ML052580305
| ML052580305 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 04/01/2004 |
| From: | NRC Region 1 |
| To: | |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2004-0314, RI-2004-A-0035 | |
| Download: ML052580305 (2) | |
Text
q:1a1legqpaneI120040035arb.wpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: IRI-2004-A-0035 Branch Chief (AOC):
Glenn Meyer I
Site/Facility:
Salem Acknowledged:
Yes ARB Date:
April 1, 2004 Confidentiality Granted:
Yes Issue Discussed: The alleger indicated that continuing problems with switchgear room ventilation including access to and from the relay rooms could result in high differential pressure across doors that could impact accessibility to safety-related component areas in the event of a fire or other transientlevent.
Alleger contacted prior to referral to licensee?
lYes llNo llN/A I X ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS:
l H
Attendees:X Chair:
Blough Br. Chief (AOC):
Meyer
_SAC:
Vito 01 Rep:
Wilson RI Counsel:
Farrar Others:
Crlenjak, Barber Disposition Actions:
(List actions for processing and closure. Note responsible person(s), form of action closure document(s), and estimated completion dates.)
- 1.
Acknowledgment letter Responsible Person:
SAC ECD:
4/6/04 Closure Documentation:
Completed:
- 2.
Refer issue to PSEG. DRP to provide words for Enclosure 1 to referral letter.
Responsible Person: J P63 ECD:
4/20/04 Closure Documentation:
Completed:
- 3.
Repanel after PSEG response.
Responsible Person:
SAC ECD:
6/04/04 Closure Documentation:
Completed:
- 4.
Contact the alleger to ascertain if they object to referral of issue(s). Provide documentation of response from alleger to SAC for file.
Responsible Person: SAC ECD:
416/04 Closure Documentation:
Completed:
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT Provide narrative assessment of safety significance; should be commensurate with estimated action plan completion dates.
The initial safety significance of this issue is low since no specific door or system inadequacy was listed as being affected and because of the low probability of an event that would require timely access to various plant compartments.
PRIORITY OF 01 INVESTIGATION I
IQ.
v
.4W
- High I
l Normal l
Low.
l l
If potential discrimination or wrongdoing and 01 is not opening a case, provide rationale here (e.g. no prima fade, lack of specific indication of wrongdoing):
Rationale used to defer 01 discrimination case (DOL case in progress):
ENFORCEMENT STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS CONSIDERATION (only applies to wrongdoing matters (including discrimination issues) that are under investigation by 01. DOL. or DOJ):
What is the potential violation and regulatory requirement?
When did the potential violation occur?
(Assign action to determine date, if unknown)
Once date of potential violation is established, SAC will assign AMS action to have another ARB at four (4) years from that date, to discuss enforcement statute of limitations issues.
NOTES: (Include other pertinent comments. Also include considerations related to licensee referral, if appropriate. Identify any potential generic issues)
Distribution: Panel Attendees, Regional Counsel, 01, Responsible Individuals (original to SAC)