ML021000122

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Response of Nuclear Information and Resource Service to NRC Staff'S Motion for Stay and Interlocutory Review of the Licensing Board'S March 1, 2002 Order Authorizing Discovery and Ordering an Evidentiary Hearing Regarding Mox-Related Enviro
ML021000122
Person / Time
Site: Catawba, McGuire, Mcguire  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/21/2002
From: Olson M
Nuclear Information & Resource Service (NIRS)
To: Diaz N, Dicus G, Mcgaffigan E, Merrifield J, Meserve R
NRC/Chairman, NRC/OCM
Byrdsong A
References
50-369-LR, 50-370-LR, 50-413-LR, 50-414-LR, ASLBP 02-794-01-LR, RAS 4244
Download: ML021000122 (5)


Text

, --ý A6 Llgý-q

-1 DOCKETED USNRC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION April 8, 2002 (11:35AM)

OFFICE OF SECRETARY Before The Commission RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Richard A. Meserve, Chairman Edward McGaffigan, Commissioner Jeffrey S. Merrifield, Commissioner Greta J. Dicus, Commissioner Nils J. Diaz, Commissioner In the Matter of Docket No's. 50-369-1-R, 50-370-1-R, 50-413-LR, and 50-414-LR DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION (McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2) March 21, 2002 RESPONSE OF NUCLEAR INFORMATION & RESOURCE SERVICE TO NRC STAFF'S MOTION FOR STAY AND INTERLOCUTORY REVIEW OF THE LICENSING BOARD'S MARCH 1, 2002 ORDER AUTHORIZING DISCOVERY AND ORDERING AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING REGARDING MOX-RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL AND SAFETY ISSUES Nuclear Information and Resource Service (NIRS) conditionally supports the NRC Staff's request for a stay and interlocutory review of the March 1, 2002 Order authorizing discovery and ordering an evidentiary hearing in the Duke license renewal proceedings, insofar as this would be the effective result should the Commission decide to suspend the Duke license renewal process for Catawba 1 & 2 and McGuire 1 & 2 as premature until such time as any question about Duke's intention to use plutonium fuel is definitively settled. NIRS has previously proposed this resolution1 as the most efficient, technically defensible, and procedurally sound path, and it would 1 NIRS RESPONSE TO APPEAL MEMORANDA OF DUKE ENERGY AND NRC STAFF TO ATOMIC SAFETY LICENSING BOARD JANUARY 24, 2002 RULING ON STANDING AND CONTENTIONS 02-14-02 page 4.

/a e- £CCY-lOW -/

-2 resolve NRC Staffs concerns. In the alternative, NIRS requests that the NRC Staff motion be denied since it fails to show irreparable harm will be caused by proceeding on the current path.

It is well established that participation in a hearing does not constitute irreparable harm, and further previous petitions on the impropriety of the current prccess of considering MOX and renewal have been rejected. Indeed, the Commission's own response to "Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League Petition To Dismiss Licensing Proceeding Or, In The Alternative, Hold It In Abeyance" 2states:

We are unpersuaded by BREDL's assertion that the "piecemeal" nature of the adjudication "makes it impossible to perform a complete or effective evaluation of the issues ...

within the scope of the current hearing" and "is wasteful of [the petitioners'] resources." See Petition at 16. We have repeatedly rejected such resource-related arguments in prior proceedings, and do so again here. As we stated just this March in ConsolidatedEdison Co. of NY (Indian Point, Units 1 and 2), CLI-01-8, 53 NRC 225, 229-30 (2001), "litigation invariably results in the parties' loss of both time and money. We cannot postpone cases for many weeks or months simply because going forward will prove difficult for litigants or their lawyers."

It is NIRS view that the only irreparable harm to NRC at this time stems from their own failure to pose to Duke when they came to renew the licenses for Catawba 1 & 2 and McGuire 1

& 2, the same question that NIRS has posed (effectively) "What is the impact of Duke's contractually stated intent to use plutonium fuel in these four reactors on license renewal?" In NIRS view, if NRC staff had asked this question at the outset, NRC staff would not be in the situation that they are complaining about. NIRS appreciates the ASLB ruling of January 24, 20023 ruling which affirmed that this is a question relevant to the current proceeding. The March 1, 2002 ASLB Order" is merely the implementation of this ruling.

Alternately, NIRS notes that if NRC staff were to embrace the intent of the National Environmental Policy act to provide information that INFORMS the decisions and actions of 2 CLI-01-27 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, DOCKETED 12128101 3 LPB-02-04 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Ruling on Standing and Contentions) 4 ORDER (Addressing Matters Discussed at February 12, 2002, Telephone Conference

federal agencies, perhaps it would joyfully engage with the ordered discovery and hearing process on this question. It would appear from the Staff's Motion that it is, instead following the misguided impression that the NEPA process is merely a set of procedures to justify irreparable, but avoidable, harm to the public caused by the actions of federal agencies; or simply a packag'ng and mode of presentation that assists the beneficiaries of such major federal actions in proclaiming that any resulting harm is "acceptable."

NIRS asks the Commission to carefully consider the root causes of this situation and to rule in a manner that truly protects public health, safety, our environment, and upholds the publics' rights to full participation in decisions regarding programs which significantly impact health, safety and environment and security, such as the utilization of plutonium as fuel.

Respectfully Submitted, 2r, Mary Olson Director, Southeast Office Nuclear Information & Resource Service Asheville, NC March 21, 2002 and Scheduling March 13, 2002, Telephone Conference) March 1, 2002.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION In the Matter of: )

) Docket Nos. 50-369-LR DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION

) 50-370-LR

) 50-413-LR (McGuire Nuclear Station,

) 50-414-LR Units 1 and 2,

)

Catawba Nuclear Station,

) March 21, 2002 Units 1 and 2)

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of "Response Of Nuclear Information & Resource Service To NRC Staff's Motion For Stay And Interlocutory Review Of The Licensing Board's March 1, 2002 Order Authorizing Discovery And Ordering An Evidentiary Hearing Regarding MOX-Related Environmental And Safety Issues" is being serves on the parties listed below via electronic transmission and will be deposited in US first class mail on February 15, 2002 to the postal addresses listed below.

Richard A. Meserve, Chairman Edward McGaffigan, Commissioner U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Jeffrey S. Merrifield, Commissioner Greta J. Dicus, Commissioner U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Nils J. Diaz, Commissioner Lester S. Rubenstein U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Administrative Judge Washington, DC 20555-0001 4760 East Country Villa Drive Tucson, Arizona 85718 (e-mail: lesrrr@msn.com)

Ann Marshall Young, Chairman Office of the Secretary Administrative Judge U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Washington, DC 20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff Washington, DC 20555-0001 (original + two copies)

(e-mail: amy@nrc.gov) (e-mail: HEARINGDOCKET@nrc.gov)

Dr. Charles N. Kelber Adjudicatory File Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Washington, DC 20555-0001 (e-mail: cnk@nrc.gov)

Office of Commission Appellate Susan L. Uttal, Esq.

Adjudication Office of the General Counsel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Washington, DC 20555 (e-mail: slu@nrc.gov)

David Repka, Anne Cottingham Janet Marsh Zeller Winston & Strawn Executive Director 1400 L St. NW Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League Washington, DC 20005-3502 P.O. Box 88 (e-mail: drepka( i@winston.com and Glendale Springs, NC 28629 acotti ng(@winston. corn) (e-mail: BREDL@skybest.com)

Paul Gunter Donald J. Moniak Nuclear Information and Resource Service Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League 1424 16th Street, NW P.O. Box 3487 Washington, DC 20026 Aiken, SC 29802-3487 (e-mail: pgunter@nirs.org) (e-mail: donmoniak@earthlink. net)

Jesse Riley 854 Henley Place Charlotte, NC 28207 (e-mail: Jlr2020@aol.com)

Mary Olson Nuclear Information & Resource Service, Southeast Office P.O. Box 7586 Asheville, North Carolina 28802 USA March 21, 2002