ML030660503

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment Submitted by John P. Wolflin on NUREG-1437, Final Supplement 6 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement Regarding Surry Units 1 & 2
ML030660503
Person / Time
Site: Surry  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 02/24/2003
From: Wolflin J
US Dept of Interior, Fish & Wildlife Service
To: Kugler A
NRC/ADM/DAS/RDB
References
67FR20555 00004, NUREG-1437, S6
Download: ML030660503 (5)


Text

United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Chesapeake Bay Field Office 177 Admiral Cochrane Drive Annapolis, MD 21401 February 24, 2003 Chief, Rules Review and Directives Branch U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission C-) "-I Mail Stop T6-D59 Washington, D.C. 21555-0001 Attention: Andrew Kugler Re: NUREG-143 7, FinalSupplement 6 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement RegardingSurry Power Station, Units 1 and 2

Dear Sir:

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has determined that Surry operations and minor refurbishment are not likely to have an adverse affect on natural resources in the area. As documented in the your Biological Assessment on the federally threatened bald eagle, (Haliaeetusleucocephalus), we agree there are no immediate effects on eagles. Please reference the attached letter on the subject. Regarding aquatic species, the cooling water intake structures at the Power Station are nearly the state of the art, but any replacement screens should have a mesh size of one millimeter or less.

We appreciate the opportunity to review the final environmental document and provide comment on natural resource protection. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact David W. Sutherland of the Service's Chesapeake Bay Field Office by telephone at (410) 573-4535, or by e-mail at DavidSutherland@fws.gov.

Sincerely,

  • . John P. Wolflin Supervisor Attachment

ý'7ý-ý , h 13 2?e 4

cc: Dominion Energy Company (Tony Banks) 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060 USFWS Atten: Karen Mayne

United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Chesapeake Bay Field Office 177 Admiral Cochrane Drive "Annapolis,MD 21401 February 13, 2003 Mr. Andrew Kugler Rules Review and Directives Branch United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop T6-D59

_--_Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Re: Surry Power PlantLicense Renewal

Dear Mr. Kugler:

This responds to your submittal of a biological assessment report, dated November 6, 2002, pertaining to the renewal of an operating license for the Surry Power Plant in Surry County,.

Virginia. The bald eagle (Haliaeetusleucocephalus), a federally threatened species, occupies forested habitat between the power plant and the James River for nesting and year round foraging. We have reviewed the information you have enclosed and are providing comments in accordance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 U.S.C.

1531 et seq.)

As described in your cover letter-the proposed action, a permit renewal, would include the continued operation and maintenance of the existing facilities at the power station site and the transmission corridor between Units 1 and 2. You also stated that no new construction or onsite disturbance will occur as a result of the license renewal.

Eagle nesting surveys conducted in 2002 by biologists with the Virginia Department of Game

-- ;and Inland Fisheries and the Center for Conservation BioIogy at-th&-Clleg& 6f Williain and Mary, have determined that at least four active bald eagle nests occur near the plant and the peninsula encompassing Hog Island. Three of these nests; as described in your biological assessment, are located between one and two miles from the plant. A fourth nest, located closer to the plant, may no longer be intact as observers could not relocate the nest structure. The forested peninsula is currently characterized as a foraging area for as many as 50 non-breeding eagles during the summer and winter periods. The Service believes that the configuration of the forested shoreline along the James River will attract more eagles and may become a communal roosting area for bald eagles in the upcoming years. Since the new permit license will not take effect until 2012, nine years from nowý the Service cannot predict what impacts to eagles may occur in the distant future. However, since no land clearing or disturbances will occur as a result

of the new license renewal and the current management procedures to protect eagles are not likely to change, the Service would expect little disturbance to bald eagles.

We recommend that you conduct annual monitoring of bald eagle activity at the plant facility, inclusive of the Hog Island Tract, and inform representatives with the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service if eagle nests occur within 1,320 feet of the plant facility. If you have any questions or additional concerns, please contact Karen Mayne of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Virginia Field Office, at 804-693-6694, extension 103.

Sincerely, So lfl in ,..

"upervisor .

cc: Attn: Dr. Bryan Watts, Center for Conservation Biology, College of William and Mary Attn: Karen Mayne, USFWS, Virginia Field Office Attn: Jeff Cooper, VDGIF t ' *' k*'t.--° -

. -1,

.' I UNITED STATES MAAi DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR - " ....

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE "SES303 CHESAPEARE BAY FIELD OFFICE 177 ADMIRAL COCHRANE DR. 4 850 2 17 U.SPOSTAGE' ANNAPOLIS, MD 21401 OFFICIAL BUSINESS

/,PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE, $300 CHIEF, RULES REVIEW AND DIRECTIVES BRANCH U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION MAIL STOP T6-D59 WASHINGTON, DC 295-0001 115 -

_____~~~AM _____

_____ -7=6___,