ML042940145
| ML042940145 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 10/13/2004 |
| From: | Wetterhahn M Duke Energy Corp, Winston & Strawn, LLP |
| To: | Anthony Baratta, Elleman T, Austin Young Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| Byrdsong A T | |
| References | |
| 50-413-OLA, 50-414-OLA, ASLBP 03-815-03-OLA, RAS 8651 | |
| Download: ML042940145 (1) | |
Text
'RAS 345I WINS TON & STRAWN LLP 35 WEST WACKER DRIVE CHICAGO. ILLINOIS 60601-9703 43 RUE DU RHONE 1204 GENEVA. SWITZERLAND CITY POINT 1 ROPEMAKER STREET LONDON. EC2Y 9HT 1400 L STREET, N.W.
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-3502 (202) 371-5700 FACSIMILE (202) 371-5950 www.winston.com October 13. 2004 333 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071-1543 200 PARK AVENUE NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10166-4193 21 AVENUE VICTOR HUGO 75116 PARIS, FRANCE 101 CALIFORNIA STREET SAN FRANCISCO. CALIFORNIA 94111-5894 MARK J. WETTERHAHN (202) 371-5703 mwetterhahn winston.com Ann Marshall Young, Chairman
-___Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Anthony J. Baratta Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 DOCKETED Thomas S. Elleman Administrative Judge 5207 Creedmoor Road # 101 Raleigh, N.C. 27612 Re:
In the Matter of Duke Energy Corporation Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-413-OLA, 50-414-OLA USNRC October 19, 2004 (9:45AM)
OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF
Dear Administrative Judges:
In its October 1, 2004 Order (Confirming Scheduling and Other Matters Addressed at September 28, 2004, Closed Session), the Licensing Board allowed Duke and BREDL to file responses to information provided by the Staff relating to three questions discussed in the September 28 closed session at Tr. 3543-45. The NRC Staff has addressed these three questions in its response to Specific Interrogatory No. 3 contained in NRC Staff's
-Response to the Blue-Ridge Environmental-Defense League's Second Set of Discovery-Requests- -
to NRC Staff Regarding the Security Plan Submittal dated October 5, 2004.
Duke's understanding as to the type of information assumed to be available to the insider and the mock adversary team is similar to that of the Staff's as set forth in the interrogatory response.
Duke submits that such information constraints should be used in evaluating any theft or diversion scenario in this proceeding.
Very truly yours, Mark J. Wetterhahn Counsel for Duke Energy Corporation cc: Service List DC:380902.1 IIv p late = 5e cV-ot3 SC'C-opL