ML050100048

Init Exam - 12/2003 - Public Forms

ML050100048
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	01/29/2004
From:	Gody A Operations Branch IV
To:	Ray H Southern California Edison Co
References
50-361/03-301, 50-362/03-301 50-361/03-301, 50-362/03-301
Download: ML050100048 (27)

Text

ITEM DESCRIPTION DUE DATE INlT DATE 0

1 17' loutlines reviewed by NRC & Feedback Sent (c.2.h;C.3.e)

I Aug2412003 IGV 1 4 ~ 7 - 3 1 Exam/lnspection Schedule Agreement (C. 1.a;C.2.a&b)

Jun 1 I, 2003 ATG 5/21/2002 NRC Staff & Fac. Contact Assigned (C.l.c;C.2.e)

Jun 11, 2003 ATG 5/21/2002 Jun 11, 2003 MJ 612614 3 2

Facility contact briefed on security & other issues (C.2.c) 3 Corp. Notification Letter Sent (C.2.d) (Exams only)

Juri 11,2003 #$I &jo3 3a Inspection Announcement Letter Sent (PIR & LORT if req'd)

Oct 24, 2003 N I a Sep9,2003 d6/09 14 Task Expectations, Issues, & Standards Discussed w/ BC 5'

[Reference Material Due (C.l.d;C.3.c)]

Aug I O, 2003 v$j

$f?b/03 6'

Integrated Exam Outlines Due (C. 1.d&e;C.3.d)

Aug 10,2003 #J 8/gb3 8'

9' Preliminary Applications Due (C. 1.j;C.2.g;ES202)

Nov 8, 2003 tr/telo3 Draft Exams w/ Doc./Ref. Due (C.l.d/e/f;C.3.d)

Oct 9, 2003 ro/zzfoj 14' 15' NRC Supervisor Approved Final Exams (C.2.i;C.3.h)*

Dec 1, 2003 fkc la(,,l~?

Final Appl. Rec'd & Waivers Sent (C.2.g)

Dec 1, 2003 n/6/69 16' 17 18' 19'

~~~

~

~~

~

~

~

Proctor Rules Reviewed w/ Fac. & Written Authorized (C.3.k)

Dec 1,2003 pg 1 2 /+e Fac. graded exam & Comments Rec'd Dec20, 2003

~2

~ (Z/fS/O 3 Exam/lnsp Material to Team (C.3.i) 1 2003 #?

12/5/03 NRC Written Grading Completed Dec23, 2003

@J 01/&3/09

• Note Supervisor/Peer initials required.

[I Required NRC-auth. exams only.

When complete, for exams, add to pkg & fwd copy to BC, for insp, fwd orig'l to BC.

Last revised 10/15/01 S:\\DRS\\OB\\EXAMS\\GG\\2003-IN-EX\\exam assignment sheet.wpd

Examination Outline Quality Checklist ES-201 Date of Examination: 12/15/2003 Facility:

SONGS Units 2 & 3 Form ES-201-2 I

Task Description (a)

Verify that the outline fits the appropriate model per ES-401 Initials B

Item

1.

W R

I T

T E

N

2.

S I

M

3.

WIT C

A NA NA

~~

~

(b) Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with section D.l of ES-401 and whether all knowledge and ability categories are appropriately sampled Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected WA statements are appropriate (c)

(d)

NA NA NA NA NA NA (a)

Using form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, and major transients Assess whether there are enough scenario sets and spares to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new scenario. Scenarios will not be repeated over successive days.

To the extent possible, assess whether the outline conforms with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D (b)

(c)

(a)

Verify that:

(1) the outline contains the reuired number of control room and in-plant tasks (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination (3)* no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test, and (4) no more than 80% of any operating test is taken directly from the licensees exam banks (b) Verify that:

(l)the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301 (2)one task is conducted in a low power or shutdown condition (3)40% of the tasks require the candidate to implement an alternate path procedure (4)one in-plant task tests the applicants response to an emergency or abnormal condition (5)the in-plant walkthrough requires the applicant to enter the RCA (c)

Verify that the required administrative topics are covered, with emphasis on performance-based activities e

m (d)

Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on successive days.

Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section Assess whether the 10CFR55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate Ensure that WA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5 (a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections Check the entire exam for balance of coverage (f)

Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO)

I.

Author

2.

Facility Reviewer (*)

3 Chief Examiner 4

NRC Supervisor

(*) Not applicable for NRC developed examinations NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 (R8, SI)

Quality Checklist Facility: San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Date of Exam: 15 December 2004 Exam Level: SRO I

than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropria

1.

Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams Question duplication from the license screeninglaudit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or

5.

6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank at least 10 percent new, and the 39 27 34 rest modified); enter the actual question distribution at right

7.

Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory CIA the exam (including 10 new questions) are written at the comprehensionlanalysis level; enter the actual question distribution at right Referenceslhandouts Drovided do not aive awav answers 48 52

8.

a '

fl f%

w N/d

9.

Question content conforms with specific WA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified A

10.

11.

Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet Date

a. Author IO/. i o 3 Thomas F. Stet& %

J&i-

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

NIA

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Regional Supervisor I clI5b 3 Note:

• The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 (R8, SI)

Quality Checklist Facility: San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Date of Exam: 15 December 2004 Exam Level: RC I

Item DescriDtion Initial I T I T

1.

Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility

2.

a. NRC WAS referenced for all questions

3.

b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate per Section D.2.d of ES-401 Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears consistent with a systematic sampling process Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

1.

5.

the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or the examinations were developed independently; or

_. the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain) from the bank at least 10 percent new, and the

6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New 36 31 33 rest modified); enter the actual question distribution at right I

7.

Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the exam (including 10 new questions) are written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the actual auestion distribution at riaht Memory

8.

9.

Referencedhandouts provided do not give away answers Question content conforms with specific WA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified A

Y Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet 4Y IO.

11.

tJh C#

?i??

Date

a. Author

+?/OJ

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

rc.

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Regional Supervisor p!/3!03 Note:

• The facility reviewers initials/signature are not applicablyf6 NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

-acility:

SONGS Unit 2 and 3 Date of Examination: 12/15/2003 Ope

1. GENERAL CRITERIA

1.

The operating test conforms to the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

I.

There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section

j.

Overlap with the written examination and between operating test categories is within acceptable limits.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.

4.

2. WALK-THROUGH (CATEGORY A & B) CRITERIA

3.

Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee specific performance criteria that include:

o o

o o

o o

detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b.

The prescripted questions in Category A are predominantly open reference and meet the criteria in Attachment 1 of ES-301.

Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and does not compromise test integrity.

C.

d.

At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified.

3. SIMULATOR (CATEGORY C) CRITERIA

a.

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

ing Test Number: 1 a

Jm Initials B*

"/A

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor C#

I 1

(*) The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests

(#) Independent NRC reviewer initial items in column "C". Chief Examiner concurrence required.

Facility:

SONGS Unit 2 & 3 Date of Exam 12/15/2003 Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 / 3 Operating Test No.: 1 I I--

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES w

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

2.

3.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptomslcues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

6.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given.

'W (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D)

1.

Total malfunctions (5-8) 6 7

7 1

2 2

2.

3.

Abnormal events (2-4) 3 4

2 1

2 1

2 1

2 0

1 0

2 2

2 Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)

4.

Major transients (1-2)

5.

6.

7.

Critical tasks (2-3)

EOPs enteredlrequiring substantive actions (1-2)

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2)

Initials =E

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Reactivity Normal Instrument/

Component Major OPERATING TEST NO.:

SROl 1 1

1 0

NA 2

2,4,5, 7

1 6

Applicant Type Normal RO/PO 1

1 1

Evolution I

Minimum I Scenario Number I

Instrument/

Component Major As RO or PO SRO-I As SRO 2

2,3,4, 5,7 1

6 8 I

Reactivity I

0 I

I NA I SRO-U Instructions:

(1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution conditions (refer to Section 8.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

1. Pe.

eactivity manipulations ma be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal (2) component malfunctions should be included; insight to the applicant's Author:.

Chief Examiner:

NUREG-I 021, Revision 8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Major 1

As RO or PO SRO-I As SRO Reactivity I

1 Instrument/

Component Major 1

Instructions:

(1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution conditions (refer to Section 8.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

1. Pe.

eactivity manipulations ma be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal (2)

Author:

and component malfunctions should be included; ons that provide insight to the applicant's um requirement.

-zzw# d B

W Chief Examiner:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-30 1 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Component Major OPERATING TEST NO.: RO 1 1

6 6 3 Applicant Type I

Reactivity I

I Evolution I

Minimum I

Scenario Number I

I Normal I

0 I

I I

I 1

1 2

1 3

1 4

l 1

Type I Y U I I I U G I I

Major I

1 I

RO/PO Instrument/

Component I

Reactivity I

I 2

I I

I I

1 Reactivity Normal Instrument/

Component Major I N A I 4 I

1 0

2 1

I Normal I

I I

1 Normal I

I N A I 1

I Instrument/

I SRO-U 4

Reactivity 0

Normal 1

Instrument/

2 Component Major 1

I I

As RO or PO SRO-I As SRO 1

1 Reactivity I

O I

I I

Instructions:

(1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution conditions (refer to Section 8.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

Whenever radical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; gpe.

only those P hat require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants eactivity manipulations ma be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal (2)

(3) toward the minimum requirement.

Author:.

Chief Examiner:

7 - - % c u # a NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: RO 2 Reactivity Normal I nstrumentl Component Major As RO or PO SRO-I As SRO 1

0 2

1 Reactivity Normal I nstrumentl Component Major 0

1 2

1 SRO-U Reactivity Normal Instrument/

0 1

2 Component Major Instructions:

(1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution t pe.

Jeactivity manipulations ma be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section 8.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(2) component malfunctions should be included; hat provide insight to the applicant's um requirement.

Author:.

1 Chief Examiner:

NUREG-I 021. Revision 8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Type OPERATING TEST NO.: RO 3 1

2 3

4 Number Applicant Type Reactivity Normal Instrument/

Component Major RO/PO 1

1 NA 1

NA 1

4 2,4,5, 3,4,7 7

1 6

6,8 I

Evolution I

Minimum 1

Scenario Number I

Reactivity Normal Instrument/

Component 1

0 2

Major As RO or PO SRO-I As SRO 1

I Reactivity I

0 I

I I

I 1

Normal I

1 I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I Instrument/

1 2

I I

1 I

Component I

Major I

1 1

I I

I SRO-U Instructions:

(1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution t pe.

Jeactivity manipulations ma be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section J.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(2 )

malfunctions should be included; insight to the applicants Author:,

Chief Examiner:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Type Reactivity Normal Instrument/

Component Major OPERATING TEST NO.: RO 4 1

2 3

4 Number 1

NA 4

1 1

NA 4

2,3,5 2,4,5 1

6 633 Applicant Type SRO-U ROlPO Reactivity 0

Normal 1

Instrument/

2 Component Major 1

I Evolution I

Minimum I Scenario Number I

As RO or PO SRO-I As SRO Instructions:

(1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution conditions (refer to Section 8.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix n

1. Pe.

eactivity manipulations ma be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal (2)

Author:

malfunctions should be included; insight to the applicants 0

+-j-Chief Examiner:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Reactivity Normal Instrument/

Component Major As RO or PO SRO-I As SRO 1

0 2

1 SRO-U Reactivity 0

Normal 1

Instrument/

2 Component Major 1

Reactivity 0

Normal 1

Instrument/

2 Component Major 1

Instructions:

(1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution conditions (refer to Section 8.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix gPe.

eactivity manipulations ma be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal (2)

Author:

U.

malfunctions should be included; insight to the applicants Chief Examiner: u z l M & $ a NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-30 1 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 SRO-U OPERATING TEST NO.: RO 6 Major 1

6 Reactivity 0

Normal 1

Instrument/

2 Component Major 1

As RO or PO SRO-I As SRO Reactivity 1

Normal 0

Instrument/

2 Component Major 1

Reactivity 0

Normal 1

Instrument/

2 Component Major 1

Instructions:

(1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution conditions (refer to Section 8.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

1. Pe.

eactivity manipulations ma be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal (2 )

malfunctions should be included; insight to the applicant's Author:.

Chief Examiner: Ll-',

d m

NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 2

2,4,5 2,4,5 2,4,5 2,4,5 2,4,5 3

ALL NA NA CREW NRC EXAM Competencies 3

4 1,4 1,4,7 1,4,7 1,3,4

,7 1,3,4

,7 ALL NA NA CRS co ACO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1

1 2

4 Understand and Interpret Annunciators and Alarms Diagnose Events and Conditions Understand Plant and Svstem ResDonse Comply With and Use Procedures (I)

Operate Control Boards (2)

NA NA Communicate and Interact With the Crew Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3) i ALL ALL ALL ALL NA NA -

NA -

NA -

NA NA -

NA Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3) 3 NA -

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applic Author:

1/

Chief Examiner:

NUREG-I 021, Revision 8

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 2

ACO 3,4 3,4,7 3!4 1 A 4

,5 1 2 4

,7,8 ALL NA NA CREW A Competencies 3

4 Understand and Interpret Annunciators and Alarms Diagnose Events and Conditions

,7 1,2,4

,7 Understand Plant and System Response Comply With and Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control Boards (2)

NA Communicate and Interact With the Crew Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)

SURROGATE SROI-1 RO-1 1

CRS ALL ALL 3

SCENARIO SCENARIO CO I l 2 CRS ALL I ALL +

NA I ALL NA I 3,5 Notes:

( I ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

SCENARIO 112 2,3 I 2,4,5 2,3 2,4,5 1,2,3 2,4,5 1,2,3 2,4,5

,8 1-6 ALL NA NA I NA I NA I

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applic Author:

Chief Examiner:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 1

ACO 2 3 2 3 2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3 1-6 NA NA SURROGATE SROI-2 RO-2 CREW B 2

CO 2

2 2

2 2,8 ALL NA NA SCENARIO Understand and Interpret Annunciators and Alarms SCENARIO 2*3,4 Competencies I

SCENARIO Diagnose Events and Conditions 2,3,4

,5,6, 7

Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Comply With and ALL 3

3 ACO 4

1 co 2

CRS 3,4 2 -

2 3,4,7 Understand Plant and System Response I-Use Procedures (1)

Comply With and 1-6 1,3,4 Operate Control Boards (2)

I NA NA ALL Communicate and I ALL Interact With the Crew ALL NA NA NA ALL NA -

NA 3

NA (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every app Author:

Chief Examiner:

NUREG-I 021, Revision 8

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 CREW C Competencies SURROGATE RO-3 RO-4 SCENARIO SC E NARlO SCENARIO I

co 1

ACO 3

4 1

CRS 23,4 2

ACO 2

co 2.4 3,4 2.3 Understand and Interpret Annunciators and Alarms Diagnose Events and Conditions 3,4,7 Understand Plant and System Response 3,4 2.3 Comply With and Use Procedures (1) 1-6 Operate Control Boards (2)

NA Communicate and Interact With the Crew ALL ALL ALL 1

NA ALL NA Demonstrate Supervisory Abilitv (3)

NA -

NA ALL 3

NA NA Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)

NA -

NA Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applic Author:

Chief Examiner:

l/ - 7 Z n A d 4 4 - b NUREG-I 021, Revision 8

ES-301 2

ACO 3,4 3,4,7 3,4 1,3,4

,5 1 A 4

,7,8 ALL NA NA

~

~~

Competencies Checklist 3

4 Form ES-301-6 SURROGATE RO-5 RO-6 CREW D Competencies I

SCENARIO Understand and Interpret 2 7 3 7 4 Annunciators and Alarms Diagnose Events and 2,3,4 Conditions

,5,6, 7

Understand Plant and 2,3,4 System Response 17 Comply With and 1-6 Use Procedures (1 )

Boards (2)

Operate Control NA Communicate and I ALL Interact With the Crew Demonstrate Supervisory ALL Ability (3) l 3 Comply With and Use Tech. SDecs. (3)

NA NA -

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

SCENARIO SCENARIO 1

ACO -

2,3 NA -

NA Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applic Author:

Chief Examiner: ztwd $b NUREG-I 021, Revision 8

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility:

Sam d h o g t e Date of Exam:

Exam Level: P 3 S R O Item Description a

1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading Nib

2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)

Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2%) reviewed in detail All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name / Signature documented E51b d

3.

4.

5.

EIlfi Vlfi

6.

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

A.Z&tac/ / 0 Initials I

Date

~~

~

(*)

The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

5 of 5 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility:

5 a r ~ OaoIre Date of Exam:

item Description

1.

2.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)

Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2%) reviewed in

3.

4.

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name / Signature

6.

a. Grader

b. Facility Reviewerr) cam Level: R O ~ S G ~

Initials

~~

Date

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

• Q&

Ql/o6/orf

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

A. f. 6 0 ~ ~ [ OTAX,

+/w

(*)

The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

5 of 5 NUREG-1 021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

2 a

2 IT u

e le!

u) z I

d 2

I-2 P

9 I;;

ki 7

0 m

m 0

0 cu.

7 0

m m

0 0

cu cu (D

m 0

0 0

.cu acu t o 0 "

u)I-Sq e x 5 2 w

0 m

0 u

d d

u) a Z

2 I-I-

I-2 2

P P

P t ; t ; t ;

I-I-

u

)

u) c E 2 8

n 8

n 7

7 0

0 m

m m

m 0

0 0

0 cu cu 7

cu (D

(D m

Cl 0

0 0

0 0

0

.cu

.cu acu a N t o t o 0 "

0 "

u)I-01-

. \\

Sq S q e x e x

9 59 8

x 8

3 0

0 e

x 7

2 4

a

/

C 0

m t

c Em 2

a t

0 c

.- I E

8 a"

W J

cn c\\i

io U

N 01 v1 w 5 z

8 0

m t

e E

4 2

a 7

C 0

m 8

c E

x w

J v) 0 a

c\\j

/i.-.f-I I

I I

I 1

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

d

-;s d

.Jan 20 04 l 2 : 3 6 p J a e A r s e n a u l t 01/28/2804 14:47

.-,, a607333702 I6233 535-1307 P - 2 PARGEL CENTRE PAGE Mi X did nat divulge any infarmation regarding the Sun Onofre License Exam that took Place The week of bcctmbtr 25,2003.