ML032481267

Nov/Dec Exam 50-390/2002-301 Draft Written Exam Sample Outlines

ML032481267
Person / Time
Site:	Watts Bar
Issue date:	11/26/2002
From:	Tennessee Valley Authority
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
50-390/02-301, 50-391/02-301
Download: ML032481267 (17)

Text

Draft Submittal (Pink Paper)

1. Written Exam Sample outlines WATTS BAR EXAM 2002-301 50-390 NOVEMBER 26 &

DECEMBER 9 13,2002-

ES-401 PWR RO Examination Outline Form ES-401-4 (R8, S I )

Facility: Watts Bar Date of Exam: 12/09/02 Exam Level:RO Note: 1. Ensure that at least two topics from every WA category are sampled within each tier (i.e., the "Tier Totals" in each WA category shall not be less than two).

2. The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table. The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by

+I from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions. The final exam must total 100 points.

3. Select topics from many systems; avoid selecting more than two or three WA topics from a given system unless they relate to plant-specific priorities.

4. Systems/evolutionswithin each group are identified on the associated outline.

5. The shaded areas are not applicable to the categoryher.

6.* The generic WAS in Tiers 1 and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the WA Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system.

7. On the following pages, enter the WA numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics' importance ratings for the SRO license level, and the point totals for each svstem and cateaorv. - . WAS below 2.5 should be justified on the basis of plant-sbecific priorities. Enter the tier totals for each category in the table above.

m ES-401 PWR SRO Examination Outline Form ES-401-3 (R8, S I )

Facility: Watts Bar Date of Exam: 12/09/02 Exam Level: SRO I I I I I WA Category Points I

3. Generic Knowledge and Abilities Note: 1. Ensure that at least two topics from every WA category are sampled within each tier (i.e., the "Tier Totals" in each WA category shall not be less than two).

2. The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table. The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by f l from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions. The final exam must total 100 points.

3. Select topics from many systems; avoid selecting more than two or three WA topics from a given system unless they relate to plant-specific priorities.

4. Systemslevolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline.

5. The shaded areas are not applicable to the categorykier.

6.* The generic WAS in Tiers 1 and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the WA Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system.

7. On the following pages, enter the WA numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics' importance ratings for the SRO license level, and the point totals for each system and category. WAS below 2.5 should be justified on the basis of plant-specific priorities. Enter the tier totals for each category in the table above.

2 7 C

P C

nC

I