ML011150055
ML011150055 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Nuclear Energy Institute |
Issue date: | 04/17/2001 |
From: | Sheron B NRC/NRR/ADPT |
To: | Marion A Nuclear Energy Institute |
References | |
Download: ML011150055 (3) | |
Text
April 17, 2001 Mr. Alex Marion, Director Engineering Nuclear Energy Institute 1776 I Street, N.W., Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20006-3708
SUBJECT:
ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED IN A GENERIC JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION OF PWRS
Dear Mr. Marion:
The NRC staff met with the EPRI Materials Reliability Program (MRP) on Thursday, April 12, 2001, to discuss the generic implications of circumferential cracking found on the pressurized water reactor (PWR) upper head control rod drive mechanism (CRDM) penetrations at the Oconee Nuclear Station, Unit 3. The staff had requested, by letter dated April 5, 2001, that the MRP include in this presentation, among other items, a discussion of proposed industry actions to address the generic aspects of the CRDM nozzle circumferential cracking issue.
During this meeting, the staff raised several concerns (e.g., need for expanded inspections for plants presently in refueling or maintenance outages, industry assessment of risk involved in not immediately inspecting, and others to be detailed in the staffs meeting summary) regarding the initiation and growth of significant circumferential cracks in PWR Alloy 600 weldments, apparently at growth rates that are faster than previously modeled. The staff requested that the MRP address the questions raised both in the staffs letter dated April 5, 2001, and during the April 12, 2001, public meeting, in its preliminary safety assessment of the generic implications of this cracking issue. The MRP stated that this assessment will be submitted to the staff by April 27, 2001.
The staff is primarily concerned with those plants that have either never inspected or have not recently inspected their CRDM penetrations. In order to ensure that the staffs concerns related to this potentially significant safety concern are addressed, we request that the MRPs assessment answer the following questions related to a generic justification for continued operation (JCO) for PWRs. If you can not provide responses to these questions by April 27, 2001, we request that you immediately notify the staff of the date by which you can provide responses.
Mr. Alex Marion - 2 of 3 -
- 1. The MRP stated during the April 12, 2001, meeting that they are conducting a survey of the PWR plants to determine the scope and extent, to date, of the under-insulation visual inspections used by PWR licensees to detect boron deposits on the upper reactor pressure vessel (RPV) head. The preliminary results presented indicate that licensees of CE and Westinghouse PWR-designed plants may not be capable of performing comprehensive VT-2 leakage examinations of the upper vessel heads without having to remove the existing vessel head insulation materials. Based on this, provide a technical justification, supported by appropriate deterministic and/or risk-informed assessments, as to why it is safe, for each of the various PWR vessel designs, to continue to operate, or for those in or entering outages to restart, until such time that appropriate inspections of all of the RPV upper head penetrations have been performed. This discussion should include, but not be limited to:
- a. description of inspections of the upper RPV head penetrations that have been performed to date, and their applicability to plants that have not yet inspected;
- b. an assessment of the probability for circumferential flaw(s) to exist in the upper RPV head penetrations, with lengths and depths, on the order of or greater than that found at Oconee for those plants that have not yet performed comprehensive leakage examinations of all of the upper RPV head penetrations;
- c. means utilized to detect and characterize through-wall cracks in the upper RPV head penetrations;
- d. MRP recommendations regarding any expanded operator actions/training on beyond design basis accident (DBA) scenarios involving rod ejection(s), small-, medium- and large-break loss of coolant accidents (LOCA), rod insertion failure(s), etc.; and,
- e. MRP recommendations regarding increased operator actions during periods of highest rod worth (e.g., Startup, Cool-down and Hot Standby periods).
- 2. Postulated crack growth rates (CGR) were discussed during the April 12, 2001, meeting.
Based on the staffs comments regarding the likelihood for an exceptionally aggressive operating environment in the CRDM housing annulus, where potentially highly concentrated borated primary water could become oxygenated, discuss the acceptability of your CGR model, and conditions under which the model was developed consistent with the conditions to which it is being applied. Include a technical basis for this CGR, including postulated times it will take to initiate and grow a through-wall crack, and the environmental factors (e.g., temperature, boron concentrations, oxygen levels, etc.) that will effect this CGR.
Based on this proposed CGR, identify the frequency and scope of inspections that would be necessary to detect a circumferential flaw before it could exceed the critical size for failure of the CRDM penetration.
Mr. Alex Marion - 3 of 3 -
If you have any question regarding this letter, please contact Mr. Jack Strosnider of my staff at 301-415-3298.
Sincerely,
/ra/
Brian W. Sheron, Associate Director For Project Licensing and Technical Analysis Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Project No. 689 cc: See next page
Mr. Alex Marion - 3 of 3 -
If you have any question regarding this letter, please contact Mr. Jack Strosnider of my staff at 301-415-3298.
Sincerely, Brian W. Sheron, Associate Director For Project Licensing and Technical Analysis Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Project No. 689 cc: See next page Distribution:
File Center WDTravers JAZwolinski MEMayfield WDLanning, R1 EMCB R/F WFKane GMHolahan NCChokshi CCasto, R2 PUBLIC SJCollins DBMatthews WDBecker JGrobe, R3 ACRS JRJohnson BABoger LBMarsh AHowell, R4 Document Name: C:\MRP JCO Qs.wpd INDICATE IN BOX: C=COPY W/O ATTACHMENT/ENCLOSURE, E=COPY W/ATT/ENCL, N=NO COPY EMCB:DE E EMCB:BC E REXB:BC E DE:D E NRR:ADPT E CECarpenter:cec WHBateman: LBMarsh:lbm JRStrosnider:jrs BWSheron:bws 04/17/2001 04/ /2001 04/17/2001 04/17/2001 04/17/2001 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Nuclear Energy Institute Project No. 689 cc:
Mr. Ralph Beedle Ms. Lynnette Hendricks, Director Senior Vice President Plant Support and Chief Nuclear Officer Nuclear Energy Institute Nuclear Energy Institute Suite 400 Suite 400 1776 I Street, NW 1776 I Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-3708 Washington, DC 20006-3708 Mr. Jim Davis, Director Mr. Charles B. Brinkman, Director Operations Washington Operations Nuclear Energy Institute ABB-Combustion Engineering, Inc.
Suite 400 12300 Twinbrook Parkway, Suite 330 1776 I Street, NW Rockville, Maryland 20852 Washington, DC 20006-3708 Mr. David Modeen, Director Mr. H. A. Sepp, Manager Engineering Regulatory and Licensing Engineering Nuclear Energy Institute Westinghouse Electric Company Suite 400 P.O. Box 355 1776 I Street, NW Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230-0355 Washington, DC 20006-3708 Mr. Anthony Pietrangelo, Director Larry Mathews, MRP Risk & Performance Based Regulation Southern Nuclear Operating Company Nuclear Energy Institute Manager, Inspection and Testing Services Suite 400 P. O. Box 1295 1776 I Street, NW Birmingham, AL 35201 Washington, DC 20006-3708 Vaughn Wagoner, Technical Chair Avtar Singh, EPRI MRP Manager Assessment Committee Electric Power Research Institute Carolina Power & Light Company P. O. Box 10412 One Hannover Square 9C1 3412 Hillview Ave.
P.O. Box 1551 Palo Alto, CA 94303 Raleigh, NC 27612 C. Thomas Alley, Jr., Technical Chair Mr. Allan McIlree, EPRI Inspection Task Assessment Manager Duke Power Company Electric Power Research Institute Nuclear General Office P. O. Box 10412 526 South Church Street 3412 Hillview Ave Mail Code EC09O Palo Alto, CA 94304 PO Box 1006 Charlotte NC 28201 Gary D. Moffatt, Technical Chair Frank Ammirato, EPRI Repair/Mitigation Task Inspection Manager V. C. Summer Nuclear Station EPRI NDE Center P. O. Box 88 P. O. Box 217097 Jenkinsville, SC 29065 1300 W. T. Harris Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28221