ML020170495
| ML020170495 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 01/17/2002 |
| From: | Assa R NRC/NRR/DLPM |
| To: | Beasley J Southern Nuclear Operating Co |
| Assa R,NRR/DLPM,415-1391 | |
| References | |
| TAC MB3568, TAC MB3569 | |
| Download: ML020170495 (4) | |
Text
January 17, 2002 Mr. J. B. Beasley, Jr.
Vice President Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Post Office Box 1295 Birmingham, Alabama 35201-1295
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RE: APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENTS TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSEES, VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 (TAC NOS. MB3568 AND MB3569)
Dear Mr. Beasley:
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is reviewing your amendment request dated October 17, 2001, in which you proposed changes to Vogtle Unit 1 and Unit 2 Technical Specification Table 3.3.1-1, Reactor Trip Instrumentation. These changes would clamp the over temperature T (OTT) function during cooldown events to a value 3 lower than the reference temperature for the associated loop. This clamp will limit the OTT trip setpoint increase during cooldown events, thereby increasing the clad stress margin. In addition, you proposed to use this increased clad stress margin to allow relaxation of the reduced relaxed axial offset control (RAOC) band to limits which do not account for cycle-to-cycle fuel management variations.
The staff has determined that, in order to complete its review, a detailed technical justification is needed to show that the proposed clamp will provide the required clad stress margin to allow relaxation of the RAOC band to the limits proposed in the licensing amendment request. In addition, the staff is requesting you to show that the effects of relaxation of the RAOC band have been considered for plant transients and accidents for which the axial flux difference (AFD) is an initial condition. Based on these considerations, the staff requests the following information in order to continue with its review:
- 1) Identify the clad stress criteria used as the basis for determining the allowable values of the AFD. Include a reference to the NRC approved methodologies used in performing the analyses that serve as the basis for justifying the proposed changes.
- 2) Submit a quantitative technical justification demonstrating that the proposed OTT clamp value will result in the required clad stress margin necessary to allow relaxation of the RAOC band to the proposed limits.
- 3) Demonstrate that with the proposed RAOC band the clad stress criteria identified in question number (1) continues to be met for all transients and accidents for which the AFD is an initial condition. In addition, identify any transients or accidents which will have a reduced safety margin resulting from the proposed changes.
- 4) Provide justification for the non-conservative change in the trip setpoint reduction value when AFD > +10 percent. Include a discussion of the effects of the change in this value from 2.7 percent rated thermal power (RTP) to the less conservative 1.95 percent RTP on transients and accidents which result in a top-skewed AFD.
- 5) Provide a discussion, including references to NRC approval, explaining the technical considerations which resulted in the current AFD limits for Vogtle.
I discussed these questions with Mr. Jim Bailey, Vogtle Licensing Manager, and he estimated that your answers will be submitted by January 31, 2002.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Ramin Assa, Project Manager, Section 1 Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-424 and 50-425 cc: See next page 4)
Provide justification for the no value when AFD > +10 percent. I this value from 2.7 percent rated ther percent RTP on transients and accident 5)
Provide a discussion, including references considerations which resulted in the current AFD I discussed these questions with Mr. Jim Bailey, Vogt that your answers will be submitted by January 31, 2002 Sincerely,
/RA/
Ramin Assa, Project Manager, Section 1 Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-424 and 50-425 cc: See next page DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC PDII-1 R/F RLaufer CHawes RAssa OGC ACRS T-2 E26 LPlisco, RII ADAMS ACCESSION NO.ML020170495 OFFICE PDII-1/PM PDII-1/LA PDII-1/SC(A)
NAME RAssa CHawes RLaufer DATE 1/16/02 1/16/02 1/16/02 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Vogtle Electric Generating cc:
Mr. J. A. Bailey Manager, Licensing Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
P. O. Box 1295 Birmingham, Alabama 35201-1295 Mr. J. Gasser General Manager, Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
P. O. Box 1600 Waynesboro, Georgia 30830 Office of Planning and Budget Room 615B 270 Washington Street, SW.
Atlanta, Georgia 30334 Mr. J. D. Woodard Executive Vice President Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
P. O. Box 1295 Birmingham, Alabama 35201-1295 Steven M. Jackson Senior Engineer - Power Supply Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia 1470 Riveredge Parkway, NW.
Atlanta, Georgia 30328-4684 Harold Reheis, Director Department of Natural Resources 205 Butler Street, SE. Suite 1252 Atlanta, Georgia 30334 Attorney General Law Department 132 Judicial Building Atlanta, Georgia 30334 Mr. J. D. Sharpe Resident Manager Oglethorpe Power Corporation Alvin W. Vogtle Nuclear Plant P. O. Box 1600 Waynesboro, Georgia 30830 Charles A. Patrizia, Esquire Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker 10th Floor 1299 Pennsylvania Avenue Washington, DC 20004-9500 Arthur H. Domby, Esquire Troutman Sanders NationsBank Plaza 600 Peachtree Street, NE.
Suite 5200 Atlanta, Georgia 30308-2216 Resident Inspector Vogtle Plant 8805 River Road Waynesboro, Georgia 30830 Office of the County Commissioner Burke County Commission Waynesboro, Georgia 30830