ML031040069

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Annual Assessment Meeting Slides for Region I and PPL Susquehanna, LLC
ML031040069
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/31/2003
From:
NRC Region 1
To:
References
Download: ML031040069 (24)
v • d • e


Text

Annual Assessment Meeting Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Reactor Oversight Program - Year 2002 0

A_

0 Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region I King of Prussia, PA Agenda Introduction

  • Review of Reactor Oversight Process
  • National Summary of Plant Performance
  • Discussion of Plant Performance Results NRC Security Update PPL Response and Remarks
  • Break
  • Public Comments and Questions

Region I Organization i

Hubert Miller Regional Administrator James Wiggins

)eputy Regional Administrator

.'i I

A. Randolph Blough lirector Division of Reactor Projects John Rogge Acting Deputy Director Wayne Lanning Director Division of Reactor Safety Richard Crienjak Deputy Director I

Dr. Mohamed Shanbaky Branch Chief Regional Specialists Susquehanna Peach Bottom Limerick Project Resident Inspectors esident Inspectors Resident Inspectors Engineers Samuel Hansell nthony McMurtray Arthur Burritt Donald Florek John Richmond Michael Buckley Blake Welling Shriram lyer NRC Representatives k$

  • Randolph Blough, Director, DRP
  • 610-337-5229 / ARB~nrc.gov
  • Dr. Mohamed Shanbaky, Chief - Branch 4
  • 610-337-5209 /MMS1 nrc.gov
  • Samuel Hansell, Senior Resident Inspector
  • 570-542-2134 / SLHlnrc.gov
  • John Richmond, Resident Inspector
  • 570-542-2134 / JER(nrc.gov
  • 301-415-1030 / RVG(nrc.gov
  • Shriram Iyer, Project Engineer - Branch 4
  • 610-3376943 / SGI~nrc.gov

Reactor Oversight Process (ROP)

E s~ignifica~nce

_Threshold Regulatory Response Examples of Baseline Inspections

  • Equipment Alignment
  • Triennial Fire Protection
  • Operator Response
  • Radiation Release Controls
  • Worker Radiation Protection
  • Corrective Action Program
  • Corrective Action Case Reviews

-92 hrs/yr

-200 hrs every 3 yrs

-125 hrs/yr

-80 hrs/yr

-I100 hrs every 2 yrs

-O00 hrs/yr

-250 hrs every 2 yrs

-60 hrs/yr

I Significance Threshold m

Performance Indicators Green:

White:

Yellow:

Red:

Only Baseline Inspection May increase NRC oversight Requires more NRC oversight Requires more NRC oversight Inspection Findings Green:

White:

Yellow:

Red:

Very Low safety issue Low to moderate safety issue Substantial safety issue High safety issue Examples of Performance Indicators

  • Scrams with Loss of Normal Heat Removal
  • Emergency AC Power System Safety System Unavailability
  • Alert and Notificationn System Reliability Performance indicators are the second type of input in the assessment process.

Action Matrix Concept

.. ~

Licensee Regulatory Degraded Multiple/Rep.

Unacceptable

Response

Response Cornerstone Degraded Performance Cornerstone EIZZZ

EZZIZI?>

zZIII>

LZZZI

Increasing Safety Significance Increasing NRC Inspection Efforts Increasing NRC/Licensee Management Involvement Increasing Regulatory Actions National Summary of Plant Performance Status at End of ROP Cycle 3 Licensee Response 75 Regulatory Response 24 Degraded Cornerstone 2

Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone 1

Unacceptable 0

Total Plants 102

-10 National Summary

  • Performance Indicator Results (at end of ROP Cycle 3)
  • Green 1835 White 5

Yellow 0

  • Red 0
  • Total Inspection Findings (ROP Cycle 3)
  • Green 783
  • White 30
  • Yellow 1

Red 2

Susquehanna - Performance Indicators Radito Safeguards Safy Occpatona ll Pu ic lll l Safety ll Safety llProtection Performance Indicators I

Performance Indicator Drill/Exercise Performance

'..-

z.,.

,,6 j a

100.0% +/-k aN a

N a

N a

N N

a N

a 90.0% -

80.0% -

70.0% -

60.0% -

50.0% -

.3%

Thresholds: Whte < 90.0% Yellow < 70.0%

Susquehanna Inspection Activities Gu..

I.

01 (Jan 1 - Dec 31, 2002)

  • 3113 hours0.036 days <br />0.865 hours <br />0.00515 weeks <br />0.00118 months <br /> of inspection related activities

. 2 Resident Inspectors assigned to the site

  • 21 Regional Inspector visits
  • Included 5 team inspections
  • Inspection Findings
  • 16 findings of very low safety significance (Green)

Strategic Performance Areas & Cornerstones

  • Reactor Safety

Mitigating Systems (9 Green findings)

Emergency Preparedness (4 Green findings)

  • Radiation Safety
  • Safeguards

Susquehanna Unit 1-Insp(iction Results Radiation sateguardsI SafetyI Occupational u

Radiation Radiation I

Safetyty Protection 4Q)2002 4 =PQI 2Qr2OO2 1 Qr2002 Most Significant Inspection Findings "WW]

of m

1

~ ~qu'tm IX77771

Susquehanna Unit 2-Inspection Results Reactor Radiation Safe guards initiating a

Emergency l Rdation a

diation Physical Events Systems Integrity Preparedness Sadfaetyn Safety Protection Most Significant Inspection Findings 4Qr2002

=

Age mi 3Q/2002 2Qr2002 Miscella{<neous l

Substantive Cross-Cutting Issue

  • One Substantive Cross-Cutting Issue
  • Common Performance Theme
  • Significant Number of Findings (8 Green findings)
  • Operator Human Performance Cross-Cutting Area
  • Implementation of Procedures
  • PPL's Corrective Action

I Non-SDP Enforcement Action

  • Severity III Violation - January 13, 2003
  • No Civil Penalty
  • Certificate of Compliance requires Helium gas
  • Dry Cask filled with mixture of Helium gas and Argon gas
  • Discovered by PPL
  • Corrective Actions
  • Actions to prevent recurrence completed Susquehanna Assessment Results Summary (Jan 1 - Dec 31, 2002)
  • Operated Safely
  • Met all Cornerstone objectives
  • Currently in "Licensee Response" column of Action Matrix
  • Graded in the "Regulatory Response" column of the Action Matrix for first three quarters of 2002
  • NRC will conduct Baseline Inspections in 2003

NRC Security Program Update

  • NRC has issued Orders (February 2002):
  • Increased Patrols Augmented Security Capabilities
  • Added Barriers and Posts Enhanced Personnel Screening for Access Enhanced Security Awareness
  • Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response Formed (April 2002)
  • Threat Advisory and Protective Measure System (August 2002):
  • NRC established a five level threat advisory and protective measure system based on Homeland Security Advisory System NRC Security Program Update (continued)
  • Access Authorization Order (January 7, 2003)
  • Force-on-Force Exercises (February 2003)
  • Training Order (TBD)
  • Fatigue Order (TBD)
  • Design Basis Threat (TBD)

Reference Sources

  • Reactor Oversight Process
  • Public Electronic Reading Room
  • Public Document Room
  • 1-800-397-4209 (Toll Free)

IwqI 7

C)

I/A

/

NRC Annual Assessment Meeting March 31, 2003 1

tOne tN PPL Susquehanna Team

  • Jim Miller
  • Bryce Shriver
  • Rich Anderson
  • George Jones

/I.

  • Bob Saccone
  • Al Wrape
  • Terry Harpster President-PPL Generation Senior VP and Chief Nuclear Officer Vice President - Nuclear Operations Vice President - Special Projects General Manager - Nuclear Engineering General Manager - Nuclear Assurance General Manager - Plant Support 2

One StrategicObjectives

  • Exemplary Safety Performance
  • Operational Excellence
  • Excellent Financial Performance
  • Exceptional Teamwork and Commitment 3

Continuous Improvement n

be C° -.

provemenut nitiatives i1 4

Operational Focus

- Conduct of Operations

- Corrective Action

- Work Management

- Work Standards

- Training

- Equipment Reliability

. a w

6 Y -11 o

SI I

4' A

I 2003 Improvement Initiatives

- Unit 2 -11 Rio

- Human Performance

- Radiation Protection r..

.4..

.4,-



' &i-

-.'

.;

7: 

- Work Management

- Regulatory Performance

- Organizational Effectiveness he, -....

I I

.

.



WWF7{.

  -

I I



, I I,

wi Emergency Preparedness

'~One O

  • We are assuring on-shift staffing meets Plan requirements, resolving the 'White' finding
  • Drills and actual events demonstrate solid performance, with strong off-site agency support
  • Additional actions are, being taken to achieve excellent performance
  • Lessons are being extended to other regulatory programs 6

4 *-Od Dry Fuel Storage

  • Use of wrong inert gas was a significant human performance error
  • Self-identified and reported
  • No health or safety impacts
  • Effective corrective actions restored canister to its design configuration
  • Review identified human performance lessons that are being applied station-wide 7

-0Human Performance

  • An adverse human performance trend was identified with procedure adherence and use self-assessment broadened our understanding of the issue scope
  • We recognize the need to accelerate improvement eflorts
  • Actions in-progress address all aspects of this issue:

programmatic improvements supervisory oversight individual worker focus

  • Our indicators are showing some improvement in Operations performance 8

One 0 Security Changes recognize the new threat environment:

Physical barriers & detection Security staffing and training

> Access authorization

> Interface with government agencies NRC and industry are working together on upgraded requirements, integrating Emergency & Security response 9

One /Industry Lessons Excellent Nuclear Performance Requires:

  • Leadership & worker commitment to safety
  • IntegratiQln of safety into processes & programs
  • Strong interface with the NRC, Industry & Public
  • Rigorous oversight and independent assessment 10

Station Performance Index One,..

Ve; On e, Ca Index Parameters

  • Safety System Performance
  • Fuel Reliability
  • Industrial Safety
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Unplanned Shutdowns
  • Chemistry Performance "IC ON~

ON CON of*

0 0-00

  • Station Availability 11

7 1I 40W

/

/

Io I'l 12

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML031040069&oldid=5423339"