ML052570135
| ML052570135 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 05/08/2002 |
| From: | NRC Region 1 |
| To: | |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2004-0314, RI-2002-A-0064 | |
| Download: ML052570135 (2) | |
Text
\\.
I.. -
t g:\\alleg\\panel\\20020064arbwpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2002-A-0064 Site/Facility: Salem ARB Date:
5/8/02 Branch Chief (AOC):
Meyer Acknowledged: N/A Confidentiality Granted: No Issue discussed: Anonymous - Issues Raised by Security Guards to POGO - oresumed facility is Salem/Hone Creek Alleger contacted prior to referral to licensee (if applicable)?
N/A ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees:
Chair - Lanning Branch Chief(AOC) - Meyer SAC -
Vito 01 Rep. - Letts RI Counsel -
Fewell Others - JWhite. Schorry. Lorson. Barkley, Holodv DISPOSITION ACTIONS:
- 1)
Refer issues that are applicable to the plant to the licensee. DRP/DRS to provide words for Enclosure 1 to referral letter.
Responsible Person: _
Closure Documentation:
Mever/JWhite ECD:
5/13/02 Completed:
- 2)
Review licensee response Responsible Person:
Closure Documentation:
Mlever/JWhite ECD:
6/12/02 Completed:
- 3)
For information purposes, (not as an allegation referral) RI will verbally notify all other Region I plants near the coast of the issues on the POGO website. RI will also inform RII re: the information on the POGO website.
Responsible Person:
Closure Documentation:
J. White ECD:
5/31/02 Completed:
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT: Security issues - training, weapons, equipment.
PIORITY OF O INVESTIGATION:
High-I If potential discrimination or wrongdoing and 01 is not opening a case, provide rationale here (e.g., no prima facie, lack of specific indication of wrongdoing):
Rationale used to defer 01 discrimination case (DOL case in progress):
ENFORCEMENT STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS CONSIDERATION (only anolies to wrongdoing matters (including discrimination issues) that are under investigation by 01, DOL. or DOJ):
What is the potential violation and regulatory requirement?
When did the potential violation occur?_
(Assign action to determine date, if unknown)
Once date of potential violation is established, SAC will assign AMS action to have another
\\
ARB at four (4) years from that date, to discuss enforcement statute of limitations issues.
NOTES: (Include other pertinent comments. Also include considerations related to licensee (/
referral, if anpropriate. Identify any potential generic issues)
J. White contacted POGO on 5/7/02 in an effort to obtain any additional info re: the individuals who raised the issues on the list and the affected sites. POGO would not provide the requested information. POGO agreed to contact the individuals and aporise them that they could contact the NRC. Based on the above, and as noted in the Allegation Receipt Report. as well as information provided by the utility on 5/8/02 to the Regional Administrator that some security guards may have visited POGO. Region I has concluded that the issues most likely refer to Salem/Hope Creek.
Distribution: Panel Attendees, Regional Counsel, 01, Responsible Individuals (original to SAC)