ML032880197
| ML032880197 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim |
| Issue date: | 09/29/2003 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB |
| To: | Santiago M Entergy Nuclear Operations |
| IE42 | |
| References | |
| 50-293/03-301 | |
| Download: ML032880197 (6) | |
Text
ES-401 Pilgrim Written Examination Form ES-401-9 Review Worksheet
[Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.
Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy - difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable).
Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e,, clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).
The answer choices are a collection of unrelated truelfalse statements.
One or more #!m-medistractors is not credible.
One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).
The quest!on is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid WA but, as written, is. not operational in content).
The question requires the reell of knowled e that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).
The question contains data with an unrealisfic !eve1 of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.
- 4.
Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:
- 5.
- 6.
Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved WA and those that are desiqnated SRO-only (WA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).
Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
I 7.
At a minimum, explain any "U" ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).
I(
33 of 34 NUREG-I 021, Draft Revision 9
2 Form ES-401-9 ES-401 34 of 34 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
ES-401 2
Form ES-401-9 34 of 34 NUREG-I 021, Draft Revision 9
ES-401 2
Form ES-401-9 34 of 34 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
ES-401 2
Form ES-401-9 34 of 34 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
ES-401 2
Form ES-401-9 34 of 34 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9