ML032320212
| ML032320212 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | University of Texas at Austin |
| Issue date: | 10/22/2003 |
| From: | Matthews D Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs |
| To: | Landsberger S University of Texas at Austin |
| Madden P, NRC/NRR/DRIP/RNRP 415-1188 | |
| References | |
| NRR-03-003 | |
| Download: ML032320212 (6) | |
Text
October 22, 2003 CAL No. NRR-03-003 Dr. Sheldon Landsberger, Director - NETL University of Texas Building No. PRC-159 10100 Burnet Road Austin, TX 78758
SUBJECT:
CONFIRMATORY ACTION LETTER - SITE-SPECIFIC COMPENSATORY MEASURES IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Dear Dr. Landsberger:
By letter dated January 23, 2003, Mr. William D. Beckner of my staff initiated a process to address compensatory measures (CMs) related to security and safeguards at your facility.
Mr. Beckners letter requested that you develop a site-specific CM implementation plan. In accordance with that letter, you have provided us your final site-specific CM implementation plan dated June 23, 2003. It is our understanding that you have taken or will take the actions in accordance with the schedule as specified in your final plan.
Pursuant to Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act, 42 U.S.C. 2232, you are required to:
- 1) Notify me immediately if your understanding differs from that set forth above;
- 2) Notify me if for any reason you cannot complete the actions within the specified schedule and advise me in writing of your modified schedule in advance of the change; and
- 3) Notify me in writing when you have completed the actions addressed in this Confirmatory Action Letter.
You may, under certain circumstances, request NRC approval, in writing to change the commitment you made for any of the proposed actions you took to implement your site-specific CMs. The enclosed guidance provides the conditions under which the staff would consider approving changes to the proposed actions you took in response to implementing your initial site specific CMs.
Issuance of this Confirmatory Action Letter does not preclude issuance of an order formalizing the commitments you have made in your final site-specific CM implementation plan or requiring other actions. In addition, failure to take the actions addressed in this Confirmatory Action Letter may result in enforcement action.
Dr. S. Landsberger In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRCs "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, and any response will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS).ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
To the extent possible, any correspondence between you and the NRC relating to your response to this CAL should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made available to the public without redaction. Due to the direct relationship of the CMs, which the NRC has classified as unclassified-sensitive information exempted from public disclosure under the provisions of 10 CFR 73.21 (safeguards information), your site-specific CM implementation plan is considered safeguards information, and thus, is not authorized for public release. If safeguards information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21.The use of non-sensitive cover letters to transmit safeguards information as a separate enclosure is encouraged.
Sincerely,
/RA by Catherine Haney Acting for/
David B. Matthews, Director Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-602 License No. R-129 cc: Please see next page
Enclosure:
As stated
University of Texas Docket No. 50-602 cc:
Governors Budget and Planning Office P.O. Box 13561 Austin, TX 78711 Bureau of Radiation Control State of Texas 1100 West 49th Street Austin, TX 78756 Mr. Roger Mulder Office of the Governor P.O. Box 12428 Austin, TX 78711 Mr. David Sean OKelly, Associate Director Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory The University of Texas at Austin 10100 Burnet Road Austin, TX 78758 Dr. William Vernetson Test, Research, and Training Reactor Newsletter University of Florida 202 Nuclear Sciences Center Gainesville, FL 32611
Dr. S. Landsberger October 22, 2003 In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRCs "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, and any response will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS).ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
To the extent possible, any correspondence between you and the NRC relating to your response to this CAL should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made available to the public without redaction. Due to the direct relationship of the CMs, which the NRC has classified as unclassified-sensitive information exempted from public disclosure under the provisions of 10 CFR 73.21 (safeguards information), your site-specific CM implementation plan is considered safeguards information, and thus, is not authorized for public release. If safeguards information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21.The use of non-sensitive cover letters to transmit safeguards information as a separate enclosure is encouraged.
Sincerely,
/RA by Catherine Haney Acting for/
David B. Matthews, Director Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-602 License No. R-129 cc: Please see next page
Enclosure:
As stated DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC RNRP\R&TR r/f MMendonca AAdams DHughes CBassett TDragoun PMadden JLyons SMorris ATardiff BRogers ADAMS ACCESSION NO.:ML032320212 TEMPLATE #:NRR-106
- Please see previous concurrence OFFICE RNRP:LA RNRP:PM RNRP:PM NAME *EHylton:rdr *MMendonca *PMadden DATE 09/ 16 /03 09/ 17 /03 09/ 17 /03 OFFICE NSIR RNRP:PD DRIP:D NRR:OD NAME *SMorris *JLyons DMatthews JDyer DATE 10/ 06 /03 10/ 07 /03 10/ 10 /03 10/ 10 /03 C = COVER E = COVER & ENCLOSURE N = NO COPY OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Conditions for requesting approval of Safeguards and Security Compensatory Measure Commitments - Research and Test Reactor Licensees During the development of the Compensatory Measures, the staff realized that changes to the initial commitments made during the implementation of the actions needed to meet the objective of the individual CMs. The following circumstances or conditions may result in a licensee s need to change its commitments:
- 1. The initial commitment was temporary and a more permanent measure was implemented. For example, routine monitoring of experimental and researcher activities were being performed once every four hours by an operator. A closed circuit TV monitoring systems was installed which allowed the operator in the control room to monitor these activities more frequently. Prior to taking the action to implement the more permanent measure (change in commitment) the licensee should submit to the NRC for approval: a) description of the commitment change and how it meets the objective of the compensatory measure; and b) a proposed schedule for implementing the change in commitment.
- 2. Identifying conditions where the original commitment does not accomplish the objective of the CM and a temporary change in commitment is needed in order to meet the objective. For example, all commercial package deliveries for the reactor are made to a central receiving area. The packages are inspected at this central facility. The licensee changes its business policy and the packages are now delivered to the reactor. The licensee needs to make a temporary change to its commitment, until it can develop a more permanent solution, to receive only expected deliveries at the door to the facility reception area and inspect them in this area prior to allowing them into a vital area.
Upon taking this action the licensee should submit to the NRC: a) description of the necessity for this temporary change and a description of how they intend to restore the actions needed to meet the original commitment and the objective of the compensatory measure; and b) a proposed schedule for restoring the objectives of the original commitment and the compensatory measure.
- 3. Identifying that the implementation of the actions to meet the objective of a compensatory measure results in a personnel or reactor safety impact. For example, emergency exit/access door from the protected or vital areas is locked and barred shut such that it can not be used in the event of a facility emergency. This action has resulted in the facility not being able to meet its compliance with local fire codes. Upon discovery of such condition the licensee should submit to the NRC: a) description of the adverse safety condition that was caused by the implementation of the actions needed to meet the objective of the compensatory measure; b) proposal for correcting the adverse safety condition; c) a commitment describing your revised actions; and d) the schedule for re-establishing the objective of compensatory measure.
Absent NRC approval of a change to the CM actions, all actions taken in response to the CMs and confirmed by the site-specific CAL shall be maintained until the Commission determines otherwise.
Enclosure