ML022330065

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
July 2002 Monthly Operating Report for Oconee Nuclear Units 1, 2 & 3
ML022330065
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/14/2002
From: Dimmery T
Duke Power Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML022330065 (12)


Text

Duke Power

-- smuniq. m 526 South Church Street O. Box 1006 Pp A Duk,E C Charlotte, NC 28201-1006 August 14, 2002 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555

Subject:

Duke Energy Corporation Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 Docket Numbers 50-269, 50-270 and 50-287 Monthly Performance and Operation Status-July, 2002 Please find attached information concerning the performance and operation status of the Oconee Nuclear Station for the month of July, 2002.

Any questions or comments may be directed to Roger A. Williams at (704) 382-5346.

Sincerely, Terry Dimmery, Manager Nuclear Business Support Attachment XC:

L. A. Reyes, Regional Administrator USNRC, Region II Dave LaBarge, Project Manager USNRC, ONRR INPO Records Center Ms. Margaret Aucoin Nuclear Assurance Corporation Dottie Sherman, ANI Library American Nuclear Insurers Oconee NRC Inspector

Document Control Desk U.S. NRC - Oconee bxc:

L. E. Nicholson (ON03RC)

RGC Site Licensing File ELL (EC050)

Operating Data Report Docket No. 50-269 Date August 14,2002 Completed By Roper Williams Telephone 704-382-5346 Operating Status

1. Unit Name: Oconee 1
2. Reporting Period: July 1, 2002- July 31, 2002 Notes: Year-to-date
3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt): 2568 and cumulative
4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe): 934 capacity factors are
5. Design Electrical Rating (Net Mwe): 886 calculated using a
6. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Gross MWe): 886 weighted average for
7. Maximum Dependable Capacity(Net MWe): 846 maximum dependable capacity.
8. If Changes Occured in Capacity Ratings (Items Number 3-7) Since Last Report, Give Reasons:
9. Power Level To Which Restricted, If Any (Net MWe):
10. Reason for Restrictions, If any:

This Month YTD Cumulative 744.0 5087.0 254592.0

11. Hours in Reporting Period 744.0 4222.6 199936.1
12. Number of Hours Reactor was Critical 0.0 0.0 0.0
13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hours 744.0 4184.3 196455.4
14. Hours Generator On-Line 0.0 0.0 0.0
15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours 1908743 10673429 485992369
16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) 658910 3729443 168066215
17. Gross Electrical Energy Generated (MWH) 630506 3565303 159831892
18. Net Electrical Energy Generated (MWH) 100.0 82.3 77.2
19. Unit Service Factor 100.0 82.3 77.2
20. Unit Availability Factor 100.2 82.8 73.5
21. Unit Capacity Factor (Using MDC Net) 95.6 79.1 70.9
22. Unit Capacity Factor (Using DER Net) 0.0 0.4 9.4
23. Unit Forced Outage Rate
24. Shutdown Scheduled Over Next 6 Months (Type, Date and Duration of Each)
25. If ShutDown At End Of Report Period, Estimated Date of Startup
26. Units in Test Status (Prior to Commercial Operation)

Forcast Achieved Initial Criticality Initial Electricity Commercial Operation NRC Calculated from Generator Nameplate Data:

1 037 937 KVA x 0.90 Pf=934 MW 3A - 8/14/2002

Page: 1 of 7 UNIT SHUTDOWNS DOCKET NO. 50-269 UNIT NAME: Oconee 1 DATE: August 14, 2002 COMPLETED BY: Roger Williams TELEPHONE: 704-382-5346 REPORT MONTH: July. 2002 No. Date: Type Duration (1) Reason (2) Method of Licensed Cause and Corrective Action to Prevent Recurrence F - Forced Hours Shutdown R/X Event Report S - Scheduled No.

No Outages for the Month Summary:

(1) Reason (2) Method 1 - Manual 2 - Manual Trip/Scram A - Equipment failure (Explain) E - Operator Training/License Examination 3 - Automatic Trip/Scram 4 - Continuation B - Maintenance or Test F - Administrative G - Operator Error (Explain) 5 - Other (Explain)

C - Refueling D - Regulatory restriction H - Other (Explain) 3C- 8/14/2002

MONTHLY REFUELING INFORMATION REQUEST

1. Facility name: Oconee Unit 1
2. Scheduled next refueling shutdown: September 2003
3. Scheduled restart following refueling: November 2003 THE PROJECT MANAGER HAS BEEN ADVISED BY SEPARATE COMMUNICATION OF ANY T.S. CHANGE OR LICENSE AMENDMENT. THEREFORE, QUESTIONS 4 THROUGH 6 WILL NO LONGER BE MAINTAINED IN THIS REPORT.
4. Will refueling or resumption of operation thereafter require a technical specification change or other license amendment?

If yes, what will these be?

If no, has reload design and core configuration been reviewed by Safety Review Committee regarding unreviewed safety questions?

5. Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action and supporting information.
6. Important licensing considerations (new or different design or supplier, unreviewed design or performance analysis methods, significant changes in design or new operating procedures).
7. Number of Fuel assemblies (a) in the core: 177 (b) in the spent fuel pool: 866*

(c) in the ISFSI: 1680****

8. Present licensed fuel pool capacity: 1312 Size of requested or planned increase: **
9. Projected date of last refueling which can be accommodated by present capacity: January 2005***

DUKE POWER COMPANY DATE: August 14, 2002 Name of

Contact:

R. A. Williams Phone: (704) - 382-5346

  • Represents the combined total for Units 1 and 2
    • On March 29, 1990, received a site specific license for ISFSI which will store 2112 assemblies (88 modules). Forty (40) site specific modules were constructed and loaded.
      • In 1999 Oconee transitioned to its general license. Forty-four (44) general license modules were installed and 30 modules have now been loaded.

Additional modules will be installed on an as-needed basis.

    • Represents the combined total for Units 1, 2, and 3

Operating Data Report Docket No. 50-270 Date August 14,2002 Completed By Roger Williams Telephone 704-382-5346 Operating Status

1. Unit Name: Oconee 2
2. Reporting Period: July 1, 2002- July 31, 2002 Notes: Year-to-date
3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt): 2568 and cumulative
4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe): 934 capacity factors are
5. Design Electrical Rating (Net Mwe): 886 calculated using a
6. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Gross MWe): 886 weighted average for
7. Maximum Dependable Capacity(Net MWe): 846 maximum dependable capacity.
8. If Changes Occured in Capacity Ratings (Items Number 3-7) Since Last Report, Give Reasons:
9. Power Level To Which Restricted, If Any (Net MWe):
10. Reason for Restrictions, If any:

This Month YTD Cumulative 5087.0 244512.0

11. Hours in Reporting Period 744.0 744.0 5087.0 198402.4
12. Number of Hours Reactor was Critical 0.0 0.0 0.0
13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hours 744.0 5087.0 195849.8
14. Hours Generator On-Line 0.0 0.0
15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours 0.0 1906894 23733866 494478280
16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) 658680 4567913 166313038
17. Gross Electrical Energy Generated (MWH) 630886 4379297 158494501
18. Net Electrical Energy Generated (MWH) 100.0 80.1
19. Unit Service Factor 100.0 100.0 80.1
20. Unit Availability Factor 100.0 101.8 75.9
21. Unit Capacity Factor (Using MDC Net) 100.2 97.2 73.2
22. Unit Capacity Factor (Using DER Net) 95.7 0.0 8.7
23. Unit Forced Outage Rate 0.0
24. Shutdown Scheduled Over Next 6 Months (Type, Date and Duration of Each)
25. If ShutDown At End Of Report Period, Estimated Date of Startup
26. Units in Test Status (Prior to Commercial Operation)

Forcast Achieved Initial Criticality Initial Electricity Commercial Operation NRC Calculated from Generator Nameplate Data:

1 037 937 KVA x 0.90 Pf-=934 MW 3A - 8/14/2002

Page: 2 of 7 UNIT SHUTDOWNS DOCKET NO. 50-270 UNIT NAME: Oconee 2 DATE: August 14, 2002 COMPLETED BY: Roger Williams TELEPHONE: 704-382-5346 REPORT MONTH: July, 2002 No. Date: Type Duration (1) Reason (2) Method of Licensed Cause and Corrective Action to Prevent Recurrence F - Forced Hours Shutdown R/X Event Report S - Scheduled No.

No Outages for the Month Summary:

(1) Reason (2) Method I - Manual 2 - Manual Trip/Scram A - Equipment failure (Explain) E - Operator Training/License Examination F - Administrative 3 - Automatic Trip/Scram 4 - Continuation B - Maintenance or Test G - Operator Error (Explain) 5 - Other (Explain)

C - Refueling D - Regulatory restriction H - Other (Explain) 3C - 8/14/2002

MONTHLY REFUELING INFORMATION REQUEST

1. Facility name: Oconee Unit 2
2. Scheduled next refueling shutdown: October, 2002
3. Scheduled restart following refueling: November, 2002 THE PROJECT MANAGER HAS BEEN ADVISED BY SEPARATE COMMUNICATION OF ANY T.S. CHANGE OR LICENSE AMENDMENT. THEREFORE, QUESTIONS 4 THROUGH 6 WILL NO LONGER BE MAINTAINED IN THIS REPORT.
4. Will refueling or resumption of operation thereafter require a technical specification change or other license amendment?

If yes, what will these be?

If no, has reload design and core configuration been reviewed by Safety Review Committee regarding unreviewed safety questions?

5. Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action and supporting information.
6. Important licensing considerations (new or different design or supplier, unreviewed design or performance analysis methods, significant changes in design or new operating procedures).
7. Number of Fuel assemblies (a) in the core: 177 (b) in the spent fuel pool: 866*

(c) in the ISFSI: See unit I ****

8. Present licensed fuel pool capacity: 1312 Size of requested or planned increase: **
9. Projected date of last refueling which can be accommodated by present capacity: January 2005***

DUKE POWER COMPANY DATE: August 14, 2002 Name of

Contact:

R. A. Williams Phone: (704) - 382-5346

  • Represents the combined total for Units 1 and 2
    • See footnote on Unit I In 1999 Oconee transitioned to its general license. Forty-four (44) general license modules were installed and 30 modules have now been loaded.

Additional modules will be installed on an as-needed basis.

        • See footnote on Unit I

Operating Data Report Docket No. 50-287 Date August 14,2002 Completed By Roger Williams Telephone 704-382-5346 Operating Status

1. Unit Name: Oconee 3
2. Reporting Period: July 1, 2002 - July 31, 2002 Notes: Year-to-date
3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt): 2568 and cumulative
4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe): 934 capacity factors are
5. Design Electrical Rating (Net Mwe): 886 calculated using a
6. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Gross MWe): 886 weighted average for
7. Maximum Dependable Capacity(Net MWe): 846 maximum dependable capacity.
8. If Changes Occured in Capacity Ratings (Items Number 3-7) Since Last Report, Give Reasons:
9. Power Level To Which Restricted, If Any (Net MWe):
10. Reason for Restrictions, If any:

This Month YTD Cumulative 744.0 5087.0 242159.0

11. Hours in Reporting Period 744.0 5087.0 191444.8
12. Number of Hours Reactor was Critical 0.0 0.0 0.0
13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hours 744.0 5087.0 188805.2
14. Hours Generator On-Line 0.0 0.0 0.0
15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours 1909976 36782594 495792485
16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) 662256 4582022 163335933
17. Gross Electrical Energy Generated (MWH) 634209 4393173 155827297
18. Net Electrical Energy Generated (MWH) 100.0 78.0
19. Unit Service Factor 100.0 100.0 100.0 78.0
20. Unit Availability Factor 100.8 102.1 75.4
21. Unit Capacity Factor (Using MDC Net) 96.2 97.5 72.6
22. Unit Capacity Factor (Using DER Net) 0.0 0.0 9.2
23. Unit Forced Outage Rate
24. Shutdown Scheduled Over Next 6 Months (Type, Date and Duration of Each)
25. If ShutDown At End Of Report Period, Estimated Date of Startup
26. Units in Test Status (Prior to Commercial Operation)

Forcast Achieved Initial Criticality Initial Electricity Commercial Operation NRC Calculated from Generator Nameplate Data:

1 037 937 KVA x 0.90 Pf=934 MW 3A - 8/14/2002

Page: 3 of 7 UNIT SHUTDOWNS DOCKET NO. 50-287 UNIT NAME: Oconee 3 DATE: August 14, 2002 COMPLETED BY: Roger Williams TELEPHONE: 704-382-5346 REPORT MONTH: July. 2002 No. Date: Type Duration (1) Reason (2) Method of Licensed Cause and Corrective Action to Prevent Recurrence F - Forced Hours Shutdown R/X Event Report S - Scheduled No.

No Outages for the Month Summary:

(1) Reason (2) Method E - Operator Training/License Examination I - Manual 2 - Manual Trip/Scram A - Equipment failure (Explain)

F - Administrative 3 - Automatic Trip/Scram 4 - Continuation B - Maintenance or Test G - Operator Error (Explain) 5 - Other (Explain)

C - Refueling D - Regulatory restriction H - Other (Explain) 3C - 8/14/2002

MONTHLY REFUELING INFORMATION REQUEST

1. Facility name: Oconee Unit 3
2. Scheduled next refueling shutdown: April 2003
3. Scheduled restart following refueling: June 2003 THE PROJECT MANAGER HAS BEEN ADVISED BY SEPARATE COMMUNICATION OF ANY T.S. CHANGE OR LICENSE AMENDMENT. THEREFORE, QUESTIONS 4 THROUGH 6 WILL NO LONGER BE MAINTAINED IN THIS REPORT.
4. Will refueling or resumption of operation thereafter require a technical specification change or other license amendment?

If yes, what will these be?

If no, has reload design and core configuration been reviewed by Safety Review Committee regarding unreviewed safety questions?

5. Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action and supporting information.
6. Important licensing considerations (new or different design or supplier, unreviewed design or performance analysis methods, significant changes in design or new operating procedures).
7. Number of Fuel assemblies (a) in the core: 177 (b) in the spent fuel pool: 536 (c) in the ISFSI: See Unit I1
8. Present licensed fuel pool capacity: 825 Size of requested or planned increase: **
9. Projected date of last refueling which can be accommodated by present capacity: January 2005***

DUKE POWER COMPANY DATE: August 14, 2002 Name of

Contact:

R. A. Williams Phone: (704) - 382-5346

    • See footnote of Unit 1 In 1999 Oconee transitioned to its general license. Forty-four (44) general license modules were installed and 30 modules have now been loaded.

Additional modules will be installed on an as-needed basis.

        • See footnote on Unit 1

OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION MONTHLY OPERATING STATUS REPORT JUNE 2002

1. Personnel Exposure The total station liquid release for JUNE has been compared with the Technical Specifications maximum annual dose commitment and was less than 10 percent of this limit.

The total station gaseous release for JUNE has been compared with the Technical Specifications maximum annual dose commitment and was less than 10 percent of this limit.