ML033180518

E-mail from B. J. George to S. Bloom Regarding EOF Relocation

ML033180518
Person / Time
Site:	Hatch, Vogtle, Farley
Issue date:	10/31/2003
From:	George B Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Steven Bloom NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD2
References
TAC MC1056, TAC MC1057, TAC MC1058, TAC MC1059, TAC MC1060, TAC MC1061
Download: ML033180518 (3)

Text

i Stever.Bloom - RE: EOF Relocation Page Page 11 1 I.SteverBloom - RE: EOF Relocation From: "George, Ben J." <BJGEORGE~southernco.com>

To: "Steven Bloom" <SDB1~nrc.gov>

Date: 10/31103 3:16PM

Subject:

RE: EOF Relocation Thanks Steve. Ben

-Original Message-From: Steven Bloom @nrc.gov

Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 1:20 PM To: George, Ben J.; Baker, Ray 0.

Cc: John Nakoski; Giddens, John M.

Subject:

RE: EOF Relocation Ben, As an example, the review and approval for Exelon, was started with the initial submittal on July 1,2002, and ended with the final approval on March 20, 2003. As you can see just about 9 months.

steve

>>> "George, Ben J." <BJGEORGE~southernco.com> 10/31/03 08:23AM >>>>

Steve, Great to see you and John at the NEI Licensing Forum. Thanks for the input. I understand based on our conversation that the NRC review schedule for the common SNC EOF would be in the order of 9 months. Thanks, Ben

-Original Message-From: Steven Bloom [1]

Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:03 AM To: George, Ben J.; Baker, Ray 0.

Cc: John Nakoski

Subject:

EOF Relocation Ray and Ben, The key components of getting a submittal of this type reviewed will consist of the following:

Review of the submittal Review of applicable guidance Request for additional information(RAI) questions Teleconference with licensee regarding RAI questions Response from the licensee to RAI questions An exercise conducted by the licensee to determine their ability to function wla dual event coordinated with the support of the Regional Inspectors and Headquarters and under the direction of the Commission Review of the exercise and possibly additional RAI's A Commission paper Approval or denial by the Commission History has shown that projects of this nature are originally given a due date of 1 year, but are completed prior to the year, if we can complete this task earlier we will. Therefore adue date of Aprilwith asubmittal of

Stever

_ Bloom - RE: EOF Relocation page 2 October is not feasible.

I hope this helps. If you have any questions please let me know.

thank you steve bloom

4 C:IWIND0WS\TEMP\GWI00001.TMP Page Paqe II 11 II

. CAWINDOWS\TEMP\GWIOOOOI .TMP Mail Envelope Properties (3FA2C2FD.C86:0:23686)

Subject:

RE: EOF Relocation Creation Date: 10/31/03 3:15PM From: "George, Ben J." <BJGE0RGE(absouthernco.comn>

Created By: BJGEORGE 0ai southemco.comi Recipients nrc.gov owf4_po.OWFN_-DO SDB I (Steven Bloom)

Post Office Route owf4_po.OWFNDO nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1894 10/31/03 03:15PM Mirne.822 2944 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard