ML051740427
| ML051740427 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper  |
| Issue date: | 04/06/2005 |
| From: | Dante Johnson NRC/NSIR/DPR/EPD |
| To: | Dylanne Duvigneaud NRC/NRR/DLPM |
| Honcharik M, NRR/DLPM, 301-415-1774 | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML051810257 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC MC5848 | |
| Download: ML051740427 (7) | |
Text
Dylann Duineu
- Re Cope l
PCag norainPg Dylanne Duvigneaud - Re: Cooper - EP Change lntormatqn Page 1 I From:
Don Johnson To:
Dylanne Duvigneaud Date:
4/6/05 10:25AM
Subject:
Re: Cooper - EP Change Information Hi Dylanne.
Sorry, I just got around to reviewing the information today. I have an additional question based upon my review:
DOES THE EXISTING MPF KAMAN READOUT AND/OR ALARM IN THE CONTROL ROOM? AND IF SO, DOES THE PROPOSED CAM REPLACEMENT DO LIKEWISE? PLEASE PROVIDE TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CHANGE IF THE PROPOSED CAM DOES NOT PROVIDE THE SAME REMOTE ALARM(S) AND INDICATION(S) AS THE EXISTING KAMAN.
Thanks!
Don A. Johnson NSIR/DPR/EPD 301-415-4040
>>> Dylanne Duvigneaud 3/29/2005 4:51:16 PM >>>
Don - Attached is the information you requested for the Cooper EP change. Please let me know if the information is adequate. If not, I can set up another phone call with the licensee. Thanks.
DyLanne Duvigneaud US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Division of Licensing Project Management Project Engineer 301-415-4010
c:\\temp\\GW)00001.TMP Page I 1 c:tm\\G)OO
.TM Pag 1:1..<
Mail Envelope Properties (4253F16E.CDA: 9:11612)
Subject:
Creation Date:
From:
Created By:
Re: Cooper - EP Change Information 4/6/05 10:25AM Don Johnson DAJ3 @nrc.gov Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPOO1.HQGWDO01 DDD (Dylanne Duvigneaud)
Post Office OWGWPOO1.HQGWDO01 Route nrc.gov Files MESSAGE Size 1839 Date & Time 04/06/05 10:25AM Options Expiration Date:
None Priority:
Standard Reply Requested:
No Return Notification:
Send Mail Receipt when Opened Concealed
Subject:
No Security:
Standard
Dlne Duinad-R:R:Coe PCag ai Dylanne Duyigneaud - RE: Re: Cooper - EP Change Page 1 Ml I I I I I
=______J From:
"Sumpter, James R. [Jim]" <jrsumpt@nppd.com>
To:
"Dylanne Duvigneaud" <DDD@nrc.gov>
Date:
4/14/05 4:59PM
Subject:
RE: Re: Cooper - EP Change In response to Don Johnson's question -
In the Operating License Change Request (OLCR) #2000-02, on Page 1, in the section discussing adding the Multi-Purpose Facility (MPF) to Table D3.2.3-1 of the ODAM, the statement is made, "It is prudent, however, that this building effluent be treated with the same degree of rigor with respect to particulates and iodines as the other gaseous effluent pathways". The "rigor" referred to in this statement concerns treating the particulates and iodines in Table D3.2.3-1 with the same rigor as they are treated in other effluent pathways. In this table, all the release paths such as Reactor Building Vent, Elevated Release Point, Augmented Radwaste Building Vent and Turbine Building Vent have similar sample types for iodines and particulates, i.e., Charcoal Sample, Particulate Sample and Composite Particulate Sample.
Therefore, the same sample types were provided in the MPF for particulates and iodines.
The sample types at points other than the MPF were not alarmed. The MPF particulate and gaseous effluent were tied to the same annunciator and alarmed. The reason for this is provided as described on Page XII-2-8 of the USAR (attached). The MPF was originally designed to permit the long-term storage of low level radioactive waste. The perceived potential for gaseous and particulate releases, if long term storage of low level waste were to be incorporated into the MPF building, resulted in the establishment of the alarm in question. Since there are no plans currently or in the foreseeable future to use the MPF for long term storage of low level waste, alarms are no longer necessary.
James R. Sumpter Senior Staff Engineer - Licensing Phone: 402-825-5663 Pager: 402-943-0919
Original Message-----
From: Dylanne Duvigneaud [1]
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 10:01 AM To: Vanderkamp, David W.; Sumpter, James R. [Jim]
Subject:
Fwd: Re: Cooper - EP Change Dave, Jim - The reviewer has one more question regarding Cooper's EP change submittal (attachment).
Let me know if you have any questions.
DyLanne Duvigneaud US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Division of Licensing Project Management Project Engineer 301-415-4010
c:\\temp\\GW}OOOO1.TMP Page 1 I c:\\temp\\GW}00001.TMP Page 1 Il Mail Envelope Properties (425ED98B.B 18:15: 2840)
Subject:
Creation Date:
From:
Created By:
RE: Re: Cooper - EP Change 4/14/05 3:34PM "Sumpter, James R. [Jim]" <jrsumpt@nppd.com>
jrsumpt@nppd.com Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPO0 1.HQGWDO0 1 DDD (Dylanne Duvigneaud)
Post Office OWGWPOO 1.HQGWDO0 1 Route nrc.gov Files MESSAGE Untitled.PDF Mime.822 Options Expiration Date:
Priority:
Reply Requested:
Return Notification:
Concealed
Subject:
Security:
Size 2222 51131 73790 Date & Time 04/14/05 03:34PM None Standard No None No Standard
Dylanne Duvigneaud - FW: Re: Cooper - EP Change Page 1 l From:
"Sumpter, James R. [Jim]" <jrsumpt@nppd.com>
To:
<DDD nrc.gov>
Date:
5/2/05 9:48AM
Subject:
FW: Re: Cooper - EP Change In a conversation with Don Johnson this morning, I indicated that the following change will be made to the USAR once NRC approval is received for the change to the Emergency Plan referenced in the letter from Nebraska Public Power District to the NRC dated January 28, 2005 (NLS2005006).
Chapter XII, Section 2.2.9, the following sentence will be added at the end of this section:
"There are no plans currently or in the foreseeable future for long term storage of low level waste in the MPF".
James R. Sumpter Senior Staff Engineer - Licensing Phone: 402-825-5663 Pager: 402-943-0919
Original Message-----
From: Sumpter, James R. [Jim]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 2:35 PM To: 'Dylanne Duvigneaud'
Subject:
RE: Re: Cooper - EP Change In response to Don Johnson's question -
In the Operating License Change Request (OLCR) #2000-02, on Page 1, in the section discussing adding the Multi-Purpose Facility (MPF) to Table D3.2.3-1 of the ODAM, the statement is made, "It is prudent, however, that this building effluent be treated with the same degree of rigor with respect to particulates and iodines as the other gaseous effluent pathways". The "rigor" referred to in this statement concerns treating the particulates and iodines in Table D3.2.3-1 with the same rigor as they are treated in other effluent pathways. In this table, all the release paths such as Reactor Building Vent, Elevated Release Point, Augmented Radwaste Building Vent and Turbine Building Vent have similar sample types for iodines and particulates, i.e., Charcoal Sample, Particulate Sample and Composite Particulate Sample.
Therefore, the same sample types were provided in the MPF for particulates and iodines.
The sample types at points other than the MPF were not alarmed. The MPF particulate and gaseous effluent were tied to the same annunciator and alarmed. The reason for this is provided as described on Page XII-2-8 of the USAR (attached). The MPF was originally designed to permit the long-term storage of low level radioactive waste. The perceived potential for gaseous and particulate releases, if long term storage of low level waste were to be incorporated into the MPF building, resulted in the establishment of the alarm in question. Since there are no plans currently or in the foreseeable future to use the MPF for long term storage of low level waste, alarms are no longer necessary.
James R. Sumpter Senior Staff Engineer - Licensing Phone: 402-825-5663 Pager: 402-943-0919
Original Message-----
From: Dylanne Duvigneaud [2]
Dylanne Duvigneaud - FW: Re: Cooper - EP Change Page 2 Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 10:01 AM To: Vanderkamp, David W.; Sumpter, James R. [Jim]
Subject:
Fwd: Re: Cooper - EP Change Dave, Jim - The reviewer has one more question regarding Cooper's EP change submittal (attachment).
Let me know if you have any questions.
DyLanne Duvigneaud US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Division of Licensing Project Management Project Engineer 301-415-4010
c:tm\\G}OO.TM Page 11 c:\\temp\\GW)00001.TMP Page.1 1 Mail Envelope Properties (42762F9B.99E :0: 31134)
Subject:
Creation Date:
From:
Created By:
FW: Re: Cooper - EP Change 5/2/05 9:47AM "Sumpter, James R. [Jim]" <jrsumpt@nppd.com>
jrsumpt@nppd.com Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPOO1.HQGWDOO1 DDD (Dylanne Duvigneaud)
Post Office OWGWPO01.HQGWDO01 Route nrc.gov Files MESSAGE Untitled.PDF Mime.822 Options Expiration Date:
Priority:
Reply Requested:
Return Notification:
Concealed
Subject:
Security:
Size 2974 51131 74568 Date & Time 05/02/05 09:47AM None Standard No None No Standard