|
|---|
Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARML11189A0492011-07-0606 July 2011
Comment (8) of Lewis Patrie, Opposing Proposed Rules Pr 50, Draft Regulatory Basis for a Potential Rulemaking on Spent Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Facilities
ML0913503862009-05-13013 May 2009
Comment (1) of Gary E. Williams on Behalf of Veterans Health Administration Draft Rulemaking for Part 37, Subpart C, Physical Protection of Byproduct Material
ML0807205022008-03-0505 March 2008
Letter from Thomas P. Harrall on Behalf of Duke Energy on Pr 20, 30, 40, 50, 70 and 72 Regarding Decommissioning Planning. Supports Nei'S Request for a 90-Day Extension of the Comment Period
ML0735215422007-12-17017 December 2007
Comment (1) of Thomas P. Harrall, on Behalf of Duke Energy, on Proposed Rule Pr 50, Regarding Alternate Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against Pressurized Thermal Shock Events
ML0727709122007-09-21021 September 2007
Comment (1) of Henry B. Barron, on Behalf of Duke Energy on Energy Solutions PRM-50-88 Re to Amend 10 CFR 50.82., Termination of License
ML0632102172006-11-15015 November 2006
Comment (2) Submitted by Duke Energy, Bryan J. Dolan, on Supplemental Proposed Rules PR-2, 50, 51, and 52, Regarding Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants
ML0607302102006-03-0606 March 2006
Comment (11) Submitted by Duke Power Company, James R. Morris on Proposed Rule PR-50 Regarding Risk-Informed Changes to Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA) Technical Requirements
ML0407609042004-03-0303 March 2004
Comment (13) Submitted by Duke Energy Corporation, H. B. Barron on Proposed Rules Pr 170 & 171, Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 2004
ML0326903062003-09-23023 September 2003
Comment (1) Submitted by Duke Energy Corporation, W. R. Mccollum on Proposed Rule PR-50 Re Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Production and Utilization Facilities
ML0328012992003-09-22022 September 2003
Comment (1) Submitted by Duke Energy Corp., W. R. Mccollum on Proposed Rule PR-50 Re Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Production and Utilization Facilities
ML0323905172003-08-11011 August 2003
Comment (15) Submitted by Duke Power Co., W. R. Mccollum on Proposed Rule PR-50 Re Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors
ML0312701402003-04-28028 April 2003
Comment (13) Submitted by Duke Power, Michael S. Tuckman, on Proposed Rules PR-170 and PR-171 Re Revision for Fee Schedule; Fee Recovery for Fy 2003
ML0228904032002-09-17017 September 2002
Comment from Mary T. Kelly on Proposed EIS for a MOX Fabricating Facility at SRS
ML0225600652002-09-0303 September 2002
Comment of M.S. Tuckman on Model Safety Evaluation on TS Improvement to Modify Requirements Regarding Mode Change Limitations Using Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process
ML0223305642002-07-10010 July 2002
General Notice Comment Letter on Draft Regulatory Guides, DG-1114, Control Room Habitability at Nuclear Power Reactors, and DG-1115, Demonstrating Control Room Envelope Integrity at Nuclear Power Reactors Dated March 28, 2002
ML0219906432002-07-10010 July 2002
General Notice Comment Letter on Draft Regulatory Guides, DG-1114, Control Room Habitability at Nuclear Power Reactors, and DG-1115, Demonstrating Control Room Envelope Integrity at Nuclear Power Reactors Dated March 28, 2002
ML0214902762002-05-23023 May 2002
Comment (3) Submitted by Duke Power Co., M.S. Tuckman on Proposed Rule PR-50 Regarding Incorporation by Reference of ASME BPV and OM Code Cases
2011-07-06
[Table view] |
Text
Duke Power SDuke 526 South Church St. ECO7H VPower DOCKETED Charlotte, NC 28202 A Duke Energy Company USNRC P. O. Box 1006 EC07H Charlotte, NC 28201-1006 May 29, 2002 (8:15AM) (704) 382-2200 OFFICE IhlJ M. S. Tuckman (704) 382-4360 FAX Executive Vice President Nuclear Generation OFFIC :E OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJL JDICATIONS STAFF May 23, 2002 DOCKET MU. i PROPOSED Ms. Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (617Fb 12:)
Washington, DC 20555-0001 Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff
Subject:
Comments on Proposed Amendment to 10CFR50.55a, Codes and Standards, 67FR12488 dated March 19, 2002 Duke Energy offers the following comments relative to the solicitation for public comments regarding the proposed amendment to 10CFR50.55a, "Codes and Standards" as published in the Federal Register on March 19, 2002. This amendment proposes to incorporate by reference certain ASME Code Cases which the NRC has reviewed and found acceptable for use.
As written, new paragraphs (i)(2)(ii), (i)(3)(ii), and (i)(4)(ii) of the proposed rulemaking would require immediate implementation of a later edition of a Code Case once the applicable Regulatory Guide is referenced in a revision to IOCFR50.55a. These paragraphs could place limitations and conditions on the earlier version of a Code Case once a later version is approved and incorporated into the applicable Regulatory Guide and referenced in IOCFR50.55a.
This appears to be inconsistent with the existing regulatory requirements contained in IOCFR50.55a, paragraphs (f)(4)(ii) and (g)(4)(ii), which permit licensees to defer implementation of new ASME Code criteria until the end of the current 10 year inservice test or inspection interval. It is recommended to revise these paragraphs to be consistent with existing regulations.
Please address any questions to Lee Hentz at 704-382-F081. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these comments.
Sincerely, M. S. Tuckman Te vn IdL ~5cY.,o1 S. Sel 4-P0o
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission May 23, 2002 Page 2 bxc: M.T. Cash C.J. Thomas G.D. Gilbert L.E. Nicholson E.B. Miller ELL
