ML052490074
| ML052490074 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Oyster Creek, Hope Creek |
| Issue date: | 12/17/2002 |
| From: | Johnson S NRC Region 1 |
| To: | |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2004-0314 | |
| Download: ML052490074 (2) | |
Text
..,
U V i1 ' IIL I
?.
.- -Teleph'oneCalI on December 17, 2002
- I reciveda I ephone call from a ecember 17, 2002 at
'call iasted 1 hourand 15-minutes.
- ¢.-z val
>.' v a i ve
'person in hlis words) who works most of the time atte/
'Salemi e.
a o 'lieves harassment a n donhvcotnued sini-i aleainDOL substa'ntated compiaint and enforcement was taken against Salem.
as stated he, In the utalned ano the Jb ond asserts'he was MMr
-r ereport th G
nr fearH of elaon estated b oke thaunion
- person and they. suggested he must report th e
reported th ever G, PSEG attermip ed to con ct the site doctor (Dr. Solomon) but Dr. Solomor iever returned the call. PSEG Infornied the individual he rimust then'go to the emergency room at Salem Hospitl. The irdividual stated h'e didnot want to go to the hospital because he knew exactly what the would do frhim:' lglQied PSEG he Just wanted to go home, he had a ride, and r_
m t The,individual went home.
The Individual stated he received a phonieal 'onDecember.17 '2002,from'a Mr Dave Brown stating that he had falled to call offo nbr 17 2002,,eventhough,he'wassent home with PSEG's knowledge,
as an integrity ofupervisor arenreustd
-persona day to roop from hi in r. Brown acknowledged that request: On"
-December 17, 2002,M1. 11rown e
tom oe'and 's ted
'thded to report being off work, sserts that Mr. Brown hd lied e
bou equest to use a personal day and has lied about othter ssuesithat PSEG has told him that e off recoerig f t,
ecan not leave is house 1
~unless he ca~lls PSEG"rdctdta
~i not ng.pi e off oh 1ave s t
-why does he have to P
cforhe 66u1d leav i
etted th',at if employees would lieaboit lssues they would be fired.
feeels th s does not apply to supervisors - but should; tated that P d
s u s
plicy ndicated that.;
when he again injure i
on te iwas afraid to rep the injury for' fear of retaliatWon.
8 indicated that when h adoes ack to work he knows PSEG will place a'letter in his file regarding his absenteeism:
stated that you can not rise a
'safety (un'pec~fied) or acident (personal injury) iss upervisors because they will lie about the issue tou'pper management. Again,anintityissuewith sup isors.
dicated that recently two persons in-the mainte r dpartment were fired for ess-':
p anid fessiig up. These two individuals were working or valves or pumps. There -
'was a procedure (did not elaboraiebther'than air operated) 'that was nbt followed d when.the two individuals reaized what wa s wrong'they esse d
MIdere terminated.
- i --d;Xl',
jt s.,'a-
- e'Ss d- ;pa werd te q
lnf ori~ation in this'record wa's deleied i,.n accordance with'the Freedom of IO
-0 c-.'exemptions -
r
- -,FOIA --- Z,--
4 2
indicated that there was a chilling effect In the maintenance department. Johnson askedf specifically if it were the whole department... his response was he was chilled because of what PSEG was doing to him with hi-,lr
.. but would assume that others were chilled because of the two recent firings.
Maintenance DeDartment 32 nuke tech mechanics 30 welders 12 machinists ndicated that he believes HR is and has been Iookirqg for a way to fire him.
Johnson aske if he had contacted ECP.
eplied 'no one can go to ECP.' He believes ECP is part of the process to get rid of him.
is tryin to relate what he perceives as H&l back to his Ilegation - but all of hjjs
~are Fnd not safety-related. There has been no adv rae action taken againsti December 18, 2002 9:20 a.m.
Sharon Johnson