ML050350086

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Meeting Slides of D.C. Cook Meeting
ML050350086
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 02/07/2005
From:
Indiana Michigan Power Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Lyon C, NRR/DLPM, 415-1292
References
Download: ML050350086 (16)


Text

INDIAN AEP/W NRC Meeting DEC. Cook Unit 1 Fuel Upgrade February 3,2005 1

Agenda / Alignment ARE

  • Cook Unit 1 15x1 5 fretting wear issues
  • Proposed 15x15 Upgrade fuel design
  • LOCA re-analysis commitments
  • Past experience / lessons learned
  • Analyses and methodology changes
  • Technical Specification changes / submittals required
  • Schedule / options
  • NRC feedback 2

INDIANA MICHIGAN PDWER*

Fretting Wear Issues

  • Past Unit 1 fuel rod failures
  • Current 15x1 5 fuel assembly design
  • Proposed 15x15 fuel assembly design Benefit: Design to eliminate (significantly reduce) grid-to-rod fretting as a potential failure mechanism 3

INDIALMA MICHIGAN POWER*

Fuel Design Description

@ Key features of 1 5x1 5 Upgrade design compared to current Cook 15x15 design Modified ZIRLOTM structural mid-grids (line contact vs point

  • contact),

Modified ZIRLOTM IFM grids, and Tube-in-Tube ZIRLOTM guide thimbles 4

J 4z NDSAR POMWELL Licensing Precedence

  • 15x1 5 Upgrade design Licensed under the Westinghouse Fuel Criteria Evaluation Process (FCEP), WCAP-12488-A Per the SER requirements for FCEP, NRC notification required Detailed design aspects in LTR-NRC-04-8, dated February 6, 2004 5

Design Precedence and

-R07 Application

@ Design aspects:

Applicable DNB correlation - WRB-1

  • no change-currently usedl5xl5 V5HN+ Cook Unit 1 Slight decrease in fuel assembly loss coefficients No new methodology required to support the fuel design
  • Current use for full region application
  • Indian Point Unit 2
  • Indian Point Unit 3 6

9NDIANA MICHIGAN BOWER*

Lessons Learned

@ Past fuel transition experience / lessons learned Early dialogue is very beneficial Face-to-face discussions w/ Staff Technical Reviewers is very positive for LAR development I process

  • W / NRC Fuel Performance Meeting (12/7/04)

Only load core with NRC approved fuel design and analyses Schedule pre-application meeting Secure regulatory concurrence with the plan 7

Impact Assessment

  • Minimize changes to current licensing bases

@ Complete assessment of plant impacts

  • Assessment results define the required Analyses/Evaluations Thermal / Hydraulic Analyses Anticipated Operation Occurrence (AOO) Transient Analyses Accident Analyses Special Analyses 8

Analyses / Methodology Changes INDIAim MICHIGAN POWER 9:

WCAP-1 6009-P-A NRC-approved 11/5/2004 Limited Technical Specification change

  • COLR changes expected
  • Balance Cook near-term & long-term goals 9

-8NDEANA Planned NRC Submittals

  • License Amendment Request

- LBLOCA analysis using the NRC-approved ASTRUM methodology

-Add WCAP-16009-P-A (ASTRUM) to Tech Spec reference list for methods used to determine Thermal Limits in COLR

- SBLOCA re-analysis using NOTRUMP

  • Currently used, NRC-approved, Appendix K methodology 10

Options Cycle 21 (Fall '06) implementation - interim Appendix K assessment Preferable for timely resolution of fuel fretting wear WCOBRA/TRAC-based PCT assessment to current Appendix K LBLOCA AOR (BASH Evaluation Model)

ASTRUM analysis of LBLOCA & COLR TS change for WCAP-1 6009-P-A submitted for NRC approval Approval mid-Cycle 21 Cycle 22 (Spring '08) implementation Fuel fretting issue resolution delayed 18 months Approval mid-Cycle 21 Not preferred option - inconsistent with AEP/W standards 11

Transition Core Assessment

  • Use WCOBRA/TRAC to assess transition core effects Line item on BASH Evaluation Model (EM) PCT rack-up sheet
  • Justification

- WCOBRA/TRAC can explicitly model transition effects

  • Loss coefficients
  • Grid heat transfer
  • Code applicability
  • Temporary PCT assessment for a fuel cycle 12

INDIAN Schedule - Fall '06 (Cycle 21, interim App K assessment)

  • Interim Appendix K assessments
  • Fuel reload 50.59 complete
  • Startup U1C21 with 1st reiion Upgraded fuel
  • NRC approval of LAR
  • Startup U1C22 with 2nd region Upgraded fuel

- May-Aug Aug Fall Jan

< Mar

'- Jan Spring 2006 2006 2006 2007 2007 2008 2008 13

INDIAMA MICMIGAM POWERe Schedule - Spring '08 (Cycle 22, ASTRUM LBLOCA)

  • Startup U1 C21 with current fuel product
  • LAR approval Fall 2006 Jan 2007

< Mar 2007

-Jan 2008

  • Startup U 1 C22 with 1 st Upgraded fuel product region Spring 2008 14

NRC Feedback a Presentation addressed:

Fuel design description

- Analyses and methodology changes Technical Specification changes

- Options Schedule 15

INDIANA MICHIGAN POLIVERM Objectives

  • Describe 15x1 5 Upgrade fuel

@ Discuss analyses / methodology to implement

  • Understand NRC submittals required
  • Discuss submittal schedule and options
  • Obtain NRC feedback 16