ML022770576

Final Qa/Related Forms

ML022770576
Person / Time
Site:	Susquehanna
Issue date:	08/12/2002
From:	Hunt W Susquehanna
To:	Conte R NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB
Conte R
References
50-387/02301, 50-388/02301 50-387/02301, 50-388/02301
Download: ML022770576 (30)

Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 (R8,S1)

Facility: PPL - Susquehanna Date of Examination: August 11, 2002 Examinations Developed by: PPL - Susquehanna Target Date*

Chief Task Description / Reference Examiner's Initials 02/11/02

1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a & b) 04/11102-TH

2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) 4S 04/11/02-TH

3. Facility contact briefed on security & other requirements (C.2.c) i44lC g

04/11/02-TH

4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) 14/pZ K

NA

[5. Reference material due (C. 1.e; C.3.c)]

NA 05/27/02-M

6. Integrated examination outline(s) due (C.1.e & f; C.3.d) 51/2 4

05/31/02-F

7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e) 06/25/02-TU

8. Proposed examinations, supporting documentation, and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g & h; C.3.d)

I/,j 07/10/02-W

9. Preliminary license applications due (C. 1.1; C.2.g; ES-202) 07/26/02-F

10. Final license applications due and assignment sheet prepared (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202) 07/26102-F

11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f) 7//, /D 07126/02-F

12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f & h; C.3.g) 08/02/02-F

13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h) 08/02/02-F

14. Final applications reviewed; assignment sheet updated; waiver letters sent (C.2.g, ES-204) 08/02/02-F

15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee and authorization granted to give written exams (if applicable) (C.3.k) 08/02/02-F

16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i).

Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter.

They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[ ]Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201 Examination Outline ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 (R8,SI)

IFaciity:

Date ot Examination:

item I ask Description initials a

A_3'___

1.

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model per ES-401.

AJ W

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance R

with Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

I

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or AlA T

generic topics.

c wn T

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are N

appropriate.

2.

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number i

of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, and major transients.

VI" S

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected I

number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and M

rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)*, and scenarios will not be repeated over successive days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and r quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3.

a. Verify that:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, l;,

W (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination, I

(3)* no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and T

(4) no more than 80% of any operating test is taken directly from the licensee's exam

¶ banks.

b. Verify that:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, o

. F (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, (3) 40% of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path procedure, (4) one in-plant task tests the applicant's response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and (5) the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RCA.

c. Verify that the required administrative topics are covered, with emphasis on performance-based activities.

d. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on successive days.

V D'

4.

a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section.

G

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

E

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

N

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

E

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

AR f Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

L Pri ted a re/Signatu e Date

a. Author X

11(

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

wwJA

.L~-EW. 14. cj,,9

c. NRCChiefExaminer(#)

Ala,)

(

W. 4I n

d. NRC Supervisor R IC-i-iY Co,,

)

1)

/u Note:

Not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

a

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

I

May 30, 2002 MEMORANDUM TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

Exam File PPL Susquehanna, LLC Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Alan Blamey

£1 56-:d~a 3

Senior Operations Engineer COMMENTS ON SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNITS 1 & 2 FINAL EXAM OUTLINE.

The purpose of this memorandum is to document comments on the Susquehanna final exam outline received on Friday, May 24, 2002. Changes to the exam outline was reviewed by A.

Blarney, Senior Operations Engineer. Comments were provided to J. Morris, Examination Developer, Susquehanna on May 30, 2002. The comments are as follows.

ES-201-2, Examination Outline Quality Checklist Section 1.

Section 2.

Written NO COMMENTS Simulator

a.

Form ES-301-5, "Transient and Event Checklist,"& ES-301-6, "Competencies Checklist."

These forms have been completed by PPL but have not been signed by PPL management. The NRC has completed our review of these forms and determined that the applicants would receive the required evolutions during the simulator exam.

b.

No scenarios are duplicated from the applicants audit exam.

Since the audit exam has not been developed this must be verified prior to administering the exam. PPL is aware that the simulator exams can not be a duplicated from the audit exam.

c.

Does the simulator exam outline confirm to the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified in ES-3014.

Scenario 1, Event 2 Failure of the EDG B output breaker in the tripped condition do to overcurrent may allow limited opportunities to evaluate an applicant on a response to an instrument failure.

Scenario 2 Seems to have a high number of equipment failures that are not related.

This scenario and scenario 4 seem to be similar ATWS / Turbine Trip (or BPV) I SBL failure Scenario 4, Event 2 Failure of the RHRSW radiation monitor to its high value may provide limited opportunity to evaluate an applicant on a response to an instrument failure. Especially since the RHRSW pump has already been tripped.

Scenario 5 Should have event that results in fuel failure. Such as HPCI inadvertent start / inject ect.

Section 3.

Walk Through - Job Performance Measures (JPM)

a. (3)

No scenarios are duplicated from the applicants audit exam.

a_

Since the audit exam has not been developed this must be verified prior to administering the exam. PPL is aware that the walk through (JPMs) exams can not be a duplicated from the audit exam.

Section 4.

General

4. b.

Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

a The outline does not specify which items are SRO / RO questions.

This will be reviewed when the questions are developed.

c.

Ensure the K/A importance ratings are at least 2.5.

The facility walk-through exam dose not have K/A importance assigned to the tasks. (ES-301-2)

d.

Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

The outline appears acceptable; however, the NRC can not make a final determination until the exam is drafted and the individual questions can be reviewed.

e.

Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

The outline appears balanced ; however, can not make a final determination until the exam is drafted and the individual questions can be reviewed.

f.

Assess whether exam fits the appropriate job level. (RO / SRO).

The outline appears acceptable; however, can not make a final determination until the exam is drafted and the individual questions can be reviewed.

(

(

(

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 (R8, S1)

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/12/2002 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did nopt divul ge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evalu gte, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

C PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATUREA1)

1.

Bruce A. Hennigan Project Manager/Deve oper(WD)

2.

Jeffery D. Morris Facility Supervisor (SSES) 3.-FoJrrillfl, trc-dya7 cEyaw wr,&-v w7t) 1i)<

4. 1A d -_ewA-^r-t*V ad~

F~/

m G

sd

-Y 4-

5.

A<

4SA V/ A: 6 clJe uc 1H r\\i n31, a G.

A l5'

7. 09r^J ez) k'^##< ZvltB s

iol D

Yc~

8.

Add JI >f*le

(-_

xpv;<,T'ei-4L Ath

,at

10.

iYs, D

oil 11. (

,5 A I

12. DoyNc\\ o,\\A-SE.S S-Roloc,................

feAw d

3 0

4s/(

4 (J 4 -§,< 4f I'dAw I r

l 4, 6 1 4.

I~o. /C/e p

an

>V,

'LI..............

V A.

oo0Cc 15.(r-e. eha4 K. 8 t

P NOTES:

DATE SIGNATURE (2) ikdI.

1117 63o4-c

/__

V.

DATE NOTE

k

(

A ZA ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 (R8, S1)

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/12/2002 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of

/

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, eor provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

_eofllfie klwel

Alanov,--

&
V_6 -

6 -7S
IZG&C_

GNIT- 'Summulfox

_-)

1
57,7 P W C-'I)

) -.

+A WFIr P,_&OT _C1P>V-",0PGZ0r#W)

ZA(III&

&I 46

Z F k

_:J
/If /.11F levz1awn
7

_ -

1105

6.'

lk i

1.I-a 7.

L

. 4 12.PZ-L 13.

14. In p p d ~ ~ l

• C 1 5.

L

1. .&s!

S

,4 25tW Aui fwm7hb H

WV-i

- 67,

/I 0 A

/10_
, Z y

M I

An VI i 7 TZ z _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

/2-24 7-22J1 9& ~_W"22 1

=

{ NW 5 t

. W

)

\\

)

^

^

. l v A.

e R

-M-26A -

11 ffLaQ_

4 1tSZ_4C46=..Z_- JELOM-

/V/Z(:

lzes
k-%+

w F

NOTES:

(

(

(

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 (R8, SI)

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08112/02 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination

,q L'6-if, AeQoA To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of

£xf.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaludfe, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE

2. Rpi&,r rev-a-

5.

7.

9.

10.

11..

12.

13.3 14.

15.

NOTES: SSES NRC Exam

K ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 (R8, SI)

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/12/2002 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of,

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evalu e, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME

1.

Bruce A. Henniaan JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATUREX1)

Proiect Manacer/Develoner(WD)

(

(?

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE

(~0 Is-00')

oil4

2.

Jeffery D. Morris Facilitv Supervisor (SSES) 3.rt W

&7eriewl)

Lasral n Wrl vWe z a) 4.A V:J(u asZ amt

/-I Rep 7.

8.

8.

D o etQi-c )1 Z-7 t /iA

10. _

4 V,°2

11.

/ ho n I IC, Ab,4\\

]

A,

12. DonoNA E. Ro~arv S,,

SAeri~

1 3.0p 4e 14

1. -6x JM/

by-

14.

et(<_//C C';

5I>v 15 Ee eaI 1 Rm

~t umet 5t 1°C

_IAN/'W v-I I _

I11L I

.A.

ace 2_

i(-ZI0 2 1.

1117_

£ o/h

)

VAPZ__

87 zt LZ 5--,i-0

~

~

LA NOTES:

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 (R8, Si)

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/12/2002 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 2ZZ From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME

1. JU6('I,/Ie Allike'I 2.

4.

6.

8. <1411L Jo. *jf6/

10.Qr¶-nj He2rb l w

11.

42 l

1 2./xC L

t2 /

13.

\\Ai

14.

It] a- /IC-

15.

Z,,L

/ Cb'iseel JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE

,_(*1 k/2,)(:

f

'L' k

QIrj

(-f.Pur i "

I--Ir

,1 1L-

=

&b; yt

.5.

IeS 5 M& CT miLL fg e

.sss N

,,, 1,

- LC7, 'L
f __
,

i4 _f A 71-t

_4;
_

4

VI

., 0 -I I, W

L

- Mle
),

O Kl-,l V

~

VI IL/72 it O.(_.

77/7~__3 1 vI-f-o-z I

i,,

,,,_,j:

AHZ( Res.,+ 

NOTES:

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES;201-3 (R8, S1)

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 08/12/02 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination 9L'b-AJCVA, 4e,'

/9 socA To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 4 A c. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evawluae, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME

2.

RJul r a

-Milthams

2. gF,3~zr auo-xma

_e)/-

L 3. It s

vl 8S JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE WO ?'Dt V.

t v.I]y )

/ n

<<Via QhkI4 4-4 ok oi al As'j

V' an

- "ks s,8so

,-o

-I

-I WW4 k.7-kill 402 F 1k17f JJ_'. ' SJ cv *t'

'ikCJ-a-c

7. _

8. _

9.

10.

II.

12.

13.

14.

4

15.

-a-,r.,

a 1

0I h~

NOTES: SSES NRC Exam

as - 7 C.

1.-5 05

_

E 3

_R, SI I acitnauldeOt Ilahw. aqukat epecidiw u leg abote NClicnlg anhrntoe scheduled forum weay oL~hflL.O _as of OW date dum lgea llwn.ta i a -

Imimgqy Swigne ialion tout heseasans oan p~sans sit have A

filbe f

authau bgy te NRCWC mev. I sdeismias t lis am notto buevalat, or povd petoruwoc ec thos th ppfis n

-schdstohaeduinndlhes Ilce*sg auwe afinten lisle 1 Wcop~fletin fmumaon Skaumm. ecpta apectey note iwlow md afhuhe* by Uth IFlC..........

Furtamm I amwo en Witlsph:sic Seiufl ommas and reubuewsts (a docuhuwa lb, :S.............................-He i F of.nt aaccmsth MVlon aguas mu Usfaility keenes 1 s61 buuamod spun to facility nh'mme"t or the P11 ctsfeamsmer

-wpm 1*

• 1. tr*<

M' *40:0 f~

to PRWTED NAME JOB YEI I REPONSIBlRY SIGNATURE 41)

DATE SIGNATURE f2)

DATE NOTE

~~~:M =---- -.,..

Nto 13.--

t__

ri-MsNaRCS Exam 13

i

-a NOTE+/-

SOS NR Exa

-GI M

.24 E St21 ESecuri Agreemeint ES-20t-3 (R, S1 I ackowledgetha ae acqir d spec d kwdgs about th NRC lshg naminalinS schedued lor lbs weekgs) ol C1f2112 as ol tue date o ly s ignature. I agewe tfi I wilt not krhiwowu divulg~e any ienfoation about these *anmInaS60nS to any persona who hawo not boen authorind by the NRCchivf e~xamine. Iurdertad that I -noto Intrtn evawlate. or piliodeperomtneO taootlot applilets scheduled to be atntnisied these licensing eximinatlions from his date u(iMl completion of aexinulaQ adminitratbn. except as specificalra nted below and authorized by te NRC. FurterI.r am aware ol the physical scurty wasresand rmnt (as documente ~lb.in fa Wiity Ilese(s pmoc"Luis) and understand that wiolation of theconditons.1 tlIs Wagrtiment May result iOn catcedtlo of ote examinalons ardlor an enforcement Scion against me cr the facility rlcensee. I will iinmalSty roptnt tofacli mmnagerentor 1 a

NRC chief.xaminer any IndIcationS or sugges~lons that examinalion security may have been compronise&

-2.

Post-ExawMfltionl t

de o

k dd dlv s

ynithmilbd pesods may inform alo concrnin the NRC icensing.xle

• xlmnsi S xc admlnlsktcflfo, I did not-Instt ewa~iiWtorO pro.lnbh6P fedbick to thos applicants wise wer SdelfSInhlOdthese IknlcoiZfi

.excmhnions, except as spclicaly nVoed below and wdu Urlad by the NRC-PRITtD WAVE JOB tITLE f RESPONSIBILITY BIGNATURE (1),

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE C1 i9 ius -

-t N

-)

Ifn

-D 12-.

114 (S)~

C.-

'N-C-

ES-2101 Examinaion Security Agreement Form ES-201.3 (R8, SI)

1.

Pr.Exn

..u-.

i acknwokbdgo Ot I have aquired specialfted knowledge about tke NRC licensing examinatkons scheduled for the week(s) of 0

as of tho daft of my s9gnature. I age that I wi lnot hnowingly diviwge any infonnation about These exanihalions to any pamons who have Aot bail auhkorizd by te NRC hief examiner. I undtand at iam not to insiruct evaluate or provid performance Iedback o Iw applicants scheduled to be adminlstvred these licensing examinations from Ihis daie unlil completion o1 exavaidation administralion, exept as speclicaly nobed below and authorleed bythe NRC, Furero, l awa o the pysial scury mea rs and requhements {as

• docvnented in the laczly likensee's procedures) and understand thailviolation of the ouditlons of lhis agreement may result in cancellation ol the examl~oatos andlor an,nformnetS action against nmor Ike lacility lIcense S Wil ie diatity eprtof lhymnaiemlt or the NRC chie swmn an yidkations or suggestions tat sxamination security inay hava been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination Tolth, best of my knowledge I did not divue 1to any unauthforied prsons any ormuation nccrning the NR licnsing examinatIlns administere dwing the week{s oJfR FXrom tbe date that I enlored into ths security agremnt until the cenmpisllon od examila~oo arblnistratiom i Mid not instruct. e" ieov rprovide pomformance feedback to those applicants who ware administeroO these lICsi'nlo examintons, except as mcificay. noted below and authrized by th MRC.

PRIMTED HIME JOB TITLE f RESPONSIBIJITY SIGNATURE01)

DATE SOttATUV (2)

DATE NOTE

,11jr16,

_L d,01167o1 IIIII L -e T2

'L" a e.. J

-W J

aa

-4 4.

064?.___

NOMES; K.

C.'

4N\\4 co coI Ci47:

AUG-28-2002 WED 02:48 PM PPL SUSQUEHANNA LLC FAX NO. 570 542 3042 P. 01 examiner examinatonsecrit sons b

owegthtIhave acquired specialied knoWledi about the NR Ilct5Ifl eabotllfthOfS bschedlenaO tor tny perks of hose as date my sintue I agree that 1 will not knowfl~gly divulge M anylnortOf 'oaboute thes proiamdel t

n perSoww f

nSc who hv authorise by tin NRC chief examiner. I understand that 1 am not to InT~ruct evlae Oprovnidefo of exfmTntlo adin~istkton thos sminised licensing.x=nniO" flSmnt this date untilI comiptti ofsexary adilfftenl aflp 1 lfanoted below and authorized by the NRC. Purttil'n&% lOm aware of the nhyicS ec it alSmOS i Mnd reqult 'P montted In the WaIRiY lloenSSO'5 procedl) aI nesadIbtvoaino the l

cinveidflafthi areement mmfciiy resutIm ent anor'

• ewtiiat ns ndlf -enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

ilimdaeyrpr ofclt aai-tO che xmns, anyndictlor rangelol5tate amntiofi securit may have been" 'cMrompflI55t p ostmixanolfrtsttatexa pu bst-of my knaowtdg I i ~h51@

n nuhrzdpr~l n noiftoconcernlfing thn NRC licensing.,xrmnlau@Ms

'inistfld~

duigteweZ)o 'LL~

Fron ft, date that I enteed into tNSl Security agremntft until the mpetI of6 exaOmkIn lnttrglWf, duidg nth inkstrct ofauat, _ Uor provide performance feedback ha thou* applicant who Were amnse~ hnicnii rulnatilns, except as specifically noted below and mauhorized byGNAUthe RCDAT PRINTED NAME JOB TITLEt I RESPOQSIl3ITY SIGATURE (1 DATE SIGNATUR2)

DAT f

t Plao Dres:

N.

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 (R8, SI)

Facility:

Date of Examination:

Operating Test Number:

Initials l1. GENERAL CRITERIA a

b*

c#

a.

The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, Ckb safety function distribution).

b.

There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

c.

The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.1l.a).

W4U V

d.

Overlap with the written examination and between operating test categories is within acceptable limits.

e.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.

2. WALK-THROUGH (CATEGORY A & B) CRITERIA a..

Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

l initial conditions initiating cues l references and tools, including associated procedures l reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee l specific performance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b.

The prescripted questions in Category A are predominantly open reference and meet the l

s criteria in Attachment 1 of ES-301.

Ire

c.

• Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within

$4(

VAl'k.

acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity.

d. '

At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified.

[

3. SIMULATOR (CATEGORY C) CRITERIA l

l

a.

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed Name / Signature Date

a. Author

%Ac~iX 1 titiir4 6/olo

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

V(LgP g,(

U c./ A) a 1 02

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) AIe7 tV

d. NRC Supervisor o0/£

/

Lt=

NOTE:

• The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

• Q C, -C I

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 (R8, SI)

Facility: fj5s Date of Exam: 8//z/OZ Scenario Numbers: I I Z 13 OperatingTestNo.:

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a

b*

c#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment andlor instrumentation may be

_ A out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

3.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position)

• r the event termination point (if applicable) v

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

SkA

6.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time (V

constraints. Cues are given.

8.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

9.

The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section DA4 of ES-301.

11.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 OK4 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12.

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13.

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D)

Actual Attributes

1.

Total malfunctions (5-8) 8 /I q1 I I/3

2.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2/1I

/3 1 A/2- _

}

V

3.

Abnormal events (2-4) 5/313/2 1213

4.

Major transients (1 -2) i

/ / I / I / I

5.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 /2, 2 /Z/13 a V

6.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) j /!2-I

/j/i OA

7.

Critical tasks (2-3) 351 2 4 /2 / 2 CA(

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (R8, SI)

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (R8, Sl)

OPERATING TEST NO.: SRO-1 #1 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1

2 4

Reactivity 1

Normal 1

RO Instrument 4

Component Major 1

Reactivity 1

4 Normal 0

1 As RO Instrument /

2 5,7 3,5, Component

_10 7

Major 1

6 6

SRO-I Reactivity 0

Normal 1

1 A

SRO Instrument 2

2,3 s

Component 4,5 8,10 Major 1

9 SRO-U Reactivity I0 Normal 1

Instrument /

2 Component I

Major I

Instructions:

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

(1)

(2)

Enter the operating test number and FoimES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

ES-30 1 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (R8i, tin)

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist PERLKA I INU I Lb I NU.:

)U-I sZ Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1

2 3

Reactivity I

Normal 1

RO Instrument 4

Component Major 1

Reactivity 1

6

=

Normal 0

1 As RO Instrument 2

4,5,3 4,5 Component 7,8 Major 1

9 SRO-I Reactivity 0

2 Normal 1

1 Instrument 2

3,4,5, As SRO Component 7,8 9,10 Major 1

6 Reactivity 0

Normal 1

SRO-U Instrument I 2

Component l

Major I

fictions: (1 )

Enter the operating test number and For ED1 event Instr (2) numbers for each evolution type.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the m!urenm e

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (R8, Sl)

OPERATING TEST NO.: SRO-I #3,

Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1

3 4

Reactivity 1

Normal 1

RO Instrument 4

Component Major 1

Reactivity 1

6 Normal 0

l As RO Instrument I 2

4,5 3 Component 7,

Major 1

9 6

SRO-I Reactivity 0

2 Normal 1

1 Instrument /

2 3,4 As SRO Component 5,7 Major 1

6 Reactivity 0

Normal 1

SRO-U Instrument !

2 Component Major 1

__ I

__ I Instructions:

Audhor:

(1)

(2)

Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (R8, Si)

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (R8, Si)

OPERATING TEST NO.: SRO-I #4 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1

2 3

Reactivity 1

Normal 1

RO Instrument/

4 Component Major 1

Reactivity 1

2 Normal 0

l Z

As RO Instrument /

2

,,.B5'Z Component 3,7,'O Major 1

9 6

SRO-I Reactivity 02 Normal 1

1 Instrument /

2 3,4,5 As SRO Component 7,8 Major 1

6 Reactivity 0

Normal 1

SRO-U Instrument /

2 Component Major 1

t ictions: (1 )

Enter the operating test number and Form Ed event Instri Author:

NRC Reviewer:

( 2 (2) numbers for each evolution type.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

A

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (R8, Si)

OPERATING TEST NO.: RO #1 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1

2 Reactivity 1

6 Normal 1

1 RO Instrument 4

,2$3 5,7 Component 4,5 9,10 Major 1

9 6

Reactivity 1

=

=

Normal 0

As RO Instrument I 2

Component Major 1

SRO-I Reactivity 0

Normal 1

As SRO Instrument /

2 Component Major 1

Reactivity 0

Normal 1

SRO-U Instrument 1 2

Component Major 1

Ljctions: (1 )

Enter the operating test number and F

ig E1 event InstrL (2)

Author:

numbers for each evolution type.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

a eA

-Q NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Transient and Ivent Uflecklist rack of

\\

ES-30 1 Transient and Event Checklist t

Form E'-ioJl-o (Ka, Si)

OPERATING TEST NO.: RO #2 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1

2 Reactivity 1

2 Normal 1

1 RO Instrument /

4 2,3 3,4 Component 8,10 5

Major 1

9 6

Reactivity I__

Normal 0

As RO InstrumentI 2

Component Major 1

SRO-I Reactivity 0

Normal 1

As SRO Instrument I 2

Component Major 1

Reactivity 0

Normal I

SRO-U InstrumentI 2

Component Major 1

.actions: (1)

Enter the operat na test numbUer and Form EdS-1 event Instri (2) numbers for each evolution type.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requrement RX, -

~-

C -

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Foi rm ES-301-5 (R8, SI)

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Foiarm ES-301-5 (R8, S1 )

OPERATING TEST NO.: RO #3 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1

2 Reactivity 1

2 Normal 1

1 RO Instrument /

4 2,3 3,4 Component 810 5

Major 1

9 6

Reactivity 1

=

Normal 0

As RO InstrumentI 2

Component Major 1

SRO-I Reactivity 0

Normal 1

As SRO Instrument /

2 Component Major I

Reactivity 0

Normal I

SRO-U Instrument /

2 Component Major 1

ictions: (1) nter the operatng test number and Fom E event Instri numbers for each evolution type.

(2)

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimUm requirement.

A Author:

NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-b (Kts, S-1 OPERATING TEST NO.: SRO-U #1 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1

Reactivity 1

Normal 1

RO Instrument /

4 Component Major 1

Reactivity 1

Normal 0

As RO Instrument /

2 Component Major 1

SRO-I Reactivity 0

Normal 1

As SRO Instrument!

2 Component Major 1

Reactivity 0

Normal 1

1 SRO-U Instrument /

2 2,3 Component 4,5 8,10 Major 1

9 uctions: (1)

Enter the operating test number an d

FI i ESI3-1 event Instr (2)

Author:

numbers for each evolution type.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the min m requirement.

thee

, 2-4 NRC Reviewer:

AUG-07-2002 WED 12:21 PM FAX NO, P. 02 Pa<<l /3 ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 A

it

1. 1 Applicant #2 Apoicnt #3 RO-RO-RORS RO-U lR/

Competencies SCENARIO SCENARI0 l

SCENARIO 1

2 -3 4

1 2

3 4

1 2

3 4

Understand and Interpret

..i 3

3.4 I

3t Ig 3

Annunciators and Aarrns 4

o7 to 6_

1 1 7 Diagnose Events 6

3-S 9

3 31 and Conditions 7q3-Understand Plant

4.

I 5

and System Response q

-10 6_ 7

-l( -

7 GD 7

Comply With and 2,4 37 4 3 3I2 3

Use Procedures (1).

7 9 1 Operate Control 7

Boards (2)

Crinunin3cateanl 4and 3-3 1 1-Interact With the Crew 6l Demonstrate Supervisory 3,5 P/

Ability (3)

__70Ir Comply With and 1z/AA Use Tech. Specs. (3)

-A Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

(

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author:

Chief Examiner NUREG-1 021, Revision 8 A

K 26 of 26 AUG-07-2002 12:41 P. 02

AUG-07-2002 WED 12:21 PM FAX NO, P. 03 Poj

'2 e a:

ES-301 CoptnisChecklist Form F-S-301 -6 Aplgn

]

plicant VS

,.,,$4plicant W6U R

SRO&70-

?

!E;RO-USRO-U /RSRO-I/SRO-U Competencies

__SCENARIO SCENARIO

__SCENARIO

.1 3

4 1

2 3 l4 1 l2 l 3 4

Understand and Interpret 7

S_

-7 Annunciators and Alarms l

6 7

77 3 1 Diagnose Events 3-5 7l-and Conditionse1 7.@

t

)_

Understand Plant{v MB 7

o and System Response j,¢ p-ttA LIC)

Intrc W;lth the Cr e

7 M

E A 4--tSS_

41_

Comply With and

/

M7-9 Use Procedures (1)

I Operate Control Thc 2c e

Boards (2)

__A nO C(3municate able to A

Interact With the Crew 1,1 q4 Demonstrate Supervisory A JI#/A I

)J Ability (3)

/44 '0 Comply With and AJA A3/4-i Use Tech. Specs. (3P___-/A (J VIA

Notes, (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

C Instructions:

Circle the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

.Dg. O.

Author Chief Examiner:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8 26 of 26 AUG-07-2002 12: 41 P. 03

AUG-07-2002 WED 12:22 PM FAX NO, P. 04 Par g % 3 ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Applicant I7 Appicant<_

Applicant #3 SRO-VSRO-U RO/SRO-4 RO-U RO/SRO-I/SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1

2 3

41 2

3 4

1 2

3 4

Understand and Interpret 2

3 Annunciators and Alarms 7

3

/-

Diagnose Events

?, 7 and Conditions

-1_

Understand Plant 51 a79 and System Response

__I Comply With and t a I

Use Procedures (1).

7-6 7,

Operate Control

.0.

A VI Boards (2) iC con g.7-4 _.a-7 interact With the Crew 7-I

}

Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)___-

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

3) Only applicable to SROs.

(

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

1. e e.L Author Chief Examiner:

NUREG-1021, Revision 8 k

-_'-
7 f

26 of 26 K

AUG-07-2002 12:42 P. 04

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 (R8, SI)

Quality Checklist F

Facility:

Date of Exam:

Exam Level: ROISRO Initial Item Description a

b*

C#

1.

Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility

2.

a. NRC K/As referenced for all questions

b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available U -Gl

3.

RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate per Section D.2.d of ES-401

4.

Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears consistent with a systematic sampling process

5.

Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

_X the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or l_ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or

-_ the examinations were developed independently; or l _ the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or l

other (explain)

6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 Bank Modified New A

percent from the bank at least 10 percent Rot / RO t0 /

IQJ p

4J new, and the rest modified); enter the actual fi

/

,/

i question distribution at right

/

/ I l_

7.

Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions Memory C/A l

on the exam (including 10 new questions) go So l

Qa0 are written at the comprehension/analysis 17 x

c level; enter the actual question distribution l lI 5

T53 55 at right l

l

8.

References/handouts provided do not give away answers

9.

Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified

1. 12

10.

Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines

11.

The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet I

l it Name / Signature Date

a. Author H

MOe..Ul

b. Facility Reviewer (*) WXL-Zre l, 14u

. "U 6/"/o l

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

an B7 I

v17

d. NRC Regional Supervisor /Gt A

KtNa I

Note:

• The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

(i)

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility-Date of Exam:

Exam Level: RO/SRO0 Initials Item Description a

b c

1.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented ia-Al

2.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)

3.

Grading for all borderline cases (80% +1-2%) reviewed in WA/M detail HI-

4.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades

"'I are iustified

_t_

5.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicantsRo Printed Name / Signature Date

a. Grader R.

C /

"6O

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

r.- (3 S 7 B

JZk L

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

/fJc 1

0 J C Hi

/

A 69 2b 9/i t

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

5 of 5 NUREG-1021, Revision 8