ML030780346

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Seabrook Meeting Notice Slides for Annual Assessment Meeting
ML030780346
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/17/2003
From:
NRC Region 1
To:
Shared Package
ml030650398 List:
References
Download: ML030780346 (22)


Text

NRC Reactor Oversight Program Annual Assessment Meeting Seabrook Power Station Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region I King of Prussia, PA

Agenda Business

< Introduction

< Review of Reactor Oversight Process

< National Results

< Seabrook Results

< NRC Security Update

< Licensee Response and Remarks Public Comments and Questions

Region I Organization Hubert Miller Regional Administrator James Wiggins Deputy Regional Administrator A. Randolph Blough W ayne Lanning Director Di vision of Reactor Projects Director Di vision of Reactor Safety John Rogge Richard Crlenjak Acting Deputy Director Deputy Director Brian J. McDermott John W hite Branch Chi ef Branch Chi ef Millstone Project Engineers Seabrook Incident Response Security Radiation Resident Inspectors Kenneth Jenison Resident Inspectors Center Specialists Protection Stephen M. Schneider Martha Barillas Glenn Dentel Colleen Picciotto Specialists Paul Cataldo Shani Lewis Javier Brand Felicia Hinson Silas Kennedy Kevin Mangan

Reactor Oversight Process Strategic Performance Areas Safety Cornerstones Performance Indicator Baseline Inspection Results Results Significance Significance Threshold Threshold Action Matrix Regulatory Response

Examples of Baseline Inspections

  • Equipment Alignment ~90 hrs/yr
  • Triennial Fire Protection ~200 hrs every 3 yrs
  • Operator Response ~125 hrs/yr
  • Rad Release Controls ~100 hrs every 2 yrs
  • Worker Radiation Protection ~100 hrs/yr
  • Corrective Action Program ~250 hrs every 2 yrs
  • Corrective Action Case Reviews ~60 hrs/yr

Examples of Performance Indicators

  • Scrams with Loss of Normal Heat Removal
  • Emergency AC Power System Safety System Unavailability
  • Alert and Notification System Reliability

Significance Threshold Performance Indicators Green: Baseline Inspections White: May increase NRC oversight Yellow: Requires more NRC oversight Red: Requires more NRC oversight Inspection Findings Green: Very low safety significant issue White: Low to moderate safety significant issue Yellow: Substantial safety significant issue Red: High safety significant issue

Action Matrix Concept Licensee Regulatory Degraded Multiple/Rep. Unacceptable Response Response Cornerstone Degraded Performance Cornerstone Increasing Safety Significance Increasing NRC Inspection Efforts Increasing NRC/Licensee Management Involvement Increasing Regulatory Actions

National Summary of Plant Performance Status at End of 2002 Licensee Response 75 Regulatory Response 24 Degraded Cornerstone 2 Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone 1 Unacceptable 0 Total Plants* 102

National Summary

  • Performance Indicator Results (at end of 2002)

< Green 1835

< White 5

< Yellow 0

< Red 0

  • Total Inspection Findings (2002)

< Green 783

< White 30

< Yellow 1

< Red 2

Seabrook Assessment Results January 1 - December 31, 2002

  • Operated safely
  • Met all cornerstone objectives
  • Licensee Response Column on Action Matrix
  • NRC will conduct baseline inspections in 2003

Seabrook Assessment Results (continued)

Cross-Cutting Issues

  • NRC removed the substantial cross-cutting issue designation for Problem Identification &

Resolution

< Confirmed progress through resident and team inspections

< Demonstrated improvement by a decrease in significance and number of findings

Seabrook - Performance Indicators www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SEAB1/seab1_chart.html#pi_section

Performance Indicator Seabrook Inspection Activities January 1 - December 31, 2002

  • 5500 hours0.0637 days <br />1.528 hours <br />0.00909 weeks <br />0.00209 months <br /> of inspection related activities
  • 2 resident inspectors on-site
  • 17 regional inspector visits
  • 5 team inspections

< Permanent Plant Modifications

< Fire Protection

< Special Inspection Team

< Problem Identification & Resolution

< Emergency Preparedness Exercise

Seabrook - Inspection Results Inspection Findings January 1 - December 31, 2002

  • 7 inspection findings of very low safety significance (Green)
  • EDGs provide backup power to emergency equipment

NRC Security Program Update

  • Interim Compensatory Measures (February 2002)

< Required by NRC Order

< Increased Patrols

< Augmented Security Capabilities

< Added Barriers and Posts

< Enhanced Personnel Screening for Access

  • Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response (April 2002)
  • Threat Advisory and Protective Measure System (August 2002)

< Five threat levels corresponding to the Homeland Security Advisory System

NRC Security Program Update (continued)

  • Access Authorization Order (January 2003)
  • Force-on-Force Exercises (February 2003)
  • Revised Design Basis Threat (TBD)
  • Training Order (TBD)
  • Fatigue Order (TBD)

NRC Representatives

  • Brian McDermott, Chief, Projects Branch 6 & Incident Response, Region I (610) 337-5233
  • John White, Chief, Radiation Safety & Safeguards, Region I (610) 337-5114
  • Victor Nerses, Project Manager, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (301) 415-1484
  • Glenn Dentel, Senior Resident Inspector, Seabrook Resident Office (603) 474-3589
  • Javier Brand, Resident Inspector, Seabrook Resident Office (603) 474-3580
  • Neil Sheehan, Public Affairs Officer, Region I (610) 337-5331

Reference Sources

  • Reactor Oversight Process

< http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html

  • Public Electronic Reading Room

< http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html

  • Public Document Room

< 1-800-397-4209 (Toll Free)

End of Presentation