ML053480146

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Control of Security-Related Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Inform. Handled by Individuals, Firms & Entities Sub. to Reg. of the Use of Source, Byproduct, & Spec. Nu. Mat., & Attachment One
ML053480146
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/22/2005
From: Chris Miller
NRC/NMSS/IMNS
To: Brach E, Camper L, Jun Lee, Pierson R, Reamer C, Rothschild T, Schlueter J
NRC/NMSS/DHLWRS, NRC/NMSS/DWMEP, NRC/NMSS/FCSS, NRC/NMSS/SFPO, NRC/OGC, NRC/OIP, NRC/STP
FPC
Shared Package
ML053480073 List:
References
RIS-05-031
Download: ML053480146 (8)


See also: RIS 2005-31

Text

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001

December 22, 2005

NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY 2005-31

CONTROL OF SECURITY-RELATED SENSITIVE UNCLASSIFIED NON-

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION HANDLED BY INDIVIDUALS, FIRMS,

AND ENTITIES SUBJECT TO NRC REGULATION OF THE USE OF

SOURCE, BYPRODUCT, AND SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL

ADDRESSEES

All licensees, certificate holders, applicants, and other entities (hereafter referred to as

licensees and others) subject to regulation by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

of the use of source, byproduct, and special nuclear material, except for those as covered by

provisions of Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) 2005-26 for nuclear power reactors.

INTENT

This RIS sets forth procedures that licensees and others are encouraged to follow when

handling documents and/or when submitting documents to the NRC that contain security-

related sensitive information, other than classified or safeguards information, that could be

useful, or could reasonably be expected to be useful, to a terrorist in a potential attack.

Attached to this RIS are screening criteria that licensees and others should use to identify

security-related sensitive information.

No specific action nor written response is required.

BACKGROUND

NRC traditionally has given the public access to a significant amount of information about the

facilities and materials the Agency regulates. Openness has been and remains a cornerstone

of NRCs regulatory philosophy. The Atomic Energy Act, subsequent legislation, and various

NRC regulations have given the public the right to participate in the licensing and oversight

process for NRC licensees. To participate in a meaningful way, the public must have access to

information about the design and operation of regulated facilities and use of nuclear materials.

However, NRC and other Government agencies have always withheld some information from

public disclosure for reasons of security, personal privacy, or commercial or trade secret

protection.

ML053480073

RIS 2005-31

Page 2 of 5

In the post-September 11, 2001, environment, NRC, like many other agencies, has found it

necessary to be more judicious in determining what information to voluntarily release, so as not

to inadvertently provide assistance to those who might use certain information for malevolent

acts. NRC has issued orders and advisories and taken specific actions regarding the security

of its licensed facilities and has also assessed and revised its policies and practices for making

information available to the public. One of the actions NRC took was to suspend public access

to documents in its electronic Agency-wide Documents Access and Management System

(ADAMS) on October 25, 2004. Subsequently, NRC screened those documents to determine

whether they contained security-related sensitive information. Based on this screening, a large

number of documents were returned to public access in ADAMS. This screening process

continues as requests for specific documents are received and as new documents are created

by NRC and received from licensees and others.

To facilitate this screening process, NRC has developed screening criteria for conducting its

reviews. In November 2005, NRC issued guidance (NRC RIS 2005-26) for assessing whether

documents associated with reactor licensees should be made publicly available. As part of the

continuing efforts in this area, NRC has now developed the attached criteria for screening from

public disclosure security-related sensitive information associated with various NRC-regulated

activities of persons handling source, byproduct, and special nuclear material.

This RIS and its attachments do not apply to classified information or Safeguards Information.

Classified information (Confidential, Secret, Top Secret) is withheld from the public by law.

Safeguards Information is withheld because it provides details of security measures at nuclear

facilities. Handling requirements for classified information and Safeguards Information are set

forth in various NRC orders, regulations, and generic communications (e.g., requirements for

the handling and protection of Safeguards Information are discussed in RIS-2003-08,

Protection of Safeguards Information from Unauthorized Disclosure, dated April 30, 2003).

Sensitive (but unclassified, non-safeguards) information covers a range of information for which

the loss, misuse, modification, or unauthorized access can reasonably be foreseen to harm the

public interest, commercial or financial interests of an entity, the conduct of NRC and Federal

Programs, or the personal privacy of individuals. As noted above, this RIS covers security-

related information which, if released, could cause harm to the public interest as it could be

useful, or could reasonably be expected to be useful, to a terrorist in a potential attack.

Specifically, information that should be protected under this RIS is described in Attachment 2.

In addition, licensees and others should use the procedures set forth below to protect

information designated for protection by other federal, State, or local agencies.

SUMMARY OF ISSUE

This RIS:

1) Informs licensees and others of the screening criteria that NRC uses to identify and

protect security-related sensitive information in documents generated by the Agency

and in documents received from licensees and others;

2) Encourages licensees and others to identify security-related sensitive information

contained in documents submitted to NRC, by using the screening criteria in

Attachment 2 and marking procedures; and

RIS 2005-31

Page 3 of 5

3) Encourages licensees and others that may possess security-related sensitive

information to control the information, to limit the risk that the information might fall into

the hands of those who would use it for malevolent acts.

Specifically, protection of the information should be implemented in the following manner:

1. Screening of Future Documents Submitted to NRC

To assure that future submittals containing security-related sensitive information are not

made publicly available in ADAMS, while still making other appropriate information

available to the public, NRC is encouraging licensees and others to screen submittals in

accordance with the guidance in Attachment 2. If practical, documents submitted to

NRC should avoid including security-related sensitive information to permit releasing the

document to the public in its entirety.

2. Marking and Submitting Documents Containing Security-Related Sensitive Information

If it is necessary to include security-related sensitive information in a submitted

document, the submittal should be marked to indicate the presence of such information

as follows:

a) The cover letter should clearly state that the attached documents contain

security-related sensitive information. When separated from the attached

documents, if the cover letter itself does not contain security-related sensitive

information, the cover letter itself is uncontrolled.

b) As shown in Attachment 1 (Section A), the top of every page of a letter or

document that contains security-related sensitive information should include the

marking Security-Related Information Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390 (note

that NRCs procedure for these documents is to mark them as Official Use Only

- Security-Related Information). For the pages having security-related sensitive

information, an additional marking (e.g., an editorial notebox) should be included

adjacent to the material meeting the screening criteria in Attachment 2.

Information on suggested handling and methods of submittal of security-related

sensitive information is also contained in Attachment 1 (Section B).

Licensees and others can submit both a public and a non-public version of a document,

when security-related documents need to be submitted. The public version could have

the security-related sensitive information marked out or removed with a notation that

the information was withheld on the basis that it is Security-Related Information. This

is similar to what is sometimes done to protect proprietary information under 10 CFR

2.390, except that an affidavit is not needed. Alternatively, security-related sensitive

information could be segregated from the main body of the document and included only

in attachments to the submittal. Only the attachments containing security-related

sensitive information would be marked for withholding from public disclosure. Using this

approach, the public version need not be marked as containing security-related sensitive

information.

RIS 2005-31

Page 4 of 5

3. Protection of Security-Related Sensitive Information

Documents that contain security-related sensitive information should be protected from

public disclosure, using methods similar to that for protecting proprietary information.

To the extent practicable, any existing documents containing security-related sensitive

information that licensees or others have previously made available to the public should

be withdrawn from public access. As with proprietary information, licensees and others

should have sufficient internal controls to prevent release of information. Possible

methods to prevent the inadvertent release of security-related sensitive information

include marking documents Security-Related Information - Withhold Under 10 CFR

2.390, restricting access to electronic recordkeeping systems that contain such

information, and controlling the reproduction, distribution, and destruction of potentially

sensitive records. Licensees and others should ensure that similar controls are in place

when security-related sensitive information is provided to outside parties such as

contractors or other Government agencies, and that the information is made available

only to such parties who have a need to know the information to perform their jobs and

who are made aware of the security-related nature of the information.

This RIS, the attached screening criteria, and additional explanatory material, as appropriate,

are also posted on the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/sensitive-info.html)

(note that the criteria for fuel cycle facilities in this website and in this RIS supercedes

information at http://www.nrc.gov/materials/fuel-cycle-fac/review-criteria-fuel-cycle.html).

The NRC staff will interact with licensees and others on a case-by-case basis to resolve

questions regarding the application of the procedures and screening criteria set forth in this RIS

and its attachments.

NRC will continue to make available to the public as much information as possible. Much of

NRCs information is readily available to the public via the NRC Web site (www.nrc.gov) and

NRCs ADAMS system (www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html). In addition, other information

may be released to the public in response to formal and/or informal requests. Although the

security-related sensitive information screening criteria were developed with the principles of

the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in mind, a review for security-related sensitive

information does not substitute for a FOIA review. FOIA requests will continue to be reviewed

and processed independently from the security-related sensitive information review process.

BACKFIT DISCUSSION

This RIS requires no action nor written response and is, therefore, not a backfit under 10 CFR 70.76, 72.62, or 76.76. Consequently, the NRC staff did not perform a backfit analysis.

FEDERAL REGISTER NOTIFICATION

A notice of opportunity for public comment on this RIS was not published in the Federal

Register because it is informational and does not represent a departure from current regulatory

requirements and practice.

RIS 2005-31

Page 5 of 5

SMALL BUSINESS REGULATORY ENFORCEMENT FAIRNESS ACT OF 1996

NRC has determined that this action is not subject to the Small Business Regulatory

Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996.

PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT

This RIS does not contain information collections and, therefore, is not subject to the

requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.).

Please direct any questions about this matter to the technical contacts listed below.

/RA/

Charles L. Miller, Director

Division of Industrial and Medical

Nuclear Safety

Office of Nuclear Material Safety

and Safeguards

Technical Contacts:

Spent Fuel Storage and

Materials IMNS/Regional Transportation Fuel Cycle

Paul Goldberg, NMSS/IMNS Joe Sebrosky, NMSS/SFPO Patricia Silva, NMSS/FCSS

301-415-7842 301-415-1132 301-415-8029

E-mail: pfg@nrc.gov E-mail: jms3@nrc.gov E-mail: pas6@nrc.gov

Decommissioning HLWRS Import/Export

Ted Carter, NMSS/DWMEP Alexander Sapountzis Stephen Dembek

301-415-6668 301-415-7822 301-415-2342

E-mail: thc1@nrc.gov E-mail: aps@nrc.gov E-mail: sxd@nrc.gov

Attachments:

1. Suggested Markings; Withhold From Public Disclosure in Accordance With 10 CFR 2.390

2. NMSS Guidance on Screening Criteria for Security-Related Sensitive Unclassified Non-

Safeguards Information

3. List of Recently Issued NMSS Generic Communications

RIS 2005-31

Page 5 of 5

SMALL BUSINESS REGULATORY ENFORCEMENT FAIRNESS ACT OF 1996

NRC has determined that this action is not a rule and thus is not subject to the Small Business

Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996.

PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT

This RIS does not contain information collections and, therefore, is not subject to the

requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.).

Please direct any questions about this matter to the technical contacts listed below.

/RA/

Charles L. Miller, Director

Division of Industrial and Medical

Nuclear Safety

Office of Nuclear Material Safety

and Safeguards

Technical Contacts:

Spent Fuel Storage and

Materials IMNS/Regional Transportation Fuel Cycle

Paul Goldberg, NMSS/IMNS Joe Sebrosky, NMSS/SFPO Patricia Silva, NMSS/FCSS

301-415-7842 301-415-1132 301-415-8029

E-mail: pfg@nrc.gov E-mail: jms3@nrc.gov E-mail: pas6@nrc.gov

Decommissioning HLWRS Import/Export

Ted Carter, NMSS/DWMEP Alexander Sapountzis Stephen Dembek

301-415-6668 301-415-7822 301-415-2342

E-mail: thc1@nrc.gov E-mail: aps@nrc.gov E-mail: sxd@nrc.gov

Attachments:

1. Suggested Markings; Withhold From Public Disclosure in Accordance With 10 CFR 2.390

2. NMSS Guidance on Screening Criteria for Security-Related Sensitive Unclassified Non-

Safeguards Information

3. List of Recently Issued NMSS Generic Communications

DISTRIBUTION:

ML053480073

OFFICE IMNS/RGB IMNS/MSIB TECH ED IMNS/RGB IMNS/RGB

NAME FCardile AMcIntosh EKraus CAbrams SMoore

DATE 12/12/05 12/15/05 12/8/05 12/20/05 12/21/05

OFFICE D:SFPO D:FCSS D:HLWRS D:DWMEP OIS

NAME WBrach RPierson WReamer LCamper BShelton

DATE 12/19/05 12/20/05 12/19/05 12/19/05 12/20/05

OFFICE D:IP D:STP NSIR OGC D:IMNS

NAME JDunnLee JSchlueter MWeber TRothschild CMiller

DATE 12/20/05 12/21/05 12/19/05 12/16/05 12/22/05

Attachment 1

RIS-2005-31

Page 1 of 2

SUGGESTED MARKINGS AND HANDLING

This attachment provides information on suggested markings for pages of a document that

contains security-related sensitive information (Section A) and suggested handling of such

documents (Section B).

A. Page Markings

Overall page marking on the top of all pages of

a document that contains security-related

sensitive information

Security-Related Information Note that a cover letter should clearly state

Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390 that attached documents contain security-

related sensitive information - - However,

this marking is also needed on the cover

letter only if it itself contains security-

related sensitive information.

Subject

Ensure Subject Line is non-sensitive

XXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXX

Attachment 1

RIS-2005-31

Page 2 of 2

B. Appropriate Controls for Handling Documents

Access: Need-to-know in order to perform official licensee, applicant or

entity functions.

Storage: Openly within licensee, applicant, or other entity facilities with

electronic or other access controls, for example, key cards,

guards, alarms.

Mail: U.S. Postal Service first class mail, registered mail, express mail,

or certified mail in single opaque envelope with no external

markings to indicate 10 CFR 2.390 contents.

Electronic Transmission: Over phone if the recipient is confirmed as being authorized to

access the information; over facsimile if it is confirmed that a

recipient who is authorized to access the information will be

present to receive the transmission; over encrypted computer e-

mail (using computer software such as SecureZip).

Note that NRC is using SecureZip when transmitting security-

related sensitive information by e-mail to licensees and others to

encrypt electronic information. Users will be prompted for a

password to access a free download of the reader.