ML033160423

Final Qa/Related Forms

ML033160423
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	09/25/2003
From:	Todd Fish NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB
To:	Santiago M Entergy Nuclear Operations
Conte R
References
50-293/OL-03-301
Download: ML033160423 (12)

Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1

9. Preliminary license applications due (C. 1.I; C.2.g; ES-202)

Facility:

c( rim Date of Examination: 9 129 -7 II n

11 Examinations Developed by:

w9 /

NRC (circle one)

I of3

~~

Target Date*

Task Description / Reference 11

-180 I 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.l.a; C.2.a & b) 11

-120 I 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)

~

[-901

3. Facility contact briefed on security & other requirements (C.2.c)

~~~

~~

4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)

15. Reference material due (C.l.e; C.3.c)]

7. Examination outline(s) reviewed to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)

I45

8. Proposed examinations, supporting documentation, and reference materials due (C.l.e, f, g & h; C.3.d) m administration guidelines reviewed with uthorization granted to give written exams oved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions buted to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

~

Chief Examiner's Initials

~~

Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter.

They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC.

[ ]

25 of 25 NUREG-I021, Draft Revision 9

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 L

1, Facility: Pilgrim Station Date of Examination: 09/29/03 Item I Task Description

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3.

a. Verify that:

w (1) the outline@) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination, (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test@), and (4) no more than 80% of any operating test is taken directly from the licensees exam banks.

4.

G E

N E

R A

L -

b. Verify that:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, (3) 4 - 6 (2 - 3 for SRO-U) of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path procedure, (4) one in-plant task tests the applicants response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and (5) the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RCA.

c. Verify that the required administrative topics are covered

d. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer r)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

Note:

• Not aoolicable for NRC-developed examinations.

, I

1. Independent NRC reviewer iniiial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

qkce Ai

I.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measure procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility manag examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination

/or an enforcement C licensing examinations administered of examination administration, I did not noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME 25 of 25 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

I ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

..^

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measure procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility manag examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination and/or an enforcement dications or suggestions that letion of examination administration, I did not nsing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBI

--I__

25 of 25 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Pilgrim Station Date of Examination: 09/29/03 Operatii

1. GENERAL CRITERIA

a.

b.

The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.l.a)wj IL Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.

C.

d.

e.

2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA

a.

Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

. initial conditions

. initiating cues

. references and tools, including associated procedures

. reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific

. specific performance criteria that include:

designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity.

b.

C.

At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified.

3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA

a.

The associated simulator oDeratina tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Test Numt lnitia -

b* -

P P

Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attaihed. '

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewerr)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor NOTE:

• The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Qualitv Checklist Form ES-301-4

1.

Total malfunctions (5-8)

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 11 Facility: Pilgrim Station Date of Exam: 09/29/03 Scenario Numbers: I / 2/ 3 Operating Test No.: I 71817 2 1 2 1 1

1.

2.

3.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

Abnormal events (2-4)

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

2 1 3 1 3

5.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

ve sufficient time 11 TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.5.d) I Actual Attributes I ---

2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 l / l / l

7.

Critical tasks (2-3) 21312 6 j

5.

EOPs enteredhequiring substantive actions (1-2)

$jj

4.

Major transients (1-2)

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2)

6.

I I

I A Trs l--

NUREG 1021, Draft Revision 9 25 of 27

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 I

As SRO OPERATING TEST NO.: 1 (SI, S3, S5, S7)

Reactivity 0

Normal I*

I Instrument /

2*

2,334,598 Component Maior 1

6.7 Reactivity Normal SRO-U Instrument /

Component Major As RO 0

I

• 2*

1 Instructions: (I)

(2)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-I event numbers for each evolution type.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

• Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight (3) s competence count toward the minimum requirement.

yb/ly3

?/&I 03 Author:

NRC Reviewer:

26 of 27 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Applicant Type RO OPERATING TEST NO.: 1 (S2, S4, S6)

Evolution Minimum Scenario Number 1

2 3

4 Type Number RO BOP RO BOP RO BOP RO BOP Reactivity I

• Normal I*

Instrument /

4*

Component Major 1

Reactivity Normal SRO-U Instrument /

Component Major 0 I*

2*

1 Instructions: (I)

(2)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

• Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight (3) licants competence the minimum requirement.

?/d Y 0 3 P -

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

26 of 27 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

Reactivity Normal Instrument /

Component Maior ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: 1 (RI. R2. R3)

I

• 0 2*

1 Applicant Type SRO-U RO Reactivity 0

Normal I

• Instrument /

2*

Component Major 1

As RO SRO-I As SRO Reactivity 0

Normal I*

Instrument /

2*

I Maior I

1 I

I I

I I

I I

I I

L-'

Instructions: (1)

(2)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

• Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight (3) e count toward the minimum requirement.

7/%&

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

26 of 27 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-301 ComDetencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Interpret I Diagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (1)

SRO-I (SI 1s31s51s7)

(CRS)

(BOP) 2, 394, 3,4,6, 5, 6, 7, 7,

8 1,2, 3, 2, 394, 4, 5, 6, 5, 6, 7,

7. 8 9

SCENARIO L

Competencies 2

Comply With and NIA Operate Control Boards (2)

NIA 3,4, 6, 7, 9 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,

7. 8 Communicate and Interact 1, 2, 3, Demonstrate Supervisory 4, 5, 6, Ability (3) 1 7. 8 NIA I

Use Tech. Specs. (3)

SRO-I (S2lS41S6)

Notes:

(1 ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

RO (R1 lR2lR3)

SCENARIO 1

2 (BOP)

(905) 4, 5 6,

1,4,5, 7, 8 6, 7, 8, cj-$

4, 5, 6, 1, 4, 5, 4, 5, 6, 194, 5, 7, 8 6, 7, 8, NIA NIA 9

NIA NIA Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

3 #A NUREG 1021, Draft Revision 9 26 of 27

Written Examination Form ES-401-?%

ES-401 Quality Checklist Bank use meets limits (no from the bank at least 10 p t, multiple choice items;

~

Note:

• The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 30 of 34

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9