av. Workforce 1,382.9.9 .:25 E 1 5953 Category Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused *rested Positive Refused Follow-Up 5 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 8 1 0 Observed Behavior 7 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 10 1 0 Other 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 Post Accident 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 Pre-Access 90 0 0 0 0 0 159 2 0 249 2 0 Random 355 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 0 404 0 0 Total 460 1 0 0 0 0 217 3 0 677 4 0 Section III - Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances Alcohol Ampheta- Cocaine Marijuana Marijuana Opiates Phenycli- FFD Refused Total mines 50 100 dine Violation Licensee Employee 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Short-Term Contractor 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 Total 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 Note: Discrepancies in the totals in this section versusSection II indicate that one or more tests detected multiple drugs. Refer to Section IV for the declaration of these tests and their corresponding drugs.
Generated on 02/09/2006 Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT II TO JPN-06-001 / NL-06-024 / ENO 2.06.012 / BVY 06-016 Section IV - Breakdown of Tests With Multiple Detected Drugs Alcohol Ampheta- Cocaine Marijuana Marijuana Opiates Phenycli- FFD Refused mines 50 100 dine Violation None Section V - Blind Testing Results Q3 11.83 %
Q4 11.80 %
Period 11.82 %
Section VI - Random Testing Results For Period 24.34 %
ForYear 51.07 %
Generated on 02/09/2006 Page 2of 2
ATTACHMENT III TO JPN-06-001 / NL-06-024 / ENO 2.06.012 / BVY 06-016 PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR JULY 2005 THROUGH DECEMBER 2005 (4 pages)
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION DOCKET NO. 50-293 DPR-35
ATTACHMENT IlIl TO JPN-06-001 / NL-06-024 / ENO 2.06.012 / BVY 06-016 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Pilgrim Station Nuclear Power Plant Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Report For the Period July through December 2005 INTRODUCTION 10 CFR 26.71 (d) requires that nuclear power plant licensees periodically collect, compile and submit Fitness-for-Duty performance data. Specifically, this performance data must include:
- 1. Random testing rate;
- 2. Drugs tested for and cut-off levels, including results of tests using lower cut-off levels;
- 3. Workforce populations tested;
- 4. Numbers of tests and results by population and type of test (i.e., pre-access, random, for-cause, etc.);
- 5. Substances identified;
- 6. Summary of management actions; and
- 7. A list of events reported.
Fitness-for-Duty performance data for Entergy's Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (PNPS) for the period July 2005 through December 2005 are provided below and in the attached tables.
Data on random testing rate, a summary of management actions, and a list of events reported (items 1, 6 and 7) are given below. Data for the remaining items (2, 3, 4 and 5) are given in the attached tables.
An additional section not required by 10 CFR 26 is included in this report. The additional section summarizes events related to the PNPS Fitness-for-Duty Program and lessons learned.
RANDOM TESTING RATE For this period, 29.35% of the workforce was randomly tested. The annual testing rate was 52.53%.
SUMMARY
OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS Entergy used the definition of "Management Actions" implicit in 10 CFR 26.27
("Management actions and sanctions to be imposed") to determine the content of this section.
1
ATTACHMENT IlIl TO JPN-06-001 / NL-06-024 / ENO 2.06.012 / BVY 06-016 Pre-Access Testing A total of 59 pre-access tests (24 licensee employees, 25 long term contractors, and 10 short term contractors) were administered during this period. All pre-access test results were negative.
Random Testing A total of 242 random tests (174 licensee employees, 53 long term contractors, and 15 short term contractors) were administered during this period. All random test results were negative.
For Cause Testing (Observed Behavior and Post Accident)
A total of 4 for-cause tests (4 observed behavior and 0 post accident) were administered during this period. All were licensee employees and all for-cause test results were negative.
Follow UP Testing A total of 7 follow-up tests were administered during this period. All tests were on licensee employees and all follow-up test results were negative.
Other This category includes tests repeated because the results of the specimen were negative but the specimen was determined by the laboratory to have either a low specific gravity or a low concentration of creatinine. There were no atypical tests administered during this period.
Events Reported There were no reportable events during this period. No performance indicators were identified during this period.
Lessons Learned and Program Events There were no program events during this period.
2
ATTACHMENT IlIl TO JPN-06-001 / NL-06-024 / ENO 2.06.012 / BVY 06;-016 Fitness For Duty Program Semi-Annual Performance Data Report - Personnel Subject to 10CFR26 Section I - Company Data Company: Entergy - Pilgrim Station Six-Month Period: 07/01/2005 to 1:2/31/2005 l Location: Entergy - Pilgrim Station Drugs Tested For Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml) 600 Rocky Hill Road Plymouth, MA 02360 Marijuana 100/15 Marijuana 50/15
Contact:
Barb Renney Cocaine 300/150 Supervisor of Investigations & Fitness for Duty Opiates 300/300 Amphetamines 1000/500 Phencyclidine 25/25 Phone: (508) 830-8285 Alcohol (%BAC) 0.04% BAC Random Testing Rate: NLT 50% per annum.
Section II - Testing Results Licensee Employee Long-Term Contractor Short-Term Contractor Total Avg. Workforce 59772 138.64 88^15 E 82.
Category Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Follow-Up 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 Observed Behavior 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Post Accident 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pre-Access 24 0 0 25 0 0 10 0 0 59 0 0 Random 174 0 0 53 0 0 15 0 0 242 0 0 Total 209 0 0 78 0 0 25 0 0 312 0 0 Section III - Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances Alcohol Ampheta- Cocaine Marijuana Marijuana Opiates Phenycli- FFD Refused Total mines 50 100 dine Violation Licensee Employee 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Long-Term Contractor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Short-Term Contractor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Note: Discrepancies in the totals in this section versusSection II indicate that one or more tests detected multiple drugs. Refer to Section IV for the declaration of these tests and their corresponding drugs.
Generated on 02/09/2006 Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT IlIl TO JPN-06-001 / NL-06-024 / ENO 2.06.012 / BVY 06-016 Section IV - Breakdown of Tests With Multiple Detected Drugs Alcohol Ampheta- Cocaine Marijuana Marijuana Opiates Phenycli- FFD Refused mines 50 100 dine Violation None Section V - Blind Testing Results Q3 10.58 %
04 10.57 %
Period 10.58 %
Section VI - Random Testing Results For Period 29.35 %
ForYear 52.53 %
Generated on 02/09/2006 Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENT IV TO JPN-06-001 / NL-06-024 / ENO 2.06.012 / BVY 06-016 VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR JULY 2005 THROUGH DECEMBER 2005 (5 pages)
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station Docket No. 50-271 DPR-28
ATTACHMENT IV TO JPN-06-001 / NL-06-024 / ENO 2.06.012 / BVY 06-016 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Report For the Period July through December 2005 INTRODUCTION 10 CFR 26.71 (d) requires that nuclear power plant licensees periodically collect, compile and submit Fitness-for-Duty performance data. Specifically, this performance data must include:
- 1. Random testing rate;
- 2. Drugs tested for and cut-off levels, including results of tests using lower cut-off levels;
- 3. Workforce populations tested;
- 4. Numbers of tests and results by population and type of test (i.e., pre-access, random, for-cause, etc.);
- 5. Substances identified;
- 6. Summary of management actions; and
- 7. A list of events reported.
Fitness-for-Duty performance data for Entergy's Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant (VY) for the period July 2005 through December 2005 are provided below and in the attached tables. Data on random testing rate, a summary of management actions, and a list of events reported (items 1, 6 and 7) are given below. Data for the remaining items (2, 3, 4 and 5) are given in the attached tables.
An additional section not required by 10 CFR 26 is included in this report. The additional section summarizes events related to the VY Fitness-for-Duty Program and lessons learned.
RANDOM TESTING RATE For this period, 25.15% of the workforce was randomly tested. The annual testing rate for 2005 was 54.52%.
SUMMARY
OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS Entergy used the definition of "Management Actions" implicit in 10 CFR 26.27
("Management actions and sanctions to be imposed") to determine the content of this section.
1
ATTACHMENT IV TO JPN-06-001 / NL-06-024 / ENO 2.06.012 / BVY 06-016 Pre-Access Testinc A total of 576 pre-access tests (39 licensee employees, 11 long term contractors, and 526 short term contractors) were administered during this period. All licensee and long term contractor pre-access tests results were negative. 5 short term contractor pre-access tests received positive results (2 tests were positive for marijuana > 50; 1 test was positive for marijuana > 100; 1 test was positive for alcohol and 1 test was positive due to a refusal to test). These 5 short term contractors were all denied access.
Random Testing A total of 265 random tests (170 licensee employees, 32 long term contractors, and 63 short term contractors) were administered during this period. 2 random tests received positive results (1 licensee employee test was positive for alcohol and 1 short term contractor test was positive for marijuana > 100). Both individuals were denied access. The licensee employee returned to work after the required 14 days off with EAP intervention and is currently in a follow-up program.
For Cause Testing (Observed Behavior and Post Accident)
A total of 2 for-cause tests (1 observed behavior and 1 post accident) were administered during this period. The observed behavior test was a licensee employee who received a positive result for alcohol. The licensee employee (a college intern) was denied access. He elected not to participate in EAP and did not return to the plant. Access was denied for one year. The post accident test was for a short term contractor who received a negative test result.
Follow UP Testing A total of 37 follow-up tests (8 licensee employees, 4 long term contractors, and 25 short term contractors) were administered during this period. All follow-up test resulits were negative.
Other This category includes tests repeated because the results of the specimen were negative but the specimen was determined by the laboratory to have either a low specific gravity or a low concentration of creatinine. There were 15 atypical tests (1 licensee employee and 14 short term contractors) administered during this period. All licensee test results were negative. 1 short term contractor received a positive result for marijuana > 1000. He was denied access.
Events Reported There were no reportable events during this period. No performance indicators were identified during this period.
2
ATTACHMENT IV TO JPN-06-001 / NL-06-024 / ENO 2.06.012 / BVY 06-016 Lessons Learned and Program Events During the 3rd quarter, VY did not meet the 10% blind sample submittal as required (although the combined average rate for the 3rd and 4 th quarters was over 10%/c,). This was due to the much higher number of contractors brought in to support the outage during the last weeks of the 3T quarter. A condition report (CR-VTY-2005-034341 was generated.
Additional blind samples were sent to the lab in the beginning of the 4t quarter to raise the average to above 10%.
3
ATTACHMENT IV TO JPN-06-001 / NL-06-024 / ENO 2.06.012 / BVY 06-016 Fitness For Duty Program Semi-Annual Performance Data Report - Personnel Subject to 10CFR26 Section I - Company Data Company: Entergy - Vermont Yankee Six-Month Period: 07/01/2005 to 12/31/2005l Location: Entergy - Vermont Yankee Drugs Tested For Screen/Corfirmation (ng/ml)
PO Box 157 Vernon, VT 05354 Marijuana 100/15 Marijuana 50/15
Contact:
Barb Renney Cocaine 300/150 Supervisor of Investigations & Fitness for Duty Opiates 300/300 Amphetamines 1000/500 Phencyclidine :25/25 Phone: (802) 258-5801 Alcohol (%BAC) 0.04% BAC Random Testing Rate: NLT 50% per annum.
Section II - Testing Results Licensee Employee Long-Term Contractor Short-Term Contractor Total Avg. Workforce 588.49 109.93 5 E 1053.70 Category Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Tested Positive Refused Follow-Up 8 0 0 4 0 0 25 0 0 37 0 0 Observed Behavior 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Other 1 0 0 0 0 0 14 1 0 15 1 0 Post Accident 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 Pre-Access 39 0 0 11 0 0 526 4 1 576 4 1 Random 170 1 0 32 0 0 63 1 0 265 2 0 Total 219 2 0 47 0 0 629 6 1 895 8 1 Section III - Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances Alcohol Ampheta- Cocaine Marijuana Marijuana Opiates Phenycli- FFD Refused Total mines 50 100 dine Violation Licensee Employee 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Long-Term Contractor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Short-Term Contractor 1 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 1 7 Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 3 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 1 9 Note: Discrepancies in the totals in this section versusSection II indicate that one or more tests detected multiple drugs. Refer to Section IV for the declaration of these tests and their corresponding drugs.
Generated on 02/09/2006 Page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT IV TO JPN-06-001 / NL-06-024 / ENO 2.06.012 / BVY 06-016 Section IV - Breakdown of Tests With Multiple Detected Drugs Alcohol Ampheta- Cocaine Marijuana Marijuana Opiates Phenycli- FFD Refused mines 50 100 dine Violation None Section V - Blind Testing Results Q3 9.06 %
Q4 14.18 %
Period 12.29 %
Section VI - Random Testing Results For Period 25.15 %
For Year 54.52 %
Generated on 02/09/2006 Page 2of 2