ML043000177

Indian Point, Unit 3, Stretch Power Uprate - License Amendment Request NRC - Entergy Review Meeting

ML043000177
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	09/14/2004
From:	Entergy Nuclear Generation Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML043000177 (18)

Text

Indian Point Unit 3 Stretch Power UDrate License Amendment Request NRC - Entergy Review Meeting September 14, 2004

- Enh .rgy Enclosure 2

A zYeN ad

Introductions

1. Meeting Objective

2. Key Perspectives

3. Project Objectives

4. NRC Requested Approvals

5. Tech Spec and Bases Changes

6. IP2 & IP3 Summary Comparison

- Licensed Core Power

- Key IP2 and IP3 NSSS Analyses Inputs

- Key IP2 and IP3 NSSS Analyses Methodology Changes

- Key IP2 and IP3 NSSS Analyses Results

- BOP Summary

- Operational Comparison

- System/Equipment Considerations Comparison

- Reliability & Efficiency Improvements Comparison

- Summary of Modifications

7. Feedback/Questions & Answers AE

Entergy

Meeting Obj ective Support NRC efforts to review and approve the Indian Point Unit 3 Stretch Power Uprate LAR by March 2005 - prior to start of the 3R13 Refueling Outage.

Entergy

Key Perspectives

• Licensed "Stretch" increase of 4.85% to 3216 MWt.

• Licensed core power will be no greater than the original maximum calculated reactor power.

• Format, content, and methodologies very similar to separate IP2 SPU submittal.

• Incorporated IP2 SPU lessons learned and NRC Feedback.

• Took a "Defense in Depth" approach to quality measures.

• Design and licensing bases acceptance criteria remain the same and continue to be met for IP3 systems, components, and safety analyses.

• No Significant Hazards per 10CFR50.92.

=Entergy

Proj ect O)j ectives

• Safely support and implement a /4%increase in the licensed core thermal power for IP3 at the start of Cycle 14 (Phase 1).

• Support Entergy' s strategy of providing much-needed additional electricity to the Northeast Region, particularly Metropolitan New York City.

'Entera

NRC Requested Approvals Stretch Power Uprate

• 3216 MWt Licensed Core Power

• 10-Minute Operator Action

• Associated Tech Specs

• No New NRC Licensing Commitments Alternate Source Term

• Associated Tech Specs

• Methodology and Assumptions

• Dose Limits

=Entergy

SPU Tech Spec and Bases Changes

• RPS and ESFAS Allowable Values

• RCS Minimum Flow

• Pressurizer Water Level Limit

• Power Limit for Inoperable MSSVs

• ILRT Pressure Limit

• Relocate Certain Tech Spec Parameters to COLR According to TSTF-339

- Entergy

1P2 & 1P3 Summary Comparison

-Licensed Core Power

-NSSS Analyses Inputs

-NSSS Analyses Methodology

-NSSS Analyses Results

-BOP Summary

-Operational Comparison

-System/Equipment Considerations Comparison

-Reliability & Efficiency Improvements Comparison

-Summary of Modifications DEntergy

Licensed Core Po wer IP2 Stretch IP3 Stretch

• MWt: 3 114.4 to 3216

• MWt: 3067.4 to 3216

>Phase I -A4%

> Phase II -0.85%

-Entergy

__________ P2 and 1P3 NS SS Inputs IP2 IP3 Parameter Current Value SPU Value Current Value SPU Value Licensed Reactor Thermal 3114.4 MWt 3216 MWt 3067.4 MWt 3216 MWt Power Power Calorimetric 0.6% 2.0% 0.6% 2.0%

Uncertainty .

Reactor Vessel Tavg 549.4 0F - 579.20F 549.0F - 572.0F 5670 F - 574.70F 549.0F - 572.0F Analysis Range Actual Full-Power 562°F +30F 562°F +30F 567°F 567°F + 3°F Programmed Tavg F F Assumed Maximum SG Tube 20% 10% 30% 10%

Plugging Maximum Steam Flow 13.48E06 - 13.56E06 14.01E06 - 14.07E06 13.24E06 13.14E06- 13.99E06 (lbm/hr)

ITS RWST Boron Concentration 2000ppm - 2500ppm 2400ppm - 2600ppm 2400ppm - 2600ppm 2400ppm - 2600ppm Entfergy

1P2 and IP3 Analyses Methodology Changes

SUMMARY

OF-NSSS METHODS AN-IPUTS IP2 [P3 Analysis Current SPU Current SPU Non-LOCA Transient Code LOFTRAN RETRAN/ LOFTRAN LOFTRAN WCOBRA- WCOBRA- WCOBRA-BE LBLOCA BELBOA oe Code ApoahWCOBRA-Approach TRAC Anal. TRAC Eval. TRAC Anal. TRAC Anal.

SBLOCA Evaluation Model EM EM + COSI EM EM + COSI Operator Action for LONF/LOAC Not Credited 10 Minutes Not Credited 10 Minutes Containment Peak Pressure - LOCA Coco coco coco coco Containment Peak Pressure - MSLB COCo COCo COCO COCO HLSO Time Generic Specific Specific Specific AST Draft AST Final Misc. Reg. AST Final Radiological Dose Analysis RG 1081 RG113 Guides (e.g. R .8

_ ___ ___ __ __ _ _ __ _ _ _I_ _ "'Plus" RG___ 1__183 _ 1.4, 1.25, 1.77) RG___1_183 _

~--Entergy

IP2 and IP3 Analyses Results SUMM:ARY- OF-NSSS ANALYSES RESULTS';

IP2 IP3 Analysis Current SPU Current SPU BE LBLOCA 2176°F PCT 2137°F PCT 2174°F 2014°F PCT SBLOCA 2116°F PCT 1028°F PCT 1526°F 1543F PCT Operator Action for LONF/LOAC NO PRZR FILL NO PRZR FILL NO PRZR FILL NO PRZR FILL Containment Peak Pressure - LOCA 43.0 psig 45.7 psig 38.77 psig 42.0 psig Containment Peak Pressure - MSLB 46.7 psig 38.9 psig 42.1 psig 39.2 psig HLSO Time 24 Hrs 6.5 Hrs 14 Hrs 6.5 Hrs

< Thyroid and Radiological Dose Analysis < TEDE Limits < TEDE Limits Whole-Body Dose < TEDE Limits

_ __ __ _ _ __ _ __ __ __ _ __ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _L im its_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

E t

--- Entegy

Operational Comparison IP2 Stretch Uprate IP3 Stretch Uprate

• Restored 2% power

• Same uncertainty to analyses for improved safety and operational margin.

• Hot Leg Safety Injection

• Start HLSO at 14 hours1.62037e-4 days <br />0.00389 hours <br />2.314815e-5 weeks <br />5.327e-6 months <br />, switch over completion complete by 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> - to time from 24 to 6.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />. start at 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />, complete (EOPs) at 6.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />

• 10 Minute Operator

• Same Action for AFW Flow Entergy

BOP Summary

• The initial NRC questions and NRC RAIs on the IP2 SPU submittal were considered when preparing the IP3 SPU LAR.

• Known industry issues related to Systems and Programs were considered in the IP3 SPU LAR.

• Strengthened the Acceptance Criteria, Design Criteria and Results/Conclusions sections of the IP3 LAR.

• The Piping Vibration Plan for IP3 will be similar to that used for 1P2.

--Entergy

System/Equipment Considerations Comparison 1P2 Stretch Uprate IP3 Stretch Uprate

• Components were added to Flow

• Same Accelerated Corrosion (FAC) program.

• Power uprate had no appreciable

• Same affect on EQ program.

• Main Feedwater Block valves

• Main Feedwater Block valves (BFD-5's) were added to MOV already in MOV program and program to take credit for closure credited in analysis on feedwater isolation.

• SI System analysis addressed the

• HHSI modifications are being recirculation sump particle criteria implemented and system throttle valve cavitation issues for the as-set system conditions.

Entergy

Reliability &W Efficiency Improvements Comparison IP2 Stretch Uprate IP3 Stretch Uprate

• HP Turbine

• Same upgrade to HP Turbine

• Moisture Separator Reheater

• Same upgrade to MSRs Internals changed to chevron design

• Iso Phase Bus Duct cooling

• Phase 2 only upgrade Main Power

• Transformer Monitoring

• Similar modifications planned A-Entergy

Summary of Modifications IP2 t ? 1P3

• HPT Steam Path

• HPT Steam Path

• Moisture Separator

• Moisture Separator Reheater Internals Reheater Internals

• Main Power Transformer

• Main Power Transformer Monitoring Monitoring

• Setpoint / Instrument

• Setpoint / Instrument Changes Changes

• Iso Phase Bus Duct

• HHSI flow balancing Cooling

• CCR Charcoal Filter

• MW Meter Replacement Upgrade

• RCS RTD Replacement Entergy

Feedback RAI Process Discussion Questions and Answers

-A Entergy