ML052490085
| ML052490085 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Oyster Creek, Hope Creek |
| Issue date: | 11/27/2002 |
| From: | - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2004-0314, RI-2002-A-0144 | |
| Download: ML052490085 (2) | |
Text
-g:\\alleg\\panel\\200201 arb.wpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2002-A-0144 Branch Chief (AOC): Meyer Site/Facility: SalemlHope Creek Acknowledged: No ARB Date:
11127/2002 Confidentiality Granted: No Alleger contacted prior to referral to licensee (if applicable)?
Yes ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees:
Chair - Holian Branch Chief (AOC) - Meyer SAC - Vito 01 Rep. - Wilson RI Counsel -
Fewell Others -
Dimitriadis. Crleniak DISPOSITION ACTIONS: (List actions for processing and closure. Note responsible person(s), form of action closure document(s), and estimated completion dates.)
- 1)
Acknowledgment letter Responsible Person:
SAC ECD: 12/13/2002 Closure Documentation:
Completed:_
- 2)
Refer technical issue to PSEG. DRP to provide enclosure for referral letter.
Responsible Person:
Meyer ECD:
12/18/2002 Closure Documentation:
Completed:
- 3)
Await license response Responsible Person:
Mever/J White ECD:
1/17/2003 Closure Documentation:
Completed:_
- 4)
Review licensee response.
Responsible Person: Mever/J White ECD:
1/31/2003 Closure Documentation:
Completed:
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT: The risk significance of this concern appears low since it is unlikel that a response plan woul [ wl o operate computer equipment.
PRIORITY OF 01 INVESTIGATION:
If potential discrimination or wrongdoing and 01 is not opening a case, provide rationale here (e.g., no prima facie, lack of specific indication of wrongdoing):
Rationale used to defer 01 discrimination case (DOL case in progress):
Information in this rc&.as-.d~el~
EVEE lin accmoardance w
ith thrhe dXV6? 0tl ARE REVIEWED AND APPROVED AT THE ARB Act, exemptions 8-FOIA T
t
?I 2
ENFORCEMENT STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS CONSIDERATION (only applies to wrongdoing matters (including discrimination issues) that are under Investigation by 01. DOL, or DOJ):
What is the potential violation and regulatory requirement?
When did the potential violation occur?_
(Assign action to determine date, if unknown)
Once date of potential violation is established, SAC will assign AMS action to have another ARB at four (4) years from that date, to discuss enforcement statute of limitations issues.
NOTES: (Include other pertinent comments. Also include considerations related to licensee referral, if appropriate. Identify any potential generic issues)
Distribution: Panel Attendees, Regional Counsel, 01, Responsible Individuals (original to SAC)