ML041400363

Final Qa/Related Forms

ML041400363
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	04/20/2004
From:	Christman R Entergy Nuclear Northeast
To:	Conte R NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB
Conte R
References
50-286/04-301
Download: ML041400363 (4)

Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Target Date*

Task Description / Reference Chief Examiner's Initials

~~~

~

6. Integrated examination outline(s) due (C.l.e & f; C.3.d)

-180

1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a & b)

-120

2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.l.d; C.2.e)

-120

3. Facility contact briefed on security & other requirements (C.2.c)

-120

4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)

[-901

[5. Reference material due (C.l.e; C.3.c)l

-75

-70

7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided

8. Proposed examinations, supporting documentation, and to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e) reference materials due (C.l.e, f, g & h; C.3.d) 68

-45 11

-30 I 9. Preliminary license applications due (C.1.l; C.2.g; ES-202) 1

%0 II

-I4 I O. Final license applications due and assignment sheet prepared (C.1.I; C.2.g; ES-202) 1 1. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f) 11

-14 I 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f & h; C.3.g) I a ll I7

13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)

BB I7

14. Final applications reviewed; assignment sheet updated; waiver letters sent (C.2.g, ES-204)

15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee and authorization granted to give written exams (if applicable) (C.3.k)

16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

-7

-7 Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter.

They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC.

[ ]

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 22 of 24

ES-201 Examination Outline Form ES-201-2 Quality Checklist Task Descriotion Facilit Item

1.

W R

T T

E N

1 Initials I

I

2.

S I

M

3.

w I

T

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model per ES-401.

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.l of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.

cc

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

I l

l

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, and major transients.

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)',

and scenarios will not be repeated over successive days.

II

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix 0.

a. Verify that:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination, (3)* no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and (4) no more than 80% of any operating test is taken directly from the licensee's exam banks.

b. Verify that:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, (3) 40% of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path procedure, (4) one in-plant task tests the applicant's response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and (5) the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RCA.

1 1

c. Verify that the required administrative topics are covered, with emphasis on performance-based activities.

d. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on successive days.

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer (')

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor 11 Note:

• Not aDDlicable for NRC-develooed examinations.

I

1. Independent NRC reviewer iniiial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

23 of 24 NUREG-I 021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) o$d &oCL date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

asofthe

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of

. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATENOTE NOTES:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 24

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility:

Date of Examination:

Operating Test Number:

lnitia

+ a b

I. GENERAL CRITERIA

. initial conditions

. initiating cues

. references and tools, including associated

. reasonable and validated time limits (a

. specific performance criteria that

- detailed expected actions

- system response and 01 he previous licensing examination is within Printed Name / Signature

3. NRC Supervisor VOTE:

The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 24 of 27