ML052570363

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Allegation Review Board Disposition Record, Allegation No. RI-2002-A-0137, Salem
ML052570363
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 01/22/2003
From:
NRC Region 1
To:
References
FOIA/PA-2004-0314, RI-2002-A-0137
Download: ML052570363 (2)


Text

. , - 4 g:\alleg\panel\20020137arb3.wpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2002-A-0137 Branch Chief (AOC): Meyer Site/Facility: Salem Acknowledged: Yes ARB Date: 1/22/2003 Confidentiality Granted: No Issue discussed: DRS to discuss potential SSW issue related to alleger communicating planned FFD testing of alleger's friend and their actions to ensure that individual would not be "for cause FFD tested."

Alleger contacted prior to referral to licensee (if applicable)? Not Asked ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees: Chair - Blouah Branch Chief (AOC) - Barber (Act) SAC - Urban. Vito 01 Rep. - Monroe. Neff RI Counsel - Fewell Others - Crleniak. Lew. Pindale DISPOSITION ACTIONS: (List actions for processing and closure. Note responsible person(s), form of action closure document(s), and estimated completion dates.)

1. 01 will gather information related to potential Part 26 violation.

Responsible Person: Wilson ECD: TBD Closure Documentation: Completed:

2. Repanel after 01 gathers information Part 26 information.

Responsible Person: SAC ECD: TBD Closure Documentation: ____ Completed:

3. Open new allegation file # on technical issues derived from the 01 transcript. (bayou4 -2.oO3-A-Ooo Responsible Person: Panel Decision ECD:

Closure Documentation: Completed: 1/22/03

4. Acknowledgment letter Responsible Person: SAC ECD: 2/21/03 Closure Documentation: Completed:_
5. Refer new issues to the licensee. DRP to provide words for Enclosure 1 to referral letter.

Responsible Person: Meyer ECD: 02/05/03 Closure Documentation: Completed:_

SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT: Low - typical installations have substantial safety margins.

PRIORITY OF 01 INVESTIGATION:

I.,'

If potential discrimination or wrongdoing and 01 is not opening a case, provide rationale here (e.g., no prima facie, lack of specific indication of wrongdoing):

Rationale used to defer 01 discrimination case (DOL case in progress): ,Fiji ARB MINUTES ARE REVIEWED AND APPROVED AT THE ARB

    • L - .

2 ENFORCEMENT STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS CONSIDERATION (only applies to wrongdoing matters (including discrimination issues) that are under investigation by 01. DOL. or DOJ):

What is the potential violation and regulatory requirement?

When did the potential violation occur?

(Assign action to determine date, if unknown)

Once date of potential violation is established, SAC will assign AMS action to have another ARB at four (4)years from that date, to discuss enforcement statute of limitations issues.

NOTES: (Include other pertinent comments. Also include considerations related to licensee referral, if appropriate. Identify any potential generic issues)

Distribution: Panel Attendees, Regional Counsel, 01, Responsible Individuals (original to SAC)

tti'