ML030860505

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
February 2003 Monthly Operating Report for Nine Mile Point Unit 1
ML030860505
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/12/2003
From: Hopkins L
Constellation Nuclear
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NMP1L 1719
Download: ML030860505 (4)


Text

P0 Box 63 Lycoming, New York 13093 Constellation Nuclear Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station March 12, 2003 NMP1L 1719 A Member of the Constellation Energy Group U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

SUBJECT:

Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Docket No. 50-220 DPR-63 Monthly Operating Report for February 2003 Gentlemen:

Submitted herewith are the Operating Data Report, Unit Shutdowns, and a Narrative of Operating Experience for February 2003 for the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 1.

Submittal of this information complies with Section 6.9.1.c of the Unit 1 Technical Specifications.

Very truly yours, Lawrence A. Ylpkins Plant General Manager LAH/BE/jm Attachments cc:

Mr. H. J. Miller, NRC Regional Administrator, Region I Mr. G. K. Hunegs, NRC Senior Resident Inspector 41

ATTACHMENT A OPERATING DATA REPORT DOCKET NO. 50-220 DATE: 3/5/03 PREPARED BY: B. L. Eastman TELEPHONE: (315) 349-2559 OPERATING STATUS Unit Name: Nine Mile Point Unit #1 Reporting Period: February 2003 1

2 Design Electrical Rating: (Net MWe)

Maximum Dependable Capacity: (Net MWe) 613 565 Critical Hours Hours Generator On-Line Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours Net Electrical Energy Generated (MWH)

This Month 538.1 513.8 0.0 310,547.0 Yr-to-Date 1,282.1 1,257.8 0.0 768,363.0 Cumulative 206,568.9 202,120.1 20.4 112,703,744.0 3

4 5

6

ATTACHMENT B UNIT SHUTDOWNS REPORTING PERIOD - FEBRUARY 2003 (1)

Reason A.

Equipment Failure (Explain)

B Maintenance or Test C

Refueling D.

Regulatory Restniction E.

Operator TraininglLicense Examination F.

Administrative G

Operational Error (Explain)

H Other (Explain)

  • NOTE-Sequential numbenng used if DOCKET NO: 50-220 UNIT NAME: NMP1 DATE: 3/5/03 PREPARED BY: B. L. Eastman TELEPHONE: (315) 349-2559 (2)

Method

1.

Manual 2

Manual Trip/Scram 3

Automatic Trip/Scram

4.

Continuation

5.

Other (Explain)

TYPE NO

  • DATE F: FORCED DURATION REASONS' METHOD OF SHUTTING CAUSE & CORRECTIVE ACTIONS S: SCHEDULED (HOURS)

DOWN 2 COMMENTS 1

030213 S

158.2 A

1 THE UNIT WAS SHUTDOWN TO REPAIR LEAKING EMERGENCY CONDENSER ISOLATION VALVES

ATTACHMENT C NARRATIVE OF OPERATING EXPERIENCE DOCKET NO. 50-220 UNIT NAME: NMP1 DATE: 3/5/03 PREPARED BY: B. L. Eastman TELEPHONE: (315) 349-2559 The unit operated during the month of February 2003 with a Net Electrical Design capacity factor of 75.4 percent.

On February 12, 2003, at 2102 hours0.0243 days <br />0.584 hours <br />0.00348 weeks <br />7.99811e-4 months <br />, a planned reactor shutdown was commenced to repair containment isolation valve 39-10. The main turbine was removed from service at 0250 hours0.00289 days <br />0.0694 hours <br />4.133598e-4 weeks <br />9.5125e-5 months <br /> on February 13, starting planned outage 03-01. Following completion of planned maintenance, Mode 2, Startup was entered at 1407 hours0.0163 days <br />0.391 hours <br />0.00233 weeks <br />5.353635e-4 months <br /> on February 18 and the reactor was brought critical at 1840 hours0.0213 days <br />0.511 hours <br />0.00304 weeks <br />7.0012e-4 months <br /> the same day. The main generator was placed in service at 1702 hours0.0197 days <br />0.473 hours <br />0.00281 weeks <br />6.47611e-4 months <br /> on February 19. Full power operation was achieved at 1012 hours0.0117 days <br />0.281 hours <br />0.00167 weeks <br />3.85066e-4 months <br /> on February 20, 2003.

On February 23, 2003, at 1956 hours0.0226 days <br />0.543 hours <br />0.00323 weeks <br />7.44258e-4 months <br />, reactor power was lowered to 83% to perform a control rod pattern adjustment. Full power operation was resumed at 2125 hours0.0246 days <br />0.59 hours <br />0.00351 weeks <br />8.085625e-4 months <br /> the same day.

There were no challenges to the electromatic relief valves or safety valves during this reporting period.