ML052570175

Allegation Review Board Disposition Record, Allegation No. RI-2002-A-0034

ML052570175
Person / Time
Site:	Salem
Issue date:	05/29/2002
From:	NRC Region 1
To:
References
FOIA/PA-2004-0314, RI-2002-A-0034
Download: ML052570175 (2)

Text

g:\alleg\panel\20020034arb1.wpdALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2002-A-0034 Branch Chief (AOC): Meyer Site/Facility: Salem 2 Acknowledged: Yes ARB Date: 5/29/2002 Confidentiality Granted: No Issue discussed: Adeauacv of PSEG response to concern regarding their refusal to provide a whole body count record to an former contract emolovee and the alleger's assertion that they are covering up the incident and the resulting exposures to workers.

Alleger contacted prior to referral to licensee (if applicable)? Yes ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees: Chair - Blouah Branch Chief (AOC) - Barkley (Act) SAC - Vito 01 Rep. - Teator RI Counsel - Fewell Others - Crleniak, McFadden, Nimitz DISPOSITION ACTIONS: (List actions for processing and closure. Note responsible person(s),

form of action closure document(s), and estimated completion dates.)

1) DRS (Furia/Nimitz) to confirm what HP records were actually provided to the alleger and what records are required to be provided by law. If records required by 19.13 were not provided to the alleger as required, resolve this enforcement issue as necessary.

Responsible Person: Furia/Nimitz ECD: 6/14/2002 Closure Documentation: DRS Inspection Feeder Completed:

2) Upon completion of the above action, issue a closeout letter to the alleger. DRP/DRS to provide words for Enclosure 1 to closeout letter.

Responsible Person: Mever/JWhite ECD: 6/30/2002 Closure Documentation: Completed:_

SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT: The risk significance of this allegation is very low based on the NRC's past inspection of the HP incident in question and the lack of a current performance issue in the HP area.

PRIORITY OF 01 INVESTIGATION: N/A If potential discrimination or wrongdoing and O is not opening a case, provide rationale here (e.g., no prima facie, lack of specific indication of wrongdoing):

Rationale used to defer 01 discrimination case (DOL case in progress):

ENFORCEMENT STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS CONSIDERATION (only applies to wrongdoing matters (including discrimination issues) that are under investigation by Ol. DOL. or DOJ):

What is the potential violation and regulatory requirement?

When did the potential violation occur?

Once date of potential violation is established, SAC will assign AMS action to have another ARB at four (4) years from that date, to discuss enforcement statute of limitations issues.

ARB MINUTES ARE REVIEWED AND APPROVED AT THE ARB

2 NOTES:

Distribution: Panel Attendees, Regional Counsel, 01, Responsible Individuals (original to SAC)