|
---|
Category:Legal-Intervention Petition
MONTHYEARML0907001332009-02-27027 February 2009 Exelon'S Answer Opposing Citizens' Petition to Require the NRC to Supplement the Safety Evaluation Report for Oyster Creek ML0904306062009-02-12012 February 2009 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff'S Response in Opposition to Citizens' Motion to Reopen the Record and to Postpone Final Disposition of the Licensing Decision ML0902902612009-01-22022 January 2009 2009/01/22-In the Matter of Amergen Energy Company, LLC (License Renewal for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station) Docket No. 50-219-LR ML0832903412008-11-19019 November 2008 Amergen'S Answer Opposing Citizens' Motion for Clarification of Certain Findings of Fact and Other Appropriate Relief ML0832204242008-11-0505 November 2008 Citizens' Answer to NRC Staff Motion to Respond to Citizens' October 14, 2008 Letter ML0823809952008-08-19019 August 2008 Oyster Creek - Notice of Withdrawal (J. Adler) ML0823906382008-08-19019 August 2008 Oyster Creek - Notice of Appearance (M. Simon) ML0824015522008-08-18018 August 2008 Citizens' Consolidated Reply Regarding Petition for Review of LBP-08-12 ML0822502302008-08-11011 August 2008 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff'S Answer in Opposition to Citizens' Petition for Review of LBP-08-12 ML0822800792008-08-11011 August 2008 Amergen'S Answer Opposing Citizens' Petition for Review of LBP-08-12 ML0822613082008-08-0101 August 2008 Citizens' Petition for Review of LBP-08-12 ML0820700772008-07-18018 July 2008 Citizens Supplemental Citation in Support of Admission of Pending Contention Regarding Metal Fatigue ML0815504232008-05-27027 May 2008 Citizens' Response to Board Order and Motion to Supplement the Basis of Their Contention, Preliminary Statement ML0814904652008-05-23023 May 2008 Amergen'S Answer Opposing Citizens' Supplemental Petition ML0816402452008-05-15015 May 2008 2008/05/15-Supplemental Petition by Listed Companies for Additional Investigation and Correction of Deficiencies Regarding License Renewal Reviews, for Oyster Creek, Indian Point, Pilgrim, and Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plants ML0814306512008-05-15015 May 2008 Supplemental Petition by Nuclear Information and Resource Service: Jersey Shore Nuclear Watch, Inc.: Grandmothers, Mothers and More for Energy Safety: New Jersey Public Interest Research Group: New Jersey Sierra Club: New Jersey.. ML0814906102008-05-15015 May 2008 2008/05/15-Supplemental Petition by Collective Petitioners for Additional Investigation and Correction of Deficiencies Regarding License Renewal Reviews for Oyster Creek, Indian Point, Pilgrim, and Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plants ML0814005782008-05-0505 May 2008 Reply by Nuclear Information and Resource Service, Et. Al., to Amergen'S Opposition to Their Petition to Add a New Contention ML0806701082008-03-0404 March 2008 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff'S Response in Opposition to Citizens' Motion for Clarification ML0802803052008-01-18018 January 2008 2008/01/18-NRC Staff Answer to Petition for Suspension of License Renewal Reviews Pending Investigation of NRC Staff License Renewal Process ML0802205772008-01-14014 January 2008 Citizens' Petition for Review of LBP-07-17 and the Interlocutory Decisions in the Oyster Creek Proceeding ML0709406512007-03-27027 March 2007 Petitioners' Opposition to Amergen Motion to Strike ML0708002202007-03-13013 March 2007 Citizens' Combined Reply to Amergen'S and NRC Staff'S Answer to Their Petition to Add a New Contention ML0703101252007-01-23023 January 2007 Citizens' Combined Reply to Amergen'S and NRC Staff'S Answer to Their Petition to Add New Contentions ML0701700452007-01-16016 January 2007 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff Reply to Citizens' Motion for Leave to Add Contentions and Motion to Add Contentions ML0625000882006-08-29029 August 2006 Oyster Creek - Citizens' Reply to NRC Staff'S Answer to the Petition to Add a New Contention and Supplement Thereto ML0623400612006-08-21021 August 2006 NRC Staff Answer to Petition to Add a New Contention and Petition Supplement ML0624001242006-08-18018 August 2006 Citizens' Reply to Amergen'S Answer to the Petition to Add a New Contention and Supplement Thereto ML0622704312006-08-11011 August 2006 Amergen'S Answer to Citizens' Petition to Add a New Contention and Supplement Thereto ML0621404182006-07-25025 July 2006 Supplement to Petition to Add a New Contention ML0603102372006-01-30030 January 2006 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff'S Response to Licensing Board'S Order Directing Supplemental Briefing ML0602505772006-01-17017 January 2006 Letter from John A. Covino to Administrative Judges Responding to the Board'S Order of 01/10/06 Directing Additional Briefing on Two Points ML0603100322006-01-17017 January 2006 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff'S Response to Licensing Board'S Order Directing Supplemental Briefing ML0535601652005-12-19019 December 2005 Petitioners' Exhibits 10 - 14 Supporting the Petitioners' Combined Reply to the Answers of Amergen and the NRC Staff, Dated 12/19/05 ML0535601682005-12-19019 December 2005 Combined Reply of Petitioners to the Answers of Amergen and the NRC Staff ML0534900822005-12-14014 December 2005 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff Answer to Request for Hearing and Petition to Intervene ML0535500932005-12-12012 December 2005 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff Answer to Request for Hearing and Petition to Intervene of the State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection ML0534903402005-12-12012 December 2005 Amergen'S Answer Opposing Njdep'S Request for Hearing and Petition to Intervene; Amergen'S Answer Opposing Nirs Et Al. Request for Hearing and Petition to Intervene; and Notices of Appearance of Donald J. Silverman, Kathryn M. Sutton. ML0533900482005-11-14014 November 2005 Additional Petitioners' Declarations ML0533605792005-11-14014 November 2005 Certificate of Service for Petitioners Exhibits 1 Through 9 ML0533605622005-11-14014 November 2005 Request for Hearing and Petition to Intervene by M. Donato ML17037B7821973-10-0505 October 1973 Letter Regarding Notice of Intent to Intervene Filed with the Commission on Behalf of the Friends of the Earth 2009-02-27
[Table view] Category:Responses and Contentions
MONTHYEARML0907001332009-02-27027 February 2009 Exelon'S Answer Opposing Citizens' Petition to Require the NRC to Supplement the Safety Evaluation Report for Oyster Creek ML0904306062009-02-12012 February 2009 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff'S Response in Opposition to Citizens' Motion to Reopen the Record and to Postpone Final Disposition of the Licensing Decision ML0902902612009-01-22022 January 2009 2009/01/22-In the Matter of Amergen Energy Company, LLC (License Renewal for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station) Docket No. 50-219-LR ML0832903412008-11-19019 November 2008 Amergen'S Answer Opposing Citizens' Motion for Clarification of Certain Findings of Fact and Other Appropriate Relief ML0832204242008-11-0505 November 2008 Citizens' Answer to NRC Staff Motion to Respond to Citizens' October 14, 2008 Letter ML0823809952008-08-19019 August 2008 Oyster Creek - Notice of Withdrawal (J. Adler) ML0823906382008-08-19019 August 2008 Oyster Creek - Notice of Appearance (M. Simon) ML0824015522008-08-18018 August 2008 Citizens' Consolidated Reply Regarding Petition for Review of LBP-08-12 ML0822502302008-08-11011 August 2008 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff'S Answer in Opposition to Citizens' Petition for Review of LBP-08-12 ML0822800792008-08-11011 August 2008 Amergen'S Answer Opposing Citizens' Petition for Review of LBP-08-12 ML0822613082008-08-0101 August 2008 Citizens' Petition for Review of LBP-08-12 ML0820700772008-07-18018 July 2008 Citizens Supplemental Citation in Support of Admission of Pending Contention Regarding Metal Fatigue ML0815504232008-05-27027 May 2008 Citizens' Response to Board Order and Motion to Supplement the Basis of Their Contention, Preliminary Statement ML0814904652008-05-23023 May 2008 Amergen'S Answer Opposing Citizens' Supplemental Petition ML0816402452008-05-15015 May 2008 2008/05/15-Supplemental Petition by Listed Companies for Additional Investigation and Correction of Deficiencies Regarding License Renewal Reviews, for Oyster Creek, Indian Point, Pilgrim, and Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plants ML0814306512008-05-15015 May 2008 Supplemental Petition by Nuclear Information and Resource Service: Jersey Shore Nuclear Watch, Inc.: Grandmothers, Mothers and More for Energy Safety: New Jersey Public Interest Research Group: New Jersey Sierra Club: New Jersey.. ML0814906102008-05-15015 May 2008 2008/05/15-Supplemental Petition by Collective Petitioners for Additional Investigation and Correction of Deficiencies Regarding License Renewal Reviews for Oyster Creek, Indian Point, Pilgrim, and Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plants ML0814005782008-05-0505 May 2008 Reply by Nuclear Information and Resource Service, Et. Al., to Amergen'S Opposition to Their Petition to Add a New Contention ML0806701082008-03-0404 March 2008 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff'S Response in Opposition to Citizens' Motion for Clarification ML0802803052008-01-18018 January 2008 2008/01/18-NRC Staff Answer to Petition for Suspension of License Renewal Reviews Pending Investigation of NRC Staff License Renewal Process ML0802205772008-01-14014 January 2008 Citizens' Petition for Review of LBP-07-17 and the Interlocutory Decisions in the Oyster Creek Proceeding ML0709406512007-03-27027 March 2007 Petitioners' Opposition to Amergen Motion to Strike ML0708002202007-03-13013 March 2007 Citizens' Combined Reply to Amergen'S and NRC Staff'S Answer to Their Petition to Add a New Contention ML0703101252007-01-23023 January 2007 Citizens' Combined Reply to Amergen'S and NRC Staff'S Answer to Their Petition to Add New Contentions ML0701700452007-01-16016 January 2007 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff Reply to Citizens' Motion for Leave to Add Contentions and Motion to Add Contentions ML0625000882006-08-29029 August 2006 Oyster Creek - Citizens' Reply to NRC Staff'S Answer to the Petition to Add a New Contention and Supplement Thereto ML0623400612006-08-21021 August 2006 NRC Staff Answer to Petition to Add a New Contention and Petition Supplement ML0624001242006-08-18018 August 2006 Citizens' Reply to Amergen'S Answer to the Petition to Add a New Contention and Supplement Thereto ML0622704312006-08-11011 August 2006 Amergen'S Answer to Citizens' Petition to Add a New Contention and Supplement Thereto ML0621404182006-07-25025 July 2006 Supplement to Petition to Add a New Contention ML0603102372006-01-30030 January 2006 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff'S Response to Licensing Board'S Order Directing Supplemental Briefing ML0602505772006-01-17017 January 2006 Letter from John A. Covino to Administrative Judges Responding to the Board'S Order of 01/10/06 Directing Additional Briefing on Two Points ML0603100322006-01-17017 January 2006 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff'S Response to Licensing Board'S Order Directing Supplemental Briefing ML0535601652005-12-19019 December 2005 Petitioners' Exhibits 10 - 14 Supporting the Petitioners' Combined Reply to the Answers of Amergen and the NRC Staff, Dated 12/19/05 ML0535601682005-12-19019 December 2005 Combined Reply of Petitioners to the Answers of Amergen and the NRC Staff ML0534900822005-12-14014 December 2005 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff Answer to Request for Hearing and Petition to Intervene ML0535500932005-12-12012 December 2005 Oyster Creek - NRC Staff Answer to Request for Hearing and Petition to Intervene of the State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection ML0534903402005-12-12012 December 2005 Amergen'S Answer Opposing Njdep'S Request for Hearing and Petition to Intervene; Amergen'S Answer Opposing Nirs Et Al. Request for Hearing and Petition to Intervene; and Notices of Appearance of Donald J. Silverman, Kathryn M. Sutton. ML0533900482005-11-14014 November 2005 Additional Petitioners' Declarations ML0533605792005-11-14014 November 2005 Certificate of Service for Petitioners Exhibits 1 Through 9 ML0533605622005-11-14014 November 2005 Request for Hearing and Petition to Intervene by M. Donato ML17037B7821973-10-0505 October 1973 Letter Regarding Notice of Intent to Intervene Filed with the Commission on Behalf of the Friends of the Earth 2009-02-27
[Table view] |
Text
R -,s II0, '-
State of New Jersey JON S. CORZINE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL NANCY KAPLEN Governor DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY Acting Attorney General DIVISION OF LAW 25 MARKET STREET DOCKETED PO Box 093 USNRC TRENTON, N4J 08625-0093 January 19, 2006 (9:26am)
January 17, 2006 OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF VIA E-MAIL & U.S. MAIL Honorable E. Roy Hawkens, Administrative Judge & Chair, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop T-3 F23 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Re: I/M/O AMERGEN ENERGY COMPANY, LLC (License Renewal for Oyster Creek N.G.S.)
Docket No. 50-219-LR ASLBP No. 06-844--Q1-LR
Dear Chairman Hawkens and Honorable Judges:
The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
("NJDEP") is in receipt of the Board's Order of January-10, 2006, in the above-captioned matter. That Order directed' additional briefing on two points. The first point concerned the contention of the Nuclear Information and Resource Service (and collective parties) as to the drywell liner corrosion management program. The Department was not directed to respond to that first point.
The second point concerns the Department's contention on the combustion turbines (CTs). The Board called for identification with specificity of the contractual agreement (or equivalent)
"which demonstrates that. AmerGen can rely on First 'Energy -to maintain, inspect, and test..the combustion'turbinesiin accordance with AmerGen's aging management plan."' (Order, pages-2 to 3). To the Department's know].~edge,..neither AmerGen nor First Energy has supplied that contractual agreement,' or its equivalent, to the Board or to the Department. Since AmerGen has apparently not taken
- L H.cEO _- i - EC ( -- 0 cl)
HUGHES JUSTICE COMPLEx ' TELEPHONE: (609) 984-5612 - FAx: (609) 341-5030 New JerseyIs An Equal OpportunityEmployer - Printedon Recycled PaperandRecyclable
January 17, 2006 Page 2 that step, the Department has not been able to examine such agreement and is not in a position to respond to the first and second aspects of Question 2 posed by the Board at this time. The Department can respond to the Board to the extent of stating that, if the combustion turbines are not available, there is a greater likelihood of core damage in the event of a station blackout. When AmerGen supplies the contractual agreement to the Board and the Department, the Department will be able to respond further.
As to the third part of Question 2, AmerGen's own response to the Board provides support for the Department. On page 26 of AmerGen's response, it acknowledges that its license transfer application states that the Oyster Creek N.G.S. "would continue to rely on the CTs as an alternative source of AC power 'through appropriate contractual arrangement.'" (AmerGen Response, p. 26).
Since AmerGen has thus stated that it will rely on CTs as an alternative source of power, AmerGen cannot now say that the CTs will not be needed. Further, Amergen, rather than the Department, is the party which should have the burden of demonstrating that it has made all contractual arrangements for the provision of the CTs and that the CTs are available in good working order for immediate operation if the need arises. Without having provided the contractual arrangement to the Board or to the Department, AmerGen cannot expect that either the Board or the Department can make a meaningful review of such contract on the question of whether, in fact, the CTs will be available if needed.
Respectfully, NANCY KAPLEN ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY By:___
tlJohn A. Covino Deputy Attorney General cc: Hon. Paul B. Abramson, Administrative Judge Hon. Anthony J. Baratta, Administrative Judge Service List (All by E-Mail & US Mail)