ML021980208

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RAI, Relief Request to Use of Risk-Informed Inservice Inspection.
ML021980208
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 07/25/2002
From: Milano P
NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD1
To: Kansler M
Entergy Nuclear Operations
Milano, P , NRR/DLPM, 415-1457
References
TAC MB4637
Download: ML021980208 (7)


Text

July 25, 2002 Mr. Michael R. Kansler Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (RAI) REGARDING RELIEF REQUEST TO USE RISK-INFORMED INSERVICE INSPECTION, INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 3 (TAC NO. MB4637)

Dear Mr. Kansler:

In a letter dated February 5, 2002, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (ENO) submitted proposed Relief Request No. RR 3-38 to use the Risk-Informed Inservice Inspection (RI-ISI)

Program as an alternative to the requirements in Section XI, Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components, of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3. The proposed alternative would be applied to Class 1, Category B-F and B-J welds.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is reviewing the information provided in the February 5 submittal and has determined that additional information is needed to complete its review. The specific questions are found in the enclosed request for additional information (RAI). During a telephone call on July 11, 2002, the ENO staff indicated that a response to the RAI would be provided within 60 days.

If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Patrick D. Milano, Sr. Project manager, Section 1 Project Directorate 1 Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-286

Enclosure:

RAI cc w/encl: See next page

July 25, 2002 Mr. Michael R. Kansler Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (RAI) REGARDING RELIEF REQUEST TO USE RISK-INFORMED INSERVICE INSPECTION, INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 3 (TAC NO. MB4637)

Dear Mr. Kansler:

In a letter dated February 5, 2002, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (ENO) submitted proposed Relief Request No. RR 3-38 to use the Risk-Informed Inservice Inspection (RI-ISI)

Program as an alternative to the requirements in Section XI, Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components, of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3. The proposed alternative would be applied to Class 1, Category B-F and B-J welds.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is reviewing the information provided in the February 5 submittal and has determined that additional information is needed to complete its review. The specific questions are found in the enclosed request for additional information (RAI). During a telephone call on July 11, 2002, the ENO staff indicated that a response to the RAI would be provided within 60 days.

If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Patrick D. Milano, Sr. Project manager, Section 1 Project Directorate 1 Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-286

Enclosure:

RAI cc w/encl: See next page DISTRIBUTION PUBLIC T. Chan T. Clark OGC PDI-1 Reading M. Rubin P. Eselgroth, RGN-I ACRS S. Richards P. Milano A. Keim R. Laufer S. Little S. Dinsmore Accession Number: ML021980208 *Concurred on by e-mail dated 7/24/02 OFFICE PDI-1:PM PDI-1:LA* EMCB:SC SPSB:SC PDI-1:SC NAME PMilano SLittle TChan SDinsmore for MRubin RLaufer DATE 07/25/02 7/24/02 07/25/02 07/25/02 07/25/02 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3 cc:

Mr. Jerry Yelverton Mr. Harry P. Salmon, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer Director of Oversight Entergy Operations Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

1340 Echelon Parkway 440 Hamilton Avenue Jackson, MS 39213 White Plains, NY 10601 Mr. Robert J. Barrett Mr. James Comiotes Vice President - Operations Director, Nuclear Safety Assurance Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 3 Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 3 295 Broadway, Suite 3 295 Broadway, Suite 3 P. O. Box 308 P.O. Box 308 Buchanan, NY 10511-0308 Buchanan, NY 10511-0308 Mr. Dan Pace Mr. John Donnelly Vice President Engineering Licensing Manager Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 3 White Plains, NY 10601 295 Broadway, Suite 3 P.O. Box 308 Mr. James Knubel Buchanan, NY 10511-0308 Vice President Operations Support Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Mr. John McCann 440 Hamilton Avenue Manager, Licensing and Regulatory Affairs White Plains, NY 10601 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 2 Mr. Joseph DeRoy 295 Broadway, Suite 1 General Manager Operations P. O. Box 249 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 3 295 Broadway, Suite 3 Resident Inspectors Office P. O. Box 308 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Buchanan, NY 10511-0308 295 Broadway, Suite 3 P.O. Box 337 Mr. John Kelly Buchanan, NY 10511-0337 Director - Licensing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Regional Administrator, Region I 440 Hamilton Avenue U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission White Plains, NY 10601 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Ms. Charlene Fiason Licensing Mr. John M. Fulton Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Assistant General Counsel 440 Hamilton Avenue Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

White Plains, NY 10601 440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3 cc:

Ms. Stacey Lousteau Mr. Ronald Schwartz Treasury Department SRC Consultant Entergy Services, Inc. 64 Walnut Drive 639 Loyola Avenue Spring Lake Heights, NJ 07762 Mail Stop: L-ENT-15E New Orleans, LA 70113 Mr. Ronald J. Toole SRC Consultant Mr. William M. Flynn, President Toole Insight New York State Energy, Research, and 605 West Horner Street Development Authority Ebensburg, PA 15931 Corporate Plaza West 286 Washington Avenue Extension Mr. Charles W. Hehl Albany, NY 12203-6399 SRC Consultant Charles Hehl, Inc.

Mr. J. Spath, Program Director 1486 Matthew Lane New York State Energy, Research, and Pottstown, PA 19465 Development Authority Corporate Plaza West Mr. Alex Matthiessen 286 Washington Avenue Extension Executive Director Albany, NY 12203-6399 Riverkeeper, Inc.

25 Wing & Wing Mr. Paul Eddy Garrison, NY 10524 Electric Division New York State Department Mr. Paul Leventhal of Public Service The Nuclear Control Institute 3 Empire State Plaza, 10th Floor 1000 Connecticut Avenue NW Albany, NY 12223 Suite 410 Washington, DC, 20036 Mr. Charles Donaldson, Esquire Assistant Attorney General Mr. Karl Copeland New York Department of Law Pace Environmental Litigation Clinic 120 Broadway 78 No. Broadway New York, NY 10271 White Plains, NY 10603 Mayor, Village of Buchanan Jim Riccio 236 Tate Avenue Greenpeace Buchanan, NY 10511 702 H Street, NW Suite 300 Mr. Ray Albanese Washington, DC 20001 Executive Chair Four County Nuclear Safety Committee Westchester County Fire Training Center 4 Dana Road Valhalla, NY 10592

Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request RR 3-28 to Use Risk-informed Inservice Inspection Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3 In a letter dated February 5, 2002, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (the licensee) submitted a proposed Relief Request No. RR 3-38 to use the Risk-Informed Inservice Inspection (RI-ISI)

Program as an alternative to the requirements in Section XI, Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components, of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers(ASME)

Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3. The NRC staff has the following questions regarding the information provided in the proposed alternative:

1. Section 3.4, Risk Characterization, of RI-ISI Program Plan states, in part, that each piping segment was evaluated to determine its potential for failure and impact on containment performance (isolation, bypass and large early release). The Program Plan does not include a large early release frequency (LERF) estimate for your probablisitc risk assessment nor any other LERF information. Describe how the impact of segment failure on containment performance (isolation, bypass and large early release) was evaluated.
2. Provide a discussion of the expected change in LERF due to implementing the RI-ISI program.
3. In Section 4, Implementation and Monitoring, the licensee addresses the procedures to implement and monitor the RI-ISI program. Does the licensee plan, as a minimum, to review and adjust the risk ranking of piping segments on an ASME ISI interval basis?

Will information coming from NRC bulletins or generic letters and from industry and plant-specific feedback be evaluated for significance and factored, as necessary, into more frequent adjustments of the ranking?

4. Section 3.5.1, Additional Examinations, states that "[a]dditional examinations will be performed on these elements up to a number equivalent to the number of elements required to be inspected on the segment or segments initially." Clarify this statement regarding the sample size selection for augmented inspections.

If additional examinations are needed following the identification of an unacceptable flaw, will all high and medium risk welds in the population of welds (with the same degradation mechanisms) be included in the examination population from which the additional sample will be selected? Discuss the time frame for performing these expanded examinations.

Enclosure