ML040130619
| ML040130619 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Monticello  |
| Issue date: | 09/23/2003 |
| From: | Allex G Nuclear Management Co |
| To: | NRC/RGN-III |
| References | |
| 50-263/03-301, ES-301, ES-301-1 50-263/03-301 | |
| Download: ML040130619 (105) | |
Text
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Retention: Life of policy + 10yrs.
Disposition: Reviewer and Approver Retain in: Training Program File Page 1 of 105 ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility:
MNGP Date of Examination:
9/15/03 Exam Level (circle one)
RO /
SRO Operating Test Number:
03-01 Administrative Describe method of evaluation Topic/Subject
- 2. TWO Administrative Questions A.1 Plant JPM Perform Core Thermal Limits Monitoring Parameter Procedure C.2-05 Verification Generic 2.1.19 (3.0)
(2002 NRC Exam)
Conduct JPM Independent Verification Valve Procedure 4AWI-04.04.02; Procedure 0255-06-IA-1 Lineup Generic 2.1.29 (3.4)
(Direct from Bank)
A.2 Surveillance JPM Perform the Daily Off-Gas Hydrogen Analyzer Checks Testing Procedure 0000-H; Test 0209 Generic 2.2.12 (3.0)
(New)
A.3 Radiation JPM Expected Dose Determination to Inspect Equipment Control Procedure 4AWI-08.04.01 Calculating Generic 2.3.1 (2.6)
Exposure (Modified from Bank)
A.4 Plant JPM Response to a Large Diesel Fuel Spill Emergency Procedure A.4-010 Procedures Generic 2.4.26 (2.9)
(New)
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Retention: Life of policy + 10yrs.
Disposition: Reviewer and Approver Retain in: Training Program File Page 2 of 105 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE (JPM)
SITE:
MONTICELLO TASK TITLE:
CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING JPM NUMBER:
JPM-A.1.a REV.
1 RELATED PRA INFORMATION:
NONE TASK NUMBERS:
CR200.129 K/A NUMBERS:
Generic 2.1.19 APPLICABLE METHOD OF TESTING:
Discussion:
Simulate/walkthrough:
Perform:
X EVALUATION LOCATION:
In-Plant:
Control Room:
X Simulator:
Other:
Lab:
Time for Completion:
15 Minutes Time Critical:
NO 30 Minutes YES Maximum Time for Completion:
Alternate Path / Faulted:
TASK APPLICABILITY:
SRO/RO Additional signatures may be added as needed.
Developed by:
Instructor Date Validated by:
Validation Instructor (See JPM Validation Checklist, Attachment 1)
Date Approved by:
Training Supervisor Date
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.1.a, CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING, Rev. 1 Page 3 of 105 JPM Number:
JPM-C.2-05.B.1-002 JPM
Title:
CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING Examinee:
Evaluator:
Job
Title:
Date:
Start Time Finish Time PERFORMANCE RESULTS:
SAT:
UNSAT:
COMMENTS/FEEDBACK: (Comments shall be made for any steps graded unsatisfactory).
EVALUATORS SIGNATURE:
NOTE: Only this page needs to be retained in examinees record if completed satisfactorily. If unsatisfactory performance is demonstrated, the entire JPM should be retained.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.1.a, CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING, Rev. 1 Page 4 of 105 SIMULATOR SETUP:
Copy of Operations Daily Log - Part E INITIAL CONDITIONS:
Reactor power has just been increased from 90% to 98% with the Recirc Flow Control System per C.2-05, LOAD FOLLOWING.
INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):
The Control Room Supervisor has just requested reactor power be increased to 100%. You have been directed to perform the Core Thermal Limits Monitoring for MFLCPR, MAPRAT and MFLPD per Ops Man C.2-05, Section B.1. Record data on Forms 0207, 0208, and 0225 of Operations Daily Log 0000 - Part E. Report when the task is complete.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.1.a, CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING, Rev. 1 Page 5 of 105 JPM PERFORMANCE INFORMATION DURING THE JPM, ENSURE PROPER SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, FME, AND/OR RADIOLOGICAL CONCERNS AS APPLICABLE ARE FOLLOWED.
Required Materials:
See Simulator Setup General
References:
C.2-05, Rev. 13 Task Standards:
Perform Core Thermal Limits monitoring Start Time:
NOTE: When providing Evaluator Cues to the examinee, care must be exercised to avoid prompting the examinee.
Typically cues are only provided when the examinees actions warrant receiving the information (i.e. the examinee looks or asks for the indication).
NOTE:
Critical steps are marked with a Y below the performance step number. Failure to meet the standard for any critical step shall result in failure of this JPM.
Performance Step: 1 Critical N Locates procedure C.2-05, POWER OPERATION.
Standard:
Locates appropriate procedure.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 2 Critical N C.2-05 Part A, Step 1:
IF process computer is not anticipated to be available during a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> period, THEN contact a Nuclear Engineer to arrange determination of MCPR.
Standard:
Determines Process Computer is available.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.1.a, CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING, Rev. 1 Page 6 of 105 Performance Step: 3 Critical Y C.2-05 Part A, Step 2.a:
When 3D Monicore computer is available, perform the following:
Demand Official 3D Monitor to calculate core nodal power distribution, AND use MCPR data for the fuel assemblies that are closest to the limiting CPR.
NOTE 4:
The most limiting MCPR is edited as MFLCPR on the Periodic Log NOTE 5:
MFLCPR is the Core Maximum ratio of power and flow dependent CPR limit to the bundles actual CPR.
Standard:
Demands an Official 3D Monitor and evaluates MCPR data.
Evaluator Note:
A 3D Monitor edit cannot be demanded on the simulator.
Evaluator Cue:
Provided the candidate with a copy of the 3D Monitor edit.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 4 Critical Y C.2-05 Part A, Step 2.b:
Record the following data for the most limiting fuel bundle on Form 0225:
- a. The value of MFLCPR
- b. Core location of MFLCPR
- c. Percent rated core flow Standard:
Records data on Form 0225.
- a. MFLCPR.883
- b. Core location 13 - 32
- c. % rated core flow 89.9%
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.1.a, CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING, Rev. 1 Page 7 of 105 Performance Step: 5 Critical Y C.2-05 Part A, Step 2.c:
Verify MFLCPR is below the Action Limit (0.98 times the Tech Spec Limit) and the Tech Spec Limit.
- 1) IF MFLCPR is below both limits, THEN initial Form 0225.
- 2) IF MFLCPR is not below both limits, THEN proceed as follows:
a) IF MFLCPR is above the Action Limit, THEN contact a Nuclear Engineer.
NOTE:
Reducing power with recirc flow will not decrease MFLCPR by a significant fraction and may increase MFLCPR. Rod pattern alteration will always be required to return MFLCPR to an acceptable value.
b) IF MFLCPR exceeds the Tech Spec Limit, THEN immediately contact a Nuclear Engineer.
AND take actions required by Tech Spec 3.11.C and 4 AWI-04.08.01 (EVENT NOTIFICATIONS).
Standard:
Verifies MFLCPR is below the Action and Tech Spec limits and checks YES on Form 0225 Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 6 Critical N C.2-05 Part A, Step 2.d:
IF MPR or EPR is out of service, THEN verify that guidance for additional actions for Core Thermal Limits Monitoring in Operations Manuals C.4-B.05.09.A (ABNORMAL PROCEDURES - MAIN STEAM PRESSURE REGULATOR FAILURE CAUSING DECREASING PRESSURE) and C.4-B.05.09.B (ABNORMAL PROCEDURES - MAIN STEAM PRESSURE REGULATOR FAILURE CAUSING INCREASING PRESSURE) is followed.
Standard:
Determines MPR and EPR are not out of service.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.1.a, CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING, Rev. 1 Page 8 of 105 Performance Step: 7 Critical N C.2-05 Part B, Step 3:
Demand Official 3D Monitor to calculate the nodal power distribution, AND use the data for the fuel assembly that has its MAPRAT closest to 1.0.
Standard:
Evaluates nodal power distribution to find the fuel assembly that has its MAPRAT closest to 1.0.
Evaluator Note:
All three thermal limits are printed out when a 3D Monitor is requested.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 8 Critical Y C.2-05 Part B, Step 3:
Record the following data for the most limiting fuel bundle on Form 0225:
- a. The value of MAPRAT
- b. Core location of MAPRAT
- c. Percent rated core flow Standard:
Records data on Form 0225.
- a. MAPRAT.880
- b. Core location 35 5
- c. % rated core flow 89.9%
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.1.a, CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING, Rev. 1 Page 9 of 105 Performance Step: 9 Critical Y C.2-05 Part B, Step 5.a:
Verify MAPRAT is below the Action Limit (0.98 times the Tech Spec Limit) and the Tech Spec Limit.
- a.
IF MAPRAT is below both limits, THEN initial FORM 0207.
- b. IF MAPRAT is not below both limits, THEN proceed as follows:
- 1) IF MAPRAT is above the Action Limit, AND below the Tech Spec Limit, THEN contact a Nuclear Engineer.
- 2) IF MAPRAT exceeds the Tech Spec Limit, THEN immediately contact a Nuclear Engineer, AND take action required by Tech Spec 3.11.A and 4 AWI-04.08.01.
NOTE:
Reducing power with recirc flow will not decrease MAPRAT by a significant fraction and may increase MAPRAT. Rod pattern alterations will always be required to return MAPRAT to an acceptable value.
Standard:
Verifies MAPRAT is below the Action and Tech Spec limits and checks YES on Form 0207.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 10 Critical N
C.2-05 Part B, Step 5.c:
IF either the MPR or the EPR is out of service, THEN verify that guidance for additional actions for Core Thermal Limits Monitoring in Operations Manuals C.4-B.05.09.A and C.4-B.05.09.B is followed.
Standard:
Determines MPR and EPR are not out of service.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.1.a, CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING, Rev. 1 Page 10 of 105 Performance Step: 11 Critical N
C.2-05 Part C, Step 6:
Demand the Official 3D Monitor to calculate the nodal power distribution.
Standard:
Evaluates nodal power distribution.
Evaluator Note:
All three thermal limits are printed out when a 3D Monitor is requested.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 12 Critical N
C.2-05 Part C, Step 7:
Scan the Periodic Log to find the highest MFLPD, AND note the MFLPD and the location in the core where it exists.
Standard:
Scans Periodic Log and finds the highest MFLPD and its location in the core.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 13 Critical Y
C.2-05 Part C, Step 8:
Record the following data for the most limiting fuel bundle on Form 0208:
- a. The value of MFLPD.
b.
The location of MFLPD.
Standard:
Records the data on Form 0208.
- a. MFLPD.990
- b. Location of MFLPD 35 5 Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.1.a, CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING, Rev. 1 Page 11 of 105 Performance Step: 14 Critical Y
C.2-05 Part C, Step 9.a:
Verify MFLPD is below Action Limit (0.98 times the Tech Spec Limit) and Tech Spec Limit.
- a. IF MFLPD is below both limits, THEN initial Form 0208 Standard:
Determines MFLPD is.990.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 15 Critical Y
C.2-05 Part C, Step 9.b:
IF MFLPD is not below both limits, THEN proceeds as follows:
- 1) IF MFLPD is above the Action Limit, AND below the Tech Spec Limit, THEN contact the Nuclear Engineer.
- 2) IF MFLPD exceeds the Tech Spec Limit, THEN immediately contact a Nuclear Engineer.
CAUTION Reducing power can cause an increase in MFLCPR or MAPRAT. If any bundle has a MAPRAT or MFLCPR greater than the corresponding Action Limit (0.98 for MAPRAT and 0.98 for MFLCPR), do not reduce power more than 3% prior to contacting a Nuclear Engineer.
a) Reduce power at the maximum allowable rate until MFLPD meets the Tech Spec Limit.
b) Take actions required by Tech Spec 3.11.B.
c) Inform personnel according to 4 AWI-04.08.01.
NOTE:
A rapid estimate of the MFLPD can be made by assuming that a power decrease of 1% leads to a MFLPD decrease of 0.01.
Standard:
Observes that MFLPD is above Action Limit but below the Tech Spec limit, and checks NO on Form 0208.
- 1. Contacts the Nuclear Engineer
- 2. Notifies CRS that MFLPD is above the Action Limit but below the Tech Spec limit and that reactor power may need to be reduced.
Evaluator Cue:
Another operator will decrease reactor power within acceptable limits.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.1.a, CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING, Rev. 1 Page 12 of 105 Terminating Cues:
Operator informs the evaluator that the task is complete.
DO NOT PROMPT!
Stop Time:
Page 13 of 105 TURNOVER SHEET INITIAL CONDITIONS:
Reactor power has just been increased from 90% to 98% with the Recirc Flow Control System per C.2-05, LOAD FOLLOWING.
INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):
The Control Room Supervisor has just requested reactor power be increased to 100%. You have been directed to perform the Core Thermal Limits Monitoring for MFLCPR, MAPRAT and MFLPD per Ops Man C.2-05, Section B.1. Record data on Forms 0207, 0208, and 0225 of Operations Daily Log 0000 - Part E. Report when the task is complete.
Page 14 of 105 1 PAGE 1 MONTI C22 3DM DIST SEQUENCE NO 16 CORE PARAMETERS 3D MONICORE 17-SEP-2003 12:11 CALCULATED POWER MWT 1769 PERIODIC LOG 17-SEP-2003 12:12 PRINTED POWER MWE 603 CASE ID FMLD1030617121158 FLOW MLB/HR 53.499 CALC RESULTS RESTART FMLD1030617120213 FPAPDR 0.907 LPRM SHAPE - FULL CORE SUBC BTU/LB 24.71 Keff 1.0015 PR PSIa 1015.8 XE WORTH % -2.41 LOAD LINE
SUMMARY
CORE MWD/sT 22679.1 XE/RATED 1.06 CORE POWER 98.0%
CYCLE MWD/sT 2810.2 CORE FLOW 89.9%
MCPR 1.719 LOAD LINE 104.2%
CORRECTION FACTOR: MFLCPR= 1.007 MFLPD= 1.000 MAPRAT= 0.987 OPTION: ARTS DUAL LOOP MANUAL FLOW MCPRLIM= 1.470 MOST LIMITING LOCATIONS (NON-SYMMETRIC)
MFLCPR LOC MFLPD LOC MAPRAT LOC PCRAT LOC 0.883 13-32 0.990 35 5 0.880 35 5 0.986 19 3 0.864 17-14 0.944 13 5 0.863 13 5 0.984 17 4 0.861 21-14 0.940 35 5 0.855 21 4 0.983 39 5 0.859 13-36 0.934 11 5 0.850 15 4 0.983 13 5 0.859 13-34 0.930 13 5 0.838 35 5 0.981 41 5 0.846 15-30 0.927 21 4 0.831 13 5 0.981 31 4 0.840 33-14 0.915 15 4 0.831 13 5 0.980 35 5 0.839 23-16 0.910 15 4 0.828 19 4 0.979 21 3 0.839 11-32 0.908 19 4 0.825 11 5 0.977 39 5 0.838 15-16 0.907 23 4 0.798 23 4 0.974 14 5 SEQ. A2R4 C=MFLCPR D=MFLPD M=MAPRAT P=PCRAT *=MULTIPLE CORE AVE AXIAL 51 NOTCH REL PW LOC 00 0.076 24 47 02 0.245 23 L 04 0.634 22 43 30 00 30 06 0.758 21 08 0.884 20 39 10 0.977 19 L 12 1.004 18 35 30 00 00 00 30 14 1.004 17 16 1.056 16 31 18 1.044 15 L 20 1.110 14 27 00 00 00 00 00 22 1.144 13 24 1.183 12 23 26 1.215 11 L 28 1.212 10 19 30 00 00 00 30 30 1.214 09 C
- 32 1.247 08 15 34 1.262 07 L 36 1.299 06 11 30 00 30 38 1.340 05 40 1.344 04 07 42 1.258 03 L 44 1.125 02 03 L L L L L L 46 0.361 01 02 06 10 14 18 22 26 30 34 38 42 46 50 CORE AVERAGE RADIAL POWER DISTRIBUTION RING # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 REL PW 0.837 1.325 1.225 1.261 1.302 1.105 0.420
Page 15 of 105 1 PAGE 2 MONTI C22 3DM DIST INSTRUMENT READINGS/STATUS SEQUENCE NO 16 CALIBRATED LPRM READINGS 17-SEP-2003 12:11 CALCULATED 17-SEP-2003 12:12 PRINTED 45D 21.4 25.4 18.3 CASE ID FMLD1020520110024 C 34.1 0.0 30.7 LPRM SHAPE - FULL CORE B 0.0 42.0 38.3 A 55.3 50.7 46.5 FAILED SENSORS:
37D 27.3 24.7 27.4 23.8 18.6 LPRM ( 4 SIGNAL FAILED)
C 41.6 42.0 43.0 40.4 30.3 1213B 2045B 2805C 2845C B 52.2 52.4 53.7 52.9 39.0 LPRM ( 0 PANACEA REJECTED)
A 60.5 63.9P 67.2 68.1 44.5 LPRM ( 2 PANACEA REJECTED) 1237A 3645A 29D 19.8 28.3C 27.2 24.2 28.5 25.4 NONE C 25.5 41.2 45.8 43.0 44.1 34.1 B 28.5 51.1 53.9 51.5 53.9 42.6 T = TIP RUN RECOMMENDED A 26.1 60.5 61.1 61.9 64.9 51.6 T = TIP RUN RECOMMENDED 21D 30.6 27.4 26.0 25.4 20.9 D = MFLPD LOCATION C 44.3 43.2 45.4 43.2 33.9 P = PCRAT LOCATION B 55.0 51.4 53.2 53.2 44.1 P = PCRAT LOCATION A 61.5 58.1 63.4 64.5 56.9 * = MULTIPLE LIMIT 13D 20.9 23.3 27.3 27.1 C 35.2 41.5 42.2 41.4 B 0.0 55.6 51.9 53.0 A 44.8 70.2 59.4 63.5*
05D 19.4 C 0.0 B 28.4 A 26.3 04 12 20 28 36 44 CORE
SUMMARY
CORE POWER 98.0% CALC SUB FLOW 89.4% DP MEAS PSI 14.73 CORE FLOW 89.9% OPER SUB FLOW -1.7% DP CALC PSI 17.85 LOAD LINE 104.2% FLOW BASIS MEAS FEEDWTR FLOW MLB/HR 7.07 APRM CALIBRATION A B C D E F READING 99.7 99.3 99.3 99.6 99.5 99.0 AGAF 0.983 0.987 0.987 0.984 0.985 0.990 APRM - %CTP 1.7 1.3 1.3 1.6 1.5 1.0 TIP RUNS RECOMMENDED STRINGS: NONE
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Retention: Life of policy + 10yrs.
Disposition: Reviewer and Approver Retain in: Training Program File Page 16 of 105 ATTACHMENT 1 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST ALL STEPS IN THIS CHECKLIST ARE TO BE PERFORMED UPON INITIAL VALIDATION AND PRIOR TO USE.
REVIEW STATEMENTS YES NO N/A
- 1.
Are all items on the signature page filled in correctly?
- 2.
Has the JPM been reviewed and validated by SMEs?
- 3.
Can the required conditions for the JPM be appropriately established in the simulator if required?
- 4.
Does the performance steps accurately reflect trainees actions in accordance with plant procedures?
- 5.
Is the standard for each performance item specific as to what controls, indications and ranges are required to evaluate if the trainee properly performed the step?
- 6.
Has the completion time been established based on validation data or incumbent experience?
- 7.
If the task is time critical, is the time critical portion based upon actual task performance requirements?
- 8.
Is the Licensee level appropriate for the task being evaluated if required?
- 9.
Is the K/A appropriate to the task and to the licensee level if required?
- 10.
Have the performance steps been identified and typed (Critical / Sequence / Time Critical) appropriately?
- 11.
Have all special tools and equipment needed to perform the task been identified and made available to the trainee?
- 12.
Are all references identified, current, accurate, and available to the trainee?
- 13.
Have all required cues (as anticipated) been identified for the evaluator to assist task completion?
All questions/statements must be answered YES or the JPM is not valid for use. If all questions/statements are answered YES then the JPM is considered valid and can be performed as written. The individual(s) performing the validation shall sign and date this form.
Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Retention: Life of policy + 10yrs.
Disposition: Reviewer and Approver Retain in: Training Program File Page 17 of 105 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE (JPM)
SITE:
MONTICELLO TASK TITLE:
INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION JPM NUMBER:
A.1.b REV.
8 RELATED PRA INFORMATION:
NONE TASK NUMBERS:
CR206.102 K/A NUMBERS:
Generic 2.1.29 APPLICABLE METHOD OF TESTING:
Discussion:
Simulate/walkthrough:
Perform:
X EVALUATION LOCATION:
In-Plant:
Control Room:
Simulator:
X Other:
Lab:
Time for Completion:
15 Minutes Time Critical:
NO 30 Minutes YES Maximum Time for Completion:
Alternate Path / Faulted:
TASK APPLICABILITY:
SRO/RO Additional signatures may be added as needed.
Developed by:
Instructor Date Validated by:
Validation Instructor (See JPM Validation Checklist, Attachment 1)
Date Approved by:
Training Supervisor Date
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
A.1.b Page 18 of 105 JPM Number:
A.1.b JPM
Title:
INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION Examinee:
Evaluator:
Job
Title:
Date:
Start Time Finish Time PERFORMANCE RESULTS:
SAT:
UNSAT:
COMMENTS/FEEDBACK: (Comments shall be made for any steps graded unsatisfactory).
EVALUATORS SIGNATURE:
NOTE: Only this page needs to be retained in examinees record if completed satisfactorily. If unsatisfactory performance is demonstrated, the entire JPM should be retained.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
A.1.b Page 19 of 105 SIMULATOR SETUP:
Initialize to any IC-246 where HPCI is operable. Place the handswitch for HPCI MO-2062 to the OPEN position. CV-3503 set at 47%.
Fill out Procedure 0255-06-IA-1 as follows:
Shift Supervisor approval on coversheet.
Reason to Perform - Quarterly. (In conjunction with no other tests.)
Fill in prerequisites:
o RWP established.
o N/A o
Current time plus 15 minutes o
I&C notified o
Chemistry notified o
47% open o
Verified Torus level 1.0 (check indication) o RHR is available
Fill in numbers and initial STEP 1 through 68.
INITIAL CONDITIONS:
The routine quarterly HPCI pump and valve surveillance has just been completed.
INITIATING CUES:
The Shift Supervisor directs you to perform the required independent verification, for the components in the Control Room, to assure the components are in an ECCS line-up.
Perform STEP 69 of Test 0255-06-IA-1.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
A.1.b Page 20 of 105 JPM PERFORMANCE INFORMATION DURING THE JPM, ENSURE PROPER SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, FME, AND/OR RADIOLOGICAL CONCERNS AS APPLICABLE ARE FOLLOWED.
Required Materials:
See simulator setup General
References:
4AWI-04.04.02, Rev 8; Procedure 0255-06-IA-1, Rev 61 Task Standards:
Place the HPCI System in Standby Readiness Start Time:
NOTE: When providing Evaluator Cues to the examinee, care must be exercised to avoid prompting the examinee.
Typically cues are only provided when the examinees actions warrant receiving the information (i.e. the examinee looks or asks for the indication).
NOTE:
Critical steps are marked with a Y below the performance step number. Failure to meet the standard for any critical step shall result in failure of this JPM.
Performance Step: Critical Standard:
Evaluator Note:
The candidate SHALL ensure verification is performed separately from the actions of the individual positioning the components.
The candidate SHALL NOT reposition any component on the checklist (4AWI-04.04.02, section 4.3.6.C).
Violation of either of the above conditions should constitute failure of this JPM.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
A.1.b Page 21 of 105 Performance Step: 1 Critical N 0255-06-IA-1 STEP 69.a: MO-2034 OPEN, handswitch 23A-S2 in NEUTRAL.
Standard:
- 1. Observes MO-2034 red OPEN indicating light is lit and green CLOSED indicating light is off.
- 2. Observes MO-2034 handswitch is in NEUTRAL.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 2 Critical N 0255-06-IA-1 STEP 69.b: MO-2035 OPEN, handswitch 23A-S3 in AUTO.
Standard:
- 1. Observes MO-2035 red OPEN indicating light is lit and green CLOSED indicating light is off.
- 2. Observes MO-2035 handswitch is in AUTO.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 3 Critical N 0255-06-IA-1 STEP 69.c: MO-2036 CLOSED, handswitch 23A-S1 in AUTO.
Standard:
- 1. Observes MO-2036 red OPEN indicating light is off and green CLOSED indicating light is lit.
- 2. Observes MO-2036 handswitch is in AUTO.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 4 Critical N 0255-06-IA-1 STEP 69.d: MO-2061 CLOSED, handswitch 23A-S14 in AUTO.
Standard:
- 1. Observes MO-2061 red OPEN indicating light is off and green CLOSED indicating light is lit.
- 2. Observes MO-2061 handswitch is in AUTO.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
A.1.b Page 22 of 105 Performance Step: 5 Critical Y 0255-06-IA-1 STEP 69.e: MO-2062 CLOSED, handswitch 23A-S13 in AUTO.
Standard:
- 1. Observes MO-2062 red OPEN indicating light is on and green CLOSED indicating light is off.
- 2. Observes MO-2062 handswitch is in OPEN.
- 3. Does not reposition switch, notifies Shift Supervisor.
Evaluator Cue:
The CRS will have another operator correct the position. Continue with the independent verification.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 6 Critical N 0255-06-IA-1 STEP 69.f: MO-2063 OPEN, handswitch 23A-S4 in AUTO.
Standard:
- 1. Observes MO-2063 red OPEN indicating light is lit and green CLOSED indicating light is off.
- 2. Observes MO-2063 handswitch is in AUTO.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 7 Critical N 0255-06-IA-1 STEP 69.g: MO-2065 CLOSED, handswitch 23A-S10 in AUTO.
Standard:
- 1. Observes MO-2065 red OPEN indicating light is off and green CLOSED indicating light is lit.
- 2. Observes MO-2065 handswitch is in AUTO.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 8 Critical N 0255-06-IA-1 STEP 69.h: MO-2067 CLOSED, handswitch 23A-S7 in AUTO.
Standard:
- 1. Observes MO-2067 red OPEN indicating light is off and green CLOSED indicating light is lit.
- 2. Observes MO-2067 handswitch is in AUTO.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
A.1.b Page 23 of 105 Performance Step: 9 Critical N 0255-06-IA-1 STEP 69.i: MO-2068 CLOSED, handswitch 23A-S6 in AUTO.
Standard:
- 1. Observes MO-2068 red OPEN indicating light is off and green CLOSED indicating light is lit.
- 2. Observes MO-2068 handswitch is in AUTO.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 10 Critical N
0255-06-IA-1 STEP 69.j: MO-2071 CLOSED, handswitch 23A-S8 in AUTO.
Standard:
- 1. Observes MO-2071 red OPEN indicating light is off and green CLOSED indicating light is lit.
- 2. Observes MO-2071 handswitch is in AUTO.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 11 Critical Y
0255-06-IA-1 STEP 69.k: CV-3503 CLOSED, valve controller set at 0% open.
Standard:
- 1. Observes CV-3503 red OPEN indicating light is lit and green CLOSED indicating light is off.
- 2. Observes CV-3503 load station setting is 47%.
- 3. Does not reposition load station, notifies Shift Supervisor.
Evaluator Cue:
The CRS will have another operator correct the position. Continue with the independent verification.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
A.1.b Page 24 of 105 Performance Step: 12 Critical N
0255-06-IA-1 STEP 69.l: Aux Oil Pump handswitch 23A-S17 in AUTO.
Standard:
Observes the Aux Oil Pump handswitch is in AUTO.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 13 Critical N
0255-06-IA-1 STEP 69.m: Gland Seal Condenser Blower handswitch 23A-S18 in AUTO.
Standard:
Observes the Gland Seal Condenser Blower handswitch is in AUTO.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 14 Critical N
0255-06-IA-1 STEP 69.n: Gland Seal Condensate Pump handswitch 23A-S19 in RUN.
Standard:
Observes the Gland Seal Condensate Pump handswitch is in RUN.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 15 Critical N
0255-06-IA-1 STEP 69.o: Pump Flow Controller, FIC-23-108, in AUTO at 87%.
Standard:
- 1. Observes the Flow Controller mode selector switch is positioned to AUTO or BALANCE.
- 2. Observes the Flow Controller tape set is at 87%.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
A.1.b Page 25 of 105 Terminating Cues:
Operator informs the evaluator that the task is complete.
DO NOT PROMPT!
Stop Time:
Page 26 of 105 TURNOVER SHEET INITIAL CONDITIONS:
The routine quarterly HPCI pump and valve surveillance has just been completed.
INITIATING CUES:
The Shift Supervisor directs you to perform the required independent verification, for the components in the Control Room, to assure the components are in an ECCS line-up.
Perform STEP 69 of Test 0255-06-IA-1.
Inform the evaluator when you have completed the task.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Retention: Life of policy + 10yrs.
Disposition: Reviewer and Approver Retain in: Training Program File Page 27 of 105 ATTACHMENT 1 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST ALL STEPS IN THIS CHECKLIST ARE TO BE PERFORMED UPON INITIAL VALIDATION AND PRIOR TO USE.
REVIEW STATEMENTS YES NO N/A
- 14.
Are all items on the signature page filled in correctly?
- 15.
Has the JPM been reviewed and validated by SMEs?
- 16.
Can the required conditions for the JPM be appropriately established in the simulator if required?
- 17.
Does the performance steps accurately reflect trainees actions in accordance with plant procedures?
- 18.
Is the standard for each performance item specific as to what controls, indications and ranges are required to evaluate if the trainee properly performed the step?
- 19.
Has the completion time been established based on validation data or incumbent experience?
- 20.
If the task is time critical, is the time critical portion based upon actual task performance requirements?
- 21.
Is the Licensee level appropriate for the task being evaluated if required?
- 22.
Is the K/A appropriate to the task and to the licensee level if required?
- 23.
Have the performance steps been identified and typed (Critical / Sequence / Time Critical) appropriately?
- 24.
Have all special tools and equipment needed to perform the task been identified and made available to the trainee?
- 25.
Are all references identified, current, accurate, and available to the trainee?
- 26.
Have all required cues (as anticipated) been identified for the evaluator to assist task completion?
All questions/statements must be answered YES or the JPM is not valid for use. If all questions/statements are answered YES then the JPM is considered valid and can be performed as written. The individual(s) performing the validation shall sign and date this form.
Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Retention: Life of policy + 10yrs.
Disposition: Reviewer and Approver Retain in: Training Program File Page 28 of 105 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE (JPM)
SITE:
MONTICELLO TASK TITLE:
EXPECTED DOSE DETERMINATION TO INSPECT EQUIPMENT JPM NUMBER:
A.3 REV.
0 RELATED PRA INFORMATION:
NONE TASK NUMBERS:
NL299.107 NL299.128 K/A NUMBERS:
Generic 2.3.4 APPLICABLE METHOD OF TESTING:
Discussion Simulate/walkthrough:
Perform:
EVALUATION LOCATION:
In-Plant:
Control Room:
Simulator:
Other:
Lab:
Time for Completion:
10 Minutes Time Critical:
NO 20 Minutes NO Maximum Time for Completion:
Alternate Path / Faulted:
TASK APPLICABILITY:
SRO/RO/NLO Additional signatures may be added as needed.
Developed by:
Instructor Date Validated by:
Validation Instructor (See JPM Validation Checklist, Attachment 1)
Date Approved by:
Training Supervisor Date
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
A.3 Page 29 of 105 JPM Number:
A.3 JPM
Title:
EXPECTED DOSE DETERMINATION TO INSPECT EQUIPMENT Examinee:
Evaluator:
Job
Title:
Date:
Start Time Finish Time PERFORMANCE RESULTS:
SAT:
UNSAT:
COMMENTS/FEEDBACK: (Comments shall be made for any steps graded unsatisfactory).
EVALUATORS SIGNATURE:
NOTE: Only this page needs to be retained in examinees record if completed satisfactorily. If unsatisfactory performance is demonstrated, the entire JPM should be retained.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
A.3 Page 30 of 105 SIMULATOR SETUP:
N/A INITIAL CONDITIONS:
Radiation Protection has informed the Control Room that CAM data from the Steam Chase indicates a possible steam leak exists.
Procedure 1279-05, HOT AREA INSPECTIONS, is being implemented for a full entry of the Steam Chase.
The CRS has chosen you to perform this inspection because of your expertise.
The inspection is projected to take approximately 30 minutes.
INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):
Review Procedure 1279-05, HOT AREA INSPECTIONS, and the associated RWP to determine what your expected dose will be for the inspection.
Determine what your annual exposure will be after completing the inspection.
Your current annual exposure is 1750 mrem.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
A.3 Page 31 of 105 JPM PERFORMANCE INFORMATION Required Materials:
See Simulator Setup General
References:
4 AWI-08.04.01, Rev 14 Task Standards:
Calculate Expected Dose to Inspect Equipment Start Time:
NOTE: When providing Evaluator Cues to the examinee, care must be exercised to avoid prompting the examinee.
Typically cues are only provided when the examinees actions warrant receiving the information (i.e. the examinee looks or asks for the indication).
NOTE:
Critical steps are marked with a Y below the performance step number. Failure to meet the standard for any critical step shall result in failure of this JPM.
Performance Step: 1 Critical Y Locates the survey map and RWP for the Steam Chase area.
Standard:
Describes location of survey map and RWP.
Evaluator Note:
Survey maps and RWPs are located on the basement level of the administration building in the same area where personnel obtain their ALANOR, near the Drywell entrance, by the HP Office or at the RCA Entry. Candidate may state that this task would be accomplished under its own work order that would contain the survey maps and an associated RWP.
Evaluator Cue:
AFTER the operator describes where the survey maps and RWPs are located, provide the operator with a copy of the appropriate survey map and RWP.
If the candidate asks for the most recent copy of Steam Chase leak status inform them, there are no previously known leaks in the Steam Chase.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
A.3 Page 32 of 105 Performance Step: 2 Critical Y Determines general area dose rates in the Steam Chase.
Standard:
General area dose rates are determined to be 1500 mrem/hr.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 3 Critical Y Calculate expected dose for the inspection.
Standard:
Determines total dose for the inspection is 1500 mrem/hr x 0.5 hr = 750 mrem.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 4 Critical Y Calculate the total annual exposure after completion of the inspection.
Standard:
Determines total annual exposure after the inspection to be 1750 mrem + 750 mrem = 2500 mrem.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
A.3 Page 33 of 105 Performance Step: 5 Critical Y Determines that the total annual exposure after completion of the inspection is greater than the administrative dose limit.
Standard:
Determines that the total annual exposure after completion of the inspection is greater than the administrative dose limit of 2000 mrem as stated in 4 AWI-08.04.01 page 24 (up to 40% of 10 CFR 20 limit without First Line Supervisor approval).
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 6 Critical Y Determines that a dose extension is needed and notifies the Control Room Supervisor.
Standard:
- 1.
Determines that a dose extension is needed.
- 2.
Contacts the CRS to get a dose extension.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Terminating Cues:
Operator informs the evaluator that the task is complete.
DO NOT PROMPT!
Stop Time:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Retention: Life of policy + 10yrs.
Disposition: Reviewer and Approver Retain in: Training Program File Page 34 of 105 TURNOVER SHEET INITIAL CONDITIONS:
Radiation Protection has informed the Control Room that CAM data from the Steam Chase indicates a possible steam leak exists.
Procedure 1279-05, HOT AREA INSPECTIONS, is being implemented for a full entry of the Steam Chase.
The CRS has chosen you to perform this inspection because of your expertise.
The inspection is projected to take approximately 30 minutes.
INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):
Review Procedure 1279-05, HOT AREA INSPECTIONS, and the associated RWP to determine what your expected dose will be for the inspection.
Determine what your annual exposure will be after completing the inspection.
Your current annual exposure is 1750 mrem.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Retention: Life of policy + 10yrs.
Disposition: Reviewer and Approver Retain in: Training Program File Page 35 of 105
SITE MONTICELLO TASK TITLE:
RESPONSE TO A LARGE DIESEL FUEL SPILL JPM NUMBER:
JPM-A.4 REV.
0 RELATED PRA INFORMATION:
NONE TASK NUMBERS:
CR299.147 K/A NUMBERS:
Generic 2.4.26 APPLICABLE METHOD OF TESTING:
Discussion Simulate/walkthrough:
Perform:
X EVALUATION LOCATION:
In-Plant:
Control Room:
Simulator:
Other:
X Lab:
Time for Completion:
10 Minutes Time Critical:
NO 20 Minutes NO Maximum Time for Completion:
Alternate Path / Faulted:
TASK APPLICABILITY:
SRO/RO Additional signatures may be added as needed.
Developed by:
Instructor Date Validated by:
Validation Instructor (See JPM Validation Checklist, Attachment 1)
Date Approved by:
Training Supervisor Date
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.4, RESPONSE TO A LARGE DIESEL FUEL SPILL, Rev. 0 Page 36 of 105 JPM Number:
JPM-A.4-010-001 JPM
Title:
RESPONSE TO A LARGE DIESEL FUEL SPILL Examinee:
Evaluator:
Job
Title:
Date:
Start Time Finish Time PERFORMANCE RESULTS:
SAT:
UNSAT:
COMMENTS/FEEDBACK: (Comments shall be made for any steps graded unsatisfactory).
EVALUATORS SIGNATURE:
NOTE: Only this page needs to be retained in examinees record if completed satisfactorily. If unsatisfactory performance is demonstrated, the entire JPM should be retained.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.4, RESPONSE TO A LARGE DIESEL FUEL SPILL, Rev. 0 Page 37 of 105 SIMULATOR SETUP:
None INITIAL CONDITIONS:
Reactor is operating normally at 100% power.
The Diesel Fuel Service Pump (P-77) is tagged out for repairs.
INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):
The Turbine building operator calls the Control Room and reports there is 3 inches of Diesel Fuel on the floor in the 11 EDG Day Tank room. The fuel is coming from the Day Tank overflow line and demands that the Diesel Fuel Transfer Pump be shutdown immediately. The Control Room Supervisor directs you to perform the immediate actions for a large oil spill.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.4, RESPONSE TO A LARGE DIESEL FUEL SPILL, Rev. 0 Page 38 of 105 JPM PERFORMANCE INFORMATION DURING THE JPM, ENSURE PROPER SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, FME, AND/OR RADIOLOGICAL CONCERNS AS APPLICABLE ARE FOLLOWED.
Required Materials:
See Simulator Setup General
References:
A.4-010, Rev 10 Task Standards:
Response To A Large Diesel Fuel Spill Start Time:
NOTE: When providing Evaluator Cues to the examinee, care must be exercised to avoid prompting the examinee.
Typically cues are only provided when the examinees actions warrant receiving the information (i.e. the examinee looks or asks for the indication).
NOTE:
Critical steps are marked with a Y below the performance step number. Failure to meet the standard for any critical step shall result in failure of this JPM.
Performance Step: 1 Critical N Locates procedure A.4-010 Oil or hazardous Substances Standard:
Locates appropriate procedure.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.4, RESPONSE TO A LARGE DIESEL FUEL SPILL, Rev. 0 Page 39 of 105 Performance Step: 2 Critical N Note 1: The containment and cleanup of spills, leaks or uncontrolled discharges SHALL be initiated immediately after notice of the discharge.
Note 2: A large spill/leak is one that is not easily isolated, contained and is >
5 gallons. Plant Maintenance and Operations Personnel may be required for containment and/or recovery activities at the direction of the Shift Manager/Shift Supervisor Note 3: Section 6.2.4 is a recommendation by the MPCA from the oil spill drill conducted in late October, 1996.
Note 4: Response activities SHALL NOT be attempted if contact with the spilled material is likely to occur, or if donning of specialized PPE is required.
Step 6.2.1 The Shift Manger/Shift supervisor SHALL be notified immediately of the spill/leak once discovered.
Standard:
Notifies the Shift Manger or Control Room Supervisor.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 3 Critical Y Step 6.2.2 Using the plant PA system, inform personnel of the spill/leak location and direct unnecessary personnel to remain clear of the affected area.
Standard:
Makes an announcement on the PA system such as:
Attention plant personnel, attention plant personnel, a diesel fuel oil spill has occurred in the No. 11 EDG Day Tank Room. All non-essential personnel stand clear of the No. 11 EDG Day Tank Room.
Evaluator Note:
Candidate should repeat the above announcement a second time (this is not part of the critical task).
Candidate may call out the Fire Brigade to combat the spill.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.4, RESPONSE TO A LARGE DIESEL FUEL SPILL, Rev. 0 Page 40 of 105 Performance Step: 4 Critical Y Step 6.2.3 Direct the isolation and/or containment of the spill/leak. Local damage control methods such as trenching, sand bagging, and barricading should be employed when possible to prevent the spread of hazardous chemicals.
Standard:
Verbalizes securing the Diesel Fuel Transfer pump by placing 42-4202/CS to STOP.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 5 Critical N Step 6.2.4 In the event of a large oil spill > 5 gallons, immediately consider initiating one or both of the following options to prevent spilled oil from being discharged directly to the river or discharge canal:
A. Obtain one or more storm drain blocker(s) (36x36; 30 lb rubber mats) from the east or west end of Turbine Building Addition(TBA) and apply (yellow side up) to the nearest affected storm drain(s).
B. Use containment/spill control materials from most convenient spill control equipment boxes.
C. For major spills (>100 gallons), use the site front end loader to dike sand/dirt around the affected storm drain.
Standard:
Candidate determines that there is nothing more that can be done to contain the spill.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 6 Critical N Step 6.2.5 If restricted access to the affected area is desired, contact the Security Shift Supervisor for Security Force assistance.
Standard:
Candidate may contact the Security Shift Supervisor for assistance.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.4, RESPONSE TO A LARGE DIESEL FUEL SPILL, Rev. 0 Page 41 of 105 Performance Step: 7 Critical Y Step 6.2.6 Contact one of the following organizations as soon as possible if the spill or leak is more challenging than site personnel can handle.
A. Chemical spills only
- 1.
Bay West (Containment/Cleanup Response Contractor) 1-800-279-0456 or 651-291-0456.
B. Oil spills only
- 1.
Xcel Electric Utility Construction.
- a.
Keith Olson (Day) 612-630-4505 (Pager) 612-539-0858
- b.
Steve Smieja (Day) 612-630-4141 (Pager) 612-538-5063 Standard:
Candidate calls one of the Oil spill contact numbers.
Evaluator Note:
Candidate may determine that the spill is within the capabilities of the plant and no other contact is needed.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 8 Critical Y Step 6.2.7 Inform the Environmental Coordinator of the event to provide spill containment and cleanup guidelines.
Standard:
Informs the Environmental Coordinator.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 9 Critical Y Step 6.2.8 IF spill/leak is within the Reactor Building, Turbine Building, or Radwaste Building, THEN notify the SCTMT Engr to evaluate for potential chemical contamination of the SBGT charcoal filters.
Standard:
Informs the SCTMT Engineer.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.4, RESPONSE TO A LARGE DIESEL FUEL SPILL, Rev. 0 Page 42 of 105 Terminating Cues:
Operator informs the evaluator that the task is complete.
DO NOT PROMPT!
Stop Time:
Page 43 of 105 TURNOVER SHEET INITIAL CONDITIONS:
Reactor is operating normally at 100% power.
The Diesel Fuel Service Pump (P-77) is tagged out for repairs.
INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):
The Turbine building operator calls the Control Room and reports there is 3 inches of Diesel Fuel on the floor in the 11 EDG Day Tank room. The fuel is coming from the Day Tank overflow line and demands that the Diesel Fuel Transfer Pump be shutdown immediately. The Control Room Supervisor directs you to perform the immediate actions for a large oil spill.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Retention: Life of policy + 10yrs.
Disposition: Reviewer and Approver Retain in: Training Program File Page 44 of 105 ATTACHMENT 1 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST ALL STEPS IN THIS CHECKLIST ARE TO BE PERFORMED UPON INITIAL VALIDATION AND PRIOR TO USE.
REVIEW STATEMENTS YES NO N/A
- 27.
Are all items on the signature page filled in correctly?
- 28.
Has the JPM been reviewed and validated by SMEs?
- 29.
Can the required conditions for the JPM be appropriately established in the simulator if required?
- 30.
Does the performance steps accurately reflect trainees actions in accordance with plant procedures?
- 31.
Is the standard for each performance item specific as to what controls, indications and ranges are required to evaluate if the trainee properly performed the step?
- 32.
Has the completion time been established based on validation data or incumbent experience?
- 33.
If the task is time critical, is the time critical portion based upon actual task performance requirements?
- 34.
Is the Licensee level appropriate for the task being evaluated if required?
- 35.
Is the K/A appropriate to the task and to the licensee level if required?
- 36.
Have the performance steps been identified and typed (Critical / Sequence / Time Critical) appropriately?
- 37.
Have all special tools and equipment needed to perform the task been identified and made available to the trainee?
- 38.
Are all references identified, current, accurate, and available to the trainee?
- 39.
Have all required cues (as anticipated) been identified for the evaluator to assist task completion?
All questions/statements must be answered YES or the JPM is not valid for use. If all questions/statements are answered YES then the JPM is considered valid and can be performed as written. The individual(s) performing the validation shall sign and date this form.
Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Retention: Life of policy + 10yrs.
Disposition: Reviewer and Approver Retain in: Training Program File Page 45 of 105 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE (JPM)
SITE:
MONTICELLO TASK TITLE:
OFF-GAS HYDROGEN ANALYZER CHECKS JPM NUMBER:
JPM-A.2 REV 0
RELATED PRA INFORMATION:
NONE TASK NUMBERS:
CR299.271 K/A NUMBERS:
Generic 2.2.12 APPLICABLE METHOD OF TESTING:
Discussion:
Simulate/walkthrough:
Perform:
X EVALUATION LOCATION:
In-Plant:
Control Room:
Simulator:
X Other:
Lab:
Time for Completion:
15 Minutes Time Critical:
NO 30 Minutes YES Maximum Time for Completion:
Alternate Path / Faulted:
TASK APPLICABILITY:
SRO/RO Additional signatures may be added as needed.
Developed by:
Instructor Date Validated by:
Validation Instructor (See JPM Validation Checklist, Attachment 1)
Date Approved by:
Training Supervisor Date
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.2, OFF-GAS HYDROGEN ANALYZER CHECKS, Rev 0 Page 46 of 105 JPM Number:
JPM-A.2 JPM
Title:
OFF-GAS HYDROGEN ANALYZER CHECKS Examinee:
Evaluator:
Job
Title:
Date:
Start Time Finish Time PERFORMANCE RESULTS:
SAT:
UNSAT:
COMMENTS/FEEDBACK: (Comments shall be made for any steps graded unsatisfactory).
EVALUATORS SIGNATURE:
NOTE: Only this page needs to be retained in examinees record if completed satisfactorily. If unsatisfactory performance is demonstrated, the entire JPM should be retained.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.2, OFF-GAS HYDROGEN ANALYZER CHECKS, Rev 0 Page 47 of 105 SIMULATOR SETUP:
Verify annunciator C-252B-28 is forced into alarm.
Verify a T.I.T. is hanging on Panel C-252 stating that Train A Hydrogen Analyzer Z is out of service for maintenance.
Verify that chart recorder paper for both trains analyzers contain a spike within the past 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.
Verify the Off-gas hydrogen analyzers are reading as follows:
o 0.7 for Train A H2 Analyzer X o
0.1 for Train A H2 Analyzer Y o
0.2 for Train B H2 Analyzer X o
0.3 for Train B H2 Analyzer Y o
0.1 for Train B H2 Analyzer Z INITIAL CONDITIONS:
The reactor is operating at 100% power.
The Train A Hydrogen Analyzer Z is out of service for maintenance.
INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):
Perform the daily Off-Gas Hydrogen Analyzer Checks per 0000-H, OPERATIONS DAILY LOG - PART H, Test 0209.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.2, OFF-GAS HYDROGEN ANALYZER CHECKS, Rev 0 Page 48 of 105 JPM PERFORMANCE INFORMATION DURING THE JPM, ENSURE PROPER SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, FME, AND/OR RADIOLOGICAL CONCERNS AS APPLICABLE ARE FOLLOWED.
Required Materials:
See simulator setup General
References:
Procedure 0000-H; Test 0209, Rev 80 Task Standards:
Perform the Daily Off-Gas Hydrogen Analyzer Checks Start Time:
NOTE: When providing Evaluator Cues to the examinee, care must be exercised to avoid prompting the examinee.
Typically cues are only provided when the examinees actions warrant receiving the information (i.e. the examinee looks or asks for the indication).
NOTE:
Critical steps are marked with a Y below the performance step number. Failure to meet the standard for any critical step shall result in failure of this JPM.
Performance Step: 1 Critical N Locates procedure 0000-H, OPERATIONS DAILY LOG - PART H, step 3.
Standard:
Locates appropriate procedure and step.
Evaluator Note:
Procedure 0000-H is normally kept on a clipboard within the Control Room.
Evaluator Cue:
After the candidate describes where to get a copy of the procedure hand the candidate a copy of procedure 0000-H.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.2, OFF-GAS HYDROGEN ANALYZER CHECKS, Rev 0 Page 49 of 105 Performance Step: 2 Critical Y STEP 3 IF an Off-Gas System air ejector is in operation, OR if within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of expected conditions requiring air ejector operating, THEN perform the following:
- a. Using Ops Man B.07.02.01-05 (RECOMBINER SYSTEM - SYSTEM OPERATION), determine and check the box for each trains operable H2 analyzer channels.
Train A: X Y Z Train B: X Y Z
Standard:
- 1. Monitors SPDS Screen 572 or process computer points OGR121-OGR126 to determine that hydrogen readings have been unsteady and -0.1%.
- 2. Contacts the TBO to determine that rotameter readings are greater than 50 CCM and less than full scale and bypass flow is 1800 - 2800 CCM.
- 3. Determines that the X and Y analyzers are operable for Train A.
- 4. Determines that all Train B analyzers are operable.
Evaluator Cue:
Report as the TBO that all off-gas hydrogen analyzer rotameter readings are greater than 50 CCM and less than full scale and bypass flow is 1800 - 2800 CCM.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 3 Critical N STEP 3.a.1) IF an operating train has one or less operable channel, THEN initiate required actions per ODCM-03.01, Table 3.
Standard:
Determines that a sufficient number of Off-Gas H2 Analyzers are in operation.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 4 Critical Y STEP 3.b In matrix below perform the following:
- 1) Check Yes or No for Train Operating status.
Standard:
Places a check in the Yes block for Train A and Train B.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.2, OFF-GAS HYDROGEN ANALYZER CHECKS, Rev 0 Page 50 of 105 Performance Step: 5 Critical Y STEP 3.b.2) Record channel analyzer % H2 indications. Indications may be obtained from AR-7554A/B, SPDS display 572, or process computer points OGR121 - OGR126.
Standard:
Records the following from AR-7554A/B:
- 1. 0.7 for Train A H2 Analyzer X
- 2. 0.1 for Train A H2 Analyzer Y
- 3. 0.2 for Train B H2 Analyzer X
- 4. 0.3 for Train B H2 Analyzer Y
- 5. 0.1 for Train B H2 Analyzer Z Evaluator Note:
If the candidate attempts to monitor SPDS display 572 or check process computer points OGR121-OGR126, inform the candidate that the hydrogen analyzer readings should be taken from the recorder.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 6 Critical N STEP 3.b.3) Check Yes or No for each analyzer re-zeroing within past 8.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />.
Standard:
Determines that each operating analyzer has been re-zeroed within the past 8.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />.
Evaluator Note:
This is determined by a spike on the chart recorder paper within the past 8.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> for each hydrogen analyzer.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 7 Critical N STEP 3.b.3).a) IF an analyzer has not re-zeroed, THEN perform manual re-zeroing of analyzer per Ops Man B.07.02.01-05, AND notify System Engineer during normal working hours.
Standard:
None Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.2, OFF-GAS HYDROGEN ANALYZER CHECKS, Rev 0 Page 51 of 105 Performance Step: 8 Critical Y STEP 3.b.4) For each train record the difference between its Channel X, Y and Z Highest and Lowest % H2 indications, and record reactor power.
Standard:
Records Train A H2 Analyzer Highest-Lowest difference of 0.6, Train B H2 Analyzer Highest-Lowest difference of 0.2, and reactor power of 100%.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 9 Critical Y STEP 3.b.4).a) IF difference is > 0.5%,
THEN notify System Engineer during normal working hours, AND notify Shift Supervision to determine actions and notifications.
Standard:
- 1. Determines that the Highest-Lowest difference recorded is > 0.5% and notifies the System Engineer.
Evaluator Note:
The candidate should make an entry in the comments section of the procedure stating that Train A Hydrogen Analyzer A is not operating within design tolerances.
Evaluator Cue:
Make a report as the System Engineer that Train A Hydrogen Analyzer X is not operating within design tolerances.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 10 Critical N
STEP 3.c IF the operability status is undetermined, AND Steam Jet Air Ejectors are not in service, THEN contact I&C group to perform Test 0211 (RECOMBINER TRAIN OUTLET HYDROGEN ANALYZER CALIBRATION PROCEDURES) to satisfy 0209 requirements.
Standard:
None Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Terminating Cues:
Operator informs the evaluator that the task is complete.
DO NOT PROMPT!
Stop Time:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.2, OFF-GAS HYDROGEN ANALYZER CHECKS, Rev 0 Page 52 of 105
Page 53 of 105 TURNOVER SHEET INITIAL CONDITIONS:
The reactor is operating at 100% power.
The Train A Hydrogen Analyzer Z is out of service for maintenance.
INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):
Perform the daily Off-Gas Hydrogen Analyzer Checks per 0000-H, OPERATIONS DAILY LOG - PART H, Test 0209.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Retention: Life of policy + 10yrs.
Disposition: Reviewer and Approver Retain in: Training Program File Page 54 of 105 ATTACHMENT 1 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST ALL STEPS IN THIS CHECKLIST ARE TO BE PERFORMED UPON INITIAL VALIDATION AND PRIOR TO USE.
REVIEW STATEMENTS YES NO N/A
- 40.
Are all items on the signature page filled in correctly?
- 41.
Has the JPM been reviewed and validated by SMEs?
- 42.
Can the required conditions for the JPM be appropriately established in the simulator if required?
- 43.
Does the performance steps accurately reflect trainees actions in accordance with plant procedures?
- 44.
Is the standard for each performance item specific as to what controls, indications and ranges are required to evaluate if the trainee properly performed the step?
- 45.
Has the completion time been established based on validation data or incumbent experience?
- 46.
If the task is time critical, is the time critical portion based upon actual task performance requirements?
- 47.
Is the Licensee level appropriate for the task being evaluated if required?
- 48.
Is the K/A appropriate to the task and to the licensee level if required?
- 49.
Have the performance steps been identified and typed (Critical / Sequence / Time Critical) appropriately?
- 50.
Have all special tools and equipment needed to perform the task been identified and made available to the trainee?
- 51.
Are all references identified, current, accurate, and available to the trainee?
- 52.
Have all required cues (as anticipated) been identified for the evaluator to assist task completion?
All questions/statements must be answered YES or the JPM is not valid for use. If all questions/statements are answered YES then the JPM is considered valid and can be performed as written. The individual(s) performing the validation shall sign and date this form.
Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Retention: Life of policy + 10yrs.
Disposition: Reviewer and Approver Retain in: Training Program File Page 55 of 105 ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility:
MNGP Date of Examination:
9/15/03 Exam Level (circle one)
RO /
SRO Operating Test Number:
03-01 Administrative Describe method of evaluation Topic/Subject
- 2. TWO Administrative Questions A.1 Plant JPM Perform Core Thermal Limits Monitoring and Identify Actions Parameter That Need to be Taken Verification Procedure C.2-05 Generic 2.1.19 (3.0), 2.1.33 (4.0)
(2002 NRC Exam)
Crew JPM Crew Staffing Determination Composition Procedure OWI-01.06 Generic 2.1.4 (3.4)
(New)
A.2 Surveillance JPM Perform the Daily Off-Gas Hydrogen Analyzer Checks Testing Procedure 0000-H, Test 0209 Generic 2.2.12 (3.4)
(New)
A.3 Radiation JPM Authorization for Emergency Exposure Control Exposure Procedure A.2-401 Control Generic 2.3.4 (3.1)
(New)
A.4 Emergency JPM Authorization for Potassium Iodide Use Director Actions Procedure A.2-304 Generic 2.4.38 (4.0)
(New)
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Retention: Life of policy + 10yrs.
Disposition: Reviewer and Approver Retain in: Training Program File Page 56 of 105 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE (JPM)
SITE:
MONTICELLO TASK TITLE:
CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING JPM NUMBER:
JPM-A.1.a REV.
1 RELATED PRA INFORMATION:
NONE TASK NUMBERS:
SS200.136 K/A NUMBERS:
Generic 2.1.19 APPLICABLE METHOD OF TESTING:
Discussion:
Simulate/walkthrough:
Perform:
X EVALUATION LOCATION:
In-Plant:
Control Room:
X Simulator:
Other:
Lab:
Time for Completion:
15 Minutes Time Critical:
NO 30 Minutes YES Maximum Time for Completion:
Alternate Path / Faulted:
TASK APPLICABILITY:
SRO Additional signatures may be added as needed.
Developed by:
Instructor Date Validated by:
Validation Instructor (See JPM Validation Checklist, Attachment 1)
Date Approved by:
Training Supervisor Date
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-C.2-05.B1-001, CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING, Rev. 1 Page 57 of 105 JPM Number:
JPM-C.2-05.B.1-001 JPM
Title:
CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING Examinee:
Evaluator:
Job
Title:
Date:
Start Time Finish Time PERFORMANCE RESULTS:
SAT:
UNSAT:
COMMENTS/FEEDBACK: (Comments shall be made for any steps graded unsatisfactory).
EVALUATORS SIGNATURE:
NOTE: Only this page needs to be retained in examinees record if completed satisfactorily. If unsatisfactory performance is demonstrated, the entire JPM should be retained.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-C.2-05.B1-001, CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING, Rev. 1 Page 58 of 105 SIMULATOR SETUP:
Copy of Operations Daily Log - Part E INITIAL CONDITIONS:
Reactor power has just been increased from 90% to 98% with the Recirc Flow Control System per C.2-05, LOAD FOLLOWING.
INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):
You have been asked to perform the Core Thermal Limits Monitoring for MFLCPR, MAPRAT and MFLPD per Ops Man C.2-05, Section B.1, and determine any required actions if necessary. Record data on Forms 0207, 0208, and 0225 of Operations Daily Log 0000 - Part E. Report when the task is complete.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-C.2-05.B1-001, CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING, Rev. 1 Page 59 of 105 JPM PERFORMANCE INFORMATION DURING THE JPM, ENSURE PROPER SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, FME, AND/OR RADIOLOGICAL CONCERNS AS APPLICABLE ARE FOLLOWED.
Required Materials:
See Simulator Setup General
References:
C.2-05, Rev. 13 Task Standards:
Perform Core Thermal Limits monitoring Start Time:
NOTE: When providing Evaluator Cues to the examinee, care must be exercised to avoid prompting the examinee.
Typically cues are only provided when the examinees actions warrant receiving the information (i.e. the examinee looks or asks for the indication).
NOTE:
Critical steps are marked with a Y below the performance step number. Failure to meet the standard for any critical step shall result in failure of this JPM.
Performance Step: 1 Critical N Locates procedure C.2-05, POWER OPERATION.
Standard:
Locates appropriate procedure.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 2 Critical N C.2-05 Part A, Step 1:
IF process computer is not anticipated to be available during a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> period, THEN contact a Nuclear Engineer to arrange determination of MCPR.
Standard:
Determines Process Computer is available.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-C.2-05.B1-001, CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING, Rev. 1 Page 60 of 105 Performance Step: 3 Critical Y C.2-05 Part A, Step 2.a:
When 3D Monicore computer is available, perform the following:
- a. Demand Official 3D Monitor to calculate core nodal power distribution, AND use MCPR data for the fuel assemblies that are closest to the limiting CPR.
NOTE 4:
The most limiting MCPR is edited as MFLCPR on the Periodic Log NOTE 5:
MFLCPR is the Core Maximum ratio of power and flow dependent CPR limit to the bundles actual CPR.
Standard:
Demands an Official 3D Monitor and evaluates MCPR data.
Evaluator Note:
A 3D Monitor edit cannot be demanded on the simulator.
Evaluator Cue:
Provided the candidate with a copy of the 3D Monitor edit.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 4 Critical Y C.2-05 Part A, Step 2.b:
Record the following data for the most limiting fuel bundle on Form 0225:
- a. The value of MFLCPR
- b. Core location of MFLCPR
- c. Percent rated core flow Standard:
Records data on Form 0225.
- a. MFLCPR.883
- b. Core location 13 - 32
- c. % rated core flow 89.9%
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-C.2-05.B1-001, CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING, Rev. 1 Page 61 of 105 Performance Step: 5 Critical Y C.2-05 Part A, Step 2.c:
Verify MFLCPR is below the Action Limit (0.98 times the Tech Spec Limit) and the Tech Spec Limit.
- 3) IF MFLCPR is below both limits, THEN initial Form 0225.
- 4) IF MFLCPR is not below both limits, THEN proceed as follows:
c) IF MFLCPR is above the Action Limit, THEN contact a Nuclear Engineer.
NOTE:
Reducing power with recirc flow will not decrease MFLCPR by a significant fraction and may increase MFLCPR. Rod pattern alteration will always be required to return MFLCPR to an acceptable value.
d) IF MFLCPR exceeds the Tech Spec Limit, THEN immediately contact a Nuclear Engineer.
AND take actions required by Tech Spec 3.11.C and 4 AWI-04.08.01 (EVENT NOTIFICATIONS).
Standard:
Verifies MFLCPR is below the Action and Tech Spec limits and checks YES on Form 0225 Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 6 Critical N C.2-05 Part A, Step 2.d:
IF MPR or EPR is out of service, THEN verify that guidance for additional actions for Core Thermal Limits Monitoring in Operations Manuals C.4-B.05.09.A (ABNORMAL PROCEDURES - MAIN STEAM PRESSURE REGULATOR FAILURE CAUSING DECREASING PRESSURE) and C.4-B.05.09.B (ABNORMAL PROCEDURES - MAIN STEAM PRESSURE REGULATOR FAILURE CAUSING INCREASING PRESSURE) is followed.
Standard:
Determines MPR and EPR are not out of service.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-C.2-05.B1-001, CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING, Rev. 1 Page 62 of 105 Performance Step: 7 Critical N C.2-05 Part B, Step 3:
Demand Official 3D Monitor to calculate the nodal power distribution, AND use the data for the fuel assembly that has its MAPRAT closest to 1.0.
Standard:
Evaluates nodal power distribution to find the fuel assembly that has its MAPRAT closest to 1.0.
Evaluator Note:
All three thermal limits are printed out when a 3D Monitor is requested.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 8 Critical Y C.2-05 Part B, Step 3:
Record the following data for the most limiting fuel bundle on Form 0225:
- a. The value of MAPRAT
- b. Core location of MAPRAT
- c. Percent rated core flow Standard:
Records data on Form 0225.
- a. MAPRAT.880
- b. Core location 35 5
- c. % rated core flow 89.9%
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-C.2-05.B1-001, CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING, Rev. 1 Page 63 of 105 Performance Step: 9 Critical Y C.2-05 Part B, Step 5.a:
Verify MAPRAT is below the Action Limit (0.98 times the Tech Spec Limit) and the Tech Spec Limit.
- c.
IF MAPRAT is below both limits, THEN initial FORM 0207.
- d. IF MAPRAT is not below both limits, THEN proceed as follows:
- 3) IF MAPRAT is above the Action Limit, AND below the Tech Spec Limit, THEN contact a Nuclear Engineer.
- 4) IF MAPRAT exceeds the Tech Spec Limit, THEN immediately contact a Nuclear Engineer, AND take action required by Tech Spec 3.11.A and 4 AWI-04.08.01.
NOTE:
Reducing power with recirc flow will not decrease MAPRAT by a significant fraction and may increase MAPRAT. Rod pattern alterations will always be required to return MAPRAT to an acceptable value.
Standard:
Verifies MAPRAT is below the Action and Tech Spec limits and checks YES on Form 0207.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 10 Critical N
C.2-05 Part B, Step 5.c:
IF either the MPR or the EPR is out of service, THEN verify that guidance for additional actions for Core Thermal Limits Monitoring in Operations Manuals C.4-B.05.09.A and C.4-B.05.09.B is followed.
Standard:
Determines MPR and EPR are not out of service.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-C.2-05.B1-001, CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING, Rev. 1 Page 64 of 105 Performance Step: 11 Critical N
C.2-05 Part C, Step 6:
Demand the Official 3D Monitor to calculate the nodal power distribution.
Standard:
Evaluates nodal power distribution.
Evaluator Note:
All three thermal limits are printed out when a 3D Monitor is requested.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 12 Critical N
C.2-05 Part C, Step 7:
Scan the Periodic Log to find the highest MFLPD, AND note the MFLPD and the location in the core where it exists.
Standard:
Scans Periodic Log and finds the highest MFLPD and its location in the core.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 13 Critical Y
C.2-05 Part C, Step 8:
Record the following data for the most limiting fuel bundle on Form 0208:
- b. The value of MFLPD.
b.
The location of MFLPD.
Standard:
Records the data on Form 0208.
- a. MFLPD 1.01
- b. Location of MFLPD 35 5 Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-C.2-05.B1-001, CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING, Rev. 1 Page 65 of 105 Performance Step: 14 Critical Y
C.2-05 Part C, Step 9.a:
Verify MFLPD is below Action Limit (0.98 times the Tech Spec Limit) and Tech Spec Limit.
- b. IF MFLPD is below both limits, THEN initial Form 0208 Standard:
Determines MFLPD is above the Action and Tech Spec limits and checks NO on form 0208.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 15 Critical Y
C.2-05 Part C, Step 9.b:
IF MFLPD is not below both limits, THEN proceeds as follows:
- 3) IF MFLPD is above the Action Limit, AND below the Tech Spec Limit, THEN contact the Nuclear Engineer.
- 4) IF MFLPD exceeds the Tech Spec Limit, THEN immediately contact a Nuclear Engineer.
CAUTION Reducing power can cause an increase in MFLCPR or MAPRAT. If any bundle has a MAPRAT or MFLCPR greater than the corresponding Action Limit (0.98 for MAPRAT and 0.98 for MFLCPR), do not reduce power more than 3% prior to contacting a Nuclear Engineer.
d) Reduce power at the maximum allowable rate until MFLPD meets the Tech Spec Limit.
NOTE:
A rapid estimate of the MFLPD can be made by assuming that a power decrease of 1% leads to a MFLPD decrease of 0.01.
Standard:
- 3. Immediately contacts the Nuclear Engineer
- 4. Evaluates that power needs to be reduced approximately 2%. (A caution prevents reducing power by more than 2% without Nuclear Engineer concurrence.)
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-C.2-05.B1-001, CORE THERMAL LIMITS MONITORING, Rev. 1 Page 66 of 105 Performance Step: 16 Critical Y
C.2-05 Part C, Step 9.b.2.b) & c):
e) Take actions required by Tech Spec 3.11.B.
f)
Inform personnel according to 4AWI.04.08.01.
Standard:
- 1. Describes actions that need to be taken per Tech Spec 3.11.B.
If at any time during operation it is determined that the limiting value for LHGR is being exceeded, action shall be initiated within 15 minutes to restore operation to within the prescribed limits. Surveillance and corresponding action shall continue until reactor operation is within the prescribed limits. If the LHGR is not returned to within the prescribed limits within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, reduce thermal power to less than 25% within the next 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.
- 2. Describe who needs to be notified per 4AWI.04.08.01.
Part A of Form 3389 (EVENT NOTIFICATIONS)
General Superintendent Operations
General Superintendent Engineering
Superintendent Nuclear Engineering (courtesy call only)
Plant Manager
Site Vice President Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Terminating Cues:
Operator informs the evaluator that the task is complete.
DO NOT PROMPT!
Stop Time:
Page 67 of 105 TURNOVER SHEET INITIAL CONDITIONS:
Reactor power has just been increased from 90% to 98% with the Recirc Flow Control System per C.2-05, LOAD FOLLOWING.
INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):
You have been asked to perform the Core Thermal Limits Monitoring for MFLCPR, MAPRAT and MFLPD per Ops Man C.2-05, Section B.1, and determine any required actions if necessary. Record data on Forms 0207, 0208, and 0225 of Operations Daily Log 0000 - Part E. Report when the task is complete.
Page 68 of 105 1 PAGE 1 MONTI C22 3DM DIST SEQUENCE NO 16 CORE PARAMETERS 3D MONICORE 17-SEP-2003 12:11 CALCULATED POWER MWT 1769 PERIODIC LOG 17-SEP-2003 12:12 PRINTED POWER MWE 603 CASE ID FMLD1030617121158 FLOW MLB/HR 53.499 CALC RESULTS RESTART FMLD1030617120213 FPAPDR 0.907 LPRM SHAPE - FULL CORE SUBC BTU/LB 24.71 Keff 1.0015 PR PSIa 1015.8 XE WORTH % -2.41 LOAD LINE
SUMMARY
CORE MWD/sT 22679.1 XE/RATED 1.06 CORE POWER 98.0%
CYCLE MWD/sT 2810.2 CORE FLOW 89.9%
MCPR 1.719 LOAD LINE 104.2%
CORRECTION FACTOR: MFLCPR= 1.007 MFLPD= 1.000 MAPRAT= 0.987 OPTION: ARTS DUAL LOOP MANUAL FLOW MCPRLIM= 1.470 MOST LIMITING LOCATIONS (NON-SYMMETRIC)
MFLCPR LOC MFLPD LOC MAPRAT LOC PCRAT LOC 0.883 13-32 1.010 35 5 0.880 35 5 0.986 19 3 0.864 17-14 0.944 13 5 0.863 13 5 0.984 17 4 0.861 21-14 0.940 35 5 0.855 21 4 0.983 39 5 0.859 13-36 0.934 11 5 0.850 15 4 0.983 13 5 0.859 13-34 0.930 13 5 0.838 35 5 0.981 41 5 0.846 15-30 0.927 21 4 0.831 13 5 0.981 31 4 0.840 33-14 0.915 15 4 0.831 13 5 0.980 35 5 0.839 23-16 0.910 15 4 0.828 19 4 0.979 21 3 0.839 11-32 0.908 19 4 0.825 11 5 0.977 39 5 0.838 15-16 0.907 23 4 0.798 23 4 0.974 14 5 SEQ. A2R4 C=MFLCPR D=MFLPD M=MAPRAT P=PCRAT *=MULTIPLE CORE AVE AXIAL 51 NOTCH REL PW LOC 00 0.076 24 47 02 0.245 23 L 04 0.634 22 43 30 00 30 06 0.758 21 08 0.884 20 39 10 0.977 19 L 12 1.004 18 35 30 00 00 00 30 14 1.004 17 16 1.056 16 31 18 1.044 15 L 20 1.110 14 27 00 00 00 00 00 22 1.144 13 24 1.183 12 23 26 1.215 11 L 28 1.212 10 19 30 00 00 00 30 30 1.214 09 C
- 32 1.247 08 15 34 1.262 07 L 36 1.299 06 11 30 00 30 38 1.340 05 40 1.344 04 07 42 1.258 03 L 44 1.125 02 03 L L L L L L 46 0.361 01 02 06 10 14 18 22 26 30 34 38 42 46 50 CORE AVERAGE RADIAL POWER DISTRIBUTION RING # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 REL PW 0.837 1.325 1.225 1.261 1.302 1.105 0.420
Page 69 of 105 1 PAGE 2 MONTI C22 3DM DIST INSTRUMENT READINGS/STATUS SEQUENCE NO 16 CALIBRATED LPRM READINGS 17-SEP-2003 12:11 CALCULATED 17-SEP-2003 12:12 PRINTED 45D 21.4 25.4 18.3 CASE ID FMLD1020520110024 C 34.1 0.0 30.7 LPRM SHAPE - FULL CORE B 0.0 42.0 38.3 A 55.3 50.7 46.5 FAILED SENSORS:
37D 27.3 24.7 27.4 23.8 18.6 LPRM ( 4 SIGNAL FAILED)
C 41.6 42.0 43.0 40.4 30.3 1213B 2045B 2805C 2845C B 52.2 52.4 53.7 52.9 39.0 LPRM ( 0 PANACEA REJECTED)
A 60.5 63.9P 67.2 68.1 44.5 LPRM ( 2 PANACEA REJECTED) 1237A 3645A 29D 19.8 28.3C 27.2 24.2 28.5 25.4 NONE C 25.5 41.2 45.8 43.0 44.1 34.1 B 28.5 51.1 53.9 51.5 53.9 42.6 T = TIP RUN RECOMMENDED A 26.1 60.5 61.1 61.9 64.9 51.6 T = TIP RUN RECOMMENDED 21D 30.6 27.4 26.0 25.4 20.9 D = MFLPD LOCATION C 44.3 43.2 45.4 43.2 33.9 P = PCRAT LOCATION B 55.0 51.4 53.2 53.2 44.1 P = PCRAT LOCATION A 61.5 58.1 63.4 64.5 56.9 * = MULTIPLE LIMIT 13D 20.9 23.3 27.3 27.1 C 35.2 41.5 42.2 41.4 B 0.0 55.6 51.9 53.0 A 44.8 70.2 59.4 63.5*
05D 19.4 C 0.0 B 28.4 A 26.3 04 12 20 28 36 44 CORE
SUMMARY
CORE POWER 98.0% CALC SUB FLOW 89.4% DP MEAS PSI 14.73 CORE FLOW 89.9% OPER SUB FLOW -1.7% DP CALC PSI 17.85 LOAD LINE 104.2% FLOW BASIS MEAS FEEDWTR FLOW MLB/HR 7.07 APRM CALIBRATION A B C D E F READING 99.7 99.3 99.3 99.6 99.5 99.0 AGAF 0.983 0.987 0.987 0.984 0.985 0.990 APRM - %CTP 1.7 1.3 1.3 1.6 1.5 1.0 TIP RUNS RECOMMENDED STRINGS: NONE
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Retention: Life of policy + 10yrs.
Disposition: Reviewer and Approver Retain in: Training Program File Page 70 of 105 ATTACHMENT 1 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST ALL STEPS IN THIS CHECKLIST ARE TO BE PERFORMED UPON INITIAL VALIDATION AND PRIOR TO USE.
REVIEW STATEMENTS YES NO N/A
- 53.
Are all items on the signature page filled in correctly?
- 54.
Has the JPM been reviewed and validated by SMEs?
- 55.
Can the required conditions for the JPM be appropriately established in the simulator if required?
- 56.
Does the performance steps accurately reflect trainees actions in accordance with plant procedures?
- 57.
Is the standard for each performance item specific as to what controls, indications and ranges are required to evaluate if the trainee properly performed the step?
- 58.
Has the completion time been established based on validation data or incumbent experience?
- 59.
If the task is time critical, is the time critical portion based upon actual task performance requirements?
- 60.
Is the Licensee level appropriate for the task being evaluated if required?
- 61.
Is the K/A appropriate to the task and to the licensee level if required?
- 62.
Have the performance steps been identified and typed (Critical / Sequence / Time Critical) appropriately?
- 63.
Have all special tools and equipment needed to perform the task been identified and made available to the trainee?
- 64.
Are all references identified, current, accurate, and available to the trainee?
- 65.
Have all required cues (as anticipated) been identified for the evaluator to assist task completion?
All questions/statements must be answered YES or the JPM is not valid for use. If all questions/statements are answered YES then the JPM is considered valid and can be performed as written. The individual(s) performing the validation shall sign and date this form.
Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Retention: Life of policy + 10yrs.
Disposition: Reviewer and Approver Retain in: Training Program File Page 71 of 105 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE (JPM)
SITE:
MONTICELLO TASK TITLE:
CREW STAFFING DETERMINATION JPM NUMBER:
JPM-A.1.b REV.
0 RELATED PRA INFORMATION:
NONE TASK NUMBERS:
SS299.294 K/A NUMBERS:
Generic 2.1.4 APPLICABLE METHOD OF TESTING:
Discussion Simulate/walkthrough:
Perform:
X EVALUATION LOCATION:
In-Plant:
Control Room:
Simulator:
Other:
X Lab:
Time for Completion:
7 Minutes Time Critical:
NO 14 Minutes NO Maximum Time for Completion:
Alternate Path / Faulted:
TASK APPLICABILITY:
SRO Additional signatures may be added as needed.
Developed by:
Instructor Date Validated by:
Validation Instructor (See JPM Validation Checklist, Attachment 1)
Date Approved by:
Training Supervisor Date
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.1.b, CREW STAFFING DETERMINATION, Rev. 0 Page 72 of 105 JPM Number:
JPM-A.1.b JPM
Title:
CREW STAFFING DETERMINATION Examinee:
Evaluator:
Job
Title:
Date:
Start Time Finish Time PERFORMANCE RESULTS:
SAT:
UNSAT:
COMMENTS/FEEDBACK: (Comments shall be made for any steps graded unsatisfactory).
EVALUATORS SIGNATURE:
NOTE: Only this page needs to be retained in examinees record if completed satisfactorily. If unsatisfactory performance is demonstrated, the entire JPM should be retained.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.1.b, CREW STAFFING DETERMINATION, Rev. 0 Page 73 of 105 SIMULATOR SETUP:
Not Applicable INITIAL CONDITIONS:
The time is 0930 Sunday morning with the plant operating at 100% power.
INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):
Ralph Mack has just informed you that he is leaving immediately due to a personal emergency. He has given a turnover to Tom Waibel, who has just recently completed his proficiency watches as Reactor Operator but is not current on Fire Brigade qualification.
You are to identify the staffing adjustment that need to be made, recommendations for call-outs, and time constraints. Vocalize your thought process and report when you have completed the task.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.1.b, CREW STAFFING DETERMINATION, Rev. 0 Page 74 of 105 MNGP Shift Roster Sunday, September 14, 2003 Description Assigned Assumed At Relieved At 1
Shift Manager Tim Witschen 09/16/2003 0635 2
Control Room Supervisor Greg Rask 09/16/2003 0628 3
Work Control Supervisor Don Modesitt 09/16/2003 0638 4
NLPE&RO Duane VanCulin 09/16/2003 0632 5
NPE&RO Brad Casperson 09/16/2003 0640 6
NPE&RO Ralph Mack 09/16/2003 0641 7
NAPEO Scott Dowd 09/16/2003 0632 8
NAPEO Dave Voisin 09/16/2003 0638 9
RP Specialist Howard Johnson 09/16/2003 0628 10 Chemistry Technician Donald Trump 09/16/2003 0625 11 Fire Brigade Leader Greg Rask 09/16/2003 0628 12 Fire Brigade Member #1 Ralph Mack 09/16/2003 0641 13 Fire Brigade Member #2 Scott Dowd 09/16/2003 0632 14 Fire Brigade Member #3 Howard Johnson 09/16/2003 0628 15 Fire Brigade Member #4 Donald Trump 09/16/2003 0625 16 Safe Shutdown Member #1 Tim Witschen 09/16/2003 0635 17 Safe Shutdown Member #2 Duane VanCulin 09/16/2003 0632 18 Safe Shutdown Member #3 Brad Casperson 09/16/2003 0640 19 Safe Shutdown Member #4 Dave Voisin 09/16/2003 0638 Qualified Fire Brigade Members Greg Rask Duane VanCulin Brad Casperson Ralph Mack Scott Dowd Dave Voisin Howard Johnson Donald Trump
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.1.b, CREW STAFFING DETERMINATION, Rev. 0 Page 75 of 105 JPM PERFORMANCE INFORMATION DURING THE JPM, ENSURE PROPER SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, FME, AND/OR RADIOLOGICAL CONCERNS AS APPLICABLE ARE FOLLOWED.
Required Materials:
See Simulator Setup General
References:
OWI-01.06, Rev 15; 4AWI-08.01.01, Rev 19 Task Standards:
Shift staffing adjusted and actions taken to meet minimum shift staffing within the time constraints Start Time:
NOTE: When providing Evaluator Cues to the examinee, care must be exercised to avoid prompting the examinee.
Typically cues are only provided when the examinees actions warrant receiving the information (i.e. the examinee looks or asks for the indication).
NOTE:
Critical steps are marked with a Y below the performance step number. Failure to meet the standard for any critical step shall result in failure of this JPM.
Performance Step: 1 Critical N Obtains a current copy of the shift staffing report to determine status of shift staffing.
Standard:
Reviews the MNGP Shift Roster and identifies that Ralph was filling the position of Fire Brigade Member #1 in addition to NPE&RO.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.1.b, CREW STAFFING DETERMINATION, Rev. 0 Page 76 of 105 Performance Step: 2 Critical Y Identify the time requirements to have minimum staffing positions filled.
Standard:
Determines that minimum staffing must be filled within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> per 4AWI-08.01.01.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 3 Critical Y Initiates the process for call-out to fill the Fire Brigade Member position.
Standard:
Directs the NLPE&RO to initiate a call-out for the needed individual.
Evaluator Cue:
Report as the NLPE&RO that Jerry Simpson has been called in to replace Tom Waibel as the NPE&RO and as Fire Brigade Member #1 and will be here in 45 minutes.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Terminating Cues:
Operator informs the evaluator that the task is complete.
DO NOT PROMPT!
Stop Time:
Page 77 of 105 TURNOVER SHEET INITIAL CONDITIONS:
The time is 0930 Sunday morning with the plant operating at 100% power.
INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):
Ralph Mack has just informed you that he is leaving immediately due to a personal emergency. He has given a turnover to Tom Waibel, who has just recently completed his proficiency watches as Reactor Operator but is not current on Fire Brigade qualification.
You are to identify the staffing adjustment that need to be made, recommendations for call-outs, and time constraints. Vocalize your thought process and report when you have completed the task.
Page 78 of 105 MNGP Shift Roster Sunday, September 14, 2003 Description Assigned Assumed At Relieved At 1
Shift Manager Tim Witschen 09/16/2003 0635 2
Control Room Supervisor Greg Rask 09/16/2003 0628 3
Work Control Supervisor Don Modesitt 09/16/2003 0638 4
NLPE&RO Duane VanCulin 09/16/2003 0632 5
NPE&RO Brad Casperson 09/16/2003 0640 6
NPE&RO Ralph Mack 09/16/2003 0641 7
NAPEO Scott Dowd 09/16/2003 0632 8
NAPEO Dave Voisin 09/16/2003 0638 9
RP Specialist Howard Johnson 09/16/2003 0628 10 Chemistry Technician Donald Trump 09/16/2003 0625 11 Fire Brigade Leader Greg Rask 09/16/2003 0628 12 Fire Brigade Member #1 Ralph Mack 09/16/2003 0641 13 Fire Brigade Member #2 Scott Dowd 09/16/2003 0632 14 Fire Brigade Member #3 Howard Johnson 09/16/2003 0628 15 Fire Brigade Member #4 Donald Trump 09/16/2003 0625 16 Safe Shutdown Member #1 Tim Witschen 09/16/2003 0635 17 Safe Shutdown Member #2 Duane VanCulin 09/16/2003 0632 18 Safe Shutdown Member #3 Brad Casperson 09/16/2003 0640 19 Safe Shutdown Member #4 Dave Voisin 09/16/2003 0638 Qualified Fire Brigade Members Greg Rask Duane VanCulin Brad Casperson Ralph Mack Scott Dowd Dave Voisin Howard Johnson Donald Trump
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Retention: Life of policy + 10yrs.
Disposition: Reviewer and Approver Retain in: Training Program File Page 79 of 105 ATTACHMENT 1 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST ALL STEPS IN THIS CHECKLIST ARE TO BE PERFORMED UPON INITIAL VALIDATION AND PRIOR TO USE.
REVIEW STATEMENTS YES NO N/A
- 66.
Are all items on the signature page filled in correctly?
- 67.
Has the JPM been reviewed and validated by SMEs?
- 68.
Can the required conditions for the JPM be appropriately established in the simulator if required?
- 69.
Does the performance steps accurately reflect trainees actions in accordance with plant procedures?
- 70.
Is the standard for each performance item specific as to what controls, indications and ranges are required to evaluate if the trainee properly performed the step?
- 71.
Has the completion time been established based on validation data or incumbent experience?
- 72.
If the task is time critical, is the time critical portion based upon actual task performance requirements?
- 73.
Is the Licensee level appropriate for the task being evaluated if required?
- 74.
Is the K/A appropriate to the task and to the licensee level if required?
- 75.
Have the performance steps been identified and typed (Critical / Sequence / Time Critical) appropriately?
- 76.
Have all special tools and equipment needed to perform the task been identified and made available to the trainee?
- 77.
Are all references identified, current, accurate, and available to the trainee?
- 78.
Have all required cues (as anticipated) been identified for the evaluator to assist task completion?
All questions/statements must be answered YES or the JPM is not valid for use. If all questions/statements are answered YES then the JPM is considered valid and can be performed as written. The individual(s) performing the validation shall sign and date this form.
Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Retention: Life of policy + 10yrs.
Disposition: Reviewer and Approver Retain in: Training Program File Page 80 of 105 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE (JPM)
SITE:
MONTICELLO TASK TITLE:
AUTHORIZATION FOR EMERGENCY EXPOSURE CONTROL JPM NUMBER:
JPM-A.3 REV.
0 RELATED PRA INFORMATION:
NONE TASK NUMBERS:
SS304.116 K/A NUMBERS:
Generic 2.3.4 APPLICABLE METHOD OF TESTING:
Discussion:
Simulate/walkthrough:
Perform:
X EVALUATION LOCATION:
In-Plant:
Control Room:
Simulator:
Other:
X Lab:
Time for Completion:
10 Minutes Time Critical:
20 Minutes NO Maximum Time for Completion:
Alternate Path / Faulted:
TASK APPLICABILITY:
SRO Additional signatures may be added as needed.
Developed by:
Instructor Date Validated by:
Validation Instructor (See JPM Validation Checklist, Attachment 1)
Date Approved by:
Training Supervisor Date
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.3, AUTHORIZATION FOR EMERGENCY EXPOSURE CONTROL, Rev 0 Page 81 of 105 JPM Number:
JPM-A.2-401-001 JPM
Title:
AUTHORIZATION FOR EMERGENCY EXPOSURE CONTROL Examinee:
Evaluator:
Job
Title:
Date:
Start Time Finish Time PERFORMANCE RESULTS:
SAT:
UNSAT:
COMMENTS/FEEDBACK: (Comments shall be made for any steps graded unsatisfactory).
EVALUATORS SIGNATURE:
NOTE: Only this page needs to be retained in examinees record if completed satisfactorily. If unsatisfactory performance is demonstrated, the entire JPM should be retained.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.3, AUTHORIZATION FOR EMERGENCY EXPOSURE CONTROL, Rev 0 Page 82 of 105 SIMULATOR SETUP:
Provide the candidate a completed Pre-Job Briefing form. Ensure the form states that the task will take approximately 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> in a radiation field of 20R/hr.
Form 5790-401-01 is filled out as follows:
o Part A with an authorized limit of 10 Rem.
o Part B with signature.
o Part C with REC signature.
INITIAL CONDITIONS:
Severe Fuel Element Failure has occurred.
Reactor is experiencing an ATWS and is currently at 30% power.
C.5-2007 is being implemented.
SBLC has failed to initiate from the Control Room.
The determination has been made to inject boron using C.5-3102 (ALTERNATE BORON INJECTION WITH CRD).
Reactor building radiation levels on the 935 floor are 20 R/hour
The TSC is not manned and the Shift Manager has become incapacitated.
A Pre-Job brief has been completed.
INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):
Determine if any additional paperwork or authorization is needed for the operator to perform this task.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.3, AUTHORIZATION FOR EMERGENCY EXPOSURE CONTROL, Rev 0 Page 83 of 105 JPM PERFORMANCE INFORMATION DURING THE JPM, ENSURE PROPER SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, FME, AND/OR RADIOLOGICAL CONCERNS AS APPLICABLE ARE FOLLOWED.
Required Materials:
See Simulator Setup General
References:
A.2-401 Rev 8, Form 5790-401-01 Rev 8 Task Standards:
Authorization for Emergency Exposure Control Start Time:
NOTE: When providing Evaluator Cues to the examinee, care must be exercised to avoid prompting the examinee.
Typically cues are only provided when the examinees actions warrant receiving the information (i.e. the examinee looks or asks for the indication).
NOTE:
Critical steps are marked with a Y below the performance step number. Failure to meet the standard for any critical step shall result in failure of this JPM.
Performance Step: 1 Critical N Locates procedure A.2-401 Standard:
Locates appropriate procedure and step.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.3, AUTHORIZATION FOR EMERGENCY EXPOSURE CONTROL, Rev 0 Page 84 of 105 Performance Step: 2 Critical Y IMPORTANT: In the event a planned emergency exposure is necessary, the following actions should be performed. Although it is preferable to perform and document these steps prior to the exposure, if necessary, the Emergency Director may verbally authorize the increased exposure and complete the documentation at a later time.
Step 6.1.1 Initiate Form 5790-401-01 (EMERGENCY EXPOSURE AUTHORZIATION FORM).
Standard:
Determines that the operator will exceed the federal dose limit and initiates form 5790-401-01.
Evaluator Cue:
Hand candidate Form 5790-401-01 after the candidate verbalizes it is needed.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 3 Critical N Step 6.1.2 Complete PART A of the EMERGENCY EXPOSURE AUTHORIZATION as follows:
A. Record personal information provided by the individual and/or other exposure control files.
B. Record the date the exposure was authorized and the authorized exposure limit (refer to Form 5790-107-04 (EMERGENCY WORK REQUEST) if completed).
C. Check the applicable INDIVIDUAL INFORMATION boxes.
D. Check the applicable EMERGENCY ACTIONS boxes.
E. Thoroughly brief the individual on the consequences of acute emergency exposures (review the EFFECTS OF ACUTE EXPOSURES, FIGURE 7.2) and other aspects of the emergency action.
F. Sign and date the completed PART A.
Standard:
- 1.
Reviews completed Part A and B of form 5790-401-01.
- 2.
Determines that the authorized limit is not adequate and changes authorized limit to 20 - 25 Rem.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.3, AUTHORIZATION FOR EMERGENCY EXPOSURE CONTROL, Rev 0 Page 85 of 105 Performance Step: 4 Critical Y Step 6.1.4 Route the completed form to the Radiological Emergency Coordinator for review and Emergency Director approval.
Standard:
Signs for Emergency Director approval in Part C.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Terminating Cues:
Operator informs the evaluator that the task is complete.
DO NOT PROMPT!
Stop Time:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Page 86 of 105 TURNOVER SHEET INITIAL CONDITIONS:
Severe Fuel Element Failure has occurred.
Reactor is experiencing an ATWS and is currently at 30% power.
C.5-2007 is being implemented.
SBLC has failed to initiate from the Control Room.
The determination has been made to inject boron using C.5-3102 (ALTERNATE BORON INJECTION WITH CRD).
Reactor building radiation levels on the 935 floor are 20 R/hour
The TSC is not manned and the Shift Manager has become incapacitated.
A Pre-Job brief has been completed.
INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):
Determine if any additional paperwork or authorization is needed for the operator to perform this task.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Retention: Life of policy + 10yrs.
Disposition: Reviewer and Approver Retain in: Training Program File Page 87 of 105 ATTACHMENT 1 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST ALL STEPS IN THIS CHECKLIST ARE TO BE PERFORMED UPON INITIAL VALIDATION AND PRIOR TO USE.
REVIEW STATEMENTS YES NO N/A
- 79.
Are all items on the signature page filled in correctly?
- 80.
Has the JPM been reviewed and validated by SMEs?
- 81.
Can the required conditions for the JPM be appropriately established in the simulator if required?
- 82.
Does the performance steps accurately reflect trainees actions in accordance with plant procedures?
- 83.
Is the standard for each performance item specific as to what controls, indications and ranges are required to evaluate if the trainee properly performed the step?
- 84.
Has the completion time been established based on validation data or incumbent experience?
- 85.
If the task is time critical, is the time critical portion based upon actual task performance requirements?
- 86.
Is the Licensee level appropriate for the task being evaluated if required?
- 87.
Is the K/A appropriate to the task and to the licensee level if required?
- 88.
Have the performance steps been identified and typed (Critical / Sequence / Time Critical) appropriately?
- 89.
Have all special tools and equipment needed to perform the task been identified and made available to the trainee?
- 90.
Are all references identified, current, accurate, and available to the trainee?
- 91.
Have all required cues (as anticipated) been identified for the evaluator to assist task completion?
All questions/statements must be answered YES or the JPM is not valid for use. If all questions/statements are answered YES then the JPM is considered valid and can be performed as written. The individual(s) performing the validation shall sign and date this form.
Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Retention: Life of policy + 10yrs.
Disposition: Reviewer and Approver Retain in: Training Program File Page 88 of 105 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE (JPM)
SITE:
MONTICELLO TASK TITLE:
AUTHORIZATION FOR POTASSIUM IODIDE USE JPM NUMBER:
JPM-A.4 REV.
0 RELATED PRA INFORMATION:
NONE TASK NUMBERS:
SS304.133 K/A NUMBERS:
Generic 2.4.36 APPLICABLE METHOD OF TESTING:
Discussion Simulate/walkthrough:
Perform:
X EVALUATION LOCATION:
In-Plant:
Control Room:
Simulator:
Other:
X Lab:
Time for Completion:
10 Minutes Time Critical:
NO 20 Minutes NO Maximum Time for Completion:
Alternate Path / Faulted TASK APPLICABILITY:
SRO Additional signatures may be added as needed.
Developed by:
Instructor Date Validated by:
Validation Instructor (See JPM Validation Checklist, Attachment 1)
Date Approved by:
Training Supervisor Date
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.4, AUTHORIZATION FOR POTASSIUM IODIDE USE, Rev 0 Page 89 of 105 JPM Number:
JPM-A.4 JPM
Title:
AUTHORIZATION FOR POTASSIUM IODIDE USE Examinee:
Evaluator:
Job
Title:
Date:
Start Time Finish Time PERFORMANCE RESULTS:
SAT:
UNSAT:
COMMENTS/FEEDBACK: (Comments shall be made for any steps graded unsatisfactory).
EVALUATORS SIGNATURE:
NOTE: Only this page needs to be retained in examinees record if completed satisfactorily. If unsatisfactory performance is demonstrated, the entire JPM should be retained.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.4, AUTHORIZATION FOR POTASSIUM IODIDE USE, Rev 0 Page 90 of 105 SIMULATOR SETUP:
N/A INITIAL CONDITIONS:
A manual reactor scram was inserted following a Loss of Coolant Accident and severe release of radioactivity.
The last Reactor coolant sample results showed dose equivalent I-131 of 2 x 104 Ci/gm.
Due to equipment failures, the operating crew in the Control Room is expected to be exposed to dose rates of 700 mrem/hr (whole body) and 5100 mrem/hr (thyroid).
It is expected that the operating crew will be on watch for the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> before being relieved.
The TSC Emergency Ventilation System is operating as expected.
You are the Emergency Director until the TSC is manned.
The DAC-Ratio has been determined to be > 10 in the Control Room.
INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):
Review the information provided in the Follow -up Message Notification.
Determine what additional protective actions should be taken for the operators in the Control Room.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.4, AUTHORIZATION FOR POTASSIUM IODIDE USE, Rev 0 Page 91 of 105 JPM PERFORMANCE INFORMATION DURING THE JPM, ENSURE PROPER SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, FME, AND/OR RADIOLOGICAL CONCERNS AS APPLICABLE ARE FOLLOWED.
Required Materials:
None General
References:
A.2-304 Rev 7, Form 5790-304-01 Rev 3 Task Standards:
Implement the use of Thyroid Prophylaxis (Potassium Iodide Use)
Start Time:
NOTE: When providing Evaluator Cues to the examinee, care must be exercised to avoid prompting the examinee.
Typically cues are only provided when the examinees actions warrant receiving the information (i.e. the examinee looks or asks for the indication).
NOTE:
Critical steps are marked with a Y below the performance step number. Failure to meet the standard for any critical step shall result in failure of this JPM.
Performance Step: 1 Critical N Refers to A.2-201, ON-SITE PROTECTIVE ACTION, Figure 7.1, On-Site Protective Action Guidelines, to determine that all unnecessary personnel should be evacuated and the potassium iodide use should be considered.
Standard:
Determines that all unnecessary personnel should be evacuated and the potassium iodide use should be considered.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 2 Critical Y Determines that dose to the thyroid for the operators in the Control Room will exceed 25 Rem.
Standard:
Determines that accumulated dose to the thyroid for the operators in the Control Room will be 5100 mrem/hr x 6 hrs = 30.6 Rem.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.4, AUTHORIZATION FOR POTASSIUM IODIDE USE, Rev 0 Page 92 of 105 Performance Step: 3 Critical N Locates procedure A.2-304 Thyroid Prophylaxis (Potassium Iodide Use)
Standard:
Locates appropriate procedure and step.
Evaluator Cue:
After the candidate describes where to get a copy of the procedure hand the candidate a copy of procedure A.2-304.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 4 Critical Y Note: The FDAs Bureau of Radiological Health and Drugs Bulletin Volume XVI, Number 7, recommends the issuance of KI to individuals projected to receive a thyroid dose of 25 rem CDE or more. 25 rem CDE Thyroid is 1000 DAC-hrs and is equivalent to an intake of ~25 uCi of I-131.
Step 6.1.5 If the projected thyroid dose, to affected personnel, has exceeded or is projected to exceed 25 rem CDE, then initiate Form 5790-304-01, identify the emergency response facility for which potassium iodide issuance is recommended (initiate a separated from for each affected facility) and forward the form(s) to the Emergency Director for approval.
Discuss with the Emergency Director the reason for the recommendation.
Standard:
Determines that Form 5790-304-01 should be initiated to begin issuing potassium iodide to the Control Room operators.
Evaluator Cue:
After the candidate states that Form 5790-304-01 should be initiated, hand the candidate a copy of the form and direct them to fill it out.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.4, AUTHORIZATION FOR POTASSIUM IODIDE USE, Rev 0 Page 93 of 105 Performance Step: 5 Critical Y Places a check mark in the space next to Technical Support Center on page 1 of Form 5790-304-01.
Standard:
Places a check mark in the space next to Technical Support Center on page 1 of Form 5790-304-01.
Evaluator Cue:
After the candidate places a check mark in the appropriate location on Form 5790-304-01, sign the block for recommendation by the Radiological Emergency Coordinator using current time and date.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 6 Critical Y Signs the block for approval by the Emergency Director.
Standard:
Signs the block for approval by the Emergency Director.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Terminating Cues:
PRE-APPROVED PROMPT Inform the candidate that the task is complete.
Stop Time:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Page 94 of 105 TURNOVER SHEET INITIAL CONDITIONS:
A manual reactor scram was inserted following a Loss of Coolant Accident and severe release of radioactivity.
The last Reactor coolant sample results showed dose equivalent I-131 of 2 x 104 Ci/gm.
Due to equipment failures, the operating crew in the Control Room is expected to be exposed to dose rates of 700 mrem/hr (whole body) and 5100 mrem/hr (thyroid).
It is expected that the operating crew will be on watch for the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> before being relieved.
The TSC Emergency Ventilation System is operating as expected.
You are the Emergency Director until the TSC is manned.
The DAC-Ratio has been determined to be > 10 in the Control Room.
INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):
Review the information provided in the Follow -up Message Notification.
Determine what additional protective actions should be taken for the operators in the Control Room.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Retention: Life of policy + 10yrs.
Disposition: Reviewer and Approver Retain in: Training Program File Page 95 of 105 ATTACHMENT 1 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST ALL STEPS IN THIS CHECKLIST ARE TO BE PERFORMED UPON INITIAL VALIDATION AND PRIOR TO USE.
REVIEW STATEMENTS YES NO N/A
- 92.
Are all items on the signature page filled in correctly?
- 93.
Has the JPM been reviewed and validated by SMEs?
- 94.
Can the required conditions for the JPM be appropriately established in the simulator if required?
- 95.
Does the performance steps accurately reflect trainees actions in accordance with plant procedures?
- 96.
Is the standard for each performance item specific as to what controls, indications and ranges are required to evaluate if the trainee properly performed the step?
- 97.
Has the completion time been established based on validation data or incumbent experience?
- 98.
If the task is time critical, is the time critical portion based upon actual task performance requirements?
- 99.
Is the Licensee level appropriate for the task being evaluated if required?
100. Is the K/A appropriate to the task and to the licensee level if required?
101. Have the performance steps been identified and typed (Critical / Sequence / Time Critical) appropriately?
102. Have all special tools and equipment needed to perform the task been identified and made available to the trainee?
103. Are all references identified, current, accurate, and available to the trainee?
104. Have all required cues (as anticipated) been identified for the evaluator to assist task completion?
All questions/statements must be answered YES or the JPM is not valid for use. If all questions/statements are answered YES then the JPM is considered valid and can be performed as written. The individual(s) performing the validation shall sign and date this form.
Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Retention: Life of policy + 10yrs.
Disposition: Reviewer and Approver Retain in: Training Program File Page 96 of 105 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE (JPM)
SITE:
MONTICELLO TASK TITLE:
OFF-GAS HYDROGEN ANALYZER CHECKS JPM NUMBER:
JPM-A.2 REV 0
RELATED PRA INFORMATION:
NONE TASK NUMBERS:
CR299.271 K/A NUMBERS:
Generic 2.2.12 APPLICABLE METHOD OF TESTING:
Discussion:
Simulate/walkthrough:
Perform:
X EVALUATION LOCATION:
In-Plant:
Control Room:
Simulator:
X Other:
Lab:
Time for Completion:
15 Minutes Time Critical:
NO 30 Minutes YES Maximum Time for Completion:
Alternate Path / Faulted:
TASK APPLICABILITY:
SRO/RO Additional signatures may be added as needed.
Developed by:
Instructor Date Validated by:
Validation Instructor (See JPM Validation Checklist, Attachment 1)
Date Approved by:
Training Supervisor Date
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.2, OFF-GAS HYDROGEN ANALYZER CHECKS, Rev 0 Page 97 of 105 JPM Number:
JPM-A.2 JPM
Title:
OFF-GAS HYDROGEN ANALYZER CHECKS Examinee:
Evaluator:
Job
Title:
Date:
Start Time Finish Time PERFORMANCE RESULTS:
SAT:
UNSAT:
COMMENTS/FEEDBACK: (Comments shall be made for any steps graded unsatisfactory).
EVALUATORS SIGNATURE:
NOTE: Only this page needs to be retained in examinees record if completed satisfactorily. If unsatisfactory performance is demonstrated, the entire JPM should be retained.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.2, OFF-GAS HYDROGEN ANALYZER CHECKS, Rev 0 Page 98 of 105 SIMULATOR SETUP:
Verify annunciator C-252B-28 is forced into alarm.
Verify a T.I.T. is hanging on Panel C-252 stating that Train A Hydrogen Analyzer Z is out of service for maintenance.
Verify that chart recorder paper for both trains analyzers contain a spike within the past 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.
Verify the Off-gas hydrogen analyzers are reading as follows:
o 0.7 for Train A H2 Analyzer X o
0.1 for Train A H2 Analyzer Y o
0.2 for Train B H2 Analyzer X o
0.3 for Train B H2 Analyzer Y o
0.1 for Train B H2 Analyzer Z INITIAL CONDITIONS:
The reactor is operating at 100% power.
The Train A Hydrogen Analyzer Z is out of service for maintenance.
INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):
Perform the daily Off-Gas Hydrogen Analyzer Checks per 0000-H, OPERATIONS DAILY LOG - PART H, Test 0209.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.2, OFF-GAS HYDROGEN ANALYZER CHECKS, Rev 0 Page 99 of 105 JPM PERFORMANCE INFORMATION DURING THE JPM, ENSURE PROPER SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, FME, AND/OR RADIOLOGICAL CONCERNS AS APPLICABLE ARE FOLLOWED.
Required Materials:
See simulator setup General
References:
Procedure 0000-H; Test 0209, Rev 80 Task Standards:
Perform the Daily Off-Gas Hydrogen Analyzer Checks Start Time:
NOTE: When providing Evaluator Cues to the examinee, care must be exercised to avoid prompting the examinee.
Typically cues are only provided when the examinees actions warrant receiving the information (i.e. the examinee looks or asks for the indication).
NOTE:
Critical steps are marked with a Y below the performance step number. Failure to meet the standard for any critical step shall result in failure of this JPM.
Performance Step: 1 Critical N Locates procedure 0000-H, OPERATIONS DAILY LOG - PART H, step 3.
Standard:
Locates appropriate procedure and step.
Evaluator Note:
Procedure 0000-H is normally kept on a clipboard within the Control Room.
Evaluator Cue:
After the candidate describes where to get a copy of the procedure hand the candidate a copy of procedure 0000-H.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.2, OFF-GAS HYDROGEN ANALYZER CHECKS, Rev 0 Page 100 of 105 Performance Step: 2 Critical Y STEP 3 IF an Off-Gas System air ejector is in operation, OR if within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of expected conditions requiring air ejector operating, THEN perform the following:
- a. Using Ops Man B.07.02.01-05 (RECOMBINER SYSTEM - SYSTEM OPERATION), determine and check the box for each trains operable H2 analyzer channels.
Train A: X Y Z Train B: X Y Z
Standard:
- 5. Monitors SPDS Screen 572 or process computer points OGR121-OGR126 to determine that hydrogen readings have been unsteady and -0.1%.
- 6. Contacts the TBO to determine that rotameter readings are greater than 50 CCM and less than full scale and bypass flow is 1800 - 2800 CCM.
- 7. Determines that the X and Y analyzers are operable for Train A.
- 8. Determines that all Train B analyzers are operable.
Evaluator Cue:
Report as the TBO that all off-gas hydrogen analyzer rotameter readings are greater than 50 CCM and less than full scale and bypass flow is 1800 - 2800 CCM.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 3 Critical N STEP 3.a.1) IF an operating train has one or less operable channel, THEN initiate required actions per ODCM-03.01, Table 3.
Standard:
Determines that a sufficient number of Off-Gas H2 Analyzers are in operation.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 4 Critical Y STEP 3.b In matrix below perform the following:
- 1) Check Yes or No for Train Operating status.
Standard:
Places a check in the Yes block for Train A and Train B.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.2, OFF-GAS HYDROGEN ANALYZER CHECKS, Rev 0 Page 101 of 105 Performance Step: 5 Critical Y STEP 3.b.2) Record channel analyzer % H2 indications. Indications may be obtained from AR-7554A/B, SPDS display 572, or process computer points OGR121 - OGR126.
Standard:
Records the following from AR-7554A/B:
- 6. 0.7 for Train A H2 Analyzer X
- 7. 0.1 for Train A H2 Analyzer Y
- 8. 0.2 for Train B H2 Analyzer X
- 9. 0.3 for Train B H2 Analyzer Y
- 10. 0.1 for Train B H2 Analyzer Z Evaluator Note:
If the candidate attempts to monitor SPDS display 572 or check process computer points OGR121-OGR126, inform the candidate that the hydrogen analyzer readings should be taken from the recorder.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 6 Critical N STEP 3.b.3) Check Yes or No for each analyzer re-zeroing within past 8.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />.
Standard:
Determines that each operating analyzer has been re-zeroed within the past 8.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />.
Evaluator Note:
This is determined by a spike on the chart recorder paper within the past 8.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> for each hydrogen analyzer.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 7 Critical N STEP 3.b.3).a) IF an analyzer has not re-zeroed, THEN perform manual re-zeroing of analyzer per Ops Man B.07.02.01-05, AND notify System Engineer during normal working hours.
Standard:
None Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.2, OFF-GAS HYDROGEN ANALYZER CHECKS, Rev 0 Page 102 of 105 Performance Step: 8 Critical Y STEP 3.b.4) For each train record the difference between its Channel X, Y and Z Highest and Lowest % H2 indications, and record reactor power.
Standard:
Records Train A H2 Analyzer Highest-Lowest difference of 0.6, Train B H2 Analyzer Highest-Lowest difference of 0.2, and reactor power of 100%.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 9 Critical Y STEP 3.b.4).a) IF difference is > 0.5%,
THEN notify System Engineer during normal working hours, AND notify Shift Supervision to determine actions and notifications.
Standard:
- 3. Determines that the Highest-Lowest difference recorded is > 0.5% and notifies the System Engineer.
Evaluator Note:
The candidate should make an entry in the comments section of the procedure stating that Train A Hydrogen Analyzer A is not operating within design tolerances.
Evaluator Cue:
Make a report as the System Engineer that Train A Hydrogen Analyzer X is not operating within design tolerances.
Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Performance Step: 10 Critical N
STEP 3.c IF the operability status is undetermined, AND Steam Jet Air Ejectors are not in service, THEN contact I&C group to perform Test 0211 (RECOMBINER TRAIN OUTLET HYDROGEN ANALYZER CALIBRATION PROCEDURES) to satisfy 0209 requirements.
Standard:
None Performance:
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:
Terminating Cues:
Operator informs the evaluator that the task is complete.
DO NOT PROMPT!
Stop Time:
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
JPM-A.2, OFF-GAS HYDROGEN ANALYZER CHECKS, Rev 0 Page 103 of 105
Page 104 of 105 TURNOVER SHEET INITIAL CONDITIONS:
The reactor is operating at 100% power.
The Train A Hydrogen Analyzer Z is out of service for maintenance.
INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):
Perform the daily Off-Gas Hydrogen Analyzer Checks per 0000-H, OPERATIONS DAILY LOG - PART H, Test 0209.
QF-1030-11 Rev. 1 (FP-T-SAT-30)
Page 105 of 105 ATTACHMENT 1 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST ALL STEPS IN THIS CHECKLIST ARE TO BE PERFORMED UPON INITIAL VALIDATION AND PRIOR TO USE.
REVIEW STATEMENTS YES NO N/A 105. Are all items on the signature page filled in correctly?
106. Has the JPM been reviewed and validated by SMEs?
107. Can the required conditions for the JPM be appropriately established in the simulator if required?
108. Does the performance steps accurately reflect trainees actions in accordance with plant procedures?
109. Is the standard for each performance item specific as to what controls, indications and ranges are required to evaluate if the trainee properly performed the step?
110. Has the completion time been established based on validation data or incumbent experience?
111. If the task is time critical, is the time critical portion based upon actual task performance requirements?
112. Is the Licensee level appropriate for the task being evaluated if required?
113. Is the K/A appropriate to the task and to the licensee level if required?
114. Have the performance steps been identified and typed (Critical / Sequence / Time Critical) appropriately?
115. Have all special tools and equipment needed to perform the task been identified and made available to the trainee?
116. Are all references identified, current, accurate, and available to the trainee?
117. Have all required cues (as anticipated) been identified for the evaluator to assist task completion?
All questions/statements must be answered YES or the JPM is not valid for use. If all questions/statements are answered YES then the JPM is considered valid and can be performed as written. The individual(s) performing the validation shall sign and date this form.
Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date