ML052570390
| ML052570390 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 11/27/2002 |
| From: | NRC Region 1 |
| To: | |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2004-0314, RI-2002-A-0137 | |
| Download: ML052570390 (2) | |
Text
g:\\alleg\\panel\\20020137arb2.wpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD REVISED ARB FORM - 1213102 Allegation No.: RI-2002-A-0137 Site/Facility-Salem ARB Date:
11/27/2002 Branch Chief (AOC): Meyer Acknowledged: Yes Confidentiality Granted: No Issue discussed: Alleger contends that bolting being installed (Hilti bolts) to support a modification in which cable trays are being covered with fire wrap material, will not hold up the cable trays due to added weight of the fire wrap material. Alleger forwarded new information on the technical issues on November 12, 2002 Alleger contends he was harassed for raising this concern. Alleger is also concerned that he will be suspended by NPS, and that this will negatively affect his ability to get work at other nuclear facilities in the near future. Alleger also indicated that he has been put on undesirable jobs since raising his concern.
Alleger contacted prior to referral to licensee (if applicable)?
Yes ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees: Chair - Holian Branch Chief (AOC) - Meyer 01 Rep. - Wilson RI Counsel -
Fewell Others -
Crleniak SAC - Vito DISPOSITION ACTIONS: (List actions for processing and closure. Note responsible person(s), form of action closure document(s), and estimated completion dates.)
- 1)
Review additional information provided by alleger on November 12, 2002 and during telephone contact on November 26, 2002, to determine content of referral letter. Prepare referral letter enclosure.
Responsible Person: Mever/Lew Closure Documentation:
ECD: 12/18/2002 Completed:_
- 2)
Ol/DRS to document 11/26/02 phone call.
Responsible Person: Wilson/Lew/Chaudary Closure Documentation:
ECD: 121612002 Completed:_
- 3)
Await licensee response Responsible Person: Meyer Closure Documentation:
ECD: 1/17/2003 Completed:_
- 4)
Review licensee response Responsible Person: Mever/Lew Closure Documentation:
ECD: 1/31/2003 Completed:
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT: The risk significance of this concern appears low since additional bolting could be added at a later date, if needed.
\\
ARB MINUTES ARE REVIEWED AND APPROVED AT THE ARB
t 2
PRIORITY OF 01 INVESTIGATION:
If potential discrimination or wrongdoing and 01 is not opening a case, provide rationale here (e.g., no prima facie, lack of specific indication of wrongdoing):
Rationale used to defer 01 discrimination case (DOL case in progress):
Alleger asserts that some of the reprimands he receive were justified because of a self admitted absentee problem, while the other reprimand are based on an overly critical subjective judgement of his workmanship on the job by his supervisor.
ENFORCEMENT STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS CONSIDERATION (only applies to wrongdoing matters (Includina discrimination Issues) that are under investigation by 01. DOL, or DOJ):
What is the potential violation and regulatory requirement?
When did the potential violation occur?_
(Assign action to determine date, if unknown)
Once date of potential violation is established, SAC will assign AMS action to have another ARB at four (4) years from that date, to discuss enforcement statute of limitations issues.
NOTES: (Include other pertinent comments. Also include considerations related to licensee referral, if appropriate. Identify any potential generic issues)
Distribution: Panel Attendees, Regional Counsel, 01, Responsible Individuals (original to SAC)