L-88-406, Forwards mgt-on-shift Weekly Rept for Wk Starting 880902

Forwards mgt-on-shift Weekly Rept for Wk Starting 880902

ML17345A427
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	09/14/1988
From:	Conway W FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	Grace J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
L-88-406, NUDOCS 8810060163
Download: ML17345A427 (68)

Text

(

ACCELERATED D1~13UTION DEMONS~TION LYSI'EM 1

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:8810060163 DOC.DATE: 88/09/14 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-250 Turkey Point Plant, Unit 3, Florida Power and Light C 05000250 50-251 Turkey Point Plant, Unit 4, Florida Power and Light C 05000251 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION CONWAY,W.F.

Florida Power

& Light Co.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION R

GRACE,J.N.

Region 2, Ofc of the Director RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME DRP/ADR-2 PD2-2 PD COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 1

1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NRR/DRP-1/2 EDISON,G COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 2

2

SUBJECT:

Forwards mgt-on-shift weekly rept for wk starting 880902.

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

D036D COPIES RECEIVED LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: Turkey Point Management Onshift Program NOTES:

S k

INTERNAL: AEOD NRR DEPY NRR MORISSEAU g D NRR/ADT 12-G-18 NRR/DOEA DIR 11 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS2 RGN2 FILE EXTERNAL: LPDR NSIC 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 DEDRO NRR DIR NRR/ADP 12-G-18 NRR/DLPQ/PEB NRR/DRIS DIR 9A 0

BERMAN,J E

01 NRC PDR 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1

'I R-"

8 D

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:

LTTR 23 ENCL 23

'c r

r l

88sEP le ~ll: 08 P.

X 14000, JUNO BEACH, FL 33408.0420,

~~All@

ii,e SEPTEMBER 1 4 1988 L-88-406 Dr. J. Nelson Grace Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, N. W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323

Dear Dr. Grace:

Re:

Turkey Point Units 3 and 4

Docket Nos.

50-250 and 50-251 Mana ement-on-Shift Weekl Re ort Pursuant to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Order dated October 19, 1987, the attached summary of Management-on-Shift (MOS) reports is submitted.

The Plant Supervisor-Nuclear Shift Reports are also being submitted.

Should there be any questions on this information, please contact us Very truly yours,

~W. F.

n

+Z Senior V'y e President Nuclear WFC/SDF/gp Attachment cc:

J.

Lieberman, Director, Office of Enforcement, USNRC Dr.

G. E. Edison, Project Manager,

NRR, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Plant R.

E. Talion, President, FPL mosG01 BSi0060163 Su~0914 PDR ADOCK 05000250 R

PDC an FPL Group company y ~ ~

l e

II

MANAGEMENT ON SHIFT (MOS)

WEEKLY SUMARY REPORT WEEK STARTING:

09/02/88 PAGE 1

OF 2

Six MOS Observers were on shift:

Craig D. Bersak, Westinghouse Electric Corporation (09/02-04/88, days);

Peter L.

Walker, Westinghouse Electric Corporation (09/02-05/88, nights);

David

Powell, Operating Experience Feedback Coordinator, Juno Beach (09/05-08/88, days);

James E.

Jones, Westinghouse Electric Corporation (09/05-09/88, nights);

'Max

Ammerman, INPO HPES Coordinator, Turkey Point Nuclear Plant (09/02-07/88, nights); and Wallace R.

Williams, Jr.,

Assistant Superintendent, Planned Maintenance, Turkey Point Nuclear Plant (09/07-09/88, nights).

Units 3 and 4 operated in Mode 1 for the duration of the reporting period.

No immediate safety problems or questionable work practices were noted by any observer during the reporting period.

The independent observers noted seven areas for improvement, as follows:

'Two items on hardware problems.

One concern regarding operator aids.

One complaint. about the difficultyin having to deal with two technical specification documents.

One item on communication of changes.

A concern over inadequate preparation for a surveillance.

A reported difficulty in using the Nuclear Jobs Planning System computer.

The Turkey Point observers noted four areas for improvement, as follows:

A discussion of hydroblast cleaning of. component cooling water heat exchangers, with two recommendations.

Two items on marking of indicators.

One recommendation to improve a procedure.

ATTACHMENT: MOS DAILY REPORTS

I

MANAGEMENT ON SHIFT (MOS)

WEEKLY SVMARY REPORT WEEK STARTING:

PAGE

~

OF The Plant Supervisors-Nuclear noted five areas for improvement, as

. follows:

Two recommendations for improving communications.

One concern regarding inadequate troubleshooting.

A recommendation to tape test leads used in relay racks.

A concern over scheduling of extra manpower.

ATTACHMENT: MOS DAILY REPORTS

k I

.')ate~

~

Shift Report%

Shift

~sys I'N Shift Management Schimkus Reese Spence A.

Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken The Plan of the Day (POD) was recently changed to a new format in which the PSN should be able to easily follow job progress on items that various departments are working, across 3 shifts.

Next, the PSN was requested to fill-in-the-blanks on the POD using any of 9 codes (per each job) during the control room pre-shift briefings.

This POD is to be passed from PSN to PSN each day until all the blanks are filled with actual job status.

The PSN must then transmit the filled in POD to the Operations Supervisor for review.

This new system is supposed to "help" the PSN to be more aware of all work activities occurring in the plant.

In actuality, this has become a new burden in which the PSN must track the effectiveness of how the POD is succeeding or failing to perform it's design function.

Why is the POD ineffective?

2.

3.

The POD has too much bulk!

The POD contains every job that has been identified by plant work order to need attention "but" it doesn't take into account the personnel actually available to work the jobs.

The Plan of POD is not divided orderly into Days - Peaks - Mids, but instead each work group has it's work processes scheduled haphazardly (peak, mid, mid, peak, day, etc.) down each page of the POD.

The POD should have two sections based on order of importance.

1.

The first section should contain:

4 Cover page

'ot items list page

'imiting Condition of Operation (LCO) page 4 Load threatening periodics to be performed or surveillances in their grace period. (Technical Specifications required) page.

a.

Mechanical work list page

b. Instrument and control work list page

c. Electrical work list page

d. Technical Department list page

e. Construction Department work list page

f. Procurement Department work list page

g. Engineering Department work list page

h. Fire Protection impairments page

i. Lab Department work list page

j. Health Physics work list page, Reviewed B

~'

I

Damp, Schimkus

'9/02/88

~

Shift Repo+

Page Continuation Page Items a thru j shall only contain work items that are causing load loss, causing LCOs to exist, have the potential to affect unit performance or safety, by performance of the job.

These jobs should look strictly at the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> time frame of the POD.

Hot items should also be placed in section I with a status column.

2.

Section 2 of the POD should be a list of items that are to be worked as manpower permits.

This list can contain all of the filler material which makes our FOD so large but should be used as a contingency list when Section 1 jobs are completed or on hold - or when extra manpower exists.

Recommend:

l.

Each responsible department fill out the status column of the FOD and give this to the PSN at the pre-shift briefing.

2.

Look at a sectionalized POD as described in this shift report.

C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine operations

f 7

%,>g

l)ate,

~ Shift Report Shift Da s

PSN Shift Management Schimkus Murphy Spence A.

Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken It was passed over on shift turnovers between the IGC Department that Unit 4 FCV-4-498 could not be placed on hand loader due to erratic valve motion caused by leaking tubing on feedwater isolation solenoids - thus it would require bringing unit load from 290 MWE to 60 MWE before IGC could perform calibration checks on FCV-4-498 I/P.

On dayshift, the PSN did a visual "snoop" check of this leak problem and found extremely minimal air leakage on air fittings. This was showed to the IGC dayshift supervision who concurred with PSN finding.

Actions:

Commence placing FCV-498 on hand loader at present power level for IGC calibration checks.

Recommend:

More in-depth rese'arch into possible repairs prior to recommendations of reducing unit load.

Recommend Belzona of leaking air fittings.

C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine operations.

Good shift coordination in performing numerous load threatening testing.

Reviewed 8 1 C~.

I

V

0-ADM-019 anagement on Shift (MOS MOS DAILYREPORT Page To Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date.

09/05/88 From:

David Powell (M

bserver Shift:

Qx Day Night Plant Bvolutions Observed

'ormal plant operations, Unit 3 at 100a'o Plant operations, Unit 4 - approximately 30% to 40%

Recovery of dropped rod K-12 Control Bank D, xenon dampening Repair work activities on Circulating Water pump Plant tours - Radiation Control Area (RCA) and balance of plant Shift turnovers Immediate Safety Problems None noted C.

Questionable Work Practices None noted Areas for Improvement None B.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments D

Shift turnovers conducted in a thorough manner.

Operators were acutely aware of the xenon/flux oscillations and followed the oscillations throughout the day. Quiet shift.

Completed By:

D Pwll M

server Date:

09/05/88 Reviewed By:

Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:

Management Review By:

a M(ki.I iII,IIT'bh c

M-ate ae Vl D

09/05/88

0-AD M-019 nagement on Shift (M0 MOS DAILYREPORT

'i'o:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

09/05-06/88 From:

James E. Jones bseruer)

Shift:

Q Day Qx Night A.

Plant Bvolutions Observed Unit 3 'at 100'%ower Unit 4 K-12 rod drop flux mapping and peaking factors measurement Unit 4 at 45fo power with radial xenon oscillations B.

Immediate Safety Problems None C.

Questionable VorlfPractices None D.

Areas for Improvement None B.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments None Completed By:

Reviewed By:

Management Review By; James E. Jones server perations uperi ntendent-Nuclear ate Date:

09/05-06/88

/ i

/~ate 09/05-06/88

I l

4

0-ADM-oi9 nagement on Shift(MO+

MOS l)hlLYREPORT

'I'o:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

09 05-06 88 From:

Max Ammerman bseruer)

Shift:

Q Day Qx Night Plant EvolutIons Observed Chemistry routines Component Cooling Water (CCW) Heat Exchanger tag out and cleaning Shift turnover and briefing B.

C.

Immediate Safety Problems None QuestIonable Work Practices None D.

Areas for Improvement None E.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Good shift briefing where everyone was warned not to let down guard - the reason for the dropped rod is unknown and the possibility of more of the same should be anticipated.

When the 4B CCW Heat Exchanger was opened for cleaning, we saw a copper oxide green sediment in the bottom of the water box and tubes.

This is unusual and had never befor'e been seen by the Mechanical Maintenance workers.

There was speculation of this being the result of the 4A acid flush.

Water samples were taken by Chemistry and Technical.

Reason for the condition is unknown.

Nice quiet shift.

Completed By:

Max Ammerman seruer Da te:

09/05-06/88 i

Reviewed By:

perations uperi ntendent-Nuclear Management Review By:

ate ate

~ate 09/05-06/88

l)ate Shift RePort Pea PSN brogan

'Shift'Management AI'N Singer Vetromile A.

Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed

~

Routine operations

/

~

(I Reviewed By Da~ 0/i7 V."'

, l)ate Shift Repor>>,.

PSN Shift Management Anderson A]~S+

Dallau Newton A.

Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendatfons None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine operations Reviewed Bg

t

~

~

~

r g

f

~.

~ '

~ r y

~.

~ y.

~

~.

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ I I

~

~

I

~

~

I

~

l

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~ I I

~ -, ~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~ - o.

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

'~,,

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

I ~

O'

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

0

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

r

~

~

~

~

r

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~ I I

I

~

I I

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ I

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~ r '

~

~:

0-ADM-019 nagement on Shift (MOS)

MOS l)AJLYREl'ORT

'I'o:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear

.Date:

09/06-07/88 From:

A.

J es Jones

(

bseruer)

Plant Evolutions Observed Shift:

Q Day Qx Night Unit 3 at 100% power Unit 4, ascension to 100fo power Power Range Nuclear Instrumentation System (NIS) hi flux trip setpoints adjuste.d to 100%, Unit 4 C

Steam Generator (SG)

Feed Regulating Valve (FRV) Independent Verification (IV) for A Diesel Generator (DG) maintenance RCA tour B.

Immediate Safety Problems None D.

Questionable WorIf. Practices None Areas for Improvement The Component Cooling Water (CCW) Inlet Isolation valve stem cap threads are stripped - valve ¹4-7013.

Valve stem cap fs hanging on the valve stem and could possibly fall off if the valve was shut.

B.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments During Unit 4 NIS flux trip setpoint adjustment, Bric Anderson paid very close attention to all bistables tripped and

cleared, which demonstrates needed concern for load threatening events.

Completed By:

James Jones seruer Date.

09/06-07/88 Reviewed By:

perotions uperintendent-Nuclear Dat: 0~

JJ'anagement Review By:

ate

/

SVP Dote VF 1'k 09/06-07/88

t

~

~ -

~

Ii I

~ I

~ ~

g

~ I 6

'0

~ I.

~

~..-

~

~ 0 II I

~

~

~

~ I.I

~

0 '

~

~ I-I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~ ~

I ~ -.

~

~

+

~

~

0

~

~

~

~

~

I. I-I I I'

~-

~

~

r-

~

I II'

~

~>.

~ I

. II I

I I

~ I II I

~ ~

~

~

~

~

Ii I ~

I

~

~

~

0 t 0'

~

~ I 0

0

Max Ammerman attachment Details of OSP 23.1 steps that are redundant with shift tasks:

I.

2.

3.

Mids records fuel oil storage tank level.

Each shift monitors day tank level.

Allsteps of 7.2.5 (except step 10) are performed on each shift.

Order of steps:

l.

2.

7.2.4 ckecks level - 7.2.39 records level of day tank.

There is a back and forth action checking and recording levels that make sense as far as chronology, but not efficient.

Not consistent with shift tasks:

Every shift blows down the reservoirs but when done in OSP the valves must then be IV'd shut.

The Megawatt Motor in the Emergency Diesel (ED) room should have the green band with the orange and red mark as does the one in the control room.

l)ate Shift Repol t phd PSN Salkeld Shift Management AI'N Guyer NWE Eddin er A.

Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine operations Reviewed B

l)ate Shift Report j'SN Shift Management Schimkus hfurphy Spence A.

Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine operations v

Reviewed B Da~~:f f

l)ate 09/07/88 ~

Shift Report Shift Peaks I' N Wogan Shift Management Aj'SN Singer Vetromile A.

Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine operations Reviewed B

& ~(is<

T V

A E

0-ADM-019 nagement on Shift (MOS+

MOS DAII.YREPORT'ag<<

To Operations Superintendent - Nuclear Date:

09 07 88 C

From:

David Powell bseruer Shift:

Qx Day Night A.

Plant Bvolutions Observed Unit 3 operations - 100% steady state power Unit 4 operations - approach to 100% and steady state operations 100%

Plant tours Shift turnovers Draining/filling Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) radiation/cooling system Unit 4 containment hatch pressurization test B.

Immediate Safety Problems None noted C.

Questionable Work Pract1ces None noted D.

Areas for Improvement None B.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Shift operations were conducted well and without any major problems.'hift turnovers were thorough and informative.

lt Completed By:

Reviewed By:

)

seroer Operations Superi ntendent-Nuclear Date:

Management Review By:

aM(ki.I nl o1ree VP D

09/07/88

~ '

4

0-ADM-019 nagement on Shift {MOSQ MOS I)AILYREPORT

'I'o:

Operations Superintendent-NucIear Date:

09/07-08/88 From:

James Jones bseruer)

Shift:

Q Day I Night h.

Plyat Evolutions Observed Unit 3 at 100'h power

.Unit 4 at 100% power Emergency Pan cooler operability test B Diesel Generator test Auxiliary Peedwater {APW) Train 1 operability tests Trash rake operation Immediate Safety Problems None C.

Questioanble Work Practices None Areas for Improvement The Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) administrative Limiting Condition for Operation {LCO) placards found on the main control board, EDG electrical control panels and engine control panels need correction

(

PSN notified and memorandum sent to have corrections made.

The B EDG room ventilation fan label placard has fallen off. Operations is aware that a pink card needs to be written.

The EDG KW limits listed on the control panel.placards are not the same as listed in the EOPs.

One or the other should be corrected.

B.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Crews exhibited attention to detail and followup when performing the emergency fan cooler operability test and corrected three valves'that were not labeled.

Completed By:

seruer DI:~i Reviewed By:

Management Review By:

perations uperi ntendent-Nuclear (51 ate 5l')'e ate 09/07-08/88

t 4l J

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift(MOS)

MOS llAILYREPORT

~

'l'o:

Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:

09/07-08/88 From:

W. R. Williams, Jr.

(

6server)

Shift:

Q Day.

E Night Plant Bvolutions Observed 4

Pull power operation of both Units 3 and 4 Toured intake area; 4160 switchgear rooms; cable spreading room; 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B battery rooms and 3B and 4B MCC rooms Talked with Turbine Operator on need to have ammeters "on" at 4160 switchgear for predictive trending support B.

Immediate Safety Problems None C.

Questionable Work Practices None D.

Areas for Improvement None B.

Professiona1ism, Summary of Shift, Comments None Completed By:

bserver D

Reviewed By:

IB

. SL L(

perations uperi ntendent-Nuclear Management Review By:

ate ate 09/07-08/88

'Date I~

O PSN Salkeld Shift Report

'Shift Management AI'N Gu er

> pu

~

Shift Fernandez A.

Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine operations Reviewed B Da~ r

'I l)a te j7SN o

9 08 Vogan

~ Shift Report Shift Management Al'SN NWE Peaks A.

Questionable Vork Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine operations Reviewed Bg

C

~ ~

0-ADM-019 anagement on Shift(MOQ MOS DAlLYREPORT To:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

09/08 88 From:

David Powell server Shift:

px Day p ¹ight Plant Evolutions Observed Normal plant operations - Units 3 and 4 at 100% steady state power Shift turnover Plant tours Unit 4 Volume Control Tank (VCT) purge OP-047.1 Unit 4 power Range Nuclear Instrumentation System (NIS) operational test OSP-4-059.4 Unit 3 operability test of B Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG)

B.

Immediate Safety Problems None noted C.

QuestIonable Work Practices None noted D.

Areas for Improvement None B.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Shift activities were coordinated well.

Having more non-licensed operators available to perform various tasks has made it easier for the day shift to accomodate work activities throughout the day. Shift turnovers were thorough.

Completed By:

bseruer Dt:~

Reviewed By:

Dperati ons Superintendent-Nuclear Date:

Managem'ent Review By:

a IIIai I one'1 ~ae M-ate ate VJ 14 09/08/88

A s's

~J J

0-ADM-Ol &

Management on Shift (MUh)

~

MOS llhlLYREPORT

'l'o; Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:

09/08-09/88 From:

h.

V.. Williams Jr.

(

server)

Plant Evolutions Observed Shift:

Q Day g Night Units 3 and 4 full power operation - Unit 3 had slight power reducton while 38 Heater Drain Motor lower bearing investigated Toured intake area, inverter room, 3A battery charger area, heater drain area, and condensate polishing areas B.

C.

Immediate Safety Problems None Questionable Work Practices None Areas for Improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Shift meetin attended by all necessar departments.

g y

Good job by Operations to remove 3B Heater Drain Motor from service to allow Electrical to inspect the motor and at the same time keep to MW output up by running the third condensate pump.

J Mechanical has 3B1 CWP ready for Electrical to set the motor.

They are to set motor when 3B Heater Drain is back in service, and the 3A Battery Charger is on the battery and carrying load.

Talked with the IGC peak shift supervisor about 0-ADM-710 and the process for rescheduling PMs.

Talked with Turbine Operator about daily battery pilot cell gravity readings.

Villalso talk with Electrical Maintenance on this.

Completed By:

Williams Jr.

bserver Date:

09/08-09/88 Reviewed By:

perations uperi ntendent-unclear Date:

Management Review By:

ate ate

/

VP If 09/08-09/88

0-ADM-0)9 Ma nage ment on Shift (MOS)

M OS l>hILY REPORT

'l'o:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

9 08-09 88 From:

James Jones

(

server)

Plant Evolutions Observed Shift:

Q Day Nigbt 4

Unit 3 at 100% power Unit 4 at 100% power 3A Battery Charger repair Routine operations Security drill B.

D.

Immediate Safety Problems None Questionable Vork Practices None Areas for Improvement None B.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments At the conclusion of the security drill, a recommendation was made to have checklist(s) made up to ensure necessary items are completed (card readers

secured, etc.) and not lost when under the stress of the situation.

The security director mentioned he was going to take action to develop checklists to ensure needed items are completed.

Completed By:

seruer Date:

Re'viewed By:

perations uperi ntendent-uc ear Date:

Management Review By:

C MP ate ate

~ate 09/08-09/88

%l %

,t)ate~

09/02/88 Shift Repor Shift Peaks PSN Salkeld Shift Management A1'SN Guyer Eddinger A.

Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine Operations I

/

Reviewed B 08D <6 5'

v-ADM-019 anagement on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

09 02 88 From:

Crai D. Bersak bserver Shift:

Qx Day Q Night Plant Evolutions Observed Units 3 and 4 at 100% power Shift turnover days/peaks Plan of the Day meetings Plant tour B.

Immediate Safety Problems None C.

Questionable Work Practices None D.

Areas for Improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Routine shift.

Completed By:

D B

server D

Reviewed By:

Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:

09/02/88 Management Review By:

M-

/~FG 8 ate Date

'MIWI al,a7'bh

k I

0-ADM-019 h

'I anagement on Shift (MOP MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

09/02-03/88 From:

P.,L. IValker(I bseruer)

Shift:

p Day Qx Night Plant Evolutions Observed Units 3 and 4, 100~>o steady state power operation 2330 shift turnover meeting Looked at acid wash system Immediate Safety Problems None C.

Questionable Vora'ractices None D.

Areas for Improvement None a 405 t nd ntr07qe

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (M

)

MOS DAILYREPORT Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Quiet shift.

Everyone connected with the heat exchanger acid wash system is being very conservative in their

actions, even though it is stretching the job out.

Understandable, innovation is usually costly.

hiany of the operations staff do not understand what and why changes are being made to the control room - specifically, the new console sections and the removal of the STA desk.

The changes appeared with very little explanation of why. Some communication appears to be necessary.

Teething problems with changes to the Nuclear Jobs Planning System (NJPS) computer were evident tonight as people were struggling to enter PWOs.

Operation of the control room door is marginal at best.

A FWO is attached to it. Previous hiOS comments still apply.

Completed By:

F. L. Walker server Date:

09/02-03/88 Reviewed By:

Management

. Review By:

eM(N I nnlve ee perations uperi ntendent-Nuclear ate' Pl 09/02-03/88

0-ADM-019 Management on Shift (M~)

~

MOS DAlLYREPORT

. ~

lo'perations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

09/02-03/88 From:

Max Ammerman

(

server)

Plant Evolutions Observed Shift; Q

Day

.gx ¹ight Prep for acid flush of Component Cooling Water (CCW) Heat Exchanger NLOs in Auxiliarybuilding Health Physics personnel in Radiation Control'Area Immediate Safety Problems None Questionable Work Practices None Areas for Improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments A lot of good prep went into the acid cleaning so far.

Although it has been long in coming, the cleaning contractor spent some of their waiting time observing us and the CCW heat exchanger.

Their, supervisor explained to me areas we "should" consider.

-Figs do more physical damage than other types of cleaning.

-Hydro blasting

l. We should slow down the feed of the nozzel, about l tube per minute.

2.

We need a different tip - jets at 90'nd preferably rotating.

They gave a good walkdown and explanation of their system.

Completed By:

Reviewed By:,

Max Ammerman server perations uperi ntendent-Nuclear Date:

09/02-03/88

/z Date:

e Management Review By:

C te.

ae VP'9/02-03/88

l

,l)ate 09 03 88 Shift Reports Shift PSN Shift Management Schimkus Reese Spence A.

Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendaions/Actions Taken This morning at the pre-shift briefing, IGC requested support from Health Physics to make a containment entry in Unit 3 to allow removal of ARMS channel I detector for repair.

This detector was repaired yesterday but the source is still sticking.

IGC has been trying to enter the containment over the past 2 shifts but there are inadequate HP personnel to support an entry, as this evolution was not pre-scheduled by IGC to ensure HP had extra personnel.

Actions taken:

Conferred with HP Department Supervisor and IGC Supervisor (when a call-out HP crew couldn't be obtained).

The PSN requested that this job be postponed until Tuesday when adequate resources (manpower) is available.

Recommend:

Maintenance departments should set up work schedules with required support on Friday, if the work involved will fall across the weekend when limited support is available.

C.

Good Practices/Professionalhm Observed Mechanical Maintenance has done an outstanding job in terminating a gross number of secondary steam leaks on both units.

One month ago there were at least 20 fairly large leaks which were becoming worse.

Thanks to the Maintenance Superintendent and Maintenance Supervisor (Dan Zocco) this number of leaks was reduced to where only a few, minor leaks still exist.

Reviewed B

/

Date 9 03 8 Shift Repor,.,

Peaks PSN Salkeld Shift Management AI'N Guyer Eddinger A.

Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine Operations Reviewed B

J

')ate 09 04 88 Shift Repor Shift PSN Schimkus Shift Management Al'SN Reese gQrf:

Spence A.

Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken Due to cooling canal temperature increase during this extremely.hot weather and our current limitations on Intake Cooling Water (ICW) and Component Cooling Water (CClU) temperatures a decision was made Friday 9/02/88 to help lower these temperatures.

ft was decided to have the Operations Superintendent request fossil units to come off-line in the event ICW temperature limit falls below 95 F and there is < O' margin between required unit shutdown.

A letter (memo) was sent to the STA stating this decision.

None of the PSNs were aware of this memo until the Plant Manager-Nuclear informed us on dayshift Saturday.

After a short investigation it was found that the PSN was not considered to receive a copy of this memo.

Actions: Made a copy of the memo for PSN use.

Recommend:

Place the PSN as the key person to be informed of evolutions to be performed

- especially in light of unit opertion concerns.

C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine operations Reviewed 8

I E.

0-'AD M-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAILYREPORT Page To:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

09 03 88 From:

Crai D. Bersak bserver)

Shift:

px Day

[7 Night Plant Evolutions Observed Units 3 and 4 at 100% power Shift turnover, days to peaks Plant tour 4A Component Cooling Water {CCW) Heat Exchanger acid flush safety brief.

Immediate Safety Problems None C.

Questionable Work Practices None D.

Areas for Improvement None Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Routine shift.

Completed By:

Crai D. Bersak server Date 09/03/88 Reviewed By:

Management Review By:

Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:

ate at ate 09/03/88

0-ADM-0>9 anagement on Shift(MOQ MOS DAILYREPORT

'l'o:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

09/03-04/88 From:

Peter L. Walker server)

Shift:

Q Day Qx Night Plant Bvolutions Observed Units 3 and 4 at 100ot'o steady state power operations B.

Immediate Safety Problems None C.

Questionable Work Practices None D.

Areas for Improvement None B.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift; Comments Quiet shift.

Completed By:

P. L. Walker server Date:

09/03-04/88

~

}

Reviewed By:

perations uperi ntendent-Nuclear Dat.: W.

Management Review By:

ate 485 ae

/

state 09/03-04/88

0-ADM-019 lnagement on Shjf(,(MOSy MOS l>AILYREPPR'F

'I'o:

Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date.

09/03-04/88 From:

Max Ammerman bserver)

Shift:

p Day gx Night A.

Plant Evolutions Observed Component Cooling Water (CCW) Heat Exchanger,

cleaning, flushing, draining, inspection B.

Immediate Safety Problems None C.

Questionable Work Practices None D.

Areas for Improvement None B.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Good controls and safe work practices during acid cleaning of CCW heat exchanger.

At completion, the tube sheet appeared well cleaned.

Operations, Maintenance, Technical, PUP and contractor worked well together.

Completed By:

server DI:~i Reviewed By:

Management Review By:

perations uperi ntendent-Nuclear ate PP 1h

,09/03-04/88

Date Shift Report Shift Peaks

" PSN Salkeld Shift Management AI'N Guyer Eddinger A.

Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken None C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed Routine Operations Electrical Maintenance responded to quickly and corrected a problem with the 3A battery charger.

Reviewed B

f)ate 09/05/88 Shift Repo+

Shift Mids PSN Anderson Shift Management AI'N Dallau Newton A.

Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed This is to recognize the commendable action of the RCOs and NWE in handling the dropped rod and turbine runback we had on Unit 4.

In spite of the poor performance of the

'C'team Generator (SG) regulating valve the unit was stabilized in a short time and only 20 minutes of bad time collected on the computer for axial flux difference.

They did a very good and professional job.

The RCOs were Steve Dominowski and John Baton.

The NWE was Andy Newton.

Reviewed B

CtJ I

I 0

Date.

09/05/88 Shift Reports Shift Da s

I'N Schimkus Shift Management A1'SN Reese Spence A.

Questionable Work Practices/Actions Taken/Recommendations None B.

Areas for Improvement/Recommendations/Actions Taken This afternoon IGC requested to perform calibration of TM-604 (RHR temp) on Unit 4 in Control Rack 19; While setting up their test equipment, the 2 INC Specialists ran test leads from the east side of Rack 19, thru a space between modules and out the west rack door.

During this process the untaped bare banana plugs touched across module leads TQ-408 causing a short.

TQ-408 is a vital A.C. power supply, The intermittant short caused 4PO9-Bkr 1(vital A/C) to trip open.

This caused 4D inverter to swap to it's C.V.T; Actions: Pulled INC out of racks.

Restored power supplies to normal.

Recommend:

Taping test leads (bare metal) and finding a method to push wires thru racks in a rigid manner, rather then let test leads flop around.

C.

Good Practices/Professionalism Observed The midshift operators have been receiving comments of praise from all groups on todays dayshift (Maintenance Departments).

Observers who saw the midshift in action felt they performed in an exceptionally professional manner.

Reviewed B

0-'A'DM"-019 Management on Shift (MOS)

MOS DA11 Y REPORT Page To:

Operations Superintendent-Nuclear Date:

09/04/88 From:

Crai D. Bersak (M

bser ver Shift:

Qx Day Q Night Plant Bvolutions Observed Units 3 and 4 at 100% power Shift meeting and turnover Fiant tours B.

Immediate Safety Problems None C.

Questionable Work Practices

=

None D.

Areas for Improvement None B.

Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Quiet shift.

Completed By:

bserver Dt:~

I Reviewed By:

perations Superintendent-Nuclear Date: + &

Management Review By:

aM(Ãi I al.a).'b5 M-at Date 09/03-04/88

0-ADM-019

~agement on Shift (MOS)

MOS DAlLYREPORT Page To Operations Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

09/04-05/88 From:

Peter L. Walker server)

Shift:

Q Day g Night, A.

Plant Bvolutions Observed Unit 3, 100%.steady state power operation Unit 4, 100% power operation until a C control bank rod dropped shortly after midnight.

Power was stabilized after the runback around 60%,

and was subsequently reduced below 50%

to comply with Technical Specification Quadrant Power Tilt Limitations. All.required notifications were made.

The unit is now stable and troubleshooting is underway to determine the cause of the dropped rod. At this point (0500), no attempts have been made to withdraw it, and a containment entry is being made to check for leaks.

B.

Immediate Safety Problems None C.

Questionable Work Practices None D.

Areas for Improvement None

~ l40o t esal (it47Iae

I>

D

~ V

O>>AD M-019 anagement on Shift (MOS MOS DAILYREPORT Page Professionalism, Summary of Shift, Comments Operators Dominowski, Eaton and Newton did a great job of stabilizing Unit 4 during the rod drop transient.

The rod was very reactive and caused quite a perturbation of plant systems.

The C loop steam generator water level control reacted erratically during the transient and was caught and stabilized by Newton.

Everyone on the shift is to be commended for a successful, safe save of a difficulttransient.

This event is another example of why having two different technical specificatioas in the same control room is undesireable.

I would expect a plant staff to reference their technical specifications briefly (to confirm what they already knew) and then move on to handle the transient at hand and the required paperwork and notifications.

Deciphering the requirements of ADM-021 on the fly during an involved transient with very definite time constraints is unsatisfactory, and is exactly what happened tonight.

The crew did an excellent job of meeting the requirements and time constraints.

The stress and uncertainity imposed by having to meet two sets of requirements was and is unnecessary.

Completed By:

server Date:

Reviewed By:

peraSons uperi ntendent-Nuclear Date:

Management'eview By:

1M(ttt I alnvj ea ate't

/ ~ate VP 09/04-05/88

l h

~ 'I

~At

~ ),

0-ADM-Oi9 lnagement on Shift (MOS+

MOS t)AILYREPORT i egY To:

Operas,ions Superintendent

- Nuclear Date:

09/04-05/88 From:

Max Ammerman server)

Shift:

Q Day Qx Night Plant Bvolutions Observed Shift turnover and shift brief APSN walkdown of Radiation Control Area (RCA) and Turbine Building Control Room activity B.

Immediate Safety Problems None C.

Questionable Work Practices None D.

Areas for Improvement None B.

ProfessionaHsm, Summary of Shift, Comments NWB - the most time consuming task {overtime book) went to least time consuming task, thanks to Pred Clark.

Battery hydrometers all in place.

Good walkdown of power block by the APSN.

Runback - see Peter Walkers MOS comments.

Completed By:

V mmer man server Dt:~

Reviewed By:

perations uperi ntendent-uclear Management

'eview By; ate ate

/~ote 09/04-05/88

1' h'