ML021650354
| ML021650354 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | McGuire, Mcguire |
| Issue date: | 06/03/2002 |
| From: | Barron H Duke Power Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML021650354 (11) | |
Text
Duke Power Company A Duke Energy Company McGuire Nuclear Station MGO0VP 12700 Hagers Ferry Rd.
Huntersville, NC 28078-9340 H. B. Barron Vice President, McGuire Nuclear Generation Department June 3, 2002 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
Reference:
Duke Energy Corporation McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Docket Numbers 50-369 and 50-370 Technical Specifications Amendment Request for Additional Information (RAI);
1.1 Definitions, Response Time; 3.3.1 Reactor Trip System Instrumentation and 3.3.2 ESFAS Instrumentation Letter from Mr.
H.B. Barron to NRC dated March 26, 2002 This letter provides additional information that was requested by the NRC staff during a teleconference call on May 16, 2002.
Attached you will find the excel spreadsheets which contain the historical data for the McGuire response time testing of the transmitters associated with the recent License Amendment Request (LAR).
The first table contains the actual Unit 1 response times from 1991 through the present for the applicable transmitters.
The second table contains the actual Unit 2 response times from 1990 through the present for the applicable transmitters.
The third table calculated the slowest response time from all the applicable transmitters for both units (approximately 265 data points) of 0.410 seconds.
A conservative bounding time of 0.500 seconds was then selected and used for the sensor time allocation in the LAR submittal.
P Duke d Power.
A Dhk E.er C-npy (704) 875-4800 OFFICE (704) 875-4809 FAx
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission June 3, 2002 Page 2 If you have any questions with respect to this matter, please call Norman T.
Simms of Regulatory Compliance at 704-875-4685.
Very truly yours, H.B. Barron Attachments
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission June 3, 2002 Page 3 AFFIDAVIT D.M. Jamil, being duly sworn, states that he is Acting-Vice President of Duke Energy Corporation; that he is authorized on the part of said corporation to sign and file with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission these amendments to the McGuire Nuclear Station Facility Operating Licenses Nos.
NPR-9 and NPF-17 and associated Technical Specifications; and that all statements and matters set forth within this submittal dated June 3, 2002 are true and correct to the best of his knowledp-v-,ý.
D.M. Jamil, Acting-Vice President Subscribed and sworn to me:
a"-ne-3, '
Date I.** J Dbrh. P0l Notary Public My commission expires:
certev-jg, 101 SEAL
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission June 3, 2002 Page 4 xc w/attachments:
L.A. Reyes U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regional Administrator, Region II Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth St.,
SW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA 30303 R.E. Martin NRC Project Manager (MNS)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North, Mail Stop 0-8 G9 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 S.M. Shaeffer NRC Senior Resident Inspector McGuire Nuclear Station M. Frye Division of Radiation Protection 3825 Barrett Drive
- Raleigh, NC 27609-7221
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission June 3, 2002 Page 5 bxc w/attachments:
C.J. Thomas R.L. Pacetti N.T.
Simms K.L. Crane R.L. Gill McGuire Master File # 1.3.2.9 Elliott
ATTACHMENTS
A I BI C
D E
F G
H I
J K
1 IVNS Unit 1 Table 1-Historical Transmitter Response Times (seconds) 2 Test Date Jul-91 Jan-93 Jul-94 Nov-95 Jan-97 May-98 Aug-99 Jan-01 3
W 1NCFT5000 0.14 0.11 0.13 4
o 1NCFT501 0 0.12 0.12 5
L 1NCFT5020 0.13 0.12 0.15 6
It 1NCFT5030 0.09 0.09 0.09 z
(0 "7
1NCFT5040 0.1 0.1 8
23 o
1NCFT5050 0.09 0.1 0.11 0
9 o
Cz 1NCFT5060 0.1 0.1 0.11 10 0
M 1NCFT5070 0.11 0.12 11 0
1 NCFT5080 0.11 0.1 0.13 12 o
1NCFT5090 0.12 0.1 0.13 13 1NCFT5100 0.16 0.15 14 D
1NCFT5110 0.14 0.14 0.14 15 1CFLT5490 0.27 0.21 0.28 16 1CFLT5500 0.21 0.23.
17 1CFLT551 0 0.14 0.13 0.17 18 Z
1CFLT5520 0.21 0.21 0.29 19 w
1CFLT5530 0.22 0.25 20
'i-1CFLT5540 0.12 0.11 0.16 21
,z I-1CFLT5550 0.26 0.21 0.33 22 o
1CFLT5560 0.2 0.25 23 0
cz 1CFLT5570 0.12 0.12 0.17 24 E
F-1CFLT5580 0.23 0.24 0.28 25 --
1CFLT5590 0.37 0.33 26 -6 1CFLT5600 0.13 0.11 0.15 27 5
1CFLT6000 0.23 0.23 0.2 28 1CFLT6010 0.23 0.2 0.36 29 1 CFLT6020 0.22 0.23 0.3 30 1CFLT6030 0.24 0.24 0.31 31 a
1NCPT5150 0.31 0.33 32
- _m
.o 1NCPT5160 0.38 0.35 33 a c) -
rN 1NCPT5170 0.38 0.37 34 o_
1NCPT5171 Note A 0.34 35 E
1NSPT5040 0.13 0.058 36 E
F,<
1NSPT5050 0.06 0.046 0.04 37 c 1NSPT5060 0.035 0.144 0.035 38 o
1NSPT507O 0.048 0.141 0.039
A I B C
D E
F G
H I
J K
1 MNS Unit 1 Table 1
-Historical Transmitter Response Times (seconds) 2 Test Date Jul-91 Jan-93 Jul-94 Nov-95 Jan-97 May-98 Aug-99 Jan-01 39 1 SM PT5080 0.04 0.02 0.03 40 1SMPT5090 0.02 0.02 41 1SMPT5100 0.06 0.02 0.02 42 W
LO 1SMPT5110 0.02 0.02 0.03 43 IL 1SMPT5120 0.02 0.02 44-1SMPT5130 0.04 0.02 0.02 45
-J 1SMPT5140 0.03 0.03 0.03 46 1SMPT5150 0.02 0.02 47 0
1SMPT5160 0.04 0.02 0.02 48 1SMPT5170 0.05 0.02 0.03 49 1SMPT5180 0.02 0.02 50 1SMPT5190 0.07 0.02 1
0.02 51 Note A: Recorded Time of 0.00 1 seconds was excluded from the calculations due to it 52 being a severe outlier.
A B
C D
E F
G H
I J
K L
MNS Unit 2 Table 2-Historical Transmitter Response Times (seconds) 2 Test Date Jul-90 Dec-91 May-93 Oct-94 Jan-96 Aug-97 Feb-99 Apr-00 Jan-02 3
2NCFT5000 0.11 0.15 0.16 4
0 2NCFT501 0 0.12 0.14 0.13 5
Fu 2NCFT5020 0.12 0.11 0.12 6
' I 2NCFT5030 0.08 0.11 0.13 7
2NCFT5040 0.11 0.14 0.12 8
0 2NCFT5050 0.12 0.13 0.12 "o
0 2NCFT5060 0.072 0.12 0.12 10 0
2NCFT5070 0.11 0.13 0.14 11 2NCFT5080 0.11 0.1 0.1 12 2NCFT5090 0.07 0.09 0.1 13 2NCFT5100 0.11 0.11 0.12 14 Z
2NCFT5110 0.11 0.11 0.1 15 2CFLT5490 0.21 0.22 0.37 16 2CFLT5500 0.21 0.22 0.29i 17 2CFLT551 0 0.12 0.13 0.17 18 2CFLT5520 0.19 0.2 0.29 19 2CFLT5530 0.21 0.24 0.27 20 14 2CFLT5540 0.15 0.15 0.18 21 2CFLT5550 0.22 0.23 0.34 22 0
2CFLT5560 0.18 0.23 0.32 23 0
2CFLT5570 0.13 0.12 0.19 24 E
2CFLT5580 0.19 0.2 0.39 25 2CFLT5590 0.17 0.23 0.34 26 U) 2CFLT5600 0.12 0.12 0.4 27
- D 2CFLT6000 0.17 0.19 0.36 28 2CFLT6010 0.17 0.2 0.18 29 2CFLT6020 0.2 0.2 0.39 30 2CFLT6030 0.18 0.22 0.38 31 2NCPT5150 0.31 0.004 32 0
=
H.c o 2NCPT5160 0.38 0.36 33 0 a )
2NCPT5170 0.21 0.4 34 2NCPT5171 0.31 0.37 0.41 35 2NSPT5040 0.04 0.044 Note B 36 I-O*
2NSPT5050 0.0305 0.031 0.028 37 co 2NSPT5060 0.03 0.062 0.03 38 o
_____2NSPT5O7O1 0.03
_____0.092 0.03 _________
A-A B
C D
E F
G H
I J
K L
1 MNS Unit 2 Table 2-Historical Transmitter Response Times (seconds) 2 Test Date Jul-90 Dec-91 May-93 Oct-94 Jan-96 Aug-97 Feb-99 Apr-00 Jan-02 39 2SMPT5080 0.03 0.04
--0.04 40 W
2SMPT5090 0.02 0.02 0.031 41 5
2SMPT5100 0.04 0.03 0.03 42 O
2SMPT5110 0.02 0.03 0.04 43 n
2SMPT5120 0.02 0.02 0.03 44 C:
2SMPT5130 0.03 0.04 0.04 45
-1 2SMPT5140 0.03 0.04 0.04
-E E
46 CO 2SMPT5150 0.03 0.03 0.03 47 0
4o 2SMPT5160 0.03 0.03 0.04 48 oj 2SMPT5170 0.03 0.02 0.03 49 2SMPT5180 0.02 1
0.03 0.03 50 12SMPT51901 0.03 1
0.03 0.03 51 521 Note B : The transmitter response time test has not been performed as of 2118102
A B
C D
E 1
2 Table 3 - Slowest Transmitter Response Times (seconds) 3 Slowest Response Slowest Response Slowest from 4
Transmitter Time from U1 Time from U2 either Unit Bounded by:
5 ITT Barton 764 0.370 0.400 0.400 0.5 6
ITT Barton 763 0.380 0.410 0.410 0.5 7
ITT Barton 386A 0.144 0.092 0.144 0.5 8 Rosemount 1153 0.070 0.040 0.070 0.5 9
1 10 All Transmitters 0.380 0.410 0.410 0.5