ML021160145
| ML021160145 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 03/05/2002 |
| From: | Dave Hills NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | |
| References | |
| 50-440/02301, ES-201-1 | |
| Download: ML021160145 (30) | |
Text
VARIOUS CHECKLISTS FOR THE PERRY INITIAL EXAMINATION - MARCH 2002
PERRY INITIAL LICENSE EXAM MARCH 5 THRU 13, 2002 Form ES-201-1, "Examination Preparation Checklist"
ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility:
PERRY Date of Examination:
03/04/02 - 03/15/02 Examinations Developed by:
Fa~i NRC (circle one)
Target Chief Date*
Task Description / Reference Examiner's Inials
-180
- 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.l.a; C.2.a & b)
-120
- 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.l.d; C.2.e)
-120
- 3. Facility contact briefed on security & other requirements (C.2.c)
-120
- 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)
[-90]
[5. Reference material due (C.l.e; C.3.c)]
N/A
-75
- 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due (C.1.e & f; C.3.d)
-70
- 7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)
-45
- 8. Proposed examinations, supporting documentation, and reference materials due (C.l.e, f, g & h; C.3.d)
-30
- 9. Preliminary license applications due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)
-14
- 10. Final license applications due and assignment sheet prepared (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)
-14
- 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)
-14
- 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f & h; C.3.g)
-7
- 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)
W9
-7
- 14. Final applications reviewed; assignment sheet updated; waiver letters sent (C.2.g, ES-204)
- 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with
-7 facility licensee and authorization granted to give written exams (if applicable) (C.3.k)
-7
- 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)
Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter.
They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC.
PERRY INITIAL LICENSE EXAM MARCH 5 THRU 13, 2002 Form ES-301-3, "Operating Test Quality Checklist"
Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 (R8. S1)
Facility:
Perry Date of Examination: 3/4/2002 Operating Test Number: 2002-01 Initials
- 1. GENERAL CRITERIA a
b*
c#
- a.
The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
K
- b.
There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered
,'PP during this examination.
_/
- c.
The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.1.a)._
- d.
Overlap with the written examination and between operating test categories is within acceptable limits.
- e.
It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.A
- 2. WALK-THROUGH (CATEGORY A & B) CRITERIA
- a.
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
- initial conditions
- initiating cues
- references and tools, including associated procedures
- reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee
- specific performance criteria that include:
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature
- system response and other examiner cues
- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
- criteria for successful completion of the task
- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards
- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
- b.
The prescripted questions in Category A are predominantly open reference and meet the criteria in Attachment 1 of ES-301.
- c.
Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity.
- d.
At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified.
I
- 3. SIMULATOR (CATEGORY C) CRITERIA
- a.
The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with a.Atorm ES-301-4 and aOf~S copyWL isttahed Printed Name Nignature Date
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
"-f'-
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
M
,V'Ib L.
Z7
/
2 2
5Z-
- d. NRC Supervisor 16 Z_3
/6 NOTE:
- The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.
PERRY INITIAL LICENSE EXAM MARCH 5 THRU 13, Form ES-301-4, 2002 "Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist"
Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Facility: Perry Date of Exam: 3/4/2002 Scenario Numbers: 2 / 3 / 4 Operating Test No.: 2002-01 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a
b*
C
- 1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
- 2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
4/A/
- 3.
Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
/A,,
- 4.
No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario t
without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
- 5.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
- )
- 6.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
t
- 7.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.
- 8.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
- 9.
The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
- 10.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All
- 7*
other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section DA4 of ES-301.
, t
\\
- 11.
All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit J
the form along with the simulator scenarios).
j
- 12.
Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
- 13.
The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
r, TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D)
Actual Attributes
- 1.
Total malfunctions (5-8) 6
/ 6 /
4W
- 2.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1
/ 2 / 1 3
Abnormal events (2-4) 3
/2/
3
- 4.
Major transients (1-2) 3
/ 2
/2
- 5.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1 2
2
- 6.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 3 3
2
- 7.
Critical tasks (2-3) 5 2
2 ES-301
Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Facility: Perry Date of Exam: 3/4/2002 Scenario Numbers: I /
/
Operating Test No.: 2002-01 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a
b*
c#
- 1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
/- W I
- 2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
A
- 3.
Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
- 4.
No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
41
- 5.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
i 4"I
- 6.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
- 7.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators j
have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.
1A
- 8.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
W V
- 9.
The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been
,.Oj*1 evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
- 10.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All C
other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.4 of ES-301.
/L,,
(
- 11.
All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
- 12.
Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
- 13.
The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D)
Actual Attributes 1
Total malfunctions (5-8) 4
/
/
- 2.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2
//
- 3.
Abnormal events (2-4) 2
/
/
- 4.
Major transients (1-2) 2
/,
/
fi 1
- 5.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2
/
//v
- 6.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 2
/1h
- 7.
Critical tasks (2-3) 2 Az ES-301
PERRY INITIAL LICENSE EXAM MARCH 5 THRU 13, 2002 Form ES-301-5, "Transient and Event Checklist"
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: 2002-01 Perry Composite (Master)
Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1
2 3
4 Reactivity 1
2 4
1 5
Normal 1
1 2
2 1
RO/BOP Instrument/
4 2,3,4, 1,3,4, 1,3,5, 2,3,4, 5
5,6 6,7 6
Component Major 1
4,6 7,8,9 7,8 6,7 Reactivity 1
2 4
1 5
Normal 0
NA NA NA NA RO Instrument/
2 2,3 1,5 1,3 3,4 Component Major 1
4,6 7,8,9 7,8 6,7 SRO-I Reactivity 0
NA NA NA NA Normal 1
1 2
2 1
As SRO Instrument/
2 2,3,4, 1,3,4, 1,3,5, 2,3,4, 5
5,6 6,7 6
Component Major 1
4,6 7,8,9 7,8 6,7 Reactivity 0
NA NA NA NA Normal 1
1 2
2 1
SRO-U Instrument/
2 2,3,4, 1,3,4, 1,3,5, 2,3,4, 5
5,6 6,7 6
Component Major 1
4,6 7,8,9 7,8 6,7 Instructions:
Author:
NRC Reviewei (1)
Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.
(2)
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.
(3)
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be ir~luded;,only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the tlicant s cr count toward the minimum requirement.
r:
U V-7 I NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1
ý ý AA I i
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: RO-1 Instructions:
Author:
Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1
2 3
NA 5
Normal 1
2 NA RO/BOP Instrument/
4 3,4,6 3,4 Component Major 1
7,8,9 6,7 Reactivity 1
Normal 0
RO Instrument/
2 Component Major 1
SRO-I Reactivity 0
Normal 1
As SRO Instrument/
2 Component Major 1
Reactivity 0
Normal 1
SRO-U Instrument/
2 Component Major 1
(1)
Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.
(2)
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.
(3)
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be icluded; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the a~plicant's *)rfpe~ce count toward the minimum requirement.
NRC Reviewer:
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: RO-2 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1
2 3
NA 5
Normal 1
2 NA RO/BOP Instrument/
4 5,6,7 3,4 Component Major 1
7,8 6,7 Reactivity 1
Normal 0
RO Instrument/
2 Component Major 1
SRO-I Reactivity 0
Normal 1
As SRO Instrument/
2 Component Major 1
Reactivity 0
Normal 1
SRO-U Instrument/
2 Component Major 1
Instructions:
Author:
NRC Reviewe (1)
Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.
(2)
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.
(3)
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be inqtded; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the ap I cant's crete
ýe count toward the minimum requirement.
V 1 Ysf A r:
NUREG-1 021, Revision 8, Supplement 1
- k. AA ffýt:
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: RO-3 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1
2 3
1 NA Normal 1
NA 1
RO/BOP Instrument/
4 1,3 2,6 Component Major 1
7,8 6,7 Reactivity 1
Normal 0
RO Instrument/
2 Component Major 1
SRO-I Reactivity 0
Normal 1
As SRO Instrument/
2 Component Major 1
Reactivity 0
Normal 1
SRO-U Instrument/
2 Component Major 1
Instructions:
Author:
NRC Reviewer:
(1)
Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.
(2)
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.
(3)
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be in,u ded;,only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the a p3can t s crqa eten7 e coun t toward the minimum requirement.
,.ýy J I I.*UI-NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROI-1 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1
2 3
Normal 1
RO/BOP Instrument/
4 Component Major 1
Reactivity 1
1 Normal 0
NA RO Instrument/
2 1,3 Component Major 1
7,8 SRO-I Reactivity 0
NA Normal 1
1 As SRO Instrument/
2 2,3,4, Component 6
Major 1
6,7 Reactivity 0
Normal 1
SRO-U Instrument/
2 Component Major 1
Instructions:
Author:
(1)
Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.
(2)
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.
(3)
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be in a
Ided; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the a1c a
pant's coo 7 tkn count toward the minimum requirement.
NRC Reviewer:
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 r
UJTýýý
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROI-2 Instructions:
Author:
Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1
2 3
Normal 1
RO/BOP Instrument/
4 Component Major 1
Reactivity 1
5 Normal 0
NA RO Instrument/
2 3,4 Component Major 1
6,7 SRO-I Reactivity 0
NA Normal 1
2 As SRO Instrument/
2 1,3,4, Component 5,6 Major 1
7,8,9 Reactivity 0
Normal 1
SRO-U Instrument/
2 Component Major 1
(1)
Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.
(2)
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.
(3)
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be in ed; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the aplI ant's co te count toward the minimum requirement.
NRC Reviewer:
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROI-3 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1
2 3
Normal 1
RO/BOP Instrument/
4 Component Major 1
Reactivity 1
4 Normal 0
NA RO Instrument/
2 1,5 Component Major 1
7,8,9 SRO-I Reactivity 0
NA Normal 1
2 As SRO Instrument/
2 1,3,5, Component 6,7 Major 1
7,8 Reactivity 0
Normal 1
SRO-U Instrument/
2 Component Major 1
Instructions:
Author:
NRC Reviewei (1)
Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.
(2)
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.
(3)
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be inc, iyded; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the aplolibantTs cone count toward the minimum requirement.
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 r:
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROI-4 Normal 0
NA Instrument/
2 1,5 Component Major 1
7,8,9 Reactivity 0
NA Normal 1
2 Instrument/
2 1,3,5, Component 6,7 Major 1
7,8 Instructions:
Author:
Reactivity 0
Normal 1
SRO-U Instrument/
2 Component Major 1
(1)
Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.
(2)
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.
(3)
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be in ded; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the a lpl cant's co ten count toward the minimum requirement.
NRC Reviewer:
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1
.1 r
5 F-Reactivity 1
4
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROI-5 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1
2 3
Normal 1
RO/BOP Instrument/
4 Component Major 1
Reactivity 1
1 Normal 0
NA RO Instrument/
2 1,3 Component Major 1
7,8 SRO-I Reactivity 0
NA Normal 1
1 As SRO Instrument/
2 2,3,4, Component 6
Major 1
6,7 Reactivity 0
Normal 1
SRO-U Instrument/
2 Component Major 1
Instructions:
Author:
NRC Reviewei (1)
Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.
(2)
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.
(3)
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be inu ded; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the apicant s cotentcount toward the minimum requirement.
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 I
r:
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.: SROU Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1
2 3
4 SRO Reactivity 1
Normal 1
RO/BOP Instrument/
4 Component Major 1
Reactivity 1
Normal 0
RO Instrument/
2 Component Major 1
SRO-I Reactivity 0
Normal 1
As SRO Instrument/
2 Component Major 1
Reactivity 0
NA Normal 1
1 SRO-U Instrument/
2 2,3,4, Component 6
Major 1
6,7 Instructions:
Author:
(1)
Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.
(2)
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.
(3)
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be inc fuded; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the ap r at's cm.trce count toward the minimum requirement.
NRC Reviewer:
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 I
PERRY INITIAL LICENSE EXAM MARCH 5 THRU 13, 2002 Form ES-301-6, "Competencies Checklist"
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 SRO RO BOP Master Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 Understand and Interpret 4,5,6 1,3,4 2,3,5 2,3,4 3,4 1,4,5 3,5,7 3,4,6 3,4,6 3,4,6 2,5,6 2,5,6 5,6,7 6,7 5,6,7 7,8 7
7 Annunciators and Alarms 8
Diagnose Events and 2,3,4 1,3,4 1,3,5 2,3,4 2,3,4 1,4,5 1,3,7 3,4,6 3,4,5 3,4,6 5,6,7 2,5,6 Conditions 5,6 5,6,7 6,7,8 5,6,7 7,8 8
7,9 8
7 8,9 Understand Plant and 2,3,4 1,3,4 1,2,3 2,3,4 2,3,4 1,4,5 1,3,7 3,4,5 1,3,4 2,3,4 2,5,6 1,2,5 System Response 5,6,7 5,6,7 5,6,7 5,6,7 5,6 6,7,8 8
6,7 5,6 6,7,8 7,8 6,7 8,9 8
9 Comply W ith and 2,3,4 1,3,4 1,3,4 2,3,4 2,3,4 1,4,5 1,3,4 3,4,5 1,3,4 2,3,4 2,5,6 1,2,5 Use Procedures (1) 5.6,7 5,6,7 5,6,7 5,6,7 5,6 6,7,8 7,8 6,7 5,6 6,7,8 7,8 6,7 8,9 8
9 9
Operate Control NA NA NA NA 2,3,4 1,4,5 1,3,4 3,4,5 1,3,4 2,3,4 2,5,6 1,2,5 Boards (2) 5,6 6,7,8 7,8 6,7 5,6 6,7,8 7,8 6,7 9
9 Communicate and ALL ALL ALL ALL 2,3,4 1,4,5 1,3,4 3,4,5 1,3,4 2,3,4 2,5,6 1,2,5 Interact With the Crew 5,6 6,7,8 5,7,8 6,7 5,6 6,7,8 7,8 6,7 9
9 Demonstrate Supervisory ALL ALL ALL ALL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ability (3)
Comply With and 1
1,2,4 3,5 3,4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2) Optional for an SRO-U.
(3) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applica le competency f~r every applicant.
Author:
NRC Reviewer:
k-I" NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 N % ý /J-L---
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 SROI-1 SROI-2 SROI-3 CREW A Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 RO SRO SRO RO RO SRO Understand and Interpret 3,5,7 2,3,4 1,3,4 3,4,6 1,4,5 2,3,5 5,6,7 5,6,7 7,8 6,7 Annunciators and Alarms 8
Diagnose Events and 1,3,7 2,3,4 1,3,4 3,4,6 1,4,5 1,3,5 Conditions 8
5,6,7 5,6,7 7,8 6,7,8 8,9 Understand Plant and 1,3,7 2,3,4 1,3,4 3,4,5 1,4,5 1,2,3 System Response 8
5,6,7 5,6,7 6,7 6,7,8 5,6,7 8,9 8
Comply With and 1,3,4 2,3,4 1,3,4 3,4,5 1,4,5 1,3,4 Use Procedures (1) 7,8 5,6,7 5,6,7 6,7 6,7,8 5,6,7 8,9 9
8 Operate Control 1,3,4 NA NA 3,4,5 1,4,5 NA Boards (2) 7,8 6,7 6,7,8 9
Communicate and 1,3,4 ALL ALL 3,4,5 1,4,5 ALL Interact With the Crew 5,7,8 6,7 6,7,8 9
Demonstrate Supervisory NA ALL ALL NA NA ALL Ability (3)
Comply With and NA 3,4 1,2,4 NA NA 3,5 Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2) Optional for an SRO-U.
(3) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applical* competency fLpr every applicant.
Author:
z\\
I_,_-12_AA NRC Reviewer:
( J\\" I, "1 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 SROI-4 SROI-5 RO-1 CREW B Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 RO SRO RO SRO BOP RO Understand and Interpret 1,4,5 2,3,5 3,5,7 2,3,4 3,4,6 3,4,6 Annunciators and Alarms 7,8 6,7 5,6,7 Diagnose Events and 1,4,5 1,3,5 1,3,7 2,3,4 3,4,6 3,4,6 Conditions 7,8 6,7,8 8
5,6,7 7,9 Understand Plant and 1,4,5 1,2,3 1,3,7 2,3,4 2,3,4 3,4,5 System Response 6,7,8 5,6,7 8
5,6,7 6,7,8 6,7 8
9 Comply With and 1,4,5 1,3,4 1,3,4 2,3,4 2,3,4 3,4,5 Use Procedures (1) 6,7,8 5,6,7 7,8 5,6,7 6,7,8 6,7 9
8 9
Operate Control 1,4,5 NA 1,3,4 NA 2,3,4 3,4,5 Boards (2) 6,7,8 7,8 6,7,8 6,7 9
9 Communicate and 1,4,5 ALL 1,3,4 ALL 2,3,4 3,4,5 Interact With the Crew 6,7,8 5,7,8 6,7,8 6,7 9
9 Demonstrate Supervisory NA ALL NA ALL NA NA Ability (3)
Comply With and NA 3,5 NA 3,4 NA NA Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2) Optional for an SRO-U.
(3) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicab competencyr every applicant.
Author:
(,a NRC Reviewer:
In,
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 SROU RO-2 RO-3 CREW D Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 SRO BOP RO RO BOP Understand and Interpret 2,3,4 2,5,6 3,4,6 3,5,7 2,5,6 Annunciators and Alarms 5,67 7
7 Diagnose Events and 2,3,4 5,6,7 3,4,6 1,3,7 2,5,6 Conditions 5,6,7 8
8 7
Understand Plant and 2,3,4 2,5,6 3,4,5 1,3,7 1,2,5 System Response 5,6,7 7,8 6,7 8
6,7 Comply With and 2,3,4 2,5,6 3,4,5 1,3,4 1,2,5 Use Procedures (1) 5,6,7 7,8 6,7 7,8 6,7 Operate Control NA 2,5,6 3,4,5 1,3,4 1,2,5 Boards (2) 7,8 6,7 7,8 6,7 Communicate and ALL 2,5,6 3,4,5 1,3,4 1,2,5 Interact With the Crew 7,8 6,7 5,7,8 6,7 Demonstrate Supervisory ALL NA NA NA NA Ability (3)
Comply With and 3,4 NA NA NA NA Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2) Optional for an SRO-U.
(3) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicalcompetency for every applicant.
Author:
apl
,c o
.AJ NRC Reviewer:
kA tkL-
ýXtP~k/7 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1
PERRY INITIAL LICENSE EXAM MARCH 5 THRU 13, 2002 Form ES-401-7, "Written Examination Quality Checklist"
Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-7 (R8, Si)
Facility:
Perry Date of Exam: 3/4/2002 Exam Level: RO/SRO Initial Item Description a
b-c#
- 1.
Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility 1w
- 2.
- a. NRC K/As referenced for all questions
- b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available
- 3.
RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate per Section D.2.d of ES-401
- 1.
Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears consistent with a systematic sampling process
- 5.
Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
- the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or
__ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or
- the examinations were developed independently; or V. the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or
- other (explain)
- 6.
Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank at least 10 percent new, and theI
- o.
rest modified); enter the actual question distribution at right 3
- 7.
Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A the exam (including 10 new questions) are written at the comprehension/analysis level; P4" enter the actual question distribution at right
- 8.
References/handouts provided do not give away answers
- 9.
Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are Q,1 assigned; deviations are justified
- 10.
Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines
- 11.
The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet V
Printed Na
/ Signat-e Date
- a. Author
,,n-n
'_L
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
/6L*
Lf, W
3N19 2
- d. NRC Regional Supervisor 6"
- 1.
1/i Note:
- The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.
Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-7 (R8, Si)
Facility: Perry Date of Exam: 3/4/2002 Exam Level: RO/SRO Initial Item Description a
b*
c#
- 1.
Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility 4,
/'
- 2.
- a. NRC K/As referenced for all questions."
/,
- b. Facility learning objectives referenced as availablelz
- 3.
RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate
!*j, per Section D.2.d of ES-401--
- XWY, 1.
Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams
/
appears consistent with a systematic sampling process
- 5.
Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
- the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or
__ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or f'
the examinations were developed independently; or J. the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain)
- 6.
Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank at least 10 percent new, and the rest modified); enter the actual question 44" 5
- 1' i
t 4 distribution at right
/. s_
- 7.
Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A the exam (including 10 new questions) are
- 4L written at the comprehension/analysis level; 57*o
-K" enter the actual question distribution at right W2ý V"
- 8.
References/handouts provided do not give away answers
- 9.
Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified
- 10.
Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines
- 11.
The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct andac agrees with value on cover sheet Printed Na
/ Signatu Date
- a. Author 1
,AL X V. L
- 'icA_
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
i.-
/-io -42,.
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
a
-,fi 4._
?-///.
- d. NRC Regional Supervisor
(,
Note:
- The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.
PERRY INITIAL LICENSE EXAM MARCH 5 THRU 13, 2002 Form ES-403-1, "Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist"
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: PERRY Date of Exam: 03/13/02 Exam Level: RO Item Description
- 1.
Clean answer sheets copied before grading
- 2.
Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
- 3.
Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
- 4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2%) reviewed in detail
- 5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
- 6.
Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Initials Printed Name / Signature Date
- a. NRC Grader
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
- d. NRC Supervisor (*)
N/A J
VO- -
N/A
(*)
The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
I
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: PERRY Date of Exam- 03/13/02 Exam Level: SRO Item Description
- 1.
Clean answer sheets copied before grading
- 2.
Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
- 3.
Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
- 4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2%) reviewed in detail
- 5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
- 6.
Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Initials Printed Name / Signature Date
- a. NRC Grader
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
- d. NRC Supervisor (*)
N/A Df OL?--U
-f O V
03N N/A
(*)
The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
jr f,