ML040990418
| ML040990418 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 03/30/2004 |
| From: | Leonard M Constellation Energy Group |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NMP2L 2114 | |
| Download: ML040990418 (4) | |
Text
P.O. Box 63 Lycoming, New York 13093 Constellation Energy Group Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station March 30,2004 NMP2L 2114 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001
SUBJECT:
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Docket No. 50-410; NPF-69 Transmittal of 2003 Annual Environmental Operating Report Gentlemen:
In accordance with Appendix B of the Operating License (Environmental Protection Plan) for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 2, enclosed is the Annual Environmental Operating Report for the period January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003.
In the event you have any questions concerning the report, please contact Kent Stoffle, Principal Engineer, Environmental, at (315) 349-1364.
Very truly yours, M. Steven Leonard General Supervisor, Licensing MSL/KES/bjh Enclosure xc:
Mr. H. J. Miller, Regional Administrator, Region I Mr. G. K. Hunegs, Senior Resident Inspector Mr. P. S. Tam, Senior Project Manager, NRR (2 copies)
\\j2$
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003 for NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 Facility Operating License NPF-69 Docket Number 50-410
ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT Subsection 5.4.1 of the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP), as contained in Appendix B of the Operating License for the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 2, requires that an Annual Environmental Operating Report be submitted to the Commission prior to May 1 of each year.
The following addresses the requirements found in Subsection 5.4.1 of the EPP for the submittal of the Annual Environmental Operating Report:
I1.
Provide suomnmaries and analyses of the results of the environmental protection activities required by Subsection 4.2 (if any) of the EPP for the report period, including a comparison with related preoperational studies, operational controls (as appropriate),
and previous non-radiological environmental monitoring reports, and an assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment. If hanznful effects or evidence of trends toward irreversible damage to the environment are observed, a detailed analysis of the data and a proposed course of mitigating action shall be provided.
Subsection 4.2 of the EPP denotes three areas of environmental monitoring:
Subsection 4.2.1 (Aquatic Monitoring) has no specific monitoring requirements although it is noted that the Commission will rely on the decisions made by the State of New York under the authority of the Clean Water Act for any requirements. Aquatic monitoring is specified in the station's State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (SPDES Permit) which is a site permit applicable to Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 1 and Unit 2. The SPDES Permit requires a limited Aquatic Monitoring Program (referred to in the permit as a Biological Monitoring Program) which, at the present time, is only applicable to Unit 1. Therefore, no Aquatic Monitoring Program is presently required for Unit 2.
Subsection 4.2.2 (Terrestrial Monitoring) does not contain any monitoring requirements.
Subsection 4.2.3 (Noise Monitoring) does not contain any monitoring requirements.
- 2.
Provide a list of EPP noncompliances and corrective actions.
A review of the EPP requirements and plant records showed that there were no conditions of noncompliance with the EPP requirements during 2003. Therefore, no corrective actions were required.
Page 1 of 2
- 3.
Provide a list of all changes in station design or operation, tests, and experiments made in accordance with EPP Subsection 3.1 which involved a potentially significant unreviewed environmental question (non-radiological)..
A review of plant records showed that there were no changes during 2003 in station design/operation, tests, or experiments that involved a potentially significant unreviewed environmental question (non-radiological).
- 4.
List all nonroutine reports submitted during 2003 in accordance with Subsection 5.4.2 of tihe EPP.
During 2003, there were no nonroutine reports submitted to the Commission in accordance with Subsection 5.4.2 of the EPP.
Page 2 of 2