ML030410237

Various Checklists for the Monticello Initial Examination - Oct. 2002. Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (Docket No. 50-263) Initial Licensing Examination Security Agreement

ML030410237
Person / Time
Site:	Monticello
Issue date:	11/12/2002
From:	Allex G Nuclear Management Co
To:	Mcneil D NRC/RGN-III
References
50-263/02-301, ES-201-3, NUREG-1021 50-263/02-301
Download: ML030410237 (15)

Text

VARIOUS CHECKLISTS FOR THE MONTICELLO INITIAL EXAMINATION - OCT 2002

Monticello Training Center Operated by Nuclear Management Company, LLC Committed to Nuclear Excellence November 12, 2002 Attention: Dell McNeil US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region III 801 Warrenville Road Lisle, Illinois 60532-4351

Subject:

Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (Docket No. 50-263) Initial Licensing Examination Security Agreement.

Enclosed are the necessary copies of NUREG 1021, Form ES-201-3, Examination Security Agreement, as utilized for MNGP 2002 ILO NRC Exam. All of the required post-examination signatures have been obtained with the exception of one. This individual no longer works for the company and was not able to be contacted. This has been annotated on the applicable line associated with this persons signature and a note added to the bottom of the ES-201-3 form.

If you have any questions regarding the enclosed information please contact Jerry Allex, Operations Training Instructor, at 763-295-1563 (Exam Development Room) or 763-271-2654.

Gerald M. Allex Operations Training Instructor 2100 West River Street. Monticello, Minnesota 55362-9637 Telephone: 763.295.4141 e Fax: 763.295.1592

\\)ý1311 A.1% V&

Monticello ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of C'q/O*2 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of "'/9/O2. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME

2.

3. _o"_* -)

_ki&$

4.

8. _*_*

6.

7..

8. 44wal 4-1A

10.

-C I/

12..1V*k14/K 5o0i((

13 42L4eyAK 14/tjL jc JOB TITLE /RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)

-vkc rk

~_

6cLr.

rh.t rd-f L4

.__&1'5a

% _!-* *-_* *_W, _ ___

r A,_

NOTES:

X

/C',

",-, 4 i/,

1'/

DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATENOTE 3 o

__f L_*_c*__ _j& -- JJ 2*

f'Z S7 -.

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 24

Monticello ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 0,

as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of -q From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRI TED AME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SI NATUR

)DATE SIGNATUR =(2) DATENOTE "4.

jg A

-E,-

5. -D-vwA. 'Skore C R5 A

6.

Z--0 A)*-- e 5_;-

-£

,-3 L

12

'1

_e

_I 0

15.--

NOTES:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 24

Monticello ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of ___

as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of ?&/02ý"*. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME

1. ItA *.,- _.-

u. _ _

2.

4. Ac.d,

5. JLa __

L _D_ - -------

8. _1,r__t. _

Tc 2j -_m.-

9. Ld, _. : __L -

134ý 14 I6IJý 15NOTE NOTES:

JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATENOTE DO-

,i, Z

/-.

?- Q I

-I I,,---------,*

,,N

-L_

I -

- --r * --

Ito-_*

.h-

....* *

• _ *.] -faq

.-.T --

S....

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 24

Monticello ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of c7Iqo,- as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of Yr/',,

. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

ENOTE 2.

-_s....

_ L

• .iy r;f D.-__L 4 7 - -.

TuW, --- ----

---

i- _

7.

1

5.

8.

2"...*_k_)_0fit 4.

l-

-i--

5.-~ pii L---

T-r -, " "

10.!.

./

10 C.

rz"

N

6. ~ ~~~ 4,L&fbt EQr

' /o.-

I

72.

le 13 4A 1!.6*(

y 10,* '. *,+*....--

_--_---_so

,-i

... - 714-::*i V --

NOTES:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 24

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility:

Monticello Date of Examination:

09/09/2002 Exam Level (circle one)

RO /

R Operating Test Number:

02-01 Administrative Describe method of evaluation Topic/Subject

1. ONE Administrative JPM, OR Description

2. TWO Administrative Questions A.1 Plant Parameter JPM - Perform Core Thermal Limits Monitoring and identify actions Verification that need to be taken.

Procedure: C.2-05, Rev. 13 Generic 2.1.19 (3.0), 2.1.33 (4.0)

Temporary JPM - Temporary Change Request Procedure Procedure: 4 AWI-02.02.05, Rev. 9; 0255-04-IA-1, Rev. 54 Modification (Bank)

Generic 2.2.11 (3.4)

A.2 Temporary JPM - Initiate a Jumper Bypass Form Modification Procedure: 4AWI-04.04.03, Rev. 16; B.03.02-05, Rev. 17; of Systems Jumper Bypass Form 3034, Rev. 20 (Bank)

Generic 2.2.11 (3.8)

A.3 Radiation JPM - Expected dose determination to inspect equipment Control Procedure: 4 AWI-08.04.01, Rev. 12 Calculating Exposure Generic 2.3.4 (3.1)

A.4 Emergency Plan JPM - Classify an event and determine Protective Action Protective Action Recommendations Recommendation Procedure: A.2-101, Rev. 27; A.2-204, Rev. 14 (Modified Bank)

Generic 2.4.38 (4.0), 2.4.44 (4.0)

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility:

Monticello Date of Examination:

09/0912002 Exam Level (circle one)

RO / SRO Operating Test Number:

02-01 Administrative Describe method of evaluation Topic/Subject

1. ONE Administrative JPM, OR Description

2. TWO Administrative Questions A.1 Plant Parameter JPM - Perform Core Thermal Limits monitoring Verification Procedure: C.2-05, Rev. 13 Generic 2.1.19 (3.0)

Shift JPM - Perform a Control Room Shift Turnover Checklist and Turnover panel walkdown and identify any discrepancies.

Procedure: Checklist 3139, Rev. 24 Generic 2.1.31 (4.2)

A.2 Surveillance JPM - Perform a Daily Jet Pump Operability test Testing Procedure: 0000-B, Rev. 83 Generic 2.2.12 (3.0)

A.3 Radiation JPM - Expected dose determination to inspect equipment Control Procedure: 4 AWI-08.04.01, Rev. 12 Calculating Exposure Generic 2.3.4 (2.5)

A.4 Emergency JPM - Don Fire Fighting Protection Gear Plan Generic 2.4.26 (2.9)

REVISED ES-301 Control Room Systems and Facility Walk-Through Test Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility:

Monticello Nuclear Date of Examination:

10/14/2002 Exam Level (circle one)D_0 ROI)I SRO(U)

Operating Test No.:

02-01 B.1 Control Systems System / JPM Title Type Safety Code*

Function

a. Control Rod Drive (CRD) Operability D, A, S I

JPM-B.01.03-006 201003, A2.01 (3.4/3.6), A4.02 (3.5/3.5)

b. Isolate Core Spray Loop A D, S 2

JPM-B.03.01-002 209001, A4.03 (3.7/3.6)

c. MSIV Exercise Test D, A, S 3

JPM-B.02.04-004 239001, A4.01 (4.2/4.0)

d. HPCI Reactor Vessel Pressure Control N, A, S 4

JPM B.03.02-05.G.1 206000, A1.02 (4.2/4.2)

e. Reset a Group 2 Isolation N, S 5

JPM C.4-B.04.01.B-Part A 223002, A4.03 (3.6/3.5)

f.

Manually Start #11 EDG (Control Room Actions)

D, S 6

JPM-B.09.08-001 264000, A4.04 (3.7/3.7)

g. Rod Worth Minimizer Operability D, S 7

JPM-B.05.02-001 201006, A3.02 (3.5/3.4)

B.2 Facility Walk-Through

a. Manual Control of RHRSW CV-1729 D, L, R 8

JPM B.08.01.03-001 400000, A1.01 (2.8/2.8)

Abnormal

b. FWCV Control D, R 2

JPM-B.05.07-002 259001, A2.07 (3.7/3.8)

c. Depressurize the Scram Air Header N, A, R 1

JPM-C.5-3101-007 295037, EA1.03 (4.1/4.1)

Emergency

• Type Codes: (D)irect from bank, (M)odified from bank, (N)ew, (A)lternate path, (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, (L)ow-Power, (R)CA

ES-301 Control Room Systems and Facility Walk-Through Test Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility:

Monticello Nuclear Date of Examination:

09/0912002 Exam Level (circle one)

RO / SRO(l) / SRO(U)

Operating Test No.:

02-01 B.1 Control Systems System / JPM Title Type Safety Code*

Function

a. Control Rod Drive (CRD) Operability D, A, S 1

JPM-B.01.03-006 201003, A2.01 (3.4/3.6), A4.02 (3.5/3.5)

b.

Isolate Core Spray Loop A D, S 2

JPM-B.03.01-002 209001, A4.03 (3.7/3.6)

c. MSIV Exercise Test D, A, S 3

JPM-B.02.04-003 239001, A4.01 (4.2/4.0)

d.

HPCI Reactor Vessel Pressure Control N, A, S 4

JPM B.03.02-05.G.1 206000, A1.02 (4.2/4.2)

e. Reset a Group 2 Isolation N, S 5

JPM C.4-B.04.01.B-Part A 223002, A4.03 (3.6/3.5)

f.

Manually Start #11 EDG (Control Room Actions)

D, S 6

JPM-B.09.08-001 264000, A4.04 (3.7/3.7)

g. Rod Worth Minimizer Operability D, S 7

JPM-B.05.02-001 201006, A3.02 (3.5/3.4)

B.2 Facility Walk-Through

a. Manual Control of RHRSW CV-1729 D, A, L, R 8

JPM B.08.01.03-001 400000, A1.01 (2.8/2.8)

Abnormal

b. FWCV Control D, R 2

JPM-B.05.07-002 259001, A2.07 (3.7/3.8)

c. Start a Mechanical Vacuum Pump D, R 9

JPM-B.06.03-002 271000, A2.01 (3.1/3.1) {295002, AA1.02 (2.9/2.9)}

Abnormal

• Type Codes: (D)irect from bank, (M)odified from bank, (N)ew, (A)lternate path, (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, (L)ow-Power, (R)CA

ES-301 Operatinq Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility:

Ab*ýC-eIý00 Date of Examination:- 6t isq-T5 IM k

-aLI~

I%-~I Initials

1. GENERAL CRITERIA a

b*

c#

a.

The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

1

b.

There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered gem during this examination.

c.

The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.l.a).

e,

d.

Overlap with the written examination and between operating test categories is within acceptable limits.

e.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent g d applicants at the designated license level.

2. WALK-THROUGH (CATEGORY A & B) CRITERIA

a.

Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee specific performance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b.

The prescripted questions in Category A are predominantly open reference and meet the rA

,J3 1

criteria in Attachment 1 of ES-301.

c.

Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity.

Y" IIA

d.

At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified.

9-f A

3. SIMULATOR (CATEGORY C) CRITERIA

a.

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with

. g Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Prnted Name / Signatur Date

a. Author IAOr I.f tLA e

9

/?

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

,K_

c__,__,__

r,,

16 10

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

I, X//,

f

/(*t, 0 / *Z I Io 2.,.

11

/

NOTE:

• The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

23 of 26 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility:

MONTICELLO Date of Exam:

9/9/2002 Scenario Numbers:

1 1 2 I 3 Operating Test No.

02-01 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initial a

b*

C#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of Af,1 service, but does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

3.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event k,

the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

No more than one mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without

• r a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

T j,

4.

6.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates, Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are A}4,

given.

8.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

9.

The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

/fI 4

10.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.4 of ES-301.

11.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit A',.;

the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12.

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events A,

specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios.

13.

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D)

Actual Attributes

1.

Total malfunctions (5-8) 7/

8 / 7

2.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1 /

/

1

//

3.

Abnormal events (2-4) 2 / 3 / 2 Z/

I

4.

Major Transients (1-2) 2 / 1 /2 Ik'I

,J441

5.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 / 2 / 2 4

t &

4

6.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 / 1 / 1 f*x

7.

Critical tasks (2-3) 3 / 5 / 4 _4Wf/

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 26

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.:

02-01 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1

2 3

4 Reactivity 1

2 6

2 Normal 1

1 1

1 RO Instrument 4

3,4, 2, 3, 3, 4, Component 5,6, 4,5, 5,6, 9

8,9 8

Major 1

7,8 7

7,9 Reactivity 1

2 6

2 Normal 0

NA NA NA As RO Instrument!

2 3,

3,,

4, 6, Component 8, 9 8

Major 1

7,8 7

7,9 SRO-I Reactivity 0

2 6

2 Normal 1

1 1

1 As SRO Instrument!

2 3, 4, 2, 3, 3, 4, Component 5,6, 4,5, 5,6, 9

9 8

Major 1

7,8 7

7,9 Reactivity 0

NA NA NA Normal 1

NA NA NA SRO-U Instrument /

2 NA NA NA Component Major 1

NA NA NA Instructions:

Author:

NRC Reviewer (1)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type (2)

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(3)

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the apj)licant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

lii'

//*'/

/

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 r:

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 ApýRljcnt #1 Applicant #2 Applicant #3 ROSROl RO-4U R

O RO-U &SRO-I/SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1

2 3

4 1

2 34 1

2 3

4 Understand and Interpret Yz, (0"7, 113, 1, 9,,'

, e j Annunciators and Alarms 4_7,6 'f

-m',

Diagnose Events (a

S7,

% Z;,

and Conditions I'

9 Understand Plant 3,q,5, -Sq s,

7, Y,

and System Response 4

'1g(S*

Comply With and Use Procedures (1)

-7,0 9

0,, 9q Operate Control 7, 9

,9 6,

B o a r d s ( 2 )

Communicate and

~

~

~

~~q Interact With the Crew 87, 1

ýj

-, l7 8/?

Demonstrate Supervisory

!,C q,,X, )"

AAA Ability(3)

-7, 7

• 1

-/

I Comply With and X, q, (o hZ)

Use Tech. Specs. (3)

_L_

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 26 of 26

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: /4"'o,-.f,.e //i Date of Exam:.oW/1/o*Z Exam Lev e

/RO!RO Initials Item Description a

b c

1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading

,/____

2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented L3*

t,//A

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)

A*

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2%) reviewed in detail

/'

£

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified AM

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of J

questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name / Signature Date

a. Grader 1,/~t d /'f.4/iý,

V(i

,z

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

Eve

/6C

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

)e/

P

&t-',.,./j

____t'__//,/

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

5 of 5 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1