ML042960355

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
E-mail from D. Straka Regarding Current Information on Testing Performance for Unit 1 Adv 185
ML042960355
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 10/18/2004
From: Straka D
Arizona Public Service Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
FOIA/PA-2004-0307
Download: ML042960355 (2)


Text

A -0V 1138 dCO C-Tony:

Our current information on Testing Performed for Unit 1 ADV 185.

Regards, Don Straka Senior Consultant - Regulatory Affairs dstrakafapsc.com phone: 623.393.5041 pager 602.509.6240 mobile: 602.509.6240

> -Original Message-

> From:

Berg, D. Lee (Z99751)

> Sent:

Thursday, July 01. 2004 5:11 PM

> To:

Straka, Donald J(Z99942)

> Cc:

Smyers, Daniel W(Z89227); Fisher, Daniel A(Z99305); Landstrom,

> Carl E(Z98901); Jones. Stephen 8(Z02094); Powell, Michael E(Z99700);

> McGhee, Mark A(Z65028); Fernandez, Amado T(Z02065); Muhs, Michael

> K(Z69505); Winter. Christian S(Z01491); Jones, Warren H(Z54741)

Subject:

Testing Performed for Unit I ADV 185

> Don,

> I was asked to update you regarding the testing performed and the

> final outcome for Unit I ADV 185. This valve was Identified by

> operations as having erratic operation during recovery from the most

> recent trip. It appeared to operations that the valve was changing

> positions with no demand change from the control room. At least one

> time operations Indicated that the valve went closed far enough to

> have Indications In the control room that It was full closed. To find

> the cause for this Issue three revisions to the action plan were

> issued.

> Revision 0

> ADV 185 was Isolated from the steam source and stroked to the 50% open

> position looking for any Indication of drifting. Instrument air

> fittings and associated parts were SNOOPed to locate leaks. The valve

> was Instrumented to watch I/P signal and valve position.

> During the stroking no anomalies were discovered, also no leaks were

> detected.

> Revision I

> Under this revision the ADV was stroked with steam using

> Instrumentation monitoring the actuator and valve bonnet pressure.

> During this stroke the valve again behaved as expected. The bonnet

> pressure was found to be approximately 10 psig Power than coming out

> of the last outage, -29 psig). The actuator pressures were similar to

> past traces performed on other ADVs. The valve was held open for about

> 3 minutes for this test. It was determined that the valve operated as

> expected.

> Revision 2

  • This revision combined the previous the action plans with minor

> modifications. The control system (actuator, positioner. I/P, and

> demand signal) of the ADV was instrumented to detect any Issues that

> might occur. It was also decided that the stroking would be performed

> similar to that reported from the area operator during trip recovery.

> A series of three strokes were performed, as outlined below. All

> strokes were with steam Isolated.

Provide a demand signal of 80% open. When the valve traveled to

> 20% open change the demand to 30% open. Leave the valve In this

> position for 20 minutes. After 20 minutes fully close the valve.

The second stroke was the same as the first except the Initial

> demand was 50% open.

The third stroke had an Initial demand of 50% open. When the

> valve achieved 15% open the valve was taken to 20% open. The demand

> was left at this point for 20 minutes.

> All three strokes behaved almost identically. The difference between

> demand and actual position was about 14%. This has been consistent

> from the time the valve was last calibrated during the UlR1 I outage

> through the series of five strokes described above. When that valve Is

> given a demand there Is a normal lag In time prior to the valve

> moving. This Is due to the long tubing run between the I/P and the

> valve positioner (-110 feet). Once the demand was given the UP

> started changing pressure as expected to allow the positioner to port

> air to the bottom of the actuator to start opening. This function

> occurred as expected. No anomalies were detected In any of the

> strokes. At no time did the ADV move from the desired position over

> any of the three 20 minute time frames.

> Based upon the response of the valve as seen In the Instrumentation

> response charts ADV 185 Is functioning similar to other ADVs observed

> under the same conditions. The anomalies Identified by operations

> could not be recreated. Engineering cannot find any problem with the

> operation of this valve or recreate the anomalies reported by

> operations.

> In looking at equipment history I/C determined that the positioner Is

> approximately 6 years old. Based upon the age of the positioner and

> not being able to recreate the described anomalies It was decided that

> the positioner would be replaced (WM# 2715990) and calibrated. No

> further actions will be performed at this time. When the positioner is

> replaced and calibration Is completed operations has Indicated the

> valve will be declared operable.

> If you have any questions please call me at work or home.

> Lee Berg

> Work 623-393-3676

> Pager 602-746-2498

> To hike Is to live; to hike with family Is to live In heaven'