ML042040317

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
June 2004 Monthly Operating Report for Nine Mile Point, Units 1 and 2
ML042040317
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/06/2004
From: Hopkins L
Constellation Energy Group
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NMP1L 1849
Download: ML042040317 (3)


Text

..

Constellation Energy

  • Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station RO. Box 63 Lycoming, New York 13093 July 6, 2004 NMP1L 1849 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

SUBJECT:

Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Docket No. 50-220 License No. DPR-63 Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Docket No. 50-410 License No. NPF-69 M6ontliyTOperating-Report-fo-n-e 2004 Gentlemen:

Submitted herewith are the Operating Data Report, Unit Shutdowns, and a Narrative of Operating Experience for June 2004 for the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 1 and Unit 2.

Very truly yours, Lawrence A. Hopkins Plant General Manager LAH/BE/TMtjm Attachments cc:

Mr. H. J. Miller, NRC Regional Administrator, Region I Mr. G. K. Hunegs, NRC Senior Resident Inspector L

)' e a (

X I

OPERATING DATA REPORT DOCKET NO.

UNIT NAME DATE COMPLETED BY TELEPHONE REPORTING PERIO 50-220 Nine Mile Point 1 July 01, 2004 Bruce L Eastman (315) 349-2559 June 2004

1.

Design Electrical Rating

2.

Maximum Dependable Capacity (MWe-Net) 613.00 565.00 This Month Yr-to-Date

3. Number of Hours the Reactor was Critical 720.00 3,994.21
4. Number of Hours Generator On-line 720.00 3,935.79
5.

Reserve Shutdown Hours 0.00 0.00

--- 6.-

Net Electrical Energy Generated (MWHrs)-

-424;426.00---2;382,003.00 Cumulative 216,825.81 212,173.49 20.40 118,678,758.0---

UNIT SHUTDOWNS Type Method of F: Forced Duration Shutting Cause & Corrective Action No.

Date S: Scheduled (Hours)

Reason 1 Down 2 Comments

SUMMARY

The unit operated during the month of June 2004 with a Net Electrical Design capacity factor of 96.2 percent. On June 15, 2004 at 2255 hours0.0261 days <br />0.626 hours <br />0.00373 weeks <br />8.580275e-4 months <br /> the unit started a downpower to approximately 40 percent to support Condensate Pump 12 & 13 maintenance. Due to the failure of Condensate Pump 13, the power supplies for Condensate Pump 12 & 13 were swapped to make Condensate Pump 12 a High Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI) component. Upon completion of this work power was returned to rated on June 17, 2004 at 1641 hours0.019 days <br />0.456 hours <br />0.00271 weeks <br />6.244005e-4 months <br />.

1 2

Reason:

A Equipment Failure (Explain)

B Maintenance or Test C

Refueling D

Regulatory Restriction E

Operator Training & License Examination F

Administration G

Operational Error (Explain)

H Other (Explain)

Method:

1 Manual 2

Manual Trip/Scram 3

Automatic Trip/Scram 4

Continuation 5

Other (Explain)

Page 1 of 2

-a OPERATING DATA REPORT DOCKET NO.

UNIT NAME DATE COMPLETED BY TELEPHONE REPORTING PERIC 50-410 Nine Mile Point 2 July 01, 2004 Thomas McMahon (315) 349-4045.

June 2004

1.

Design Electrical Rating

2.

Maximum Dependable Capacity (MWe-Net) 1,143.30 1,119.80 This Month Yr-to-Date

3.

Number of Hours the Reactor was Critical 720.00 3,414.72

4.

Number of Hours Generator On-line 720.00 3,371.92

5.

Reserve Shutdown Hours 0.00 0.00 6._Net Electrical Energy-Generated (MWHrs) a---815,607.70 -- -3,710,275.36 -

Cumulative 114,673.72 111,676.82 0.00 117,752,980.0 UNIT SHUTDOWNS Type Method of F: Forced Duration Shutting Cause & Corrective Action No.

Date S: Scheduled (Hours)

Reason 1 Down 2 Comments

SUMMARY

Nine Mile Point Unit Two operated with a maximum dependable capacity (MDC) factor of 101.16% and an availability factor of 100% for the month of June, 2004. On June 5, 2004 at 1000 hours0.0116 days <br />0.278 hours <br />0.00165 weeks <br />3.805e-4 months <br /> operations began to lower power to approximately 68% for a rod sequence exchange. After completion of the rod sequence exchange full power was restored at 0230 on June 6, 2004. On June 12, 2004 at 1000 hours0.0116 days <br />0.278 hours <br />0.00165 weeks <br />3.805e-4 months <br /> operations began to lower power to approximately 55% for a feed water pump swap. After removal of pump 2FWS-P1A from service and startup of 2FWS-P1 B, full power was restored at 1945 hours0.0225 days <br />0.54 hours <br />0.00322 weeks <br />7.400725e-4 months <br /> the same day. On June 18, 2004 at 0146 hours0.00169 days <br />0.0406 hours <br />2.414021e-4 weeks <br />5.5553e-5 months <br /> control rod 06-31 drifted from position 48 to 22. At 0157 hours0.00182 days <br />0.0436 hours <br />2.595899e-4 weeks <br />5.97385e-5 months <br /> operations began lowering power to approximately 92%. Control rod 06-31 was scrammed and electrically disarmed. Full power was restored at 0558 hours0.00646 days <br />0.155 hours <br />9.22619e-4 weeks <br />2.12319e-4 months <br /> the same day. On June 19, 2004 at 2200 hours0.0255 days <br />0.611 hours <br />0.00364 weeks <br />8.371e-4 months <br /> operations began to lower power to approximately 90% to recover control rod 06-31 and raise rod line.

After completion of these tasks full power was restored at 0244 hours0.00282 days <br />0.0678 hours <br />4.034392e-4 weeks <br />9.2842e-5 months <br /> on June 20, 2004. There were no challenges to the safety relief valves during this reporting period.

1 2.

Reason:

A Equipment Failure (Explain)

B Maintenance or Test C'Refueling 7~

-~~~~

~

D Regulatory Restriction E

Operator Training & License Examination F

Administration G

Operational Error (Explain)

H Other (Explain)

Method:

1 Manual 2

Manual Trip/Scram 3 __ _Autrmatid-Tripg/Scratn 4

Continuation 5

Other (Explain)

Page 2 of 2