ML022200593
| ML022200593 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Mcguire, Catawba, McGuire  |
| Issue date: | 06/07/2002 |
| From: | Gill R Duke Energy Corp |
| To: | Rani Franovich Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Franovich R, NRR/DRIP/RLEP, 415-1868 | |
| References | |
| Download: ML022200593 (2) | |
Text
S....
...P a~ge_1
[Rani Franovich-Re: UFSAR Supp Summary for Crane Inspection Program From:
"Robert L Gill Jr" <rlgill@duke-energy.com>
To:
"Rani Franovich" <RLF2@nrc.gov>
Date:
6/7/02 6:29AM
Subject:
Re: UFSAR Supp Summary for Crane Inspection Program
- Rani, The original RAI B.3.10-1 concerns the acceptance criteria for the Crane Inspection Program. As stated in the Duke response, these criteria are idenitfied in ASME/ANSI requirements and OSHA regulations. Your initial feedback was could we specifically reference ANSI B30.2.0. Now you seem to want to add in other documents that we listed simply to demonstrate that the program is effective. Normally, we do not list documents used to demonstrate effectiveness of a program within the UFSAR Summary description. Adding these to the summary is not necessary.
With respect to ANSI B30.2.0 we were non-specific in the RAI response as to what specific numerical requirement applies. If the staff requires a commitment to a specific ANSI standard in order to make its reasonable assurance finding for this program in the SDER, then Duke can add ANSI B30.20 to the UFSAR Supplement Summary description for the Crane Inspection Program.
Bob "Rani Franovich" To:
<rlgill@duke-energy.com>
<RLF2@nrc.gov cc:
"Pei-Ying Chen" <PYC@nrc.gov>, "Samson Lee" <SSLl@nrc.gov>
bcc:
06106/2002
Subject:
Re: UFSAR Supp Summary for Crane 03:56 PM Inspection Program Bob, In the RAI response, a number of other references are provided as well (e.g. OSHA regulations, NRC Inspection Procedure 62002, and NEI 96-03).
Because of the wording of the RAI response, it is not clear to the staff that these have been adopted by Duke. As such, including these references in the UFSAR Supplement (or not including them) will indicate to the staff what documents are material to defining the Duke AMPs.
Just let me know what you plan to do. Thanks Rani Thanks, Bob. Is there a reluctance to reference the standard in the UFSAR supplement by name (ANSI B30.2.0)?
2qý_A
ani Franovch -- Re:. UFSR.Supp ummary or Crannspecton rograml Pa-ge2
>>> "Robert L Gill Jr" <rlgill@duke-energy.com> 06106102 01:40PM >>>
- Rani, Debbie and I have your request of earlier today and propose that we can add the following to the UFSAR Supplement summary description of the Crane Inspection Program for each station:
Add the following sentence to Acceptance Criteria "The acceptance criterion is in accordance with the criterion identifed in ASME/ANSI requirements and OSHA regulations."
Please advise if this is acceptable. Bob "Debra V Keiser" <dvkeiser@duke-energy.com>
CC: