ML052930317

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Meeting with Florida Power and Light, Enclosure 2, Proposed Amendment for Spent Fuel Pool Boraflex Remedy (TAC Mc 8424 and TAC Mc 8425)
ML052930317
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/19/2005
From: Moroney B
NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD2
To:
Florida Power & Light Co
Moroney B, NRR/DLPM, 415-3974
Shared Package
ML052930043 List:
References
TAC MC8424, TAC MC8425
Download: ML052930317 (24)


Text

FPL NRC-FPL Meeting Turkey Point License Amendment Request Spent Fuel Pool Boraflex Remedy (Metamic Inserts and Storage Rules)

October 19, 2005 Enclosure 2

FPL Fuel Storage Organization

  • Fuel Storage Projects

- Carl Bible - Manager

- Glenn Adams - Project Licensing

- Yuan Kao - Project Engineer

- Pete Sharp - Project Engineer, nuclear criticality

- Carl O'Farrill - Supervisor, Nuclear Fuels

  • Plant Staff
  • Paul Czaya - Turkey Point licensing
  • Bob Tomonto - Reactor Engineering 2

Spent Fuel Storage Status Loss of Full Core Reserve (LOFCR)

Y LOFCR ISFSI Date Start Const First Load PSL Unit 1 2008 2006 2007 PSL Unit 2 2010 2006 2009 PTN Unit 3 2010 2007 2009 PTN Unit 4 2012 2007 2010 Seabrook 2009 2006 2008 3

Turkey Point Boraflex Remedy lW

  • Meeting Objectives

- Brief NRC Staff on license amendment request

  • Facilitate review
  • Preliminary Staff comments
  • Reduce RAIs, rules of engagement
  • Address current SFP Boraflex status

- Staff concurrence on review schedule 4

Turkey Point Background

  • Gamma-induced Boraflex degradation

- Potential loss of reactivity hold-down

  • 2nd Areal density (BADGER) test in 2004

- Racks continue to meet design basis reqmts

- Administrative controls to manage dose on high duty racks

  • New Cask Area Racks (Boral) not affected 5

Project Objectives

  • Maintain spent fuel pool storage capacity
  • Eliminate reliance on Boraflex

- Ensure rack reactivity margin

- Eliminate Boraflex surveillance testing

  • Minimize fuel moves

- Westinghouse fuel assembly top nozzle issue

  • Flexibility in reactivity management

- Variety of storage patterns, inserts 6

Project Scope

  • License Amendment Request

- New rack loading patterns o disperses high-reactivity fuel

- Metamic inserts (neutron absorber)

- TS Program to evaluate other configurations

  • Fuel movement campaign

- Several hundred fuel moves per pool

- Approximately 500 Metamic inserts per pool 7

Metamic Inserts

  • Metamic panels

- formed or welded

- chevron shape

  • Aluminum head
  • Full length
  • 24 lbs each
  • Inserted around fuel 8

Metamic Inserts N-

  • Supplier Holtec

- Metamic LLC

  • Quality Assurance
  • Mill oxidized finish 9

Fuel Loading Patterns FIGURE 5.5-2 ALLOWABLE REGION 11STORAGE PATTERNS I

DEFINITION1. 4 ILLUSTRATIO N12-34 Region 112x2 Array 1IA Category 11-1 assembly in three of every four cells:

One of every four cells is empty (water-filled).

Region 112x2 Array Il-B Category 11-2 assembly in every cell: Two of every four cells contain a Metamic insert (or full length RCCA in the assembly).

112 11-2 II 11 l.2 11-2 Region 112x2 Array Il-C Checkerboard pattern of Category 11-3 and 11-E assemblies:

One of every four cells contains a Metamic insert (or full length X Metamic inserts (or RCCAs) may be in Rftj 11-3 or 11-E cells.

Region 112x2 Array ll-D Category 11-4 assembly in every cell: One of every four

&#U contains a Metamic insert (or full length RCCA in the 1V1 Lfj14

=vOW.

10

Schedule Objectives

  • Timely restoration of SFP reactivity margin

- Currently meets reqmts, but degrading

  • Preclude next Boraflex test (2007)

- If possible

  • Continue to meet storage requirements

- Not affecting full core reserve at this time 11

Schedule Submit LAR Early 2006 RAI (if needed) 8 mos after submittal Amendment 12 mos after submittal Implementation During 2007 *

  • Date negotiable. Interim configurations comply with old and new TS.

12

LAR Preparation

. Modeled after St. Lucie Boraflex Remedy

  • Unit 1 amendment 193 (9/23/2004)
  • Applied other precedent e RAI historical review

. Holtec -QA vendor

  • NSHC compliant with RIS 2001 -22 13

LAR Structure

  • Wraparound Evaluation by FPL
  • Roadmap of evaluation, analysis
  • Information to supplement Holtec Report
  • FPL (non-Holtec) evaluations
  • Specific discussion of precedent
  • Specific discussion of related RAls
  • Holtec Report
  • NSHC, EIC, TS Markup, Bases 14

Applicable Precedent

  • Administrative controls - loading patterns

- St. Lucie Unit 1, Unit 2

  • Use of Metamic in Spent Fuel Pools

-Topical Evaluation 6/17/2003

  • Use of rack inserts in Spent Fuel Pools ANO submittal review 15

Affected Tech Specs

  • LCO - Refueling Boron Concentration

. LCO - Spent Fuel Storage

  • Establish new fuel loading reqmts per TS 5.5
  • Relocate max fuel enrichment to TS 5.5
  • Design Featu res Fuel Storage Criticality
  • Describe new fuel loading patterns
  • Describe use of rack and fuel inserts
  • Alternative loading patterns per NRC methodology 16

Physical Changes Evaluated

  • More complex loading patterns
  • Significant fuel movement campaign
  • Metamic inserts reduce water inventory
  • Metamic inserts reduce local convective flow
  • Metamic inserts change seismic response
  • Metamic potential for adverse chem reaction
  • Metamic insertion may damage fuel
  • Metamic surveillance requirements 17

Structural Evaluation

. Metamic inserts into racks

  • contribute < 0.1% of gross wt on slab
  • Whole Pool Multi-Rack WPMR Analysis
  • (DYNARACK)
  • Previously-NRC-accepted method 18

Thermal-Hydraulic Evaluation

  • Bulk THA - displaced water within margins
  • Local THA

- Metamic insert blocks two side flow channels

- Computational Fluid Dynamics analysis

- Local water temp peak is 206°F (<241 OF sat.)

- Peak clad temp is 2509 F (>241 OF sat.)

  • insufficient heat flux for DNB 19

Criticality M

  • Experienced vendor (Holtec International)

- Soluble boron credit for Keff 0.95 is 560 ppm or less

  • Previously-accepted codes, uncertainty methods

- Explicit 3D analysis of fuel/rack geometry (MCNP4a)

- Fuel burnup isotopics calculated (CASMO-4) 20

Criticality Review

  • Loading patterns, correlation table
  • Previous RAls incorporated:

- Criticality criterion 10 CFR 50.68(b)

- Sample Keff calculation

- Quality controls on fuel, materials

- Verification of calculated burnup

- Integrity of RCCAs for neutron absorption

- Configuration control on inserts

- Unit differences

- Managing new fuel types

  • Boron Dilution Event (bounded) 21

Materials - Metamic Guidance

  • Metamic Surveillance Program
  • Inspect inservice inserts, not coupons
  • B-1 0 composition, distribution assured by QA/QC
  • Simulation of scratches (monitor actual scratches)
  • Frequency (start within 48 mos. of service)
  • Tests (visual)
  • Mill oxidized finish, not anodized
  • Cleaning technique - glass beading e Limitation of 31 wt percent boron carbide 22

Proposed Rules of Engagement

  • FPL extensive use of precedent
  • FPL consideration of previous RAls
  • FPL points of contact for Staff questions

- Example - Metamic insert tolerance

  • One RAI within 8 months

- LIC-1 01 threshold for formal questions 23

Summary

  • Summary

- Comprehensive analyses per guidance

- Previously-approved methods, precedent

- One-year review schedule

- Potential for future TS Program for fuel storage

- Proposed rules of engagement

  • Questions / Followup Items 24