ML020770424

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Fitness for Duty Performance Data Report
ML020770424
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/27/2002
From: Conway J
Constellation Nuclear
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NMP1L 1646
Download: ML020770424 (6)


Text

P.O. Box 63 Lycoming, New York 13093 0

Constellation Nuclear Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station A Member of the NMP1L 1646 Constellation Energy Group February 27, 2002 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 RE:

Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Docket No. 50-220 Docket No. 50-410 DPR-63 NPF-69

Subject:

Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Report Gentlemen:

In accordance with the requirements set forth in 10CFR26.71(d), Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC (NMPNS) has compiled and is submitting the attached semiannual Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Report covering the period July 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001.

Very truly yours, (Yon T Cnway Site Vice President JTC/BMB/jm Attachment xc:

Mr. H. J. Miller, NRC Regional Administrator, Region I Mr. G. K. Hunegs, Senior Resident Inspector Mr. P. S. Tam, Senior Project Manager, NRR (2 copies)

Records Management

FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA

]PERSONNEL SUB.ZECT TO 10CFR26 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC (NMPNS)

Company December 31, 2001 6 Months Ending Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Location Beth Menikheim Contact Person (315) 349-7003 Phone Annual (Jan-Dec) Random testing rates: At least 50% for employees and approximately 100% for contractors.

Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml)

Appendix A to 10CFR26 Marijuana 100 1 15 Cocaine 300 / 150 Opiates 300 / 300 Amphetamines Phencyclidine Alcohol ( % BAC)

Long-Term Short-Term Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Contractor Personnel Average Number with Unescorted Access 1343 N/A*

328 Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 36 0

0 0

167 2

For Post Incident 2

0 0

0 0

0 Cause Observed 0

0 0

0 0

0 Behavior Randoia 344 1

0 0

197 0

Follow-up 25 1

0 0

7 0

Other**

5 0

0 0

4 2

Total 412 2

0 0

375 4

NMPNS does not differentiate between long-and short-term contractors.

obtained unescorted access are considered short-term.

All contractors who nave Primarily refers to tests conducted for samples that were hydrated (diluted). A second (observed) sample is conducted following results indicating low specific gravity or creatinine.

1 1000/500 25 / 25

.04%

Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances Amphe-Phency-Refusals Marijuana Cocaine Opiates tamines clidine Alcohol Licensee Employees 1

1 Long-Term Contractors Short-Term Contractors 3

1 Total 4I 2

For details see Section II (A), Situation Descriptions.

2 11

FITNESS FOR DUTY (FFD) PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA REPORT July 1 - December 31, 2001 SECTION I.

Process Stage Data Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC (NMPNS) conducts on-site drug screening using a Syva ETS instrument. Procedures require that tests found to be "non-negative" shall be sent to a contracted Health and Human Services (HHS)-certified laboratory for both screening and confirmatory testing as applicable. To monitor our accuracy and increase the integrity of our laboratory, NMPNS participates in proficiency testing provided by the College of American Pathologists (CAP).

SECTION II.

Situation Descriptions, Management Actions, NRC Reportable Events, and Appeals A.

Situation Descriptions

1.

An Employee tested positive for Marijuana following a Follow up drug and alcohol test.

2.

An Employee tested positive for Alcohol following Random drug and alcohol tests.

3.

Two Contractors tested positive for Marijuana following a second sample requested due to the first being hydrated.

4.

A Contractor tested positive for Marijuana and a Contractor tested positive for Alcohol following a Pre-access test for drugs and alcohol.

B.

Management Actions (in Response to Situation Descriptions 1-4)

The following list describes the procedural actions required by management as a result of the above situations:

1.

Unescorted access was immediately denied or removed and the opportunity to appeal was explained to all individuals.

2.

The FFD Staff referred the NMPNS employees to the Employee Assistance Program and recommended the Contractors seek a 3

substance abuse evaluation to determine proper treatment and rehabilitation.

3.

Supervision implemented a review of safety-related work performed by the individuals (if unescorted access was granted prior to the violation). No remedial actions were required.

C.

NRC REPORTABLE EVENTS (PER 10CFR PART 26.73)

During this reporting period, the employee from Section HA, Situation Description 2, was fulfilling a supervisory position at the time of the alcohol violation. Therefore, the NRC was notified within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per 10CFR26.73.

D.

APPEALS (PER 10CFR26.28)

During this reporting period, one of the contractors, in Section HA, Situation Description 4, who tested positive for marijuana, appealed his positive drug test.

The Appeals Officer denied the appeal due to all procedures being followed correctly and there being no evidence to overrule the Medical Review Officer's decision.

SECTION III.

FFD Program Modifications and Lessons Learned During this reporting period, NMPNS's Fitness for Duty Staff conducted a Self Assessment to measure the general workforce population's understanding of the responsibilities associated with the Continuous Behavioral Observation Program (CBOP). The self-assessment consisted of benchmarking other nuclear power plants' General Employee Lesson Plans (which included the CBOP requirements) and performing face-to-face interviews with supervisory and non-supervisory personnel at NMPNS. Non-emergency Call-out / For Cause wallet cards were distributed as quick reference aides to supplement our procedures. The assessment concluded that the workforce has a fundamental understanding of their responsibilities associated with CBOP and revealed areas that could be enhanced. NMPNS's Corrective Action Program was used to document these enhancements and to develop plans to evaluate incorporating them into the General Employee Lesson Plan.

SECTION IV.

Data Assessment and Program Evaluation NMPNS's FFD/Personnel Reliability Program Performance Indicator for this reporting period indicated zero reportable failures. Additionally, the statistical data in this report shows that the NMPNS employee overall positive test rate for this reporting period was 0.49%. The rate for contractors was 1.07%. The combined positive test rate for 4

contractors and NMPNS employees is approximately 0.76% for this time period (0.68% since the inception of this program). This performance, combined with the FFD/Personnel Reliability Program Performance Indicator, is indicative that NMPNS's FFD Program is working as intended.

5