ML042440591
| ML042440591 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 08/10/2004 |
| From: | Banks T Dominion |
| To: | Sackschewsky M Battelle Memorial Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML042440591 (7) | |
Text
Jack Gushing - RE: Chemical Application Specifications ePage1l From:
<TonyIBanks@dom.com>
To:
"Sackschewsky, Michael R" <michael.sackschewsky@pnl.gov>
Date:
8/10/04 2:36PM
Subject:
RE: Chemical Appiication Specifications Mike - Sorry for the confusion - this species has not been seen or reported either on site or within our t-line ROWs, from any of us on the Dominion team (house or contract). However, the species (evidently per VDGIF) is known to be present in the vicinity (tidewater region) of the Surry Power Station and/or tWines, and the habitat within the tidewater region, as I understand it, would certainly be conducive to the presence of the species, but not within areas very much further west of the region.
I think the wording on page 80 below is a variation on a theme.
- Thanks, Tony "Sackschewsky, Michael R" To:
Tony-Banks~dom.com
<michael.sackschews cc:
"Parkhurst, Mary Ann' <maryann.parkhurst@ pnl.gov>,
ky~pnl.gov>
"Miller, Beverly M" <Beverly.Miller~pnl.gov>, AJK1 @nrc.gov, JXC9 @ nrc.gov, rlbaker bechtel.com, Joseph-Hegner~dom.com 08/10/2004 01:58 PM
Subject:
RE: Chemical Application Specifications The Surry SEIS does include the barking tree frog in the table 2-3 on page 2-24, however, it goes on to state (page 2-25):
"Besides the bald eagle, none of the other animal or plant species in Table 2-3 are currently known to occur on the Surry Power Station site or along the related transmission corridors (VEPCo 2001c)."
However, the Dominion/Bechtel Study of Potential Sites states in Part 3, Page 80:
"With the exception of the barking tree frog and the bald eagle, terrestrial species that are federal and/or state-listed as endangered or threatened are not known to exist at the Surry site or along the corridors of its associated transmission lines."
Hence my question: Is or is not the barking tree frog found on the Surry
I Jack Cushing - RE: Chemical Application Specifications Paqe 21 Jack Gushing - RE: Chemical Application Specifications Paie 211 site or in it's transmission line ROW's?
Information from the VDGIF lacks any reports from the Site, but indicates that the species is certainly in the general vicinity of the transmission lines if not the site itself.
I never meant to make a big deal about this, it is not that important, but if someone has any other information about the presence on site, I would like to see it.
Original Message---
From: Tony-..Banks @ dom.com @ dom.com
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 1:09 PM To: Sackschewsky, Michael R Cc: Parkhurst, Mary Ann; Miller, Beverly M; AJK1 @nrc.gov; JXC9@nrc.gov; rlbaker~bechtel~com; Joseph-Hegner~dom.com
Subject:
Chemical Application Specifications Mike - attached are the 2 docs I believe you are referring to, as well as another 7-page guideline our Forestry Dept has used. The compilation of the Forestry Dept's ROW maintenance practices I have been told is on the FERC website.
Also - for the barking tree frog - it is listed in Surry's FEIS NUREG-1 437 Supplement 6 on pages 2-24 and 2-25.
(See attached file: Herbicide Application (foliar)
Specif ications.doc) (See attached file: Herbicide Application (basal)
Specifications.doc) (See attached file: Pages from Dominion T-Line Maintenance Docs.pdf)
Thank you, Tony Banks, MPH, CHMM Dominion ESP Project Project Lead - Environmental 804/273-2170 CC:
<AJK1 @nrc.gov>, "Miller, Beverly M" <B~everly.MViller~pnl.gov>,
<Joseph-Hegner~dom.com>, <JXC9@nrc.gov>, "Parkhurst, Mary Ann" <maryann.parkhurst~pnl.gov>,
<rlbaker@ bechtel.com>, <Bill_Bolin @dom.com>, <GlennBishop @dom.com>, <pattersonk @ tnus.com>
i C:\\WINDOWS\\TEMP\\GW~)00001.TMP Mail Envelope Properties (411915A5.97E: 16: 59774)
Paae 1 9I 1.-- -- --
.11
Subject:
Creation Date:
From:
Created By:
RE: Chemical Application Specifications 8/10/04 2:34PM
<TonyBanks@dom.com>
Tony_.Banks @domn.com Recipients nrc.gov owf4_po.0WFN_DO AJK1 CC (Andrew Kugler)
JXC9 CC (Jack Cushing) ttnus.com pattersonk CC dom.com Glenn_Bishop CC Bill_Bolin CC JosephHegner CC bechtel.com rlbaker CC pnl.gov maryann.parkhurst CC (Mary Ann Parkhurst)
Beverly.Miller CC (Beverly M Miller) michael.sackschewsky (Michael R Sackschew Post Office owf4_po.0WFN_DO Route nrc.gov ttnus.com dom.com bechtel.com pnl.gov Files MESSAGE Mime.822 Size 3749 5078 Date & Time 08/10/04 02:34PM Options Expiration Date:
Priority:
Reply Requested:
None Standard No
I C:\\WINDOWS\\TEMP\\GWIOOOO1.TMP Pge Return Notification:
None Concealed
Subject:
No Security:
Standard
Jack Cushina - RE: Chemical Application Specifications Page 1 11 From:
mSackschewsky, Michael R" <michael.sackschewsky@pnl.gov>
To:
<TonyBanks@dom.com>
Date:
8/10/04 2:05PM
Subject:
RE: Chemical Application Specifications The Surry SEIS does include the barking tree frog in the table 2-3 on page 2-24, however, it goes on to state (page 2-25):
aBesides the bald eagle, none of the other animal or plant species in Table 2-3 are currently known to occur on the Surry Power Station site or along the related transmission corridors (VEPCo 2001 c)."
However, the Dominion/Bechtel Study of Potential Sites states in Part 3, Page 80:
"With the exception of the barking tree frog and the bald eagle, terrestrial species that are federal and/or state-listed as endangered or threatened are not known to exist at the Surry site or along the corridors of its associated transmission lines."
Hence my question: Is or is not the barking tree frog found on the Surry site or in it's transmission line ROW's?
Information from the VDGIF lacks any reports from the Site, but indicates that the species is certainly in the general vicinity of the transmission lines if not the site itself.
I never meant to make a big deal about this, it is not that important, but if someone has any other information about the presence on site, I would like to see it.
Original Message-----
From: Tony-Banks @ dom.com @ dom.com
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 1:09 PM To: Sackschewsky, Michael R Cc: Parkhurst, Mary Ann; Miller, Beverly M; AJK1 @nrc.gov; JXC9@nrc.gov; rlbaker@ bechtel.com; JosephLHegner@dom.com
Subject:
Chemical Application Specifications Mike - attached are the 2 docs I believe you are referring to, as well as another 7-page guideline our Forestry Dept has used. The compilation of the Forestry Dept's ROW maintenance practices I have been told is on the FERC website.
Also - for the barking tree frog - it is listed in Surry's FEIS NUREG-1437 Supplement 6 on pages 2-24 and 2-25.
(See attached file: Herbicide Application (foliar)
Specifications.doc)(See attached file: Herbicide Application (basal)
Jack Cushinq - RE: Chemical Application Specifications Pane 211 JackCushnci-RE Chmica Aplicaion pecficaion Pan 2Z Specifications.doc) (See attached file: Pages from Dominion T-Line Maintenance Docs.pdf)
Thank you, Tony Banks, MPH, CHMM Dominion ESP Project Project Lead - Environmental 804/273-2170 CC:
"Parkhurst, Mary Ann" <maryann.parkhurst~pnl.gov>, "Miller, Beverly M"
<Beverly.Miller@ pnl.gov>, <AJK1 @ nrc.gov>, <JXC9@ nrc.gov>, <rlbaker@ bechtel.com>,
<Joseph-Hegner dom.com>
ICA\\WIND0WS\\TEMP\\GW)00001.TMP
-Page 1 11 I C:WIDWSTMPGWOOQ TM Pa 1I Mail Envelope Properties (41190E4E.42D: 5: 58413)
Subject:
Creation Date:
From:
Created By:
RE: Chemical Application Specifications 8/10/04 1:58PM "Sackschewsky, Michael R" <michael.sackschewsky@pnl.gov>
michael.sackschewsky~pnl.gov Recipients nrc.gov owf4_po.0WFNDO JXC9 CC (Jack Cushing)
AJK1 CC (Andrew Kugler) dom.com JosephHegner CC Tony..Banks bechtel.com rlbaker CC pnl.gov Beverly.Miller CC (Beverly M Miller) maryann.parkhurst CC (Mary Ann Parkhurst)
Post Office owf4Mpo.OWFNDO Files MESSAGE Mime.822 Options Expiration Date:
Priority:
Reply Requested:
Return Notification:
Concealed
Subject:
Security:
Route nrc.gov dom.com bechtel.com pnl.gov Size 2099 3829 Date & Time 08/10/04 01:58PM None Standard No None No Standard