ML031060467
| ML031060467 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 04/15/2003 |
| From: | FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML031060467 (94) | |
Text
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station IMC 0350 Meeting 1
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Meeting Agenda Operations Restart Readiness Assessments
- Operations Mode 4 Preparation, Actions for Restart.Randy Fast
- Operations Leadership, Operability Evaluation..Bill Pearce Design Issue Resolution .....Bob Schrauder Containment Health...Randy Fast Integrated Leak Rate Test, Resolution of Significant Plant Issues....Jim Powers Safety Culture/Safety Conscious Work Environment
- Mode 5 Safety Culture AssessmentLew Myers
- Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey...Bill Pearce Major Milestones/Bulk Work
- Milestone Progress, Modifications, Work, ResourcesMike Stevens
- Restart Action Performance........Clark Price 2
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Operations Mode 4 Preparation, Actions for Restart Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC Randy Fast Plant Manager 3
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Operations Mode 4 Preparation, Actions for Restart
- Actions and Preparation
- Appropriately staffed
- Completed annual requalification later 2002
- Just in time license requalification training
- Reactor Operator/Senior Reactor Operator pipeline
- Procedures ready for test plan
- INPO/industry evaluations ongoing
- Completed Safety Conscious Work Environment training for all Operations staff
- Implemented Operations Leadership Plan
- Key staff retrained on operability determination
- Implemented Standards and Expectations 4
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Operations Mode 4 Preparation, Actions for Restart
- Mode 4 and Mode 3 Tests
- Reactor Coolant System (RCS) pressure walkdown at 50 psig
- Augmented leakage test for RCS components
- Performed at 250 psig
- Normal Operating Pressure 5
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Operations Mode 4 Preparation, Actions for Restart
- Restraint Data; 4-15-03
- 429 Condition Reports Restraints
- 395 awaiting mode hold resolution approval
- 34 require resolution
- 355 Additional Testing work orders to complete (post-maintenance testing)
- 304 restraints awaiting Restart Station Review Board disposition
- 50 other (surveillances, etc.)
- Oversight of Control Room 6
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Operations Leadership and Operability Evaluation Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC Bill Pearce Vice President - FENOC Oversight 7
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Operations Leadership and Operability Evaluation
- Operations Overview
- Operational activities
- Shift turnovers
- Clearance activities
- Standards and expectations
- Conservative decision on Decay Heat Pumps
- Procedure adherence
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Design Issue Resolution Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC Bob Schrauder Director - Support Services 9
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Design Issue Resolution High Pressure Injection Pumps
- Issue
- Fine debris in sump could result in damage to pumps during recirculation mode
- Resolution Options
- Additional filtration
- Modify existing pumps
- Test existing pumps
- Replace pumps
- Current Status
- New pumps and motors have been purchased
- License amendment being prepared to support system pressure test using existing pumps
- Developing potential testing to confirm adequacy of existing pumps 10 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Design Issue Resolution Electrical Distribution System
- Issue
- A number of condition reports which challenge assumptions and completeness of analysis for electrical distribution system
- Resolution
- Revise analysis using updated computer software
- Evaluate results to ensure electrical distribution system has sufficient capacity and capability to accomplish plant safety functions 11 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Design Issue Resolution Air Operated Valves
- Issue
- Several Air Operated Valves (AOVs) have design basis issues
- Resolution
- 53 demonstrate sufficient margin
- 6 to be adjusted prior to restart
- 12 to be modified prior to restart
- 12 to have margin increased post restart 12 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Design Issue Resolution Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) Loading
- Issue
- EDG load table not current
- EDG starting voltage and frequency response
- Resolution
- Revise EDG load calculation
- Prepare transient analysis for EDG voltage and frequency response
- Evaluate impact of EDG voltage and frequency response on plant safety functions
- Evaluate results to ensure EDG has sufficient capacity and capability to start and carry design basis loads 13 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC Randy Fast Plant Manager 14 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health Project Scope:
- Emergency Sump
- Containment Coatings
- Decay Heat Valve Tank
- Containment Air Coolers
- Fuel Integrity
- Environmentally Qualified Equipment
- Refueling Transfer Canal
- Containment Vessel
- Boric Acid Extent of Condition Inspections, Evaluations, and Corrective Actions 15 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health Emergency Sump
Purpose:
- Ensure adequate long-term core cooling by significantly modifying the Emergency Sump and Strainers
- Status:
- Engineering Design work completed
- Increased strainer surface area from 50 ft² to approximately 1200 ft²
- Field Installation complete
- NRC inspection of the modification performed 16 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health Access Hatch and Upper Strainer 17 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health Lower Emergency Sump Strainer 18 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health Debris Screen Gate 19 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health Containment Coatings
Purpose:
- Ensure adequate long-term core cooling by removing degraded and/or unqualified coatings on components in Containment
- Status:
- All targeted coatings have been removed
- Repainting with qualified coating material is near completion
- Two weeks of work remain to complete painting the dome 20 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health Core Flood Tank 21 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health Service Water Piping and New Tags 22 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health Containment Dome 23 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health Decay Heat Valve Tank
Purpose:
- Ensure the integrity of the compartment without reliance on sealing compounds
- Status:
- Engineering Design work complete
- Installation nearly complete
- Electrical conduit seal welding and LOCA Seal installation is being completed 24 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health Containment Air Coolers
Purpose:
- Replace components damaged by exposure to boric acid
- Replace two fan motors due to a Part 21 issue
- Status:
- Fan motors have been replaced
- Fans, dampers, ductwork, and instrumentation have been cleaned, refurbished, and/or replaced, as appropriate
- Fan inlet plenum has been completely rebuilt
- Service water piping to cooling coils has been redesigned and replaced 25 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health Containment Air Coolers
- Status (Continued)
- Physical work nearly complete
- Piping to Containment Air Cooler # 1 is being reworked
- Air and Service Water testing to be performed 26 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health Containment Air Cooler #3 27 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health Fuel Integrity
Purpose:
- Ensure fuel integrity during the next fuel cycle
- Status:
- Defective fuel rods from last cycle removed from service
- Fuel handling equipment and operating procedures enhanced
- Detailed visual checks during fuel movement and core load
- Two instances of spacer grid damage found and corrected
- Core reload successfully completed 28 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health Environmentally Qualified Equipment
Purpose:
- To ensure that environmentally qualified (EQ) equipment was not damaged by exposure to boric acid
- Status:
- EQ equipment was inspected for signs of boric acid intrusion
- Boric acid did not affect EQ equipment 29 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health Refuel Canal Leakage
Purpose:
- Evaluate the effect of past leakage on structures
- Identify possible leakage sources
- Status:
- Concrete samples and non-destructive testing show concrete strength is good
- Rebar samples show only minor corrosion, not affecting structural integrity
- Visual, Acoustic, and Vacuum Box testing of canal liner have revealed three potential leak flowpaths
- Corrective action post restart 30 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health Concrete Core Bore 31 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health Containment Vessel
Purpose:
- To evaluate the integrity of the Containment liner
- Status:
- All examinations completed
- Containment is operable
- Integrated Containment Leak Test completed
- Install grout seal to close a gap between the carbon steel liner and the concrete curb 32 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health Containment Inspections
Purpose:
- Identify all components affected by boric acid
- Evaluate these conditions
- Ensure appropriate corrective actions are completed
- Document as-left condition as a base line for future inspections 33 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health Containment Inspections (Continued)
- Status:
- Discovery inspections completed
- All evaluations have been prepared
- Over 6,500 corrective actions have been identified.
Not all of these are restart issues.
- Of 2,219 Restart CAs assigned to Containment Health, 1,426 are completed
- Remaining restart work is primarily cleaning boric acid residue and reinspecting to verify cleanliness and document as-left conditions
- Steam cleaning of D-Ring areas inside Containment is in progress 34 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health Other Site Activities
- Reactor Pressure Vessel Head:
- Reactor reassembled
- Missile shields installed
- Plant is in final configuration for power operations
- Control Rod testing will be conducted during the full pressure test 35 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Containment Health
- FLUS Containment Leakage Detection System:
- Installation is complete
- Will connect to plant computer for remote monitoring
- Sensitivity testing during the full pressure test 36 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Integrated Leak Rate Test and Resolution of Significant Plant Issues Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC Jim Powers Director - Nuclear Engineering 37 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
- Purpose of Test
- Demonstrate leak-tight integrity of Containment at a pressure greater than could occur during an accident
- Approach
- Pressurize Containment to ~40 psig with compressors
- Hold for stabilization of conditions
- Perform leakage test measurements
- Validate test instrumentation with a known leak
- Depressurize and analyze test data 38 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Integrated Leak Rate Test Integrated Leak Rate Test Compressors 39 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Integrated Leak Rate Test Integrated Leak Rate Test Manifold 40 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Davis-Besse Pressure (psia) 4/
7/
03 18 13.000 18.000 23.000 28.000 33.000 38.000 43.000 48.000 53.000 58.000 4/ :4 7/ 4 Nuclear Power Station 03 20 4/ :4 7/ 4 03 22
- 4 4/
8/ 4 03 0:
4/ 44 8/
03 2:
4/ 44 8/
03 3:
4/ 50 8/
03 5:
4/ 50 8/
03 7:
4/ 50 8/
03 4/ 9:
8/ 51 03 11 4/ :5 8/ 1 03 13 4/ :5 8/ 0 03 15 4/ :0 8/ 0 Date 03 April 15, 2003 17
03 19 4/ :0 8/ 0 03 20 4/ :3 8/ 0 03 22
- 3 4/ 0 9/
03 0:
4/ 30 9/
03 1:
4/ 48 9/
03 Integrated Leak Rate Test 3:
4/ 48 9/
03 5:
4/ 48 9/
03 7:
4/ 48 9/
03 9:
41 41
- Safety Culture and ILRT Activities
- Demonstrated positive Safety Culture
- Attributes
- Preplanning
- Cross functional teamwork
- Contingency planning
- Previous lessons learned from D-B and industry
- Industry peer reviewer
- Resource allocation
- Solid project management 42 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Integrated Leak Rate Test Results: Containment Continues to be Leak Tight 43 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Resolution of Significant Plant Issues
- Significant Plant Issues Being Resolved
- Containment Emergency Sump
- Decay Heat Valve Tank
- Containment Coatings
- Valve Team Progress; 1,500 work items
- 594 valves completed
- 72 remain
- Permanent Reactor Cavity Seal
- Refueling Canal Repair
- Containment Air Cooler Rebuilds
- Containment Air Cooler Plenum Replacement
- FLUS Leakage Monitoring System 44 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Resolution of Significant Plant Issues
- Significant Plant Issues Being Resolved (Continued)
- Reactor Vessel Internal Cleaning
- Nuclear Fuel Inspections
- Reactor Coolant System Resistance Temperature Detection Repairs
- Reactor Coolant Pump 1-1 and 1-2 Refurbishment
- Electrical System Design Basis Restoration
- Emergency Diesel Generator Material Condition Improvements
- Service Water System Cleaning
- Feedwater Heater 1-6 Retubing
- Polar Crane and Fuel Handling Crane Control Upgrades
- Thorough Containment Cleaning 45 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Mode 5 Safety Culture Assessment and Independent Safety Culture Survey Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC 46 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Mode 5 Safety Culture Assessment Desired Outcome
- Demonstrate recent actions:
- Status safety culture review for Mode 5
- Independent review correlation
- Review safety conscious work environment survey results
- Methodology
- Business practice critique
- Two day meeting with all managers
- Criteria for groups/graded as groups
- Management team consensus
- Refined the criteria to be more objective 47 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Mode 5 Safety Culture Assessment Safety Culture Drive for Excellence Questioning Attitude Rigorous Work Control and Prudent Commitment to Approach Safety Open Individual Communications Goals, Roles and Commitment Area Teamwork Nuclear Professionalism Ownership and Accountability Plant Management Statement of Qualification and Commitment Area Safety Policies Training Management Value Commitment to Structure Continuous Policy or Corporate Improvement Level Commitment Resources Cross-Functional Area Work Management
& Communication New Self Assessment Environment of Engagement and New Commitment Independent Oversight 48 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Example of Safety Culture Criteria 49 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Mode 5 Safety Culture Assessment
- Policy or Corporate Commitment Area Yellow
- Policies on Safety Culture and Safety Conscious White Work Environment clearly state that safety is a core value and are understood by the organization
- Management values are clearly reflected in the Yellow Business Plan and are understood by the organization
- Resources are available or can be obtained to Yellow ensure safe, reliable operations
- Self-assessment is a tool used to monitor, assess White and improve our performance
- Independent Oversight is a tool used to validate White acceptable performance and identify areas for improvement or corrective action 50 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Mode 5 Safety Culture Assessment Policy or Corporate Commitment Area
- Basis for Overall Rating of Yellow
- The 2003 FENOC Business Plan is not approved and distributed to employees
- Employees are unaware of the Nuclear Performance Index Incentive for 2003
- Maintenance, Radiation Protection/Chemistry, and Design Engineering are yellow based on resources availability
- Lack of appropriate section performance indicators 51 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Mode 5 Safety Culture Assessment
- Plant Management Commitment Area Yellow (improving)
- There is visible commitment to safety: nuclear, White industrial, radiological, and environmental
- Goals and roles are clear and teamwork is White reinforced
- Ownership and accountability is evident Yellow
- Training and qualification is valued White
- Commitment to continuous improvement is Yellow evident
- Cross-functional work management and Yellow communication
- Creating and environment of engagement and White commitment 52 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Mode 5 Safety Culture Assessment Plant Management Commitment Area
- Basis for Overall Rating of Yellow Improving
- Until recently the site accepted the continual delay of corrective actions
- Identified lack of trust in several departments due to changes in organization and work hours
- Almost all employee development plans are overdue
- Contractor training qualifications are a concern 53 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Mode 5 Safety Culture Assessment
- Individual Commitment Area Yellow
- Drive for excellence-nuclear assets of people and Yellow plant are continuously improved to enhance margins of safety
- Questioning attitude - challenges are welcomed Green
- Rigorous work control and prudent approach - Yellow performing activities in a quality manner is the standard
- Open communications - associates are White comfortable in voicing opinions, issues and concerns
- Nuclear Professionalism - persistence and Yellow urgency in identification and resolution of problems is prevalent 54 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Mode 5 Safety Culture Assessment Individual Commitment Area
- Basis for Overall Rating of Yellow
- Overall quality of pre-job briefs is white; green for critical evolutions, yellow for lower significance work
- We are putting resources on Procedure Change Request backlog
- Rotating equipment is a major rework challenge for Maintenance
- 72 Preventive Maintenance tasks are past their due date and awaiting deferral
- Personal initiative and ownership are yellow 55 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Correlation of Independent Safety Culture Assessment Safety Culture Drive for Excellence Questioning Attitude Rigorous Work Control and Prudent Commitment to Approach Safety Open Individual Communications Goals, Roles and Commitment Area Teamwork Nuclear Professionalism Ownership and Accountability Plant Management Statement of Qualification and Commitment Area Safety Policies Training Management Value Commitment to Structure Continuous Policy or Corporate Improvement Level Commitment Resources Cross-Functional Area Work Management
& Communication New Self Assessment Environment of Engagement and New Commitment Independent Oversight 56 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC Bill Pearce Vice President - FENOC Oversight 57 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey
- Employee Survey:
- Conducted March 26 - 28, 2003
- FENOC employees and contract employees
- 1,138 responses from target population of
~1,448 (~79%)
- 36 questions
- 26 same as August 2002 survey
- Survey structured to assess four pillars 58 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
18 7 6 5 Questions Questions Questions Questions
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey Pillar 1: Willingness to Raise Concerns 0% 0%
2% 1%
98% 99%
Disagree Dont Know August 2002 March 2003 Agree As a nuclear worker, I am responsible for identifying problems and adverse conditions. 1 60 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey Pillar 1: Willingness to Raise Concerns 1%
1%
n it o s 98%
ue N ot d Q e sk A
Disagree Dont Know Agree August 2002 March 2003 If I had a nuclear safety or quality concern, I would raise it. 3 61 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey Pillar 1: Willingness to Raise Concerns 4% 10%
26% 7%
27%
19%
89%
Disagree 63%
55% Dont Know Agree August March March 2002 2003 2003 Managements expectations Managements expectations regarding safety and quality regarding safety and quality are are clearly communicated. 16 reflected in performance reviews, rewards and discipline. 17 62 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey Pillar 1: Willingness to Raise Concerns 17% 4% 20% 6%
12%
6%
22% 17%
90% 82%
Disagree 61% 63%
Dont Know Agree August March August March 2002 2003 2002 2003 My first line supervisor/foreman addresses concerns brought to Management is willing to listen his/her attention. 8 to your problems. 13 63 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey Pillar 1: Willingness to Raise Concerns 8% 15%
22%
16% 37%
19%
25%
24%
76% Disagree 53% Dont Know 66%
39%
Agree August March August March 2002 2003 2002 2003 I believe my management cares Constructive criticism is more about identifying and encouraged. 14 resolving nuclear safety, quality and compliance issues than cost and schedule. 18 64 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey Pillar 1: Willingness to Raise Concerns 4% 7%
9%
5% 17% 8%
10%
12%
91%
Disagree 85%
81%
Dont Know 71%
Agree August March August March 2002 2003 2002 2003 I feel free to approach management I believe I can raise any nuclear regarding any nuclear safety or safety or quality concern without quality concern 5 fear of retaliation. 7 65 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey Pillar 2: Normal Problem Resolution Processes 6% 2%
5% 4%
n n t io ed it o ed s k 89% e s k ue As Disagree u s Q t Q tA 94%
o o N Dont Know N Agree August March August March 2002 2003 2002 2003 I know how to write a Condition If I identified a potential nuclear safety Report and get it into the system or nuclear quality issue I would ensure or know who to contact to get help that a Condition Report was written to in initiating a Condition Report. 19 address the issue. 20 66 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey Pillar 2: Normal Problem Resolution Processes 6% 8%
25% 26%
14% 18%
18%
29%
80% Disagree 57% Dont Know 74%
45%
Agree August March August March 2002 2003 2002 2003 Identification of potential nuclear Resolution of potential nuclear safety and safety/nuclear quality issues nuclear quality issues, including root cause through the Condition Report and broader implications, through the process is effective in our Condition Report process is effective in organization. 21 our organization. 23 67 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey Pillar 2: Normal Problem Resolution Processes 14% 6%
8%
16%
70% 86%
Disagree Dont Know August 2002 March 2003 Agree I feel free to raise nuclear safety/nuclear quality concerns through the Condition Report process without fear of reprisal. 25 68 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey Pillar 3: Employee Concerns Program 2% 4%
4% 7%
n n t io ed t io ed s k 94% s k 89%
ue As Disagree ue As Q t Q t o o N Dont Know N Agree August March August March 2002 2003 2002 2003 If I had a nuclear safety or quality concern I I am aware of the Employee Concerns would raise it through the Employee Program and its purpose. 26 Concerns Program if I was uncomfortable raising the concern through my chain of command or in a Condition Report. 27 69 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey Pillar 3: Employee Concerns Program 4% 18% 7%
19% 17%
16%
n t io ed s k 77% 76%
ue As 66%
Q t Disagree o
N Dont Know Agree August March August March 2002 2003 2002 2003 I believe issues reported through I believe that the Employee the Employee Concerns Program Concerns Program will keep my will be thoroughly investigated and identity confidential at my request. 31 objectively dispositioned. 28 70 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey Pillar 3: Employee Concerns Program 15% 4%
16%
25%
80%
60%
Disagree Dont Know August 2002 March 2003 Agree I believe that upper management supports the Employee Concerns Program. 29 71 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey Pillar 4: Detect and Prevent Retaliation 1% 6%
3% 12%
n n t io ed t io ed s k 96% s k 82%
ue As Disagree ue As Q t Q t o o N Dont Know N Agree August March August March 2002 2003 2002 2003 I am aware of the FENOC Safety I am aware of the Safety Conscious Conscious Work Environment Policy. 32 Work Environment Review Team and its purpose. 34 72 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey Pillar 4: Detect and Prevent Retaliation 12%
21%
11%
13%
77%
67%
Disagree Dont Know August 2002 March 2003 Agree I believe my work environment is free of harassment, intimidation, retaliation and discrimination (HIRD). 11 73 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey Pillar 4: Detect and Prevent Retaliation Yes Yes Yes Yes 12% 15%
7% 8%
August March August March 2002 2003 2002 2003 I am aware of instances that occurred Within the last six months, I have been within the last six months in which subjected to HIRD for raising nuclear workers in my work group have been safety, quality or compliance concerns subjected to HIRD for raising nuclear while working at Davis-Besse. 35 safety, quality or compliance concerns while working at Davis-Besse. 36 74 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey Pillar 4: Detect and Prevent Retaliation FENOC Yes Yes Yes Yes ONLY 15% 10%
9% 5%
August March August March 2002 2003 2002 2003 I am aware of instances that occurred Within the last six months, I have been within the last six months in which subjected to HIRD for raising nuclear workers in my work group have been safety, quality or compliance concerns subjected to HIRD for raising nuclear while working at Davis-Besse. 35 safety, quality or compliance concerns while working at Davis-Besse. 36 75 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey
- Results Show Improvement from August 2002 Survey
- Significant improvement on 24 of 26 questions
- Additional Work Required
- Demonstrating management commitment to Safety Conscious Work Environment
- Improving Confidence in Corrective Action Program
- Improving Confidence in Employee Concerns Program 76 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Milestone Progress/Bulk Work Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC Mike Stevens Director - Maintenance 77 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Restart Progress
- Major Milestones
- Making progress
- Preparing for Mode 4 and Mode 3 pressure test
- Integrated Schedule
- Includes all Building Block activities
- Potential schedule impact
- High Pressure Injection Pump
- Bulk Work
- Performance Indicators
- Schedule vs. forecasts
- Bulk work
- Emergent workscope 78 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Integrated Schedule
- Making Progress
- Completed Reactor Coolant System Valve Maintenance
- Restored Containment Air Cooler #2 and #3
- Completed Reactor Coolant Pump Maintenance
- Completed Emergency Sump installation
- Decay Heat Valve Tank Modification near completion
- Filled Reactor Coolant System
- Completed FLUS Installation
- Completed Containment Pressure Test (ILRT)
- Next Milestone
- Mode 4 and Mode 3 Pressure Test 79 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Schedule vs Forecasts
- Total Activities = 25,013
- Completed to date = 21,363 80 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
CONTAINMENT HEALTH ASSURANCE CONTAINMENT HEALTH RESTART CR EVALUATIONS 1000 Add Close 900 800 Number of Restart CR Evaluations 700 Closed 600 500 400 300 Open 200 100 0
11/ 24 12/ 1 12/ 8 12/ 15 12/ 22 12/ 29 1/ 5 1/ 12 1/ 19 1/ 26 2/ 2 2/ 9 2/ 16 2/ 23 3/ 2 3/ 9 3/ 16 3/ 23 3/ 30 4/ 6 4/ 13 4/ 20 4/ 27 5/ 4 5/ 11 5/ 18 5/ 25 Tot a l Close d 154 171 230 300 433 433 443 484 535 598 624 649 695 724 763 803 832 864 878 885 901 Tot a l Ope n 573 562 607 582 451 452 442 401 354 295 276 251 215 189 151 114 93 63 53 49 35 Close 40 17 59 70 133 0 10 41 51 63 26 25 46 29 39 40 29 32 14 7 16 Add 21 6 104 45 2 1 0 0 4 4 7 0 10 3 1 3 8 2 4 3 2 81 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
CONTAINMENT HEALTH ASSURANCE CONTAINMENT HEALTH RESTART CAs 3000 Add Close 2500 Number of Restart CAs 2000 Closed Closed 1500 1000 Open 500 0
11/ 24 12/ 1 12/ 8 12/ 15 12/ 22 12/ 29 1/ 5 1/ 12 1/ 19 1/ 26 2/ 2 2/ 9 2/ 16 2/ 23 3/ 2 3/ 9 3/ 16 3/ 23 3/ 30 4/ 6 4/ 13 4/ 20 4/ 27 5/ 4 5/ 11 5/ 18 5/ 25 Tot a l c lose d 276 312 381 418 468 469 511 587 658 752 833 946 1029 1081 1201 1314 1510 1680 1765 1831 1923 Tot a l Ope n 1127 1129 1160 1177 1204 1203 1182 1226 1311 1335 1299 1229 1187 1174 1083 1026 870 726 655 600 511 Close 40 36 69 37 50 1 42 76 71 94 81 113 83 52 120 113 196 170 85 66 92 Add 62 38 100 54 77 0 21 120 156 118 45 43 41 39 29 56 40 26 14 11 3 82 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
SYSTEM HEALTH ASSURANCE 1600 SYSTEM HEALTH RESTART CR EVALUATIONS Add Closed 1400 Number of Restart CR Evaluations 1200 Closed 1000 800 600 400 Open 200 0
11/ 24 12/ 1 12/ 8 12/ 15 12/ 22 12/ 29 1/ 5 1/ 12 1/ 19 1/ 26 2/ 2 2/ 9 2/ 16 2/ 23 3/ 2 3/ 9 3/ 16 3/ 23 3/ 30 4/ 6 4/ 13 4/ 20 4/ 27 5/ 4 5/ 11 5/ 18 5/ 25 Tot a l Close d 520 548 585 671 752 791 824 852 899 947 983 1036 1086 1142 1224 1304 1346 1391 1428 1461 1470 Tot a l Ope n 850 834 807 758 678 640 607 580 537 525 509 458 409 355 273 194 153 109 74 42 33 Close d 69 28 37 86 81 39 33 28 47 48 36 53 50 56 82 80 42 45 37 33 9 Add 19 12 10 37 1 1 0 1 4 36 20 2 1 2 0 1 1 1 2 1 0 83 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
SYSTEM HEALTH ASSURANCE SYSTEM HEALTH RESTART CAs 1600 Add Close 1400 1200 Closed Number of Restart CAs 1000 800 600 400 Open 200 0
11/ 24 12/ 1 12/ 8 12/ 15 12/ 22 12/ 29 1/ 5 1/ 12 1/ 19 1/ 26 2/ 2 2/ 9 2/ 16 2/ 23 3/ 2 3/ 9 3/ 16 3/ 23 3/ 30 4/ 6 4/ 13 4/ 20 4/ 27 5/ 4 5/ 11 5/ 18 5/ 25 Tot a l Close d 42 70 91 103 125 131 147 170 212 251 290 354 399 476 594 650 709 766 792 826 894 Tot a l Ope n 516 528 647 775 890 889 894 988 991 992 991 966 937 880 781 753 708 670 653 629 561 Close 7 28 21 12 22 6 16 23 42 39 39 64 45 77 118 56 59 57 26 34 68 Add 97 40 140 140 137 5 21 117 45 40 38 39 16 20 19 28 14 19 9 10 0 84 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
OPERATIONAL READINESS ON-LINE CORRECT IVE M AINT ENANCE BACKLOG 500 Good 450 400 350 O pen Work O rders 300 Goal < 250 250 200 150 100 50 0
J AN FE B M AR AP R MAY J UN J UL AUG SE P OCT NOV DE C 1/ 05 1/ 12 1/ 19 1/ 26 2/ 2 2/ 9 2/ 16 2/ 23 3/ 2 3/ 9 3/ 16 3/ 23 3/ 30 4/ 6 4/ 13 4/ 20 4/ 27 5/ 4 5/ 11 5/ 18 5/ 25 WOs 172 193 199 220 242 239 251 257 283 293 306 294 296 290 293 286 286 294 291 290 289 285 283 275 271 263 259 C los e 31 17 9 19 12 10 9 12 10 13 3 10 10 13 6 Add 33 11 11 12 12 18 6 11 9 9 1 2 6 5 2 85 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Summary
- Making Progress
- Moving Toward Restart
- High Pressure Injection (HPI) Pump
- Electrical distribution
- Readiness meetings
- Mode 4 pressure test mid to late May
- Startup approximately one month later
- Working options to resolve HPI Pump within this timeframe 86 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Restart Action Performance Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC Clark Price Owner - Restart Action Plan 87 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Restart Action Performance
- Measuring Our Progress
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission 0350 Checklist
- Overall Restart Actions 88 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Restart Action Performance Item 0350 Item Description Discovery Implementation No.
1 Adequacy of Root Cause a Penetration cracking and Reactor Pressure Technical Root Cause 02-0891 Vessel corrosion b Organizational, Programmatic and Human 90 Performance Issues Adequacy of Safety Significant Structures, 2
Systems and Components a Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Replacement 97 Containment Vessel Restoration following b 99 RPV Head Replacement Structures, Systems and Components Inside c 100 86 Containment c.1 Containment Emergency Sump 100 98 EOC of Boric Acid in Systems Outside of d 100 83 Containment Field Complete In Progress Hold - Plant Conditions N/A - Not Applicable 89 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Restart Action Performance Item 0350 Item Description Discovery Implementation No.
3 Adequacy of Safety Significant Programs a Corrective Action Program 100 100 b Operating Experience Program 100 100 c.1 Quality Audits 100 95 c.2 Self-Assessments of Programs 100 d Boric Acid Corrosion Management Program 100 100 Reactor Coolant System Unidentified Leakage e 75 Monitoring Program f In-Service Inspection Program 100 100 g Modification Program 100 100 h Radiation Protection Program 100 85 Completeness & Accuracy of Required Records i 60
& Submittals to NRC Field Complete In Progress Hold - Plant Conditions N/A - Not Applicable 90 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Restart Action Performance Item 0350 Item Description Discovery Implementation No.
Adequacy of Organizational Effectiveness 4 a-b 85
& Human Performance 5 Readiness for Restart a Review of Licensee's Restart Action Plan b Systems Readiness for Restart 100 79 b.1 Design Calculation Resolution 100 Included in 5b c Operations Readiness for Restart Restart Readiness Reviews d Test Program Development and Implementation 66 6 a-f Licensing Issue Resolution 100 7 a Confirmatory Action Letter Resolution CAL Resolution & Restart Report Field Complete In Progress Hold - Plant Conditions N/A - Not Applicable 91 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
RESTART ACTION PLAN 7000 T OT AL REST ART CONDIT ION REPORT A dd Close EVALUAT IONS 6000 5000 W ork-Off Ra te s Number of Restart CRs Bes t of Las t 4 Wks =
4000 net of 103/wk Project May 11 3000 Closed Las t 4 Wk Ave =
net of 76/wk Project May 18 2000 1000 Open 0
11/ 2 4 12/ 1 12/ 8 12 / 15 12 / 22 12 / 29 1/ 5 1/ 12 1/ 19 1/ 26 2/ 2 2/ 9 2/ 16 2 / 2 3 3/ 2 3/ 9 3 / 16 3/ 2 3 3/ 3 0 4/ 6 4 / 13 4 / 20 4 / 27 5/ 4 5/ 11 5/ 18 5 / 25 To t a l Close d 22 2 7 2 30 6 2 45 9 2 7 70 2 9 61 30 3 0 3112 32 13 3 417 3 5 70 3 6 94 38 4 8 40 0 5 419 0 4 47 3 4 7 15 4 8 60 50 3 8 516 0 5 28 0 5 35 9 To t a l Ope n 23 4 0 2 30 5 2 29 3 2 0 96 19 49 18 95 18 2 1 176 1 165 6 15 97 15 60 14 5 9 13 5 1 120 1 95 1 7 62 658 555 47 0 40 7 3 53 Clo se 18 5 79 153 3 11 19 1 69 82 10 1 2 04 153 12 4 15 4 15 7 18 5 2 83 2 42 14 5 17 8 12 2 12 0 79 Ad d 83 44 141 114 44 15 8 41 99 94 87 53 49 35 33 53 41 75 37 57 25 92 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
RESTART ACTION PLAN TOTAL RESTART CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 7000 Add Close 6000 5000 Work-Off Rates Best of Last 4 Wks=
Number of Restart CAs net of 259/wk 4000 Closed Project June 1 Last 4 Wk Ave =
net of 200/wk 3000 Project June 8 2000 Open 1000 0
11/ 24 12/ 1 12/ 8 12/ 15 12/ 22 12/ 29 1/ 5 1/ 12 1/ 19 1/ 26 2/ 2 2/ 9 2/ 16 2/ 23 3/ 2 3/ 9 3/ 16 3/ 23 3/ 30 4/ 6 4/ 13 4/ 20 4/ 27 5/ 4 5/ 11 5/ 18 5/ 25 Total Clos ed 741 825 954 1073 1183 1198 1295 1439 1599 1798 1992 2247 2439 2692 3071 3392 3746 4089 4266 4494 4762 Total Open 2608 2625 2794 2932 3091 3090 3072 3245 3416 3463 3420 3299 3213 3112 2854 2668 2409 2185 2066 1869 1610 Clos e 82 84 129 119 110 15 97 144 160 199 194 255 192 253 379 321 354 343 177 228 268 Add 278 101 298 257 269 14 79 317 331 246 151 134 106 152 121 135 95 119 58 31 9 93 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003
Closing Comments Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC 94 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station April 15, 2003